English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51580887      Online Users : 934
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/7322


    Title: 老人非正式和正式照顧體系關係之初探:從家人和日託中心工作員協助項目的比較分析出發
    Authors: 呂寶靜
    Keywords: 非正式和正式照顧;老人和社會照顧;日間照護服務;暫代照顧服務(歇息服務)
    Informal and Formal Care;Aging and Social Care;Day Care Services;Respite Care
    Date: 1998-06
    Issue Date: 2008-11-13 14:08:39 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文試圖從家人和日託中心工作員對老人提供協助項目的比較分析,來檢證有關老人非正式和正式關係之三種理論模式:層級補償模式(hierarchical compensatory model)、職務取向模式(task specific model)、及補充模式(supplemental)。資料的蒐集方式為面訪問卷調查,計訪問了六所日託中心的92名老人使用者。 研究發現可歸納為下列四項結論:(一)使用日託服務的老人仍從家人獲得許多協助,這也意味著日託中心工作員不能完全替代家人,故「正式服務會取代家庭照顧」是一種迷思,此一發現駁斥了層級補償模式所主張的”各要素之相互替代性“。(二)非正式照顧體系(家人)的照顧和正式體系(老人日託中心工作員)的協助項目不是「全然分工」,也不是「完全重複」,而是「部分重複相同、部分分工不同」,故較符合補充模式的理論。此一發現可能因本研究的正式服務係以日間照護服務方案為例,而日間照護方案的目的原就具有補充家庭照顧的意含。(三)當老人可從家人和工作員獲得相同項目的協助之同時,老人接受家人的協助感到較自在,此一發現證實家人仍是老人支持要素中的優勢偏好。(四)家人和日託中心工作員提供相異的工作項目之比較分析顯示:家人提供的協助項目是非技術性的,且這些協助要求地理上的鄰近性及長期的時間投入;反之,日託中心工作員所提供的服務是可預測的、例行化的、需要技術性知識,此一結果也部份支持職務分工模式的主張。本文最後並針對研究發現提出老人福利政策和未來研究方向的建議。
    The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between informal and formal care systems for the elderly. An interview survey of 92 day care users was conducted to collect data. The conclusions can be drawn from the findings: First of all, although elderly people use day care service, they still receive lots of assistance from family members. That is, day care workers can not completely substitute family caregivers, and therefore the assumption that formal services will substitute family care is merely a myth. Secondly, the tasks provided by day care workers are not completely different from the assistance given by family caregivers, neither are they totally the same. In other words, the finding suggests that the relationship between informal and formal care is supplemental. In addition, the comparison of different tasks indicated that family members tend to give help which require only everyday knowledge and face-to-face proximity, while day care workers are more inclined to provide predictable tasks which require technical knowledge. Thirdly, when elderly people can receive the assistance both from day care workers and family caregivers, they feel more comfortable with family assistance. The finding, to some degree, support the hypothesis that family is the most preferred. Finally, policy implications and future research directions are discussed.
    Relation: 社會政策與社會工作學刊, 2(1), 3-38
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[社會工作研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2950View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback