政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/73244
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113325/144300 (79%)
Visitors : 51155553      Online Users : 916
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/73244


    Title: 散戶投資者行為偏誤之研究 － 以非信息事件為例
    The Reactions of Individual Investors toward Non-Informative Events
    Authors: 吳珍如
    Wu, Chen Ju
    Contributors: 林靖庭
    陳威光
    吳珍如
    Wu, Chen Ju
    Keywords: 行為財務學
    羊群效應
    Date: 2014
    Issue Date: 2015-02-03 10:19:05 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 　　由於有越來越多金融市場上的異常現象浮現，故本文目的在於探究效率學派對於金融市場之理性假設是否完美。本文利用最小交易量股票佔市場之比例來代表散戶投資者佔市場上之比例，並藉由檢視散戶投資者佔市場之比例與台股加權指數跨越千點事件之間的關係，來觀察台灣股市中散戶投資者的交易行為是否理性反應。由於「台股加權指數跨越千點事件」為一種不含實質信息但卻能吸引投資者注意力的事件，故若散戶投資者顯著對該類事件產生反應，則動搖效率市場假設的可能存在。而本文發現了三個現象：首先，平均而言，散戶投資者會對台股加權指數跨越千點事件產生顯著反應，而這顯示散戶投資者的交易行為存在不理性的現象。第二，散戶投資者彼此間的交易行為會不理性地相互影響且產生羊群效應，顯示其交易行為並非隨機無相關地分佈。最後，從當天短期角度或以一星期相對長期角度檢視，發現散戶投資者平均承受負報酬。
    Due to the discovering of market anomalies, this paper is aimed to test the validity of the Efficient Market Hypothesis. I use the percentage of the smallest trade size in shares as the proxy for the percentage of appearance of individual investors. I examine the relationship between individual investors’ trading behaviors and the crossings of multiples of 1,000s of TAIEX index. The crossings of multiples of 1,000s of TAIEX index are non-informative events but can actually grab people’s attention and affect investors’ behaviors. Thus, if the behaviors of individual investors are significantly affected by the non-informative events, the possibility of the misassumption of the EMH exists. The results show that 1) individual investors react to the crossings of multiples of 1,000 of TAIEX index; 2) their trading strategies are irrational in similar ways, which causes the phenomenon of the herding effect; and 3) individual investors perform poorly from either short-term or long-term perspective.
    Reference: Barber, B.M., Y. Lee, Y. Liu, and T. Odean, 2009, Just How Much Do Individual Investors Lose by Trading?, Review of Financial Studies, 22, 609-632.

    Barber, Brad M., and Terrance Odean, 2006, All That Glitters: The Effect of Attention on the Buying Behavior of Individual and Institutional Investors, forthcoming Review of Financial Studies.

    Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., and Welch, I., 1992, A Theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades, Journal of Political Economy, 100, 992-1026.

    Black, F., 1986, Noise, Journal of Finance, 41, 529-543.

    Campbell, J. Y., and Kyle, A. S., 1993, Smart Money, Noise Trading and Stock Price Behaviour, Review of Economic Studies, 60, 1-34.

    Chang, E. C., Cheng, J. W. and Khorana, A., 2000, An Examination of Herd Behavior in Equity Markets: An International Perspective, Journal of Banking and Finance, 24, 1651-1679.

    De Long, J. B., Shleifer, A., Summers, L., and Waldmann, R., 1990a, Noise Trader Risk in Financial Markets, Journal of Political Economy, 98, 703-38.

    DellaVigna, S., and Pollet, J., 2006, Investor Inattention and Friday Earnings Announcements, working paper, UC Berkeley and University of Illinois.

    Demirer, R., and Kutan, A., 2006, Does Herding Behavior Exist in Chinese Stock Markets?, Journal of International Financial Markets, institutions and money, 16, 123-142.

    Fama, E., 1965, The Behavior of Stock Market Prices, Journal of Business, 38, 34-106.

    Fama, E., 1965, Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work, Journal of Finance, 25, 383-417.

    Friedman, M., 1953, The Case for Flexible Exchange Rates, in Essays in Positive Economics.

    Grenadier, S. R., 1999, Information Revelation through Option Exercise, Review of Financial Studies, 12, 95-129.

    Griffin, John M., Jeffrey H. Harris, and Selim Topaloglu, 2003, The Dynamics of Institutional and Individual Trading, Journal of Finance, 58, 2285-2320

    Grinblatt, M., and Keloharju, M., 2001, What Makes Investors Trade?, Journal of Finance, 56, 589-616.

    Huang, L., and Liu, H., 2007, Rational Inattention and Portfolio Selection, Journal of Finance, 62, 1999-2040.

    Jensen, M., 1978, Some Anomalous Evidence Regarding Market Efficiency, Journal of Financial Economics, 6, 95-101.

    Kahneman, D., and Riepe, M., 1998, Aspects of Investor Psychology, Journal of Portfolio Management, 24, 52-65.

    Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A., 1973, On the Psychology of Prediction, Psychological Review, 80, 237-51.

    Kaniel, Ron, Gideon Saar, and Sheridan Titman, 2008, Individual Investor Trading and Stock Returns, Journal of Finance, 63, 273-310.

    Kyle, A., 1985, Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading, Econometrica, 47, 1315-36.

    Lakonishok, J., Shleifer, A., Thaler, R., and Vishny, R., 1991, Window Dressing by Pension Fund Managers, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 81, 227-31.

    Lao P., Singh H., 2011, Herding Behavior in the Chinese and Indian Stock Markets, Journal of Asian Economics, 22(6), 495-528.

    Leibenstein, H., 1950, Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers` Demand, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64, 183-207.

    Lin, Ching Ting., 2008, Do Individual Investors React to Non-informative Events?, University of Delaware.

    Lilian Ng and Fei Wu, 2005, The Trading Behavior of Institutions in Chinese Equity Markets, working paper, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and University of Massey, New Zealand.

    Peng, L., and Xiong, Wei., 2006, Investor Attention, Overconfidence and Category Learning, Journal of Financial Economics, 80, 563-602.

    Scharfstein, S., and Stein, C., 1990, Herd Behavior and Investment, American Economic Review, 80(3), 465-79.

    Seasholes, M., S., and Wu, G., 2007, Predictable Behavior, Profits, and Attention, Journal of Empirical Finance, 14, 590-610.

    Shiller, R., 1984, Stock Prices and Social Dynamics, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 457-98.

    Shleifer, A., 2000, Inefficient Markets- An Introduction to Behavioral Finance, Oxford University Press.

    Yuan, Y., 2007, Attention and Trading, working paper, University of Pennsylvania.

    Zhou, R.T., and Lai, R.N., 2009, Herding and Information Based Trading, Journal of Empirical Finance, 16, 388-393.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    金融研究所
    101352027
    103
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101352027
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Money and Banking] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2263View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback