English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51001393      Online Users : 915
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/72189


    Title: 社會學中功能分析的目的論與循環論證問題
    Other Titles: The Problem of Teleology and Tautology of Functional Analysis in Sociology
    Authors: 黃厚銘
    Contributors: 社會系
    Keywords: 功能分析;因果解釋;循環論證;目的論;結構;系統
    Functional analysis;Causal explanation;Teleology;Teology;Structure;System
    Date: 2010-12
    Issue Date: 2014-12-22 16:39:07 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文著眼於功能分析做為一種研究的邏輯形式,就其與因果解釋結合所產生的疑難,來整理社會學中的功能分析在發展過程中所遭遇的困境。同時,也從這個癥結點來掌握此一理論傳統的發展軸線,並檢討各理論家的貢獻與限制。簡言之,不正當目的論問題與循環論證的合理化現狀後果是長期困擾功能分析傳統的核心問題意識,但也如孔恩所謂的典範做為解謎遊戲一般,為了解決不正當目的論與循環論證的問題而檢討功能分析中的有機類比、系統構想、以及對功能概念的不斷重構是功能分析典範內部之重要發展軸線。這是此一傳統中的有志之士理論創造的思想源頭,也因此構成了此一傳統的活力來源,然而,由於這個典範預設了有機類比或是社會的系統性,所以也受限於這樣的觀點,而在無形中帶進了許多相關的設定,以致難以跳脫前述預設所加諸於這個理論傳統的限制。
    This paper contends that solving the problems of tautology and illegal teleology is essential for the development of functional analysis in sociology. That is, similar to conditions described by Kuhn旧 paradigm concept, generations of theorists in the tradition of functional analysis have attempted to reconstruct the concepts of function, system, etc., and to elaborate the relationships between functional analysis and causal explanation, or between functional analysis and organic analogy, in order to deal with the problems mentioned above. These efforts are the driving force behind the development of functional analysis, and the source of creativity of so many excellent scholars in this theoretical tradition. However, their endeavors were hindered by their conceptual presuppositions such as system, structure etc.
    Relation: 台灣社會研究季刊, 80, 237-286
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[社會學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2953View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback