政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/73234

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/73234

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113321/144300 (79%)
Visitors : 51110937 Online Users : 940

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Commerce > Department of Accounting > Theses > Item 140.119/73234

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/73234

Title:	內部控制有效性與投資效率之關聯性研究-以中國上市公司為例 The Association between Internal Control Efficiency and Investment Effectiveness-- Evidence from China Listed Firms
Authors:	許琬琪 Hsu, Wan Chi
Contributors:	林宛瑩許琬琪 Hsu, Wan Chi
Keywords:	內部控制有效性內部控制缺失投資效率過度投資投資不足 internal control efficiency internal control weakness investment effectiveness under investment over investment
Date:	2014
Issue Date:	2015-02-03 10:17:18 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本研究以2007年至2011年中國滬深交易所A股上市公司為研究樣本，以中國證監會公佈之行政裁罰、深滬兩交易所對上市公司之處分、及企業自行揭露的內部控制評價報告之內容分析企業發生內控缺失之類型，依照中國《企業內部控制基本規範》，將內部控制缺失依內控五大要素與五大目標予以分類彙總。並將企業的投資效率分為投資不足與過度投資，分別探討內部控制有效性對公司投資效率之影響。實證結果顯示投資不足的程度與可靠的財務報導之內控目標的內控缺失存在正向的顯著關係。而過度投資的程度與是否發生內控缺失、後勤支援活動和內控設計及執行的內控缺失類型、內控五大要素、及營運的效率效果之內控目標的內控缺失呈現顯著或單尾顯著的負向關係。整體而言，在被監管單位揭發內控缺失資訊，內控有效性較低，而自我揭露愈多內控資訊，企業內控意識可能較佳之假設下，內控缺失一定程度影響企業的投資決策，內控的有效性有助於投資效率。 Based on the sample of A-share listed companies in China over the period of 2007-2011, the research classified the companies by under investment and over investment, and investigated the impact of internal control efficiency on firm investment effectiveness separately The study comprehensively collects internal control reports released by listed firms and collects penalties which are released by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC), the Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE) and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE). A further classification of internal control weaknesses was performed based on the nature of the events, COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework and regulations of internal control in China. 　　In sum, the empirical results indicate that, for the companies under investment, the internal control weaknesses of financial reporting have significant positive impact on firm investment effectiveness. On the other hand for the companies which were over investment, those with internal control weaknesses have significant negative association with investment effectiveness. Moreover, the results show that companies with defective of logistics work or the design and execution of internal control were worse performers on investment effectiveness. Based on the COSO framework, the internal control weaknesses classified by the elements, including control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, monitoring, and the efficient and effective operations of the internal control objective are significant or one-tailed significant negative correlated to firm investment effectiveness. Collectively, if the internal control weaknesses were disclosed by the authorities, the firms had worse internal control efficiency, while the firms which were more conscious of internal control would disclose the internal control weaknesses themselves. The study shows that internal control weaknesses have impact on firm investment policy, and that internal control efficiency helps promote firm investment effectiveness.
Reference:	方紅星、施繼坤，2011，自願性內部控制鑒證與權益資本成本—來自滬市A股非金融類上市公司的經驗證據，經濟管理，2011年第12期，頁128-134。王彥超，2009，融資約束、現金持有與過度投資，金融研究，2009年07期，頁121-133。田高良、齊保壘、李留闖，2010，基於財務報告的內部控制缺失揭露影響因素研究，南開管理評論，2010年第4期，頁134-141。伍利娜、陸正飛，2005，企業投資行為與融資結構的關係—基於一項實驗研究的發現，管理世界，2005年第4期，頁99-105。李雲鶴、李湛，2012，管理者代理行為、公司過度投資與公司治理—基於企業生命週期視角的實證研究，管理評論，2012年第7期，頁117-131。李青原，2009，會計資訊質量、審計監督與公司投資效率——來自我國上市公司的經驗證據，審計研究，2009年第4期，頁65-73。李萬福、林斌、楊德明和孫燁，2010，內控資訊披露、企業過度投資與財務危機－來自中國上市公司的經驗證據，中國會計與財務研究，2012年第4期。李萬福、林斌、宋璐，2011，內部控制在公司投資中的角色:效率促進還是抑制?，管理世界，2011年第2期，頁81-99。李鑫，2007，股利政策、自由現金流與企業過度投資—基於中國上市公司的實證研究，經濟與管理研究，2007年第10期，頁35-40。李鑫，2008，股權結構、自由現金流與企業過度投資—基於中國上市公司的實證研究，新疆社會科學，2008年第1期，頁28-33。辛清泉、林斌、王彥超，2007，政府控制、經理薪酬與資本投資，經濟研究，2007年第8期，頁110-122。辛清泉、鄭國堅、楊德明，2007，企業集團、政府控制與投資效率，金融研究，2007年第10期，頁123-142。林斌、孫燁、劉瑾，2012，內部控制、資訊環境與資本成本—來自中國上市公司的經驗證據，證券市場導報，2012年第11期，頁26-31。林斌、劉春麗、舒偉、魏廣剡，2012，中國上市公司內部控制缺失揭露研究—數據分析與政策建議，會計之友，2012年第25期，頁9-16。姜付秀、張敏、陸正飛、陸才東，2009b，管理者過度自信、企業擴張與財務困境，經濟研究，2009年第 1期，頁131-143。唐雪松、周曉蘇、馬如靜，2007，上市公司過度投資行為及其制約機制的實證研究，會計研究，2007年第7期，頁44-52。財政部、證監會、審計署、銀監會、保監會，2008，企業內部控制基本規範。財政部、證監會、審計署、銀監會、保監會，2010，企業內部控制評價指引。財政部、證監會、審計署、銀監會、保監會，2010，企業內部控制審計指引。財政部、證監會、審計署、銀監會、保監會，2010，企業內部控制應用指引。馬秀如，1998，內部控制—整體架構，財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會。張純、呂偉，2009，信息環境、融資約束與現金股利，金融研究，2009年第7期，頁81-94。張敏、朱小平，2010，中國上市公司內部控制問題與審計定價關係研究—來自中國A股上市公司的橫截面數據，經濟管理，2010年第9期，頁108-113。彭程、劉星，2007，委託代理下公司非效率投資行為研究，生產力研究，2007年第15期，頁39-40。程仲鳴，2010，終極控制人的控制權、現金流權與企業投資—基於中國上市公司的經驗證據，經濟與管理研究，2010年第8期，頁51-60。程曉陵、王懷明，2008，公司治理結構對內部控制有效性的影響，審計研究，2008年第4期，頁53-61。童盼、陸正飛，2005，負債融資、負債來源與企業投資行為—來自中國上市公司的經驗證據，經濟研究，2005年第5期，頁75-84。董卉娜、陳崢嶸、朱志雄，2012，上市公司內部控制缺失揭露現狀研究—基於2009-2010年深市主機板A股的實證分析，證券市場導報，2012年第8期，頁72-77。齊保壘、田高良、李留闖，2010，上市公司內部控制缺失與財務報告資訊質量，管理科學，2010年第4期，頁38-47。劉懷珍、歐陽令南，2004，經理私人利益與過度投資，系統工程理論與實踐，2004年第10期，頁44-48。德勤企業風險管理服務，2010中國上市公司內部控制調查分析報告，中國德勤會計師事務所企業風險，2010年第1期，頁7-14。潘立生、張清政，2010，股權結構、機構投資者與企業過度投資行為研究，中國市場，2010年31期，頁101-103。蔡吉甫，2005，我國上市公司內部控制資訊揭露的實證研究，審計與經濟研究，2005年第2期，頁85-88。韓麗榮，盛金，2013，自願性揭露時期內部控制缺失影響因素的實證分析—以我國製造業A股上市公司樣本為例，吉林大學社會科學學報，第1期，頁132-140。魏明海、柳建華，2007，國企分紅、治理因素與過度投資，管理世界，2007年第4期，頁88-95。 Alexander, J. 2001. Privatization and corporate governance: Principles, evidenee, and future Challenges. The World Bank Researeh observer 16 (1): 59-84. Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., D. Collins, and W. Kinney. 2007. The discovery and reporting of internal control deficiencies prior to SOX-mandated audits. Journal of Accounting and Economics 44 (1-2): 166-192. Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., D. Collins, W. Kinney, and R. LaFond. 2009. The effect of SOX internal control deficiencies on firm risk and cost of equity. Journal of Accounting Research 47 (1): 1-43. Baker, M. 2000. Career concerns and staged investment: Evidence from the venture capital industry. Working paper. Harvard University. Beneish, M., M. Billings, and L. Hodder. 2008. Internal control weaknesses and information uncertainty. The Accounting Review 83 (3): 665-703. Biddle, G., and G. Hilary. 2006. Accounting quality and firm-level capital investment. The Accounting Review. 81 (6): 963-982. Biddle, G., G. Hilary, and R. S. Verdi. 2009. How does financial reporting quality relate to investment efficiency?. Journal of Accounting and Economics 48 (2-3): 112-131. Bronson, S. N., J. V. Carcello, and K. Raghunandan. 2006. Firm characteristics and voluntary management reports on internal control auditing. A Journal of Practice and Theory 25 (2): 25-39. Doyle, J., W. Ge, and S. McVay. 2007a. Determinants of weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 44 (1-2): 193-223. Doyle, J., W. Ge, and S. McVay. 2007b. Accruals quality and internal control over financial reporting. The Accounting Review 82 (5): 1141-1170. Easterbrook, F. Two agency-cost explanations of dividends. The American Economic Review 74(4): 650-659. Ge, W., and S. McVay. 2005. The disclosure of material weakness in internal control after the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Accounting Horizons 19 (3): 137-158. Goergen, M., and L. Renneboog. 2001. Investment policy: Internal financing and ownership concentration in U.K. Journal of Corporate Finance 7 (9): 1-30 Goh, B. W., and D. Li. 2008. Internal controls and conditional conservatism. The Accounting Review 86 (3): 975-1005. Hammersley, J., L. Myers, and C. Shakespeare. 2008. Market reactions to the disclosure of internal control weakness and to the characteristics of those weaknesses under Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. Review of Accounting Studies 13 (1): 141-165. Hoitash, U., R. Hoitash, and J. Bedard. 2009. Corporate governance and internal control over financial reporting: a comparison of regulatory regimes. The Accounting Review 84 (3): 839-867. Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4): 305-360. Jensen, M. C. 1986. Agency cost of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. American Economic Review 76(2): 323-329. Krishnan, J. 2005. Audit committee quality and internal control: An empirical analysis. The Accounting Review 80 (2): 649-675. Lang, L. H., and R. H. Litzenbetgen.1989. Dividend announcements: Cash flow signalling vs. free cash flow hypothesis. Journal of Financial Economics 24 (1): 181-191. Li, C., L. Sun, and M. Ettredge. 2010. Financial executive quality, financial executive turnover, and adverse SOX 404 opinions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 50 (1): 93-110. Mei, F., C. Li, and S. McVay. 2009. Internal control and management guidance. Journal of Accounting and Economics 48 (2-3): 190-209. Modigliani, F., and M.Miller. 1958. The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review 48 (6): 261-297. Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 1988. Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 20 (8): 293-315. Narayanan, M. P. 1985. Managerial incentives for short-term results. Journal of Finance 40 (5): 1469-1484. Narayanan, M. P. 1988. Debt versus equity under asymmetric information. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 23(1): 39-51. Pindado, J., and C. Torre. 2002. The effect of ownership structure on underinvestment and overinvestment processes. Working paper. Universidad de Salamanca. Pindado, J., and C. Torre. 2004. Effect of ownership structure on underinvestment and overinvestment: empirical evidence from Spain proeess. Accounting and Finance 49 (2): 363-38. Rice, S., and D. Weber. 2012. How effective is internal control reporting under SOX 404? Determinants of the (non-)disclosure of existing material weaknesses. Journal of Accounting Research 50 (3): 811-843. Richardson, S. 2006. Over-investment of free cash flow. Review of Accounting Studies 11 (2): 159-189. Rozeff, M. S. 1982. Growth, beta and agency costs as determinants of dividend payout ratios. The Journal of Financial Research 5 (3): 249-259. Xu, L., and A. Tang. 2008. Institutional ownership, internal control material weakness and firm performance. Working paper, Morgan State University. Zhang, Y., J. Zhou, and N. Zhou. 2007. Audit committee quality, auditor independence, and internal control weaknesses. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 26(3): 300-327.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學會計研究所 100353050 103
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1003530501
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Accounting] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
050101.pdf	1952Kb	Adobe PDF2	97	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback