政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/75393

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/75393

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51092530 Online Users : 528

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Communication > Department of Journalism > Theses > Item 140.119/75393

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/75393

Title:	政治抗議事件中的媒體創新使用與實踐：以太陽花運動為例 Mediating the Sunflower Movement: Hybrid Media Networks in a Digital Age
Authors:	劉時君 Liu, Shih Chun June
Contributors:	蘇蘅 Su, Herng 劉時君 Liu, Shih Chun June
Keywords:	太陽花運動政治抗議傳播新舊媒體行動者網絡理論 Sunflower Movement Actor Network Theory hybrid media network
Date:	2014
Issue Date:	2015-06-01 11:00:27 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本研究針對 2014 年 3 月至 4 月期間的太陽花運動三大事件（佔領立法院、衝進行政院、以及凱達格蘭大道集結）作個案研究，採質性研究的深度訪談法和資料蒐集法取得研究資料，援引 Bruno Latour 的「行動者網絡理論」（Actor Network Theory）概念進行分析，探討大眾媒體與另類媒體在當代政治抗議場域裡，如何以現有傳播科技做創新使用與傳播實踐，而科技和人的互動又如何對訊息發布與呈現方式造成影響，勾勒出人人皆可參與的政治抗議情境之下，傳播行動者如何受新舊媒體模式交織影響。 This paper traces the contemporary hybrid media network in a Taiwanese political protest context, focusing mainly on the 2014 Sunflower Movement (also known as “Occupy Parliament”) in Taiwan. The proliferation of digital media use in this protest, makes it a significant case study in regards to finding the complex media networks of tech-savvy activists and mainstream media at work in recent political protests. To answer the complex nature of this network, this paper employs Actor Network Theory (ANT) as a framework to depict the evolving media network of contemporary political protests in Taiwan through first-hand accounts of alternative media activists and mainstream journalists. This research conducts a set of qualitative interviews with heterogenous actors who participated in the Sunflower Movement. Additional data is collected from online documents of the event. In the end, the research seeks to answer the following questions: How do new and old media form links through technology and digital tools in modern political protest? What is the nature of the associations formed and how do the associations impact the existing news ecology in political protests? Further providing an empirical account of transforming protest media networks in action in a political protest context.
Reference:	壹、中文文獻王立柔（2014 年 5 月 22 日）。〈318後新舊公民團體扎根延續動能〉。《風傳媒》網站。取自 http://www.stormmediagroup.com/opencms/news/detail/6e7c109e-e1a3-11e3-9580-ef2804cba5a1/?uuid=6e7c109e-e1a3-11e3-9580-ef2804cba5a1 王光慈、楊湘鈞（2014 年 3 月 24 日）。〈棉被蓋拒馬手機號召同伴翻閱〉。《聯合報》，A3版。王彩雲（2006）。《數位時代下平面媒體轉型之策略模式研究》。政治大學經濟管理碩士學程碩士論文。王晴玲（2007）。《公民新聞的在地實踐-公視Peopo新聞平台公眾參與及多元報導研究》。政治大學廣播電視學系碩士論文。王業立（2010）。《政治學》。台北市：晶典文化事業出版社。王維菁、馬綺韓、陳釗偉（2013）。〈網際網路時代的社會運動：以台灣環境運動為例〉，《資訊社會研究》，25：1-22。吳中傑（2014 年 4 月 2 日）。〈史上最大學運推手：免費網路工具〉。《商業周刊》第 1377 期。取自 http://www.businessweekly.com.tw/KWebArticle.aspx?ID=54104&path=e&pnumber=4 李明穎（2012）。〈網路潛水者的公民參與實踐之探索：以「野草莓運動」為例〉，《新聞學研究》，112：77-116。李建興（2014 年 4 月 8 日）。〈IT人支援太陽花學運前線大作戰〉。《iThome》網站。取自 http://www.ithome.com.tw/tech/86460 李惠珍（2014 年 3 月 30 日）。〈太陽花學運英文網站上線首日湧50萬人〉。《風傳媒》網站。取自 http://www.stormmediagroup.com/opencms/news/detail/7dbe7ab6-b7dc-11e3-82ad-ef2804cba5a1/?uuid=7dbe7ab6-b7dc-11e3-82ad-ef2804cba5a1 林河名（2014 年 3 月 31 日）。〈秩序自制堪稱學運典範〉。《聯合報》，A4版。林宗德譯（2007）。《科學與技術研究導論》，台北：國立編譯館。（原書Sismondo, Sergio【2004】. An introduction to science and technology studies. ）邱惠恩（2011）。〈另類媒體的議題溢散效果--以苗栗大埔農地徵收事件為例〉，「2011年中華傳播學會研討會」論文。林婷億（2014 年 5 月 21 日）。〈在讚聲中反思傳媒責任與讀者需求：太陽花運動中新媒體的實踐〉。《台大新聞 e 論壇》網站。取自 http://ntujournal.blogspot.tw/2014/05/blog-post_1475.html 林照真（2013a）。〈當代聚合對傳統報紙轉變的影響---以紐時和衛報為例〉，「2013年中華傳播學會研討會」論文。林照真（2013b）。〈為什麼聚合？有關台灣電視新聞轉借新媒體訊息之現象分析與批判〉，《中華傳播學刊》，23：3-40。尚榮安（2001）。《個案研究法》，台北：弘智文化。（原書 Yin, R. K. [1994]. Case study research: Design and methods. New York, NY: Sage.）林鶴玲、鄭陸霖（2001）。〈台灣社運的網路經驗初探：一個探索性的研究〉，《台灣社會學刊》，25：111-156。奕之華（2014 年 4 月 8 日）。〈太陽花運動是11萬人還是50萬人？大規模的人數統計是這樣算出來的〉。《癮科技》網站。取自 http://www.cool3c.com/article/78336 奕之華（2014 年 4 月 10 日）。〈太陽花資訊端最重要的一環，能夠讓你看到第一手現場的直播，來聊聊 Skywatch〉。《癮科技》網站。取自 http://www.cool3c.com/article/78457 洪偉（2014 年 3 月 21 日）。〈從沃草經驗談網路新媒體革命〉。Slides.com。取自 http://slides.com/weihung/--120225#/ 胡瑋佳（2014 年 3 月 21 日）。〈學生佔領立法院　新科技在太陽花學運扮演關鍵角色〉。《iThome》網站。取自 http://www.ithome.com.tw/news/86006 胡愛玲（1989）。《報紙報導街頭運動新聞之分析》。政治大學新聞學系碩士論文。翁秀琪（1997）。《新聞與社會真實建構—大眾媒體、官方消息來源與社會運動的三角關係》。台北市：三民。馬綺韓（2012）。〈社會運動網路運用之困境：以台灣環境運動為例〉，「2012年中華傳播學會研討會」論文。徐毓良（2014 年 6 月 28 日）。〈社群、品牌與媒體的新融合時代〉。財團法人資訊工業策進會。取自 http://www.slideshare.net/iamwilliam/find2014up 張玉涵（1999）。〈媒介議題與網路公眾議題之間相似性之探討—以BBS政治版為例〉，「1999年中華傳播學會研討會」論文。陳平軒（2011）。〈從網路到街頭：反國光的動員經驗、成效與反省〉，《台灣社會研究》，85：437-450。陳怡秀、游婉琪（2014 年 3 月 19 日）。〈拖鞋撐iPad直播學生百態〉。《聯合晚報》，A3版。許依晨（2014 年 3 月 31 日）。〈學生下一步持久戰？思考漂亮退場？〉。《聯合晚報》，A3版。張約翰（2014 年 5 月 30 日）。〈太陽花學運期間新聞媒體臉書專頁觀察〉。財團法人卓越新聞獎基金會。取自 http://www.feja.org.tw/modules/news007/article.php?storyid=1477 張雅雯、游清鑫（2008）。〈政治抗議活動對大學生政治態度與民主價值觀之影響：以反貪腐倒扁為例〉，「2007年台灣政治學會『全球競爭、民主鞏固、治理再造－2008台灣新課題』學術研討會」論文。區家麟（2013）。〈網路新聞再界定：市場導向下的新媒體變革〉，《傳播與社會學刊》，25：103-133。陳怡如（2014 年 4 月 14 日）。〈[記者部落格]學運雖然落幕，新媒體才正要開始〉。《數位時代》網站。取自 http://bnext.com.tw/article/view/id/31781?fb_action_ids=487325921373218&fb_action_types=og.likes&fb_ref=.U0_J9JKPtP1.like 陳郁仁、吳家翔（2014 年 3 月 24 日）。〈警方進政院抬人　記者也被誤打〉。《蘋果日報》網站。取自 http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20140324/365794/ 陳順孝（2012）。〈網路社會動員的繼往開來：反國光石化運動中的社會科技基礎和行動策略演化〉，《傳播研究與實踐》， 2（1）：19-34。陳雪雲（1991）。《我國新聞媒體建構社會現實之研究—以社會運動報導為例¬¬¬》。政治大學新聞研究所博士學位論文。陳婉琪（2014 年 7 月 14 日）。〈誰來「學運」？太陽花學運參與者的基本人口圖象〉。《公視新聞》議題中心網站。取自 http://pnn.pts.org.tw/main/2014/07/14/誰來「學運」？太陽花學運參與者的基本人口圖象/ 陳韻如（2013）。〈尋找網路公眾：以ANT觀點探討網路環境運動〉，「2013年中華傳播學會研討會」論文。曾允盈（2014 年 5 月 5 日）。〈傳統媒體失靈網路「新媒體」時代來臨〉。《看雜誌》網站。取自 http://www.watchinese.com/article/2014/15182 黑色島國青年陣線（2014 年 3 月 18 日）。〈318青年佔領立法院反對黑箱服貿行動宣言（含現場實況）〉。《商業周刊》網站。取自 http://bw.businessweekly.com.tw/webarticle2.php?id=21241 黃妤婷（2014 年 4 月 24 日）。〈瞿筱葳：網路時代，每個人都可以是零時政府的一員〉。《Inside》網站。取自 http://www.inside.com.tw/2014/04/24/g0v-hsiao-wei-chiu-interview 黃彥棻（2014 年 4 月 8 日）。〈學運背後的IT推手：g0v零時政府〉。《iThome》網站。取自 http://www.ithome.com.tw/tech/86462 黃俞儒（2013）。《社會運動中的跨媒體議題設定：以文林苑為例》。世新大學公共關係暨廣告學研究所所碩士論文。黃鈴媚、沈錦惠、曹開明（2014）。〈網路傳播社會中的「電子符號行動者」: 從台灣國光石化案重構閱聽人之主體性〉，《傳播與社會學刊》，27：101-148。湯雅雯（2014 年 3 月 24 日）。〈抗議警方強勢驅離九把刀臉書「關燈」〉。《中國時報》網站。取自 http://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20140324003931-260407 彭琬馨（2014）。〈初探傳統報業如何發展數位匯流策略 ─ 以聯合報為例〉，「2014年中華傳播學會研討會」論文。新聞e論壇（2014）。《街頭守門人：台大新聞E論壇反黑箱服貿運動報導紀實》，新北市：衛城出版。楊秀娟（2010）。《報業組織與競爭分析﹣以中國時報為例》。政治大學傳播學院新聞學系博士論文。鄭宇君（2014）。〈災難傳播中的群體力量：社交媒體促成新型態的公民參與〉。《傳播與社會學刊》，27：179-205。蔡孟修（2014年3月23日）。〈佔領行政院黑島青臉書承認〉。《蘋果日報》網站。取自http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20140323/365555/ 潘淑滿（2002）。《質性研究：理論與應用》，台北市：心理。劉靜怡譯（2001）。《控制權革命：新興科技對我們的最大衝擊》，台北：臉譜。（原書 Shapiro, A. L. [1999]. The control revolution: How the Internet is putting individuals in charge and changing the world we know. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.）劉鶴群、林秀雲、陳麗欣、胡正申、黃韻如譯（2010）。《社會科學研究方法》，台北：雙葉書廊。（原書Babbie, E. [2010]. The practice of social research (12th ed.). Stamford, CT: Wadsworth.）聯合新聞網（2014 年 4 月 11 日）。〈三分鐘回顧太陽花學運！〉。聯合新聞網。取自 http://udn.com/NEWS/NATIONAL/NATS5/8583612.shtml 戴廷芳（2014年 3 月 22 日）。〈協調1500學運志工背後的關鍵工具：Hackpad共筆服務〉。《iThome》網站。取自 http://www.ithome.com.tw/news/86022 鍾明光、蔡博文、盧道杰（2012）。〈利用行動者網絡理論檢視公眾參與地理資訊系統對社區發展轉向之影響〉，《地理學報》，64：21-44。蘇芳禾、曾德蓉（2014 年 4 月 1 日）。〈百人黑島青催出50萬大軍〉。《自由時報》網站。取自 http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/focus/paper/766966 蘋果日報（2014 年 3 月 29 日）。〈《蘋果》互動式事件簿　記錄太陽花學運始末〉。《蘋果日報》網站。取自 http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20140329/368086/ 蘋果日報即時新聞中心（2014 年 3 月 27 日）〈反服貿抗爭擴大：周日集結凱道　不設結束時間〉。《蘋果日報》網站。取自 http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20140327/368175/ 蘋果日報突發中心（2014 年 3 月 24 日）。〈「黑島青」敢衝個個獨當一面〉。《蘋果日報》網站。取自 http://www.appledaily.com.tw/appledaily/article/headline/20140324/35720958/ 蘋果日報突發中心（2014 年 3 月 27 日）。〈【令】林飛帆：330穿黑衣佔凱道　網友估人數25萬起跳〉。《蘋果日報》網站。取自 http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20140327/368185/ 蘋果日報突發中心（2014 年 4 月 10 日）。〈帆廷誰才是強者　《蘋果》解密〉。《蘋果日報》網站。取自 http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/politics/20140410/376828/applesearch/帆廷誰才是強者　《蘋果》解密蘋果日報國際中心（2014 年 3 月 24 日）。〈血腥鎮壓　民眾經iReport發聲　盼獲國際矚目〉。《蘋果日報》網站。取自 http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/politics/20140324/365811/血腥鎮壓　民眾經iReport發聲　盼獲國際矚目蘋果日報網路中心（2014 年 4 月 11 日）。〈《蘋果Live》直播太陽花學運　「600小時」將達陣〉。《蘋果日報》網站。取自 http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20140403/372656/ 蘋果日報網路中心（2014 年 8 月 21 日）。〈直播、空拍「極具未來感」　《蘋果》奪「年度新聞網站」大獎〉。《蘋果日報》網站。取自 http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20140821/456224/ atticus（2014 年 4 月 9 日）。〈原來短時間我們如此強悍：太陽花運動科技應用創新總整理〉。《癮科技》網站。取自 http://www.cool3c.com/article/78266 carson（2014 年 3 月 31 日）。〈「太陽花運動」蘋果日報為何能大獲全勝？〉。《科技新報TechNews》專欄部落格。取自 http://www.businessweekly.com.tw/KBlogArticle.aspx?id=6874 Facebook（2014 年 6 月）。〈Facebook 台灣消費者線上行為調查〉。Facebook委託TNS進行的調查。取自 http://www.slideshare.net/yuanping/facebook-36279879 貳、英文文獻 Aitamurto, T., & Lewis, S. C. (2013). Open innovation in digital journalism: Examining the impact of Open APIs at four news organizations. New Media Society, 15(2), 314-331. Alcadipani, R., & Hassard, J. (2010). Actor-Network Theory, organizations and critique: towards a politics of organizing. Organization, 17(4), 419-435. Ananny, M. (2013). Press-public collaboration as infrastructure: Tracing news organizations and programming publics in Application Programming Interfaces. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(5), 623-642. Anderson, C. W. (2013). Towards a sociology of computational and algorithmic journalism. New Media & Society, 15(7), 1005-1021. Askanius, T., & Gustafsson, N. (2010). Mainstreaming the alternative: The changing media practices of protest movements. Interface, 2(2), 23-41. Atton, C. (2002). Alternative media. London, UK: Sage. Atton, C., & Hamilton, J. F. (2008). Alternative journalism. London, UK: Sage. Baringhorst, S. (2008). Political protest on the net. German Policy Studies, 4(4), 63-93. Bennett, W. L. (2003). Communicating global activism: Strengths and vulnerabilities of networked politics. Information, Communication & Society, 6(2), 143-168. Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. (Shi, A. B., & Yang, Y. K. Trans.). Communication & Society, 26, 211–245. Berger, J., & Milkman, K. L. (2012). What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 192-205. Boczkowski, P. (2004). Digitalizing the news: Innovation in online newspapers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Boczkowski, P., & de Santos, M. (2007). When more media equals less news: Patterns of content homogenization in Argentina’s leading print and online newspapers. Political Communication, 24, 167-190. Bratton, M., & van de Walle, N. (1997). Democratic experiments in Africa regime: Transitions in comparative perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Blumler, J., & Gurevitch, M. (1995). The crisis of public communication. New York, NY: Routledge. Blumler, J., & Gurevitch, M. (2005). Rethinking the study of political communication. In J. Curran & M. Gurevitch (Eds.), Mass media and society (pp. 104-121). London, UK: Hodder Arnold. Brown, C., & Groves, J. (2010). New media, enduring values: How three news organizations managed change in an age of uncertainty. Electronic News, 4(3), 131-145. Callon, M. (1991). Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 132-161). London, UK: Routledge. Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. Castells, M. (2001). The internet galaxy: Reflections on the internet, business, and society. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the internet age. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press. Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Chan-Olmsted, S., Rim, H., & Zerba, A. (2012). Mobile news adoption among young adults: Examining the roles of perceptions, news consumption, and media usage. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(1), 126-147. Chen, B., Liao, D., Wu, H. C., Hwang, S. Y. (2014). The logic of communitive action: A case study of Taiwan’s Sunflower Movement. Presented at The Internet, Policy & Politics Conference 2014, Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford. Cohen, S., Hamilton, J. T., & Turner, F. (2011). Computational journalism. Communications of the ACM, 54(10), 66-71. Coleman, S. & Blumler, J. G. (2009). The Internet and democratic citizenship: Theory, practice and policy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Cottle, S. (2011). Media and the Arab uprisings of 2011: Research notes. Journalism, 12(5), 647-659. Dahlgren, P. (2005). The internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22, 147-162. Denzin, N. (1989). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Deuze, M. (2005). What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism, 6(4), 442-464. Dowmunt, T. & Coyer, K. (2007). Introduction. In Coyer, K., Dowmunt, T. & Fountain, A. (Eds.) The alternative media handbook (pp. 1-12). New York, NY: Routledge. Downing, J. (2001). Radical media: Rebellious communication and social movements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Dunbar-Hester, C. (2009). `Free the spectrum!` Activist encounters with old and new media technology. New Media & Society, 11(1&2), 221-240. Dutton, W. (2007). Through the network (of networks) - The fifth estate. Inaugural lecture. Lecture conducted from University of Oxford Examination Halls, Oxford, UK. Ems, L. (2014). Twitter`s place in the tussle: How old power struggles play out on a new stage. Media Culture Society, Published online before print 1-12. Emerson, R. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27(1), 33-41. Fiske, J. (1992). Popularity and the politics of information. In P. Dahlgren, & C. Sparks (Eds.), Journalism and popular culture (pp. 45-63). London, UK: Sage. Gamson, W. A., & Wolfsfeld, G. (1993). Movements and media as interacting systems. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528, 114-125. Garcelon, M. (2006). The "Indymedia` experiment: The Internet as movement facilitator against institutional control. Convergence, 12(1), 55-82. Garrett, R. K. (2006). Protest in an information society: A review of literature on social movements and new ICTs. Information, Communication & Society, 9(2), 202-224. Gillion, D. (2013). The political power of protest: Minority activism and shifts in public policy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Goldstein, B., & Dyson, L. (Eds.). (2013). Beyond transparency: Open data and the future of civic innovation. San Francisco, CA: Code for America Press. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380. Gray, J., Chambers, L., & Bounegru, L. (2012). The data journalism handbook: How journalists can use data to improve the news. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media. Gurevitch, M., & Blumler, J. G. (1990). Political communication systems and democratic values. In J. Lichtenberg (Ed.), Democracy and the mass media (pp. 269-287). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Gurevitch, M., Coleman, S.,& Blumler, J. G. (2009). Political communication−Old and new media relationships. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 625, 164-181. Harcup, T. (2005). “I`m doing this to change the world”: Journalism in alternative and mainstream media. Journalism Studies, 6(3), 361-374. Harcup, T. (2011). Alternative journalism as active citizenship. Journalism, 12(1), 15-31. Hermida, A., Lewis, S. C., & Zamith, R. (2014). Sourcing the Arab Spring: A case study of Andy Carvin’s sources on Twitter during the Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 479-499. Juris, J. S. (2005). The new digital media and activist networking within anti-corporate globalization movements. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 597, 289-308. Khalil, J. F. (2012). Youth-generated media: A case of blogging and Arab youth cultural politics. Television & New Media, 14(4), 338-350. Kahn, K. F., & Goldenberg, E. N. (1991). Women candidates in the news: An examination of gender differences in U.S. Senate campaign coverage. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 55(2), 180-199. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to Actor Network Theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Law, J. (2008). Actor-network theory and material semiotics. In: B. S. Turner (Ed.), The new Blackwell companion to social theory (3rd ed., pp. 141-158). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Lee, F. L. F. (Ed.). (2013). The continual transformation of online news in the digital age. Communication & Society, 25, 1-26. Leung, D. K. K., & Lee, F. L. F. (2014). Cultivating an active online counterpublic: Examining usage and political impact of internet alternative media. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19(3), 340-359. Lewis, S. C., & Usher, N. (2013). Open source and journalism: toward new frameworks for imagining news innovation. Media, Culture & Society, 35(5), 602-619. Lim, M. (2012). Clicks, cabs, and coffee houses: Social media and oppositional movements in Egypt 2004– 2011. Journal of Communication, 62, 231-248. Lim, M. (2013). Many clicks but little sticks: Social media activism in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 43(4), 636-657. Lipsky, M. (1968). Protest as a political resource. American Political Science Review, 62(4), 1144-1158. Lotan, G., Graeff, E., Ananny, M., Gaffney, D., Pearce, I., & boyd, d. (2011). The revolutions were tweeted: Information flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions. International Journal of Communication, 5, 1375-1405. Lynch, L. (2013). Wikileaks after megaleaks: The organization`s impact on journalism and journalism studies. Digital Journalism, 1(3), 314-334. Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Mayer-Schonberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think (1st ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. McElroy, K. (2013). Where old (gatekeepers) meets new (media). Journalism Practice, 7(6), 755-771. Micó, J. L. & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2014). Political activism online: Organization and media relations in the case of 15M in Spain. Information, Communication & Society, 17(7), 858-871. Mitchelstein, E., & Boczkowski, P. J. (2013). Between tradition and change: A review of recent research on online news production. Journalism, 10(5), 562–586. Myers, D. (1994). Communication technology and social movements: Contributions of computer networks to activism. Social Science Computer Review, 12(2), 250-260. Negus, A. S. (2012). Occupy Wall Street in alternative and mainstream media: A comparative analysis of the social movement’s framing in the media. Unpublished master`s thesis, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. Newman, N., Dutton, W. H., & Blank, G. (2012). Social media in the changing ecology of news: The fourth and fifth estates in Britain. International Journal Of Internet Science, 7(1), 6-22. Oliver, P. E., & Maney, G. M. (2000). Political processes and local newspaper coverage of protest events: From selection bias to triadic interactions. American Journal of Sociology, 106(2), 463-505. Parasie, S., & Dagiral, E. (2013). Data-driven journalism and the public good: ‘computer-assisted reporters’ and ‘programmer-journalists’ at the Chicago Tribune. New Media & Society, 15(6), 853-871. Pavlik, J. (2000). The impact of technology on journalism. Journalism Studies, 1(2), 229-237. Pavlik, J. (2013). Trends in new media research: A critical review of recent scholarship. Sociology Compass, 7(1), 1-12. Peters, J. D. (2010). “The only proper scale of representation”: The politics of statistics and stories. Political Communication, 18(4), 433-449. Plesner, U. (2009). An actor-network perspective on changing work practices: Communication technologies as actants in newswork. Journalism, 10(5), 604-626. Poell, T. & Borra, E. (2012). Twitter, YouTube, and Flickr as platforms of alternative journalism: The social media account of the 2010 Toronto G20 protests. Journalism, 13(6), 695-713. Poell, T. (2014). Social media and the transformation of activist communication: Exploring the social media ecology of the 2010 Toronto G20 protests. Information, Communication & Society, 17(6), 716-731. Qiu, J. L., & Shi, A. B. (Eds.). (2013). News, politics, social movements, and digital media. Communication & Society, 26, 1-31. Reich, Z. (2013). The impact of technology on news reporting: A longitudinal perspective. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. Published online before print, 1-18. Robertson, A. (2013). Connecting in crisis: “Old” and “New” Media and the Arab Spring. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(3), 325-341. Rodríguez, C., Ferron, B., & Shamas, K. (2014). Four challenges in the field of alternative, radical and citizens’ media research. Media, Culture & Society, 36(2), 150-166. Shirky, C. (2009). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. New York, NY: Penguin Books. Shirky, C. (2010). Cognitive surplus: Creativity and generosity in a connected age. New York, NY: Penguin Group. Schudson, M. (2010). Political observatories, databases & news in the emerging ecology of public information. Dædalus, 139(2), 100-109. Stein, L. (2009). Social movement web use in theory and practice: A content analysis of US movement websites. New Media & Society, 11(5), 749-771. Strömbäck, J. (2011). Mediatization and perceptions of the media’s political influence. Journalism Studies. 12(4), 423-439. Terchek, R. (1974). Protest and bargaining. Journal of Peace Research, 11(2), 133-144. Turner, F. (2005). Actor-networking the news. Social Epistemology, 19(4), 321-324. Valenzuela, S. (2013). Unpacking the use of social media for protest behavior: The roles of information , opinion expression, and activism. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 920-942. Van Aelst, P., & Walgrave, S. (2002). New media, new movements? The role of the Internet in shaping the ‘anti-globalization’ movement. Information, Communication & Society, 5(4), 465-493. Verba, S., & Nie, N. (1972). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. New York, NY: Harper & Row. Weiss, A. S., & Domingo, D. (2010). Innovations processes in online newsrooms as actor-networks and community of practice. New Media Society, 12(7), 1156-1171.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學新聞研究所 101451018 103
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101451018
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Journalism] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
101801.pdf	2102Kb	Adobe PDF2	1182	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback