政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/73535
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113324/144300 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51134586      線上人數 : 849
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/73535


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/73535


    題名: 實施ISO14001認證對企業綠化績效之影響 – 以平衡計分卡(Balanced Scorecard)為架構分析
    The effect of ISO14001 on firms’ environmental performance – An empirical analysis with Balanced Scorecard as framework
    作者: 林展毅
    Lin, Chan Yi
    貢獻者: 羅明琇
    林展毅
    Lin, Chan Yi
    關鍵詞: 綠色供應鏈管理
    ISO14001
    平衡計分卡
    green supply chain management
    ISO14001
    Balanced Scorecard
    日期: 2014
    上傳時間: 2015-03-02 10:07:53 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 近年來，人們於生活的同時，除了滿足自身需求之外，也漸漸開始關心週遭的環境，並重視許多人類活動對於環境的影響。隨著各項國際公約與各國環保規章的制定，企業紛紛欲改善其管理系統，其中，ISO14001認證是目前於產業界中較為普及的環境管理系統(Environmental Management System, EMS)。然而，企業投入資源進行綠色相關管理活動之時，須檢視其為企業所帶來的效益或影響為何，因此，本研究以投入綠色供應鏈活動，並獲得相關綠色獎項的企業為標的，進行深入的探討，以了解企業實施ISO14001認證對其績效之影響。

    本研究以平衡計分卡(Balanced Scorecard, BSC)作為績效評估的架構，並加入環境面的指標因素，分別從財務、顧客、內部流程以及學習成長四大構面，來分析比較已實施與未實施ISO14001認證之企業，其績效表現的差異，藉以了解ISO14001認證對於企業績效之影響。

    本研究以個案研究法作為研究方法，資料來源為公司實地訪談與次級資料收集，透過訪談四間不同產業的企業，瞭解企業當前營運之績效表現，並進行跨個案分析，嘗試發掘企業導入ISO14001與否其績效表現的共通與相異之處。

    本研究發現企業實施ISO14001認證在財務構面上能有效降低汙染處置成本，且由於認證本身的特性，尤其在顧客構面上提升企業形象，並且於學習成長構面中建置環境管理系統，進而有助於提升企業內部流程構面上的績效表現。

    本研究對於學術上的貢獻是將平衡計分卡應用於環境議題，並歸納出ISO14001認證對於企業績效之影響。在實務的貢獻上，本研究提供欲進行綠色經營活動或欲改善現有綠色活動之企業一個參考依據，讓企業更清楚實施ISO14001環境管理認證後，分別於財務、顧客、內部流程以及學習成長四個構面產生那些效益與影響，以作為評估比較之範例。
    In recent years, people are getting more concerned about environments and the impacts of human activities on them. In addition, with the emergence of international agreements and regulations, corporates are putting more emphasis on enhancing their management systems. Among all, ISO14001 is currently a popular Environmental Management System (EMS) in industries. Enterprises, however, should evaluate the cost and benefit thoroughly when they invest in green supply chain management. This research uses corporates which were devoted in green supply chain activities and got awards as references, and it will further investigate into how ISO14001 influences the performances of corporates.
    This study uses the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and additional environmental indicators as major structure of performance evaluation. It will analyze the performance differences between ordinary corporates and those which have adopted ISO14001 from financial, customer, internal process, and learning and growth perspectives respectively.
    This research is based on case study method, and uses both onsite interviews and secondary resources of four corporates in different industries to understand their current performances. Besides, it will conduct cross-case analysis to discover the similarities and differences between normal corporates and those which have adopted ISO14001.
    The result indicates that ISO14001 can effectively reduce pollution treatment cost in financial perspective. Furthermore, due to the characteristic of ISO14001 itself, it can enhance corporate image (customer perspective) and establish an environmental management system (learning and growth perspective) to boost the performance in internal process perspective.
    The academic contribution of this study is to utilize Balanced Scorecard on environmental issues, and concludes how ISO14001 affects the performance of enterprises. In practical uses, this research provides a reference for corporates which are interested in green supply chain management. This study clarifies the impacts of ISO14001 on enterprise performances from financial, customer, internal process and learning and growth perspectives, and offers a good example for evaluation and comparison.
    參考文獻: Banker, R. D., Potter, G., & Srinivasan, D. (2000). An Empirical Investigation of an Incentive Plan that Includes Nonfinancial Performance Measures. The Accounting Review, 75(1), 65-92.
    Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717-736.
    Bushman, R. M., Indjejikian, R. J., & Smith, A. (1996). CEO compensation: The role of individual performance evaluation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 21(2), 161-193.
    Carter, C. R., & Jennings, M. M. (2002). LOGISTICS SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: AN INTEGRATIVE FRAMEWORK. Journal of Business Logistics, 23(1), 145-180.
    Delmas, M., & Toffel, M. W. (2004). Stakeholders and environmental management practices: an institutional framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(4), 209-222.
    Dias-Sardinha, I., Reijnders, L., & Antunes, P. (2002). From environmental performance evaluation to eco-efficiency and sustainability balanced scorecards. Environmental Quality Management, 12(2), 51-64.
    Dornier, P.-P., & Ernst, R. (1997). The Logistics Impact of the Channel Tunnel. Interfaces, 27(3), 39-59.
    Eccles, R. G., & Pyburn, P. J. (1992). Creating a comprehensive system to measure performance. Management Accounting, 74(4), 41--44.
    Feltham, G. A., & Xie, J. (1994). Performance measure congruity and diversity in multi-task principal/agent relations. The Accounting Review, 69(3), 429-453.
    Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2002). The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard – linking sustainability management to business strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(5), 269-284.
    Geffen, C. A., & Rothenberg, S. (2000). Suppliers and environmental innovation: the automotive paint process. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(2), 166-186.
    Hall, J. (2000). Environmental supply chain dynamics. Journal of Cleaner Production, 8(6), 455-471.
    Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. The Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014.
    Hubbard, G. (2009). Measuring organizational performance: beyond the triple bottom line. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(3), 177-191.
    Jenkins, T., & Schaper, H. (2005). ECM Technology: What You Need to Know: Open Text Corporation.
    Johnson, H. T., & Kaplan, R. S. (1987). Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting: Harvard Business School Press.
    Johnson, S. D. (1998). Identification and selection of environmental performance indicators: Application of the balanced scorecard approach. Corporate Environmental Strategy, 5(4), 34-41.
    Kaplan, R. (1996). Linking the balanced scorecard to strategy. California Management Review, 39(1), 53-80.
    Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard - Measures That Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, January-February, 71-79.
    Kolk, A. (2000). The Economics of Environmental Management.
    Lee, C. (1985). Increasing performance appraisal effectiveness: Matching task types, appraisal process, and rater training. Academy of Management Review, 10(2), 322-331.
    Penman, I. (1994). Environmental Concern: Implications for supply chain management. Logistics and Distribution Planning – Strategies for Management, 2nd Edition, edited by J. Cooper, London: Kogan Page Ltd.:65-172.
    Poksinska, B., Jörn Dahlgaard, J., & Eklund, J. A. E. (2003). Implementing ISO 14000 in Sweden: motives, benefits and comparisons with ISO 9000. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20(5), 585-606.
    Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2005a). Covenants with weak swords: ISO 14001 and facilities` environmental performance. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(4), 745-769.
    Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2005b). Green Clubs and Voluntary Governance: ISO 14001 and Firms` Regulatory Compliance. American Journal of Political Science, 49(2), 235-248.
    Preuss, L. (2005). Rhetoric and reality of corporate greening: a view from the supply chain management function. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14(2), 123-139.
    Purba, R. (2002). Greening the supply chain: a new initiative in South East Asia. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(6), 632-655.
    Steger, U. (1996). MANAGERIAL ISSUES IN CLOSING THE LOOP. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5(4), 252-268.
    Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory: SAGE Publications.
    Supply Chain Council. (2004). from http://www.supply-chain.org
    Tan, L. P. (2005). Implementing ISO 14001: is it beneficial for firms in newly industrialized Malaysia? Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(4), 397-404.
    The Association for Operations Management. (2002). from www.apics.org
    Walker, H., Di Sisto, L., & McBain, D. (2008). Drivers and barriers to environmental supply chain management practices: Lessons from the public and private sectors. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 14(1), 69-85.
    Wang, Y. (2004). A Study on Setting up Reverse Logistics System of Enterprise.
    Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: design and methods: Sage Publications.
    Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K.-h. (2007). Green supply chain management: pressures, practices and performance within the Chinese automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(11-12), 1041-1052.

    丁執宇. (2003). 知識經濟時代清潔生產新趨勢－綠色供應鏈管理. 永續發展產業雙月刊(7), 21-32.
    王怡琇. (2012). 綠色供應鏈導入模式之探討：企業流程再造觀點. (碩士), 國立政治大學, 台北市.
    吳佳莉. (2008). ISO14001驗證與企業聲譽及財務績效之關聯性. (碩士), 中國文化大學, 台北市.
    吳淑鶯、陳瑞和、劉欣怡. (2012). ISO 認證與未認證服務業之績效評估比較. 中華管理評論國際學報, 15(2).
    李逸綸. (2009). 某LED廠推動ISO 14001與OHSAS 18001管理系統的成效分析. (碩士), 國立交通大學, 新竹縣.
    林淑馨. (2010). 質性研究：理論與實務.
    施勵行、林琨翔. (2003). 綠色供應鏈中企業的整合策略. 永續產業發展雙月刊, 12, 11-18.
    許高樂. (2002). 企業採行ISO14000環境管理系統之績效分析─電子業之案例研究. (碩士), 淡江大學, 新北市.
    陳玉秋. (2006). 國內通過ISO14001驗證企業之持續改善效益調查與評析. (碩士), 大葉大學, 彰化縣.
    陳冠勳. (2004). 企業採行ISO14000環境管理系統之動機與財務面影響研究. (碩士), 東吳大學, 台北市.
    陳建成、陳建佑. (2009). 綠色供應鏈管理影響因素之初探性研究 中華管理評論國際學報, 12(2), 1-19.
    陳穆臻. (2005). 企業因應綠色供應鏈之對策. 企業因應綠色供應鏈之對策研討會，遠東技術學院，專題演講搞.
    彭景曼. (2007). 台灣企業環保策略之研究. (碩士), 臺灣大學, 台北市.
    程大哲. (2008). 建構永續性平衡計分卡之研究-以台灣半導體產業為例. (碩士), 國立台北科技大學, 台北市.
    黃文怡. (2005). 運用平衡計分卡協助企業環境績效評估與環境策略管理. (碩士), 國立成功大學, 台南市.
    黃柏勳. (2009). 學校環境績效評估指標之建構與實證研究：以平衡計分卡為依據. (博士), 高雄師範大學, 高雄市.
    黃登英. (2005). 整合SCOR模式和六標準差理念提升供應鏈績效衡量之研究. (碩士), 立德管理學院, 台南市.
    劉欣怡. (2007). 以平衡計分卡建構ISO認證企業之績效衡量指標及關係模式. (碩士), 國立勤益科技大學, 台中市.
    盧舜年、鄒坤霖. (2002). 供應鏈管理的第一本書: 商周出版.
    薛華泰. (2002). 台灣企業環保策略與環保績效之相關研究. (碩士), 中原大學, 桃園縣.
    謝文坤. (2006). 以SCOR模式為基礎之供應鏈績效評估與改善-IC設計業為例. (碩士), 清華大學, 新竹市.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    101355020
    103
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101355020
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    502001.pdf1465KbAdobe PDF2754檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋