政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/73546
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113648/144635 (79%)
造访人次 : 51599148      在线人数 : 418
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/73546


    题名: 公股股權對銀行業資本適足性、淨值報酬及股價淨值比之影響－以公股派任之董監組成分析
    The Effects of Public Ownership on Banks’ BIS, ROE and P/E Ratio
    作者: 洪春熹
    贡献者: 陳明進
    洪春熹
    关键词: 公營銀行
    公股董監代表
    資本適足率
    淨值報酬率
    股價淨值比
    日期: 2012
    上传时间: 2015-03-02 10:09:37 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究主要目的係探討公股股權對銀行業資本適足性、淨值報酬及股價淨值比之影響。透過代理理論與資源依賴理論之探討董監事人才之遴選對銀行業之重要性，並利用臺灣經濟新報資料庫、金融監督管理委員會網站公布數據或編輯發行之金融統計輯要，暨各上市(櫃)銀行之年報揭露公司治理之相關董監事等資料進行統計分析，進而以公股代表之遴選角度，探討政府(財政部)對具主導權之彰化、華南、第一、兆豐、台企及合庫等6家上市公營銀行，所派任之公股董監事組成差異，有無對公股銀行之資本適足性、權益報酬率及股價淨值比等產生影響，提出未來政府對公營銀行監理及遴選公股代表之參考建議。
    本文之實證結果，發現無論在全體公民營銀行，或控制銀行規模後，公營銀行之淨值報酬率並未顯著低於民營銀行；但在股價淨值比方面，公營銀行的市場評價低於民營銀行；另在資本適足性方面，公營銀行與民營銀行亦有差異，公營銀行的資本適足率低於民營銀行。至於就公營銀行比較之實證結果，發現在董事會學者或官員兼任成員之比例組成差異，對各公營銀行之資本適足性及股價淨值比等方面，並未有顯著不同之影響，但在淨值報酬率方面，則不論董事會學者或官員兼任成員比例組成差異，結果均為正向相關，惟未達10％顯著水準。
    最後，謹就公股股權管理提出建議如下：1.去除政策性任務，及強化公司治理，落實企業化經營。2.透過合約遴聘專業經理人擔任公營銀行之董事長及總經理，必要時可增訂特別規定，以規範公股代表責任。3.建立董監事之薪資獎酬與績效有效連結制度。4.面臨外商及大陸地區之銀行相繼來台競食國內金融市場，亟需及早規劃公股銀行之最適經濟規模，厚植銀行實力等建議意見，供未來政府監理之參考。
    參考文獻: 李建然、廖秀梅與廖益興，2003，股權結構、董事獨立性與企業經營績效之研究，
    會計理論與實務研討會 。
    林建甫，2007，從獨董制度論公股管理之變革，財政部2007年委託研究計畫。
    林宗輝，2004，公司治理與企業績效關聯性之研究，國立台灣大學會計學研究所
    未出版博士論文。
    洪德生，2004，公股股權管理問題之研究，行政院經濟建設委員會2004年委託研究計畫。
    陳宜伶，2008，董事會之獨立、專業、參與對企業績效及風險之影響，國立政治大學
    會計學研究所未出版博士論文。
    陳柏華，2008，金融控股公司董事持股質押比率與經營績效的關聯性探討，國立臺灣
    大學經濟學系未出版碩士論文。
    陳麗娟，2004，董事會組成、股權結構、關係人交易與企業績效關係之研究—以紡
    織業及電子業為實證，國立成功大學高階管理在職專班未出版碩士論文。
    陳宏姿，2001，董監事結構與企業經營績效關聯之研究，國立政治大學會計研究所
    未出版碩士論文。
    許加昂，2000，董監質押比率與公司經營績效、融資政策、股利政策關聯性之研究，
    國立臺灣大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    許總雅，1998，台灣地區銀行業經營效率之評估與比較，國立成功大學經營管理研究
    所未出版碩士論文。
    熊大中，2000，我國企業財務危機與董監股權質押關連性之研究，國立成功大學
    會計研究所未出版碩士論文
    趙莊敏與戴德昇，2006，台灣銀行股權結構、董事會特性與其經營成本效率之相關
    性研究，台灣金融財務季刊，第 7輯第 3 期(9月):95-125。
    劉仲嘉，2006，董監事機制及其獨立性與公司經營績效之關聯性研究，國立台灣大
    學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
    盧玟錤，2011，金融業作業風險管理有效性與董監組成關聯性之探討，國立臺灣
    大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    Altunbas,Y.,M.-H.Lin,P.Molyneux,and R.Seth(2000).Efficiency and Risk in Japanese
    Banking. Journal of Banking &Finance,24:1605-1628.
    Aldrich, H. E., and J. Pfeffer. (1976). Environments of Organizations. Annual Review of
    Sociology, 2: 79-105.
    Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., D. W. Collins, and W. R. Kinney Jr. (2007). The Discovery and
    Reporting of Internal Control Deficiencies prior to SOX-Mandated Audits. Journal of
    Accounting and Economics, 44: 166-192.
    Bhattacharyya, A., C. A. K. Lovell and P. Sahay （1997）, ”The Impact of Liberalization
    On　the ProductiveEfficiency of Indain Commericial Bank s”, European Journal of
    Operaional Reserch, 98, pp.332-345.
    Bainbridge, S. (1993). Independent Directors and the ALI Corporate Governance
    Project. George Washington Law Review, 61: 1034-1083.
    Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2003). Overview of The New Basel Capital
    Accord. Consultative Document. Bank for International Settlements. Retrieved
    November 3, 2010 from http://www.bis.org/bcbs/bcbscp2.htm.
    Baysinger, B., and R. E. Hoskisson. (1990). The Composition of Boards of Directors and
    Strategic Control: Effects on Corporate Strategy. The Academy of Management
    Review, 15: 72-87.
    Baysinger, B. D., and H. N. Butler. (1985). Corporate Governance and the Board of
    Directors: Performance Effects of Changes in Board Composition. Journal of Law,
    Economics, & Organization, 1: 101-124.
    Bazerman, M. H., and F. D. Schoorman. (1983). A Limited Rationality Model of
    Interlocking Directorates. The Academy of Management Review, 8: 206-217.
    Becker, C. L., M. L. Defond, J. Jiambalvo, and K. R. Subramanyam. (1998). The Effect of
    Audit Quality on Earnings Management. Contemporary Accounting Research,
    15:1-24.
    Becker, G. (1964). Human Capital. New York: Columbia University Press.
    Berle, A., and G. Means. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New
    York: Macmillan Publishing Co.
    Boyd, B. (1990). Corporate Linkages and Organizational Environment: A Test of the
    Resource Dependence Model. Strategic Management Journal, 11: 419-430.
    Burt, R. S. (1980). Cooptive Corporate Actor Networks: A Reconsideration of
    Interlocking Directorates Involving American Manufacturing. Administrative Science
    Quarterly, 25: 557-582.
    Chen, T.Y and T.L.Yeh(2000). A Measurement of Bank Efficiency, Ownership and Productivity Changes in Taiwan. The Service Industries Iournal,20:1,95-109.
    Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. The American
    Journal of Sociology, 94: S95-S120.
    Conyon, M. J., and I. P. Simon. (1998). Board Control, Remuneration Committees, and
    Top Management Compensation. The Academy of Management
    Journal, 41:146-157.
    Daily, C. M., and D. R. Dalton. (1994a). Bankruptcy and Corporate Governance: The
    Impact of Board Composition and Structure. The Academy of Management Journal,
    37: 1603-1617.
    Daily, C. M., and D. R. Dalton. (1994b). Corporate Governance and the Bankrupt Firm:
    An Empirical Assessment. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 643-654.
    Daily, C. M., and C. Schwenk. (1996). Chief Executive Officers, Top Management Teams,
    and Boards of Directors: Congruent or Countervailing Forces? Journal of
    Management, 22: 185-208.
    Dalton, D. R., C. M. Daily, J. L. Johnson, and A. E. Ellstrand. (1999). Number of Directors
    and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. The Academy of Management Journal,
    42: 674-686.
    Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. The Academy of
    Management Review, 14: 57-74.
    Elyasiani, E. and S. Mehdian, 1992, Productive Efficiency Performance of Minority
    and Nonminority-owned Banks: A Nonparametric Approach, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol.16, 933-948.
    Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm. The Journal of
    Political Economy, 88: 288-307.
    Fama, E. F., and M. C. Jensen. (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of
    Law and Economics, 26: 301-325.
    Fan, J. P. H., and T. J. Wong. (2002). Corporate Ownership Structure and the
    Informativeness of Accounting Earnings in East Asia. Journal of Accounting and
    Economics, 33: 401-425.
    Francis, J., R. LaFond, P. M. Olsson, and K. Schipper. (2004). Costs of Equity and
    Earnings Attributes. The Accounting Review, 79: 967-1010.
    Gales, L. M., and I. F. Kesner. (1994). An Analysis of Board of Director Size and
    Composition in Bankrupt Organizations. Journal of Business Research,
    30:271-282.
    Ge, W., and S. McVay. (2005). On the Disclosure of Material Weaknesses in Internal
    Control after the Sarbanes–Oxley Act. Accounting Horizons, 19: 137-158.
    Gul, F. A. (1999). Government Share Ownership, I nvestment Opportunity Set and
    Corporate Policy Choices in China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 7:157-172.

    Hillman, A. J., A. A. Cannella, and R. L. Paetzold. (2000). The Resource Dependence
    Role of Corporate Directors: Strategic Adaptation of Board Composition in Response
    to Environmental Change. Journal of Management Studies, 37:235-256.
    Hillman, A. J., and T. Dalziel. (2003). Boards of Directors and Firm Performance:
    Integrating Agency and Resource Dependence Perspectives. The Academy of
    Management Review, 28: 383-396.
    Hillman, A. J., G. D. Keim, and R. A. Luce. (2001). Board
    Composition and Stakeholder Performance: Do Stakeholder Directors
    Make a Difference? Business & Society, 40: 295-314.
    Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior,
    Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3:305-360.
    Johnson, R. A., and D. W. Greening. (1999). The Effects of Corporate Governance and
    Institutional Ownership Types on Corporate Social Performance. The Academy of
    Management Journal, 42: 564-576.
    Judge, W. Q., Jr., and C. P. Zeithaml. (1992). Institutional and Strategic Choice
    Perspectives on Board Involvement in the Strategic Decision Process. The Academy
    of Management Journal, 35: 766-794.
    Luoma, P., and J. Goodstein. (1999). Stakeholders and Corporate Boards: Institutional
    Influences on Board Composition and Structure. The Academy of Management
    Journal, 42: 553-563.
    Lynall, M.D.,B.R.Golden, and A.J.Hillman.(2003).Board Composition from Adolescence
    to Maturity:A Multitheoretic View. The Academy of Management
    Review,28:416-431.
    Miller, H. (1993). Corporate Governance in Chapter 11: The Fiduciary Relationship
    between Directors and Stockholders of Solvent and Insolvent
    Corporations. Seton Hall Law Review, 23: 1467-1515.
    Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power In and Around Organizations. Englewood Cliff, New York:
    Prentice-Hall.
    Mizruchi, M. S. (1983). Who Controls Whom? An Examination of the Relation between
    Management and Boards of Directors in Large American Corporations. The Academy
    of Management Review, 8: 426-435.
    Mizruchi, M. S., and L. B. Stearns. (1988). A Longitudinal Study of the Formation of
    Interlocking Directorates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33: 194-210.
    Osterloh, M., and B. Frey. (2006). Shareholders Should Welcome Knowledge Workers
    as Directors. Journal of Management and Governance, 10: 325-345.
    Pathan, S. (2009). Strong Boards, CEO Power and Bank Risk-taking. Journal of
    Banking & Finance, 33: 1340-1350.
    Petty, R. E., and J. T. Cacioppo. (1986). The Elaboration Likelihood
    Model of Persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19: 123-192.
    Pfeffer, J. (1972). Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors:
    The Organization and its Environment. Administrative Science
    Quarterly, 17:218-228.
    Pfeffer, J. (1987). A Resource Dependence Perspective on Intercorporate Relations. In M.
    S. Mizruchi & M. Schwartz(Eds.), Intercorporate relations: The structure analysis of
    business, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
    Pfeffer, J., and G. Salancik. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource
    Dependence Perspective., New York: Harper & Row.
    Pitcher, P., S. Chreim, and V. Kisfalvi. (2000). CEO Succession Research: Methodological
    Bridges over Troubled Waters. Strategic Management Journal,21: 625-648.
    Pye, A. (2002). Corporate Directing: Governing, Strategising and Leading in Action.
    Corporate Governance: An International Review, 10: 153-162.
    Rindova, V. P. (1999). What Corporate Boards have to do with Strategy: A Cognitive
    Perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 36: 953-975.
    Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the Grass Roots: A Study of the Sociology of Formal
    Organizations. New York: Harper & Row.
    Singh, J. V. (1986). Performance, Slack, and Risk Taking in Organizational Decision
    Making. The Academy of Management Journal, 29: 562-585.
    Stevenson, W. B., and R. F. Radin. (2009). Social Capital and Social Influence on the
    Board of Directors. Journal of Management Studies, 46: 16-44.
    Walsh, J. P., and J. K. Seward. (1990). On the Efficiency of Internal and External
    Corporate Control Mechanisms. The Academy of Management Review, 15:421-458.
    Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A Resource-Based View of the Firm. Strategic Management
    Journal, 5: 171-180.
    Westphal, J. D. (1999). Collaboration in the Boardroom: Behavioral and Performance
    Consequences of CEO-Board Social Ties. The Academy of Management Journal,
    42: 7-24.
    Williamson, O. (1984). Corporate Governance. The Yale Law Journal, 93: 1197-1230.
    Williamson, O. E. (1983). Organization Form, Residual Claimants, and
    CorporateControl. Journal of Law and Economics, 26: 351-366.
    Yang,L.(2003). The Asian Financial Crisis and Non-performing Loans: Evidence from Commercial Banks in Taiwan. International Journal of Management,20:69.
    Zahra, S. A., and J. A. Pearce. (1989). Boards of Directors and Corporate Financial
    Performance - A Review and Integrative Model. Journal of Management,
    15:291-334.
    Zajac, E. J., and J. D. Westphal. (1996). Director Reputation, CEO-Board Power, and the
    Dynamics of Board Interlocks. Administrative Science Quarterly,
    41:507-529.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)
    99932056
    101
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099932056
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[經營管理碩士學程EMBA] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    205601.pdf4519KbAdobe PDF21329检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈