English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113325/144300 (79%)
Visitors : 51172994      Online Users : 833
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/71808


    Title: 台灣於環境保護vs自由貿易之國際辯論中的定位
    Other Titles: The Status of Taiwan in the International Debate of Free Trade v.s. Environmental Protection
    Authors: 施文真
    Shi,Wen-chen
    Contributors: 國貿系
    Keywords: 國際環境公約;世界貿易組織;環境保護與自由貿易;臺灣
    multilateral environmental agreements;World Trade Organisation;environmental protection and free trade;Taiwan
    Date: 2002-01
    Issue Date: 2014-12-04 14:39:01 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在八○年代中期之後，各個國際環境公約爲了吸引更多的國家成爲締約國，並協助締約國履行公約的義務，開始設計不同的機制，例如與環境保護有關的貿易管制措施，以及就公約所管制的事項限制與非締約國之間的貿易。針對這些以環保爲目的的貿易手段與世貿組織所規範的義務是否相容，環保人士與自由貿易人士在國際間展開了激烈的辯論。臺灣即將成爲世貿組織的會員國，但另一方面，由於其特殊的國際地位，臺灣並無法成爲大多數的國際環境公約之締約國。因此，在一些以限制與非締約國之間的貿易爲誘因來吸引國家簽約的國際環境公約之下，臺灣的處境額外的不利。當臺灣加入世界貿易組織之後，是否會針對該些環境公約所規定的環保相關貿易措施，向爭端解決小組提起控訴？本文即嘗試者探討臺灣在環保與貿易的辯論之中應如何自我定位的問題。
    Since the mid 1980s, multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs) began to design novel mechanisms such as trade-related environmental measures (TREMs) and trade restriction against non-Parties in order to attract wider membership as well as assisting the implementation of treaty obligations. Keen debate arose as a result between environmentalists and free traders with regard to the compatibility of these TREMs with obligations under the World Trade Organisation (WTO). Taiwan becomes a Member of the WTO in 2002, whilst it is not a Party to any major MEA due to its status under international law. The circumstances put Taiwan in a very difficult position vis-à-vis those MEAs adopting trade restriction against non-Party as a means to attract wider membership. Will Taiwan bring complaints to the Dispute Settlement Body of the WTO when confronted with TREMs authorized by MEAs? This article seeks to find out the position the government might adopt in the international debate of free trade versus environmental protection.
    Relation: 臺大法學論叢,31(1),45-74
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[國際經營與貿易學系 ] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    45-74.pdf3586KbAdobe PDF2735View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback