English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50929388      Online Users : 1000
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/73999


    Title: 公民投票與鄰避困境：台灣低放射性廢棄物貯存場的選址經驗及南韓之啟示
    Authors: 邱崇原;湯京平
    Contributors: 政治系
    Keywords: 資訊經濟學;社會學習;制度承載力;貝式法則;資訊階流
    information economics;social learning;institutional capacity;Bayesian rule;information cascade
    Date: 2014-12
    Issue Date: 2015-03-24 18:22:13 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 市民拒絕嫌惡性設施在鄰近地區設置的鄰避現象，是民主制度在本質上難以處理的困境。而在民主化的情境下，以往長期便宜行事的政府，可信賴度仍受到民眾的質疑，導致選址決策的協商更為困難。從這個角度思考，南韓2006年成功地選定低放射性核廢料永久貯存場址，則製造了一個理論上的驚奇：為什麼公投這樣的民主機制能夠解決民主化過程中的鄰避困境？本文以資訊經濟學的觀點，透過深入訪談台灣負責核廢選址的官員與台電工作人員，分析鄰避困境的根源，並解釋南韓為何能以志願的方式順利解決選址的爭議。本研究發現，這類協商在民主化情境中最大的挑戰，在於政府和社會間的信任不足，加以先驗理念的干擾，使資訊傳遞失真。透過細緻的公投制度設計，以及配合的條件，可能抑制先驗信念的影響，讓「競標賽局」得以成形，並透過社會學習的機制翻轉原先傾向於對抗的主流意見。對於台灣而言，如何讓兩個以上的地方政府志願考慮提供場址，則為競標賽局成局的關鍵。本研究並藉此分析台灣現有制度的問題。
    It is common in a democracy that the citizens tend to reject the siting plan of potentially harmful or risky facility in their backyard. Such NIMBY (not-in-mybackyard) dilemma poses an even greater challenge in a newly democratized polity in which governments fail to gain trust from the citizens because of the malpractices of their authoritarian antecessors. While many regimes have thought of using referendum to solve this problem, issues such as “ tyranny of the majority” and environmental justice are entangled to prevent this solution from being effective as indicated in the lengthy struggles in Taiwan. From this perspective, the success of South Korea is valuable in revealing possible conditions for using referendum as a means to cope with the NIMBY problem.. The study points out some game theoretical analysis of possible factors for referendum to serve as a useful mechanism and collects empirical data from both Taiwan and South Korea to substantiate its arguments.
    Relation: 台灣民主季刊, 11(4), 1-36
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政治學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    1-36.pdf1376KbAdobe PDF2829View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback