政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/73537
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113392/144379 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51228701      線上人數 : 894
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/73537


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/73537


    題名: 生技產業IPO風險因子與長期獲利能力之關聯性研究
    The association between the risk factor disclosures in IPO prospectus and path-to-profitability of biotech firms
    作者: 黃庭翊
    貢獻者: 諶家蘭
    黃庭翊
    關鍵詞: 首次公開發行
    生技產業
    公開說明書
    風險因子
    獲利能力
    長期績效
    Initial public offerings
    Biotech industry
    Prospectus
    Risk factor
    Profitability
    Long-term performance
    日期: 2014
    上傳時間: 2015-03-02 10:08:23 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究主要探討生技產業公開說明書之風險因子揭露對首次公開發行公司5年內的獲利能力做研究，想得知風險因子的揭露是否會影響公司獲利時間的長短。本研究以美國生技產業首次公開發行公司為研究對象，樣本期間為1997年至2012年。
    許多文獻指出越來越多公司在尚未獲利前即先行上市，但公司未來的前景及獲利能力卻充滿高度的不確定性，而透過資訊的揭露可使該不確定性下降，因透過揭露，投資者可以了解公司營運狀況及表現，對公司價值能做較正確之判斷， 此時願意提供資金給公司營運，充足的資金使公司未來獲利機會上升。
    本研究參考過去文獻，建立資訊揭露的四級指標加上風險因子所揭露的項目多寡，系統性地衡量生技公司公開說明書之風險因子，並以存活分析檢測假說。實證結果顯示：風險因子的內容描述越著重在某些特定資訊，例如：顧客資訊、重要員工資訊、量化資訊的表達、公司未來不確定性、財務需求時，公司未來獲利能力機會大增，而當更進一步的探究時，又發現對顧客資訊和量化資訊的表達越具體，越詳細時，也會使公司未來獲利機會上升。
    This study investigates whether disclosure of risk factors in the prospectus will influence the probability of the biotech firms to attain profitability. Data is collected for biotech companies of U.S IPOs issued from1997 to2012 as the research sample.
    Many extant empirical evidences indicate that the proportion of firms going public prior to achieving profitability has been increasing over time. There is considerable uncertainty regarding the long-term economic viability of these firms at the time of going public. Disclosures in the prospector may mitigate the effects of ex-ante uncertainty about firm’s value, and disclosures are potentially important means for management to communicate firm performance and governance to outside investors. Therefore, firms can raise more money by disclosing more information in IPO prospectors, because more information reperesent lower uncertainty between investors and firms.This study uses risk factors in the prospectus as concern issue and expects that the quantity of risk factors and the content or description of risk factors will influence the uncertainty and would mitigate investors’ concern. Referring to past literature, this study builds four-class index for disclosure score and uses two classifications of risk factors to systematically measure risk factors in the prospectus.
    The empirical results show that a biotech IPO with more information or some specific information of risk factors, like disclosures of main customers and key employees, will experience good performance after IPO. In addition, more detail descriptions in quantitative risk factors and customers’ information contributed to better performance in the future. In conclusion, disclosure of risk factors in the prospectus are related to firms’ probability of profitability after IPO as expected.
    參考文獻: 1.Arnold, T., R.P.H. Fishe, and D. North. 2010. The Effects of Ambiguous Information on Initial and Subsequent IPO Returns. Financial Management 39 (4): 1497-1519.
    2.Atiase,R.K. 1980. Predisclosure information asymmetries, firm capitalization, earnings reports and security price behavior.Unpublished Ph.D.Thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
    3.Atiase, R. K. 1985. Predisclosure information, firm capitalization, and security price behavior around earnings announcements. Journal of Accounting Research 23(1): 21-36.
    4.Amihud, Y., and H. Mendelson. 1986. Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread. Journal of Financial Economics 17: 223–49.
    5.Barry, C. B., C. J. Muscarella, J.W. Peavy, and M. R. Vetsuypens. 1990. The role of venture capital in the creation of public companies. Journal of Financial Economics27 (2) : 447-471.
    6.Beatty, R. P., and E. J. Zajac. 1994. Managerial incentives, monitoring, and risk bearing: A study of executive compensation, ownership, and board structure in initial public offerings. Administrative Science Quarterly 39 (2) : 313-335.
    7.Beatty, R.P., and I. Welch. 1996. Issuer expenses and legal liability in initial public offerings. Journal of Law and Economics39 (2) : 545-602.
    8.Bharat A. Jain, Omesh Kini. 1999. On investment banker monitoring in the new issues market. Journal of Banking & Finance 23 : 49-84.
    9.Bharat A. Jain and Omesh Kini. 1999. The life cycle of initial public offering firms. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 26 (9).
    10.Botosan, C. 1997. Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. The Accounting Review (72) : 323-349.
    11.Botosan, C. and Plumlee, M. 2002. A re-examination of disclosure level and the expected cost of equity capital. Journal of Accounting Research (40) : 21-40.
    12.Carter, R. B., F. H. Dark, and A. K. Singh. 1998. Underwriter reputation, initial returns, and the long-run performance of IPO stocks. The Journal of Finance 53 (1) : 285-311.
    13.Cerbioni, F., and A. Parbonetti. 2007. Exploring the effects of corporate governance on intellectual capital disclosure: An analysis of european biotechnology companies. European Accounting Review 16 (4) : 791-826.
    Certo, S. T., J.G. Covin, C. M. Daily, and D. R. Dalton. 2001. Wealth and the effects of founder management among IPO-stage new ventures. Strategic Management Journal 22 (6‐7) : 641-658.
    14.Choi, F. 1973. Financial disclosure and entry to the European capital market. Journal of Accounting Research 75.
    15.Christine A. Botosan 2006. Disclosure and the cost of capital : what do we know? Accounting and Business Research : 31-40.
    16.Cyr, L. A., D. E. Johnson, and T. M. Welbourne. 2000. Human resources in initial public offering firms : Do venture capitalists make a difference? Entrepreneurship : Theory and Practice 25(1) : 77-92.
    17.Darrell, W., and B. N. Schwartz. 1997. Environmental disclosures and public policy pressure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy16 (2) : 125-154.
    18.Dhaliwal, D., Spicer, B. and Vickrey, D. 1979. The quality of disclosure and the cost of capital. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 6 (2) : 245-266.
    19.Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P. and Schipper, K. 2004 . Costs of equity and eamings attributes. The Accounting Review 79 : 961-1010.
    20.Frankel, R., McNichols, M. and Wilson, P. 1995. Discretionary disclostire and extemal financing. The Accounting Review 70 : 135-150.
    21.Freedman, M. and A. J. Stagliano. 1992. European unification, accounting harmonization, and social disclosures. The International Journal of Accounting 27(2) : 112-122.
    22.Glosten, L., and P. Milgrom. 1985 . Bid, ask, and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders. Journal of Financial Economics 14 : 71–100.
    23.Galant, D. 1992. Going public. Institutional Investor 26 (4) : 127-129.
    24.Gulati, R. 1999. Network location and learning : The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal 20 (5) : 397–420.
    25.Gulati, R., and M.C. Higgins. 2003. Which ties matter when? the contingent effects of interorganizational partnerships on IPO success. Strategic Management Journal 24 (2) : 127-144.
    26.Guo, R.J., B. Lev, and N. Zhou. 2004. Competitive costs of disclosure by biotech IPOs. Journal of Accounting Research 42 (2) : 319-355.
    27.Guo, R.J., B. Lev, and N. Zhou. 2005. The valuation of biotech IPOs. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 20 (4) : 423-459.
    28.Guthrie, J.P., and L. D. Parker. 1990. Corporate social disclosure practice: A returns, and the long-run performance of IPO stocks. The Journal of Finance 53(1) : 285-311.
    29.Cerbioni, F., and A. Parbonetti. 2007. Exploring the effects of corporate governance on intellectual capital disclosure : An analysis of european biotechnology companies. European Accounting Review16 (4) : 791-826.
    30.Certo, S. T., J.G. Covin, C. M. Daily, andD. R. Dalton. 2001. Wealth and the effects of founder management among IPO-stage new ventures. Strategic Management Journal 22 (6‐7) : 641-658.
    31.Cyr, L. A., D. E. Johnson, and T. M. Welbourne. 2000. Human resources in initial public offering firms: Do venture capitalists make a difference? Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 25 (1) : 77-92.
    Darrell, W., and B. N. Schwartz. 1997. Environmental disclosures and public policy pressure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 16 (2) : 125-154.
    Freedman, M. and A. J. Stagliano. 1992. European unification, accounting harmonization, and social disclosures. The International Journal of Accounting 27 (2) : 112-122.
    32.Galant, D. 1992. Going Public. Institutional Investor 26 (4) : 127-129.
    33.Guo, R.J., B. Lev, and N. Zhou. 2004. Competitive costs of disclosure by biotech IPOs. Journal of Accounting Research 42 (2) : 319-355.
    Guo, R.J., B. Lev, and N. Zhou. 2005. The valuation of biotech IPOs. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 20 (4) : 423-459.
    34.Joos, P. 2000. Discussion of the economic consequences of increased disclosure, Journal of Accounting Research 38 : 125-135.
    35.Lang, M. and R. Lundholm. 1993. Cross-sectional determinants of analyst ratings of corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research 31 (2) : 246-271.
    36.Leuz, C. and Verrecchia, R. 2000. The economic consequences of increased disclosure. The Journal of Accounting Research 38 : 91-124.
    37.Logue, D.E. 1973. On the pricing of unseasoned equity issues: 1965-1969. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 8 (1) : 91-103.
    38.Megginson, W. L., and K. A. Weiss. 1991. Venture capitalist certification in initial public offerings. The Journal of Finance 46 (3) : 879-903.
    39.Miller, G.S. 2002. Earnings performance and discretionary disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research 40 (1) : 173-204.
    40.M´onica Espinosa and Marco Trombetta 2007. Disclosure interactions and the cost of equity capital : Evidence from the spanish continuous market. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 34 (9) :1371-1392.
    41.Muscarella, C., and M. Vetsuypens. 1989. Initial public offerings and information asymmetry. Working paper, Southern Methodist University.
    42.Nam, D., J.D. Arthurs, M.L. Nielsen, F. Mousa, and K. Liu. 2008. Information disclosure and IPO valuation: What kinds of information matter and is more information always better? Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research 28.
    43.Paul M. H, Krishna G. P. 2001. Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets : A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31 : 405–440.
    44.Pisano, G.P. 1991. The governance of innovation : vertical integration and collaborative arrangements in the biotechnology industry. Research Policy 20 (3) : 237–249.
    45.Pingyang. G. 2010. Disclosure quality, cost of capital, and investor welfare. The Accounting Review 85 (1) : 1-29.
    46.Reilly, F. K. 1973. Further evidence on short-run results for new issue investors. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 8 (1) : 83-90.
    47.Ritter, J. R. 1984. The hot issue market of 1980. The Journal of Business 57 : 215-239.
    48.Randolph P. B and Edward J. Z. 1994 . Managerial incentives, monitoring, and risk bearing : A study of executive compensation, ownership, and board structure in initial public offerings. Administrative Science Quarterly 39 (2)：313-33.
    49.Richardson, A., and Welker, M. 2001. Social disclosure, financial disclosure and the cost of equity capital. Accounting, Organizations and Society 26 : 597-616.
    50.Sengupta, P. 1998. Corporate disclosure quality and the cost of debt. The Accounting Review 73 (4) : 459-474.
    Stoll, H. R. and A. J. Curley. 1970. Small business and the new issues market for equities. Journal of Finance and Quantitative Analysis 5 (3) : 309-322.
    51.Stuart, T. E., H. Hoang, and R. C. Hybels. 1999. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly 44 (2) : 315-349.
    52.Verrecchia, R. 1983. Discretionary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics 5 : 179–94.
    Verrecchia, R. 2001 . Essays on disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics 32 : 97–108.
    53.Weber, R. P. 1990. Basic content analysis. Edited by Michael S. Lewis-Beck, Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills, Calif : Sage Publications.
    54.Welbourne, T. M., and A. O. Andrews. 1996. Predicting the performance of initial public offerings: Should human resource management be in the equation? Academy of Management Journal 39 (4) : 891-919.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    101353012
    103
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1013530121
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[會計學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    012101.pdf1364KbAdobe PDF238檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋