政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/72623
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51055526      線上人數 : 811
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/72623


    題名: 「誰的公平?誰的正義?」從土地增值稅爭議談公平與權力之關係
    作者: 關秉寅
    貢獻者: 社會系
    關鍵詞: 土地增值稅;公平;權力
    日期: 1994
    上傳時間: 2015-01-05 15:26:41 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 從社會學的角度來看，一般人在分配東西時所用之公平規範至少有六大類。這些 規範之公平性及適用性是受分配目標，社會階級，社會發展及文化等多種因素的影響。因土 地使用的目標是多元的，故現行土地增值稅制即包含了多種分配公平的規範。目前稅制改革 引起爭議原因之一，即為各社要如何改變這些公平規範所維持的複雜均衡點有不同 的意見。此外，現行土地增值稅制與平均地權，漲價歸公的道德目標有差距存在。土地價格 狂飆突顯這個差距，而造成道德秩序上的危機感也是引起爭議的原因。 爭議過程中，各社不僅代表不同之利益，也顯示出各社權力與公平間的關係有不同看法。由於公平的規範及意義是多重的，因此在判斷什麼是公平時，須 問是誰定義公平及定義之程序為何。本文的假設是當受公平定義影響者有平等權力參與定義 ，並依哈伯瑪斯之理想說話情境定義時，則權力與公平是相輔相成的。離此假設狀態愈遠， 則權力與公平會呈現對立，乃至於主從之關係而使公平成為一種意識型態。
    In general people use six general distributive rules to allocate various things. Factors such as the goals of distribution, social calsses, levels of societal development, and culture would influence the fairness and relevance of these rules. Since the goals of land utilization are manifold, the current land value increment tax system is based on many distributive rules. One of the reasons why the proposed reform of this tax system aroused such a bitter controversy is that various social groups have different ideas as to how the government should maintain the complex balance of distributive rules implied in the tax system. Another cause of controversy is that the rapid rise of land value in the last few years accentuates the discrepancy between the present land value increment tax system and its intended moral objects of "the equalization of land ownership and the public appropriation of all increases in land value," which in turn creates a sense of moral crisis. During the period of controversy, various social groups had advocated different claims of fairness which represented not only different interests but also different views about the relationship between the govenmental power and fairness. Because of the plurality of norms and meanings of fairness, it is important to ask who define what is fair and how this definition is achieved. The key argument of this essay is that power and fairness would be in harmony if those affected by the definition of what is fair have equal right to participate the defining process and the defining process is concordant with Habermas`s "ideal speech situation." The further the defining process is away from the ideal situation, the more possible that the claims of fairness would be advocated to against those with power. The opposite of the ideal situation is that power turns the claims of fairness into ideology.
    關聯: 人文及社會科學集刊, 6(2), 99-133.
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[社會學系] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML21205檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋