Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/73300
|
| Title: | 探討家長網路自我效能、風險意識與媒體使用對於監督孩童網路行為的影響
Examining the Effects of Parents’ Internet Self Efficacy, Risk Perception, and Media Usage on Parental Mediation of Children’s Internet。 |
| Authors: | 曾良基
Adrianus, Vittorio |
| Contributors: | 鄭怡卉
曾良基
Vittorio Adrianus |
| Keywords: | 網路自我效能
風險意識
媒體使用
網路行為 |
| Date: | 2014 |
| Issue Date: | 2015-02-03 10:27:10 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 探討家長網路自我效能、風險意識與媒體使用對於監督孩童網路行為的影響
While previous studies on media effects had studied extensively into how parents mediate children’s use of television, the present paper will delve into parent’s mediation of children’s Internet use. Unlike traditional media, parental mediation of children’s Internet use requires Internet – related skills such as blocking websites, or using filters that parents with only basic computer and web skills may not feel comfortable of using them (Turow & Kavanaugh, 2003; Lee, 2013). Therefore, present study derived from Bandura (1977)’s self efficacy theory, to examine Internet self efficacy variable and its effects on parental mediation. It was predicted that parents’ Internet self efficacy would affect how they mediate children’s Internet use. Furthermore, parents’ risk perception and parents’ media usage variables will also be investigated in relation to parental mediation. It was thought increasing media reports on cyber related crime, and parent’s attitudes towards Internet safety were crucial in determining their parental mediation strategies. The present study utilized a survey methodology, which used a sample of parents in Taipei who currently have an elementary school child or children. The results showed that parents’ risk perception towards Internet has a moderate to strong positive correlation with Parental Mediation. Parents’ Internet self efficacy also correlated positively with four different types of parental mediation, albeit with varying degree. The results suggested that what Internet self efficacy might have brought to the parents were not a mere certain technical advantages in parenting, but instead, an overall willingness and motivation to take an active role in mediating children’s Internet. |
| Reference: | Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human
decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.
Psychological review, 84(2), 191.
Bawden, D. (2008). Origins and concepts of digital literacy. Digital literacies: Concepts,
policies and practices, 17-32.
Byron, T. (2008). Safer children in a digital world: the report of the Byron Review: be
safe, be aware, have fun. London: Department for Children, Schools and Families,
and the Department for Culture, Media and Sport.
Cassell, J., & Cramer, M. (2007). High tech or high risk: Moral panics about girls online.
Digital Youth, Innovation, and the Unexpected, 53-75.
Cassidy, W., Brown, K., & Jackson, M. (2012). " Making Kind Cool": Parents`
Suggestions for Preventing Cyber Bullying and Fostering Cyber Kindness.
Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(4), 415-436.
Clark, L. S. (2009). Digital media and the generation gap: Qualitative research on US
teens and their parents. Information, Communication & Society, 12(3), 388-407.
Clark, L. S. (2011). Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory,
1(4), 323-343.
DeHue, F., Bolman, C., & Völlink, T. (2008). Cyberbullying: Youngsters` experiences
and parental perception. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(2), 217-223.
Eastin, M. S., & LaRose, R. (2000). Internet self‐efficacy and the psychology of the
digital divide. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 6(1).
Elena, A., Laouris, Y., & Taraszow, T. (2010). Identifying and Ranking Internet Dangers.
2010 Social Applications for Life Long Learning, 68.
Henke, L. L. (1999). Children, advertising, and the Internet: An exploratory study.
Advertising and the World Wide Web, 73-80.
Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2000). What parents know, how they know it, and several forms
of adolescent adjustment: further support for a reinterpretation of monitoring.
Developmental Psychology, 36(3), 366.
Lee, S. J. (2013). Parental restrictive mediation of children’s Internet use: Effective for
what and for whom?. New Media & Society, 15(4), 466-481.
Liau, A. K., Khoo, A., & Ang, P. H. (2008). Parental awareness and monitoring of
adolescent Internet use. Current Psychology, 27(4), 217-233.
Lin, C. W. (2007). E-Learning Strategies for Aboriginal Children in Taiwan.
International Journal of Learning, 14(6).
Livingstone, S., Bober, M., & Helsper, E. (2005). Internet literacy among children and
young people: Findings from the UK Children Go Online Project.
Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2008). Parental mediation of children`s Internet use.
Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581-599.
Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2010). Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers’ use
of the Internet: The role of online skills and Internet self efficacy. New Media &
Society, 12(2), 309-329.
Lou, S. J., Shih, R. C., Liu, H. T., Guo, Y. C., & Tseng, K. H. (2010). The influences of
the sixth graders’ parents’ Internet literacy and parenting style. Turkish Online
Journal of Educational Technology, 9(4).
Lwin, M. O., Stanaland, A. J., & Miyazaki, A. D. (2008). Protecting children`s privacy
online: How parental mediation strategies affect website safeguard effectiveness.
Journal of Retailing, 84(2), 205-217.
Masters. J., & Yelland. N .(2010). Changing learning ecologies: Social media for cyber-
citizens. In S. Shariff., & A. Churchill. (Eds.), Truths and Myths of Cyber-Bullying: International Perspectives on Stakeholder Responsibility and Children`s Safety (pp.229-248) . New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
Munro, M. C., Huff, S. L., Marcolin, B. L., & Compeau, D. R. (1997). Understanding
and measuring user competence. Information & Management, 33(1), 45-57.
Nathanson, A. I. (1999). Identifying and explaining the relationship between parental
mediation and children`s aggression. Communication Research, 26(2), 124-143.
Nathanson, A. I. (2001). Parent and child perspectives on the presence and meaning of
parental television mediation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45(2),
201-220.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
Rideout, V. (2007). Parents, Children & Media: A Kaiser Family Foundation Survey.
Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
Savolainen, R. (2002). Network competence and information seeking on the Internet:
From definitions towards a social cognitive model. Journal of documentation,
58(2), 211-226.
Shariff, S., & Churchill, A. (2010). Appreciating complexity: detangling the web of
stakeholder influence and responsibility. In S. Shariff., & A. Churchill. (Eds.), Truths and Myths of Cyber-Bullying: International Perspectives on Stakeholder Responsibility and Children`s Safety (pp.1 – 23) . New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
Shariff, S., & Churchill, A. (Eds.). (2010). Truths and Myths of Cyber-Bullying:
International Perspectives on Stakeholder Responsibility and Children`s Safety.
New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
Stald, G. (2003). Outlook and insight: Young Danes` uses of the Internet, navigating
global seas and local waters. The Wired Homestead, 227-260.
Staksrud, E., & Livingstone, S. (2009). Children and online risk: Powerless victims or
resourceful participants?. Information, Communication & Society, 12(3), 364-387.
Turow, J., & Kavanaugh, A. L. (Eds.). (2003). The Wired Homestead: An MIT Press
Sourcebook on the Internet and the Family. MIT Press.
Valcke, M., Bonte, S., De Wever, B., & Rots, I. (2010). Internet parenting styles and the
impact on Internet use of primary school children. Computers & Education, 55(2),
454-464.
Valcke, M., De Wever, B., Van Keer, H., & Schellens, T. (2011). Long-term study of
safe Internet use of young children. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1292-1305.
Walrave. M., & Heirman. W. (2010). Appreciating Complexity: Detangling the Web of
Stakeholder Influence and Responsibility. In S. Shariff., & A. Churchill. (Eds.), Truths and Myths of Cyber-Bullying: International Perspectives on Stakeholder Responsibility and Children`s Safety (pp.27-47) . New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
Warren, R., & Bluma, A. (2002). Parental mediation of children`s Internet use: The
influence of established media. Communication Research Reports, 19(1), 8-17.
Wolak, J., Finkelhor, D., Mitchell, K. J., & Ybarra, M. L. (2010). Online “predators” and
their victims. Psychology of Violence, 1, 13-35.
Zinga, D. (2010). Boundaries in Cyber-space. In S.Shariff., & A. Churchill (Ed.), Truths
and Myths of Cyber-Bullying: International Perspectives on Stakeholder Responsibility and Children`s Safety (pp.105-127) . New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
國際傳播英語碩士學位學程(IMICS)
101461016
103 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1014610163 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [國際傳播英語碩士學程] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 016301.pdf | 359Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 520 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
