政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/74930

政大典藏 > College of Social Science > Graduate Institute of Development Studies > Theses > Item 140.119/74930

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/74930

Title:	共用資源治理觀點下的美濃獅子頭水圳 Governance Change of Shihtou Water Canal in Meinung:A Common-pool Resource Perspective
Authors:	游鎮維 Yu, Chen Wei
Contributors:	王振寰 Wang, Jenn Hwan 游鎮維 Yu, Chen Wei
Keywords:	集體行動共用資源環境治理非營利組織永續發展 collective actions common pool resources environmental governance non-profit organization sustainable development
Date:	2014
Issue Date:	2015-05-01 11:37:36 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本文旨在探討灌溉水資源系統中的「水圳」，在歷史的發展脈絡下如何成為農村不可或缺的依賴性治理制度。而都市化與工業發展興起後，水圳面臨了設施改造與治理困境，其制度本身所產生之變革以及新興治理機制對原有組織之影響。本文透過美濃獅子頭水圳為個案研究，運用伊利諾‧歐斯壯(E.Ostrom)之「共用資源永續發展治理八大原則」為水圳資源有效治理之理論背景，檢視早期美濃獅子頭水圳的集體行動組織（地方水利會-農民），如何成功地在自主治理的機制中運作，並探討在現代化發展過程中宏觀的外在結構環境，包含農業轉型、停徵會費、派系競爭、水患問題等變化，對既有的共用資源制度產生的衝擊與弱化。以及民主化後由愛鄉協進會透過反水庫社會運動帶動社區總體營造對於水圳治理的創新模式。本文認為早期獅子頭水圳在資源邊界、集體選擇、對組織權最低限度認可與多中心治理等面向建立起維持永續發展之基礎。制度本身雖遭受外在環境變遷而呈現鬆散，但由於觀光休閒農業的推廣，吸引農村漂鳥回流，對灌溉水資源的參與治理渴望達到穩定的力量。並且，透過給予掌水工與水利小組的正式與非正式制度性誘因，可以有效調節灌溉用水並做為提供移轉調撥其他產業用水的基礎。最後，在地方性非營利組織「愛鄉協進會」進入水圳系統的治理後，挑戰由半官僚水利會所掌控的政治經濟功能掛帥水圳系統，更融入生態、文化、公民參與等不同的元素形成一共同治理新模式，除了延續後農業時代水圳的灌溉功能之外，也強化其制度韌性。藉由這些發現，本文進而提出實務與理論的研究建議，以做為後農業時代水資源灌溉系統的永續發展之借鏡。 The subject of this essay is to explore the reason why an irrigation canal, in the process of historical development, became an indispensable governance institution in the villages. Also, in the advent of urbanization and industrialization, the irrigation canal faces a situation of the renovation of facility as well as the predicament of governance, in which the institution itself changes and newly governance system influences the original organizations. This study takes Shihtou Irrigation Canal in Meinung as the object. Using Elino Ostrom’s eight design principles of stable local common pool resource (CPR) management to review the successful self-governance mechanisms in operation performed by the early local collective action organization (mainly made by Taiwan Joint Irrigation Association and farmers). Also the paper explains the impacts of macro-environment, including the agricultural transformation, stop collecting fees, factional competition and flooding, on the existing system of CPR. And an innovational governance participated by a Meinung People`s Association, a grass-roots organization from anti-reservoir activities to comprehensive community development in the era of post-democratization. Results of this study showed as follows: Firstly, early Shihtou irrigation canal maintain the basis for establishing sustainable development as result of clearly defined boundaries, collective-choice arrangement, minimal recognition of rights to organize, and nested enterprises. Besides, although it was weaken by the later change of external structure, the development of leisure agriculture attracted recurrent youth for agriculture, who was desired for reviving the power of appropriation in canal self-governance. Meanwhile, the institutional design of water-inspectors and water conservancy group arranged through formal and informal incentives can effectively regulate the right of water for irrigation and serve as providing the basis for the allocation of water for other industries. Finally, a local non-profit organization Meinung People`s Association challenges the governance system originally controlled by a half-bureaucratic management of local Farm Irrigation Association. Compared with the mainly political and economic functions of water governance by the latter, the former emphasize the different elements of ecological, cultural, and civic participation. This formation of New model of shared governance in canal not only continue its irrigational function in post-agriculture, but also strengthen its institutional tenacity..With these findings, the paper puts forward practical and theoretical study suggests in order to learn as a sustainable development of water resources in the era of post-agricultural irrigation systems.
Reference:	Agrawal, A. (2001). Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources. World Development, 29(10), 1649-1672. Agrawal, A., & Yadama, G. (1997). How do local institutions mediate market and population pressures on resources? Forest Panchayats in Kumaon, India. Development and Change, 28(3), 435-465. Anderies, J. M., Janssen, M. A., & Ostrom, E. (2004). A framework to analyze the robustness of social-ecological systems from an institutional perspective. Ecology and Society, 9(1), 18. Baden, J. A. (1998). A new primer for the management of common-pool resources and public goods. Managing the Commons, 51-62. Bardhan, P. (2000). Irrigation and cooperation: An empirical analysis of 48 irrigation communities in South India. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 48(4), 847-865. Buchanan, J. M., Tollison, R. D., & Tullock, G. (1980). Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society: Texas A&M University Press. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120. Conca, K. (2000). The WTO and the undermining of global environmental governance. Review of International Political Economy, 7(3), 484-494. Cox, M., Arnold, G., & Tomás, S. V. (2010). A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 38. Dawes, R. M. (1973). The commons dilemma game: An n-person mixed-motive game with a dominating strategy for defection. Oregon Research Institute Research Bulletin, 13(2), 1-12. Forman, R. T. (1995). Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions: Cambridge university press. Gautam, A. P., & Shivakoti, G. P. (2005). Conditions for successful local collective action in forestry: some evidence from the hills of Nepal. Society and Natural Resources, 18(2), 153-171. Ghate, R., & Nagendra, H. (2005). Role of monitoring in institutional performance: Forest management in Maharashtra, India. Conservation and Society, 3(2), 509-532. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243-1248. Klooster, D. (2000). Institutional choice, community, and struggle: A case study of forest co-management in Mexico. World Development, 28(1), 1-20. Lam, W. F. (1996). Institutional design of public agencies and coproduction: a study of irrigation associations in Taiwan. World Development, 24(6), 1039-1054. Lam, W. F. (2001). Coping with change: A study of local irrigation institutions in Taiwan. World Development, 29(9), 1569-1592. Levine, G., Sheng, K. H., & Barker, R. (2000). The evolution of Taiwanese irrigation: Implications for the future. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 16(4), 497-510. Niskanen, W. A. (1974). Bureaucracy and representative government: Transaction Publishers. Olson, M., & Olson, M. (2009). The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups (Vol. 124): Harvard University Press. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action: Cambridge University Press. Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073-1087. Ostrom, E., & Gardner, R. (1993). Coping with asymmetries in the commons: self-governing irrigation systems can work. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 93-112. Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games, and common-pool resources: University of Michigan Press. Ostrom, V., & Ostrom, E. (1999). Public goods and public choices. Paper presented at the Polycentricity and Local Public Economies. Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. Paterson, M. (1999). Globalisation, ecology and resistance. New Political Economy, 4(1), 129-145. Pinkerton, E., & Weinstein, M. (1995). Fisheries that work: sustainability through community-based management. Vancouver, BC: The David Suzuki Foundation.(July). Pomeroy, R. S., Katon, B. M., & Harkes, I. (2001). Conditions affecting the success of fisheries co-management: lessons from Asia. Marine policy, 25(3), 197-208. Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1994). Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy: Princeton University Press. Rudel, T. K. (2011). The commons and development: unanswered sociological questions. International Journal of the Commons, 5(2), 303-318. Schmidtz, D., & Willott, E. (2003). Reinventing the commons: an African case study. UC Davis Law Review, 37, 203. Shivakoti, G. P. (1991). Organizational Effectiveness of User and Non-User Controlled Irrigation Systems in Nepal. Michigan State University Ph.D. Dissertation. Smouts, Marie-Claude, (1998). The proper use of governance in international relations. International Social Science Journal, 155, 81-89. Tang, S. Y. (1992). Institutions and collective action: Self-governance in irrigation. Trawick, P. B. (2001). Successfully governing the commons: Principles of social organization in an Andean irrigation system. Human Ecology, 29(1), 1-25. Turner, M. D. (1999). Conflict, environmental change, and social institutions in dryland Africa: limitations of the community resource management approach. Society & Natural Resources, 12(7), 643-657. Wunder, S. (2000). Ecotourism and economic incentives—an empirical approach. Ecological Economics, 32(3), 465-479. 王振寰(1996)。誰統治台灣?轉型中的國家機器與權力結構。台北：巨流。王振寰、王瑞琦與陳永生主編(2010)。兩岸鄉村發展與農村治理，臺北市：五南。王世慶(1994)。從清代臺灣農田水利開發看農村社會關係。載於氏著，清代臺灣社會經濟(頁188-190)，臺北：聯經。朱淑娟(2012)。友達不來了，中科四期開發重新檢討，學者：應暫停所有開發中工程。環境報導部落格，3月15日，。http://shuchuan7.blogspot.tw/2012/03/blo g-post_15.html 江信成(2002)。台灣省高雄農田水利會組織與功能變遷之分析:水的政治學。碩士論文，國立中山大學政治學研所。余光孝(2008)。農田水利會課責機制之研究。碩士論文，佛光大學公共事務學系碩士在職專班。吳進錩(1992)。台灣農田水利事業演化之研究。博士論文，文化大學實業計畫研究所農業組。吳昀雲(2006)。論台灣農田水利事業與政府的關係。碩士論文，國立台灣大學經濟學研究所。李永展 -(2000)。永續發展─大地反撲的省思。臺北市：巨流。 -(2006)。永續城鄉與生態社區理論與實務。台北：文笙出版。 -(2012)。埤圳社區化：民眾如何參與埤塘水圳再生。載於「低衝擊開發技術(LID)國際研討會」論文集。台北：台北科技大學。李源泉(1987)。台灣農田水利會基層灌排體系之研究。博士論文，中國文化大學實業計畫研究所農學組。林禮恭(1974)。台灣省農田水利會組織與職掌之研究。碩士論文，國立政治大學公共行政學系。林瑩秋(2012)。中科搶水，榨乾濁水溪。新新聞，1315，取自http://mag.chinatimes.co m/mag-cnt.aspx?artid=14054&page=3。林紹農(2009)。海洋生態保育與公私部門的共同管理。碩士論文，國立中正大學政治學研究所。邱淑娟（1995）。戰後台灣農田水組織變遷歷程之研究(1945-1995)。碩士論文，台灣大學政治研究所。邱郁云(2009)。水圳、權力、產業的空間轉換－以彰化縣八堡圳二水段為例。碩士論文，中原大學室內設計研究所。洪俐真（2003）。台灣水利會的政治角色－彰化農田水利會個案。碩士論文，中山大學政治學研究所。柴盈、何自力與王樹春(2007)。中國農村灌溉系統治理與制度創新研究。貴州社會科學，5(209)。翁婉茹(2007)〈水圳從自然、文化、休閒角度再利用〉農政與農情，184，頁78~80。張二文(2002)。美濃土地伯公之研究。碩士論文，台南師範學院鄉土文化研究所。張寒青(2007)。台灣農田水利會組織運作之研究。博士論文，國立中山大學中山學術研究所。郭雲萍(1994) 。國家與社會之間的嘉南大圳─以日據時期為中心。碩士論文，國立中正大學歷史研究所。郭士綸(2010)。彰化平原的水利諸神及其社會網絡。碩士論文，國立中興大學歷史學系。郭昱汝(2011)。關子嶺溫泉共享性資源治理之分析。碩士論文國立中正大學政治學研究所。郭淳瑜(2009)。美濃地區獅子頭圳的沿革。台灣文獻館電子報，40。陳鴻圖 -(2009)。台灣水利史。臺北市：五南。 -(2001)。嘉南大圳研究(1901-1993):水利、組織與環境的互動歷程。博士論文，國立政治大學歷史系。 -(2012)。戰後水利會水利小組的變遷(1945-1975)。東華人文學報，20，137-167。陳慧秋(2001)。流域用水管理與配水誘因機制之研究--以桃園農田水利會為例。博士論文，國立中興大學農業經濟學系。陳昭郎(2005)。休閒農業概論。全華科技圖書股份有限公司。台北。陸緋雲(2002)。性別與族群：客家婦女地位的反思與探討。載於客家文化學術研討會論文集(頁539－549)。台北：行政院客家委員會。湯京平與呂嘉泓(2002)。永續發展與公共行政─從山美與佳美經驗談社區自治與「共享性資源」的管理。人文及社會科學集刊，14(2)，261-287。湯京平、邱崇原與黃建勳(2011)。地方治理的制度選擇與轉型政治：台灣水利會制度變革的政治與經濟分析。人文及社會科學集刊，23(1)，93-126。傅寶玉 -(2007)。古圳:南桃園水圳空間與文化。新竹縣：行政院客家委員會臺灣客家文化中心籌備處。 -(2009)。水利與國家：日治初期桃園廳公共埤圳的公法人化。國史館館刊，20，1-38。游正鈿(2011)。我國農田水利會營運策略之研究。碩士論文，佛光大學公共事務學系碩士在職專班。黃宏森(2006)。共享性資源的網絡治理-台灣農田水利資源管理個案分析。公共行政學報，21，73-114。黃建勳(2005)。水資源管理與自治制度：以嘉義縣沿海養殖漁業發展與地下水管制為例。碩士論文，國立中正大學政治學研究所。黃美珍(2008)。聚落、信仰與地方精英：以美濃二月戲為例。碩士論文，國立交通大學客家文化學院客家社會與文化研究所。黃書緯(2012，11月)。從水庫到引水：台灣水資源分配模式的轉變與困境。論文發表於2012年秋季臺灣大學全球變遷中心系列演講「水與社會研究」座談會。台北：台灣大學全球變遷中心。楊惠貞(2012)。中科四期二林園區用水計劃風險治理爭議探討。碩士論文，台灣大學國家發展研究所。溫仲良(2008)〈原鄉逝水〉台灣民間水圳論壇暨道將圳文件展教案資料葉俊榮(2013)。永續發展的制度抉擇與文明省思，收錄於林建甫主編《全球化時代的王道文化、社會創新與永續發展》(頁169-203)。臺北市：國立台灣大學出版中心。廖心華(2008)。美濃水圳之形成與變遷（1736–1976）。碩士論文，國立成功大學建築學系。蔡明哲(1987)。社會發展理論─人性與鄉村發展取向。臺北市：巨流。蔡明華、林尉濤(2009)。臺灣灌溉史(History of Irrigation in Taiwan)。台北：行政院農業委員會劉滿娣(2005)〈地方派系對選舉影響之研究─以美濃鎮1998~2003年選舉為例〉，國立台灣師範大學政治學研究所教學碩士論文。盧道杰(2004)。台灣社區保育的發展—近年來國內三個個案的分析。台大地理學報，37，1-25。蕭代基、張瓊婷與郭彥廉(2003)。自然資源的參與式管理與地方自治制度。臺灣經濟預測與政策，34(1)，1-37。鍾鳳娣(2009)。美濃水圳文化之研究。碩士論文，國立高雄師範大學客家文化研究所。鍾明靜(2003)。水圳空間的領域性研究─以嘉南大圳灌溉區為主。碩士論文，中原大學建築研究所。謝和霖主編(2014)。2014世界現況：永續治理。台北：看守世界研究中心。(Prugh, T. & Renner, M.,2014) 顏愛靜與官大偉(2004)。傳統制度與制度選擇：新竹縣尖石鄉兩個泰雅族部落共用資源自主治理案例分析。地理學報，37，27-49。顏愛靜與孫稚堤(2008)。原住民地區共用資源自主治理之研究-以馬里克彎河域的護魚行動為例。地理學報，52，53-91。《美濃鎮誌》高雄縣美濃鎮︰美濃鎮公所出版，1997年4月美濃菸酒會(2006)。水圳文化是農村再發展的血脈，勿以首長圖利家鄉之言觀之。http://blog.yam.com/culture_meinung/article/6724929 三則有關水圳景觀改善計畫的新聞: 1.台灣立院教委會破天荒決議：文建會涉弊送辦DWNEWS.COM-- 2006年11月17日3:46:30(京港台時間) --多維新聞中國時報 2.文建會喊冤：非主動規畫的確是巧合2006.11.17 中國時報 3.三案遭立院移送查黑中心文建會澄清，依規辦理無弊端2006.11.18中國時報高雄農田水利會全球資訊網 http://www.kfia.gov.tw/aseip/ 台灣水圳文化網 http://gis.rchss.sinica.edu.tw/canal/?cat=3 上下游News&Market〈救汙染農地，環團籲灌排分離法制化〉http://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/49130/
Description:	碩士國立政治大學國家發展研究所 100261020 103
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1002610201
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Graduate Institute of Development Studies] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
020101.pdf	3529Kb	Adobe PDF2	954	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...