政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/71765

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/71765

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文笔数/总笔数 : 113303/144284 (79%)
造访人次 : 50824870 在线人数 : 389

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜寻范围

查询小技巧：

您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果

若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据

进阶搜寻

主页 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上传 ‧ 说明 ‧ 关于政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手机版

政大機構典藏 > 外國語文學院 > 英國語文學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/71765

请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/71765

题名:	中產階級女性的社會奉獻：三位英國小說家的美學研究 The Middle-Class Women’s Social Commitment: An Aesthetic Study of Dickens, Eliot, and Gaskell
作者:	呂虹瑾 Lu, Hong Jin
贡献者:	陳超明 Chen, Chao Ming 呂虹瑾 Lu, Hong Jin
关键词:	美奉獻審美判斷同情情感維多利亞小說社會奉獻 beauty devotion aesthetic judgment sympathy sentiments Victorian novels social commitment
日期:	2014
上传时间:	2014-12-01 14:28:52 (UTC+8)
摘要:	本論文以康德和經驗主義美學切入討論維多利亞文學中女性的家庭和社會奉獻，論證女性家庭奉獻的美感並非單純呼應家內天使的形象，而是作者藉此美感，提供女性一符合性別期待的社會奉獻管道。十九世紀的家內天使意識型態，歌頌中產階級女性角色為男性的幫手，其家庭奉獻象徵秩序與道德，讚揚女性的道德美感。此兩性空間的意識型態視女性的主要活動範圍為家庭，看似縮減其參與社會奉獻的相關性，但作家實以女性家庭奉獻的美感為敘事手法，傳達慈善始於家庭的想法，傳達女性情感與落實社會奉獻。本論文檢視三本1850至1870期間的英國小說：喬爾斯‧狄更斯（Charles Dickens）、喬治‧愛略特（George Eliot）、伊利莎白‧蓋斯凱爾（Elizabeth Gaskell）的小說皆以女性奉獻為主，但各展現不同的美感與社會奉獻的關係，融合社會對家庭奉獻的傳統要求和實踐女性自我主體性。論文第一章介紹美的概念演變、維多利亞時期的女性奉獻美感、以及本論文的章節架構。第二章探索美感與道德的同異性。從康德美學的觀點，探討維多利亞的家內天使形象和狄更斯《荒涼山莊》女主角的家庭奉獻，論證美雖不等同於道德，但卻是道德的象徵。第三章分析女性的愉悅美感是源於奉獻行為。愛略特《米德爾小鎮》的女主角，融合利己情感和利他奉獻，以道德和愉悅感為奉獻的基礎，彰顯女性奉獻與道德愉悅感的關係。第四章檢視女性的同情美感和社會改革。蓋斯凱爾《北方與南方》女主角的同情美感，塑造出獨立能幹的形象，致力於家庭奉獻和排解階級糾紛，並促使男性角色改善階級衝突。結論章節論述，維多利亞小說中的家內天使形象和女性奉獻所產生的美感，隱藏複雜多樣的奉獻和主體關係，雖然女性以家庭奉獻的美感為出發點，實為進行社會奉獻，蘊含豐富的改革和情感動力，挑戰傳統家內天使形象的寓意。 This study uses Kantian and Empiricism aesthetics to explore women’s devotion and effect to home and society in Victorian literature. The beauty of heroines’ devotion to home does not simply convey the conventional image of an angel in the house but offers women a socially acceptable access to social commitment in the Victorian novels written by Charles Dickens, George Eliot, and Elizabeth Gaskell. The ideology of an angel in the house regards middle-class women as helpmates. Women obtain the sense of beauty via their domestic devotion, which symbolizes order and morality. This female image not only reinforces the ideology of separate spheres but also cooperates with women’s participation in social commitment. Female devotion is used to reinforce the notion that charity begins at home and express women’s feeling and pursuit of social commitment. This study examines three Victorian novels between 1850 and 1870. The novels of Dickens, Eliot, and Gaskell accentuate female domesticity and present different aspects of female beauty in women’s participation in domestic devotion relevant to their social commitment of improving the world. They reconcile the society’s demands of women’s domestic devotion with personal pursuits for female subjectivity. In the first chapter, the study defines beauty, particularly of devotion in the Victorian time. It also shows the structure of the work through describing how other chapters are organized. The second chapter examines the affinity of beauty and morality in women’s devotion to home. Kantian aesthetics which explains the exercise of aesthetic judgments is helpful to explore Dickens’s angelic heroine’s moral beauty in Bleak House. The heroine’s beauty is not synonymous with morality but is, instead, symbolic of morality. The third chapter centers on the relation between female agreeable feelings, virtues, and beauty in Eliot’s Middlemarch. The heroine undergoes the process of reconciling self-regarding feelings and altruistic devotion to make virtuous contributions. Empiricist David Hume’s virtue theory helps explore the motivation and transformation behind the heroine’s virtuous action based on agreeable feelings and approbation of virtuous actions. The fourth chapter explores women’s beauty resulting from sympathy with family members and the poor. The independent heroine of Gaskell’s North and South dedicates herself to domestic devotion and class conflict. Her sympathetic beauty causes men to change present condition for the improvement of working-class life. In the fifth chapter, the analysis of female beauty and devotion in the three Victorian novels helps discover that various, complicated relation between devotion and subjectivity under the conventional disguise of women’s moral image. Although the women’s beauty originates from their devotion to home, the domestic devotion functions as their social commitment of reforming the world which contains rich, dynamic challenge to the ideological image of female beauty.
參考文獻:	Addison, Joseph. “No. 412: Sources of Pleasures.” The Spectator. Dublin: George Grierson, 1728. 75-79. Print. Allison, Henry E. Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001. Print. Althusser, Louis. “Lenin and Philosophy” and Other Essays. London: New Left Books, 1977. Print. Anderson, Anne. “Victorian High Society and Social Duty: the Promotion of ‘Recreative Learning and Voluntary Teaching’.” History of Education 31.4 (2002): 311-34. Print. Ashton, Rosemary. George Eliot. New York: Oxford UP, 1983. Print. ---. George Eliot: A Life. London: Hamish Hamilton, 1996. Print. Ashworth, Henry. The Preston Strike: An Enquiry into Its Causes and Consequences. Manchester: George Simms, 1854. Print. Auerbach, Sascha. “‘A Right Sort of Man’: Gender, Class Identity, and Social Reform in Late-Victorian Britain.” The Journal of Policy History 22.1 (2010): 64-94. Print. Axton, William. “The Trouble with Esther.” Modern Language Quarterly 26 (1965): 545-57. EBSCO. Web. 7 June 2013. Baillie, James. Hume on Morality. London: Routledge, 2000. Print. Bentham, Jeremy. A Fragment on Government. Ed. F. C. Montague. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1891. Print. ---. The Principles of Morals and Legislation: An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Kitchener: Batoche Books, 2000. Print. Birch, Dinah. “Beauty and the Victorian Body.” Essays in Criticism 44.2 (1994): 102-16. Print. Bodenheimer, Rosemarie. “A Permanent State of Change.” Nineteenth-Century Fiction 34.3 (1979): 281-301. EBSCO. Web. 7 June 2013. ---. The Politics of Story in Victorian Social Fiction. New York: Cornell UP, 1988. Print. ---. The Real Life of Mary Ann Evans: George Eliot, Her Letters and Fiction. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1994. Print. Bosanquet, Bernard. A History of Aesthetic. London: G. Allen & Unwin, 1904. Print. Botros, Sophie. Hume, Reason and Morality: A Legacy of Contradiction. New York: Routledge, 2006. Print. Boyle, Mary. An Imperfect Narrative of the Gay Doings and Marvellous Festivities Holden at Althorp in the County of Northants. London: C. Whittingham, 1857. Print. Brady, Emily. “Adam Smith’s ‘Sympathetic Imagination’ and the Aesthetic Appreciation of Environment.” The Journal of Scottish Philosophy 9.1 (2011): 95-109. EBSCO. Web. 17 Sep. 2013. Brimley, George. “A Review of Bleak House.” Spectator 24 (1853): 923-25. Rpt. in Bleak House: an authoritative and annotated text, illustrations, a note on the text, genesis and composition, backgrounds, criticism. Ed. George Ford and Sylvère Monod. New York: Norton, 1977. 933-37. EBSCO. Web. 15 June. 2013. Brooke, Stopford A. Tennyson: His Art and Relation to Modern Life. London: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1894. Print. Budd, Dona. “Language Couples in Bleak House.” Nineteen-Century Literature 49.2 (1994): 196-220. Web. 15 June. 2013. Burdett, Carolyn. “Is Empathy the End of Sentimentality?” Journal of Victorian Culture 16.2 (2011): 259-74. Web. 15 June. 2013. Burke, Edmund. “A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful.” The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. Vol. 1. London: Nimmo, 1899. Print. Caine, Barbara. Victorian Feminists. New York: Oxford UP, 1992. Print. Carlyle, Thomas. Past and Present. Ed. A. M. D. Hughes. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1921. Print. Carroll, Nöel. Philosophy of Art: A Contemporary Introduction. New York: Routledge, 1999. Print. Chismar, Douglas. “Empathy and Sympathy: The Important Difference.” The Journal of Value Inquiry 22 (1988): 257-66. Web. 3 Nov. 2013. Cohen, Alix. “Kant’s “curious catalogue of human frailties” and the great portrait of nature.” Kant’s Observations and Remarks: A Critical Guide. Ed. Susan Meld Shell and Richard Velkley. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2012. 144-62. Print. Cohen, Monica F. Professional Domesticity in the Victorian Novel: Women, Work, and Home. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998. Print. Colby, Robin B. “Some Appointed Work to Do”: Women and Vocation in the Fiction of Elizabeth Gaskell. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1995. Print. Costelloe, Timothy M. Aesthetics and Morals in the Philosophy of David Hume. London: Routledge, 2007. Print. Craik, W. A. Elizabeth Gaskell and the English Provincial Novel. London: Methuen, 1975. Print. Darwin, Charles. “On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection.” Henderson and Sharpe 1357-62. Print. Davidoff, Leonore, and Catherine Hall. Family Fortunes: Men and Women of the English Middle Class, 1780-1850. Chicago: The U of Chicago P, 1991. Print. Dentith, Simon. George Eliot. Brighton: The Harvester Press, 1986. Print. Dickens, Charles. Bleak House: an authoritative and annotated text, illustrations, a note on the text, genesis and composition, backgrounds, criticism. Ed. George Ford and Sylvère Monod. New York: Norton, 1977. Print. ---. The Letters of Charles Dickens. Vol. 1. London: Crystal Palace Press, 1880. Kindle ebook file. ---. Speeches: Literary and Social. Champaign, Ill: Project Gutenberg, 199-?. Kindle ebook file. ---. The Letters of Charles Dickens. Vol. 7. Ed. Gram Storey, Kathleen Tillotson, and Angus Easson. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993. Print. Dyck, Corey W. “Chimerical ethics and flattering moralists: Baumgarten’s influence on Kant’s moral theory in the Observations and Remarks.” Kant’s Observations and Remarks: A Critical Guide. Ed. Susan Meld Shell and Richard Velkley. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2012. 38-56. Print. Eagleton, Terry. Ideology: An Introduction. London: Verso, 2007. Print. Easson, Angus. “Introduction.” Elizabeth Gaskell: The Critical Heritage. Ed. Angus Easson. London: Routledge, 1991. 1-57. Print. Eliot, George. Middlemarch. Intro. Doreen Roberts. London: Wordsworth Classics, 2000. Print. ---. “Natural History of German Life.” The Essays of “George Eliot.” Ed. Nathan Sheppard. New York: Funk and Wagnalls, 1883. 141-71. Print. ---. Poems of George Eliot: New Illustrated Edition. New York: Frederick A. Stokes, 1893. Print. ---. Selections from George Eliot’s Letters. Ed. Gordon S. Haight. New Haven: Yale UP, 1985. Print. Elliott, Dorice Williams. “The Female Visitor and the Marriage of Classes in Gaskell’s North and South.” Nineteenth-Century Literature 49.1 (1994): 21-49. EBSCO. Web. 10 March. 2013. Ellis, Sarah Stickney. The Woman of England: Their Social Duties and Domestic Habits. New York: D. Appleton & Co., 1839. Print. Ermarth, Elizabeth Deeds. “George Eliot’s Conception of Sympathy.” Nineteenth-Century Fiction 40.1 (1985): 23-42. EBSCO. Web. 30 March. 2013. Fudge, Robert. “Sympathy, Beauty, and Sentiment: Adam Smith’s Aesthetic Morality.” The Journal of Scottish Philosophy 7.2 (2009): 133-46. EBSCO. Web. 17 March. 2013. Gallagher, Catherine. “Marxism and the New Historicism.” The New Historicism. Ed. Harold Veeser. New York: Routledge, 2013. 37-48 Ganz, Margaret. Elizabeth Gaskell: The Artist in Conflict. New York: Twayne, 1969. Print. Gaskell, Elizabeth Cleghorn. North and South. Ed. Patricia Ingham. New York: Penguin, 2000. Print. ---. The Letters of Mrs. Gaskell. Ed. Chapple, J. A. V., and Arthur Pollard. Cambridge: Harvard UP. 1967. Print Gérin, Winifred. Elizabeth Gaskell: A Biography. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976. Print. Glauser, Richard and Anthony Savile. “Aesthetic Experience in Shaftesbury.” The Aristotelian Society 76.1 (2002): 25-54. EBSCO. Web. 10 May. 2013. Goodlad, Lauren M. E. Victorian Literature and the Victorian State: Character and Governance in a Liberal Society. London: The John Hopkins UP, 2003. Print. Graver, Suzanne. George Eliot and Community: A Study in Social Theory and Fictional Form. London: U of California Press, 1984. Print. Greiner, Rae. “Thinking of Me Thinking of You: Sympathy Versus Empathy in the Realist Novel.” Victorian Studies 53.3 (2011): 417-26. Print. Grote, Simon. “Hutcheson’s Divergence from Shaftesbury.” Journal of Scottish Philosophy 4.2: 159-72. Print. ”Guyer, Paul. “Beauty and Utility in Eighteenth-Century Aesthetics.” American Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies 35.3 (2002): 439-53. Print. ---. “Freedom as the foundation of morality: Kant’s early efforts.” Kant’s Observations and Remarks: A Critical Guide. Ed. Susan Meld Shell and Richard Velkley. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2012. 77-98. Print. Harrison, John R. “Imagination and Aesthetics in Adam Smith’s Epistemology and Moral Philosophy.” Contributions to Political Economy 14 (1995): 91-112. Print. Harrison, Jonathan. Hume’s Moral Epistemology. Oxford: Claredmdom Press, 1976. Print. Harrison, Mary-Catherine. “How Narrative Relationships Overcome Empathic Bias: Elizabeth Gaskell’s Empathy across Social Difference.” Poetics Today 32.2 (2011): 255-88. EBSCO. Web. 27 May. 2013. Hejazi, Sayyed Mohammad R. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Ethics: Textbook on Ethics. ISRA Academy Press, 2011. Print. Hellerstein, Erna Olafson, Leslie Parker Hume, and Karen M. Offen. Victorian Women: A Documentary Account of Women’s Lives in Nineteenth-Century England, France, and the United States. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1981. Print. Henderson, Heather and William Sharpe, eds. The Longman Anthology of British Literature, Volume 2B. New York: Pearson, 2006. Print. Hill, Thomas E., Jr. “Kantian Virtue and ‘Virtue Ethics.’” Virtue, Rules, and Justice: Kantian Aspirations. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2012. 129-59. Print. Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan: or, The Matter, Form, and Power of A Commonwealth, Ecclesiastical and Civil. London: C. Richards, 1839. Print. Hoffman, Martin L. Empathy and Moral Development: Implications for Caring and Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001. Print. Hood, James W. Divining Desire: Tennyson and the Poetics of Transcendence. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000. Print. Huhn, Tom. “Burke’s Sympathy for Taste.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 35.3 (2002): 379-93. EBSCO. Web. 10 June 2013. Hume, David. “An Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals.” Enquires concerning Human Understanding and concerning the Principles of Morals. Ed. L. A. Selby-Bigge. 3rd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989. Print. ---. A Treatise of Human Nature. Ed. David Fate Norton and Mary J. Norton. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2002. Print. ---. “From David Hume.” Letter 36 of The Correspondence of Adam Smith. Ed. Ernest Campbell Mossner and Ian Simpson Ross. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1977. 42-44. Print. ---. “Of the Standard of Taste.” The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends. Ed. David H. Richter. 3rd ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2007. 234-44. Print. Hutcheson, Francis. An Inquiry into The Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue. Chicago: Liberty Fund, 2004. Print. Huxley, Thomas Henry. “Evolution and Ethics.” Henderson and Sharpe 1398-403. Print. Jaffe, Audrey. Scenes of Sympathy: Identity and Representation in Victorian Fiction. London: Cornell University Press, 2000. Print. James, Henry. Review of Middlemarch: A Provincial Novel. By George Eliot. The Galaxy 15.3 (1873): 424-28. Rpt. in The Art of Criticism: Henry James on the Theory and the Practice of Fiction. Ed. William Veeder and Susan M. Griffin. Chicago: The U of Chicago P, 1986. 48-54. Print. ---. “George Eliot’s Life.” Atlantic Monthly 55 (1885). Rpt. in Lives of Victorian Literary Figures: Eliot, Dickens and Tennyson by Their Contemporaries. Vol. 1. Ed. Gail Marshall. London: Pickering & Chatto, 2003. 127-37. Print. Jauss, Hans Robert. Aesthetic Experience and Literary Hermeneutics. Trans. Michael Shaw. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1982. Print. Jędrzejewski, Jan. George Eliot. London: Routledge, 2007. Print. Jones, Peter. “The Aesthetics of Adam Smith.” Adam Smith Reviewed. Ed. Peter Jones and Andrew S. Skinner. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 1992. 56-78. Print. Kant, Immanuel. Kant’s Critique of Judgement. Trans. J. H. Bernard. 3rd and Rev. ed. London: Macmillan, 1914. Print. ---. “Selections from Notes on Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime.” Notes and Fragments. Ed. Paul Guyer. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2005. 3-24. Print. Keen, Suzanne. Empathy and the Novel. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2007. Print. Kent, Susan Kingsley. Gender and Power in Britain, 1640-1990. London: Routledge, 1999. Print. Kornbluh, Anna. “The Economic Problem of Sympathy: Parabasis, Interest, and Realist From in Middlemarch.” ELH 77 (2010): 941- 67. EBSCO. Web. 10 June 2013. Langbauer, Laurie. “Dickens’s Streetwalkers: Women and the Form of Romance.” ELH 53.2 (1986): 411-31. EBSCO. Web. 10 June 2013. Langland, Elizabeth. “Nobody’s Angels: Domestic Ideology and Middle-Class Women in the Victorian Novel.” PMLA 107.2 (1992): 290-304. EBSCO. Web. 20 Mar. 2013. Lansbury, Coral. Elizabeth Gaskell: The Novel of Social Crisis. New York: Barnes & Nobel, 1975. Print. Lanzoni, Susan. “Sympathy in Mind (1876-1900).” Journal of the History of Ideas 70.2 (2009): 265-87. Print. Leavis, F. R. The Great Tradition: George Eliot, Henry James, and Joseph Conrad. New York: George W. Stewart, 1950. Print. LeFew-Blake, Penelope. Schopenhauer, Women’s Literature, and the Legacy of Pessimism in the Novels of George Eliot, Olive Schreiner, Virginia Woolf, and Doris Lessing. New York: Edwin Mellen Press, 2001. Print. Lefkovitz, Lori Hope. The Character of Beauty in the Victorian Novel. Diss. Brown University, 1984. Michigan: UMI Research P, 1987. Print. Marsh, Abigail A. “Empathy and Compassion: a Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective.” Empathy: From Bench to Bedside. Ed. Jean Decety. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2012. 191-205. Print. Marshall, David. The Surprising Effects of Sympathy: Marivaux, Diderot, Rousseau, and Mary Shelley. Chicago: The U of Chicago P, 1988. Print. Marshall, Gail. “Henry James: ‘George Eliot’s Life’.” Lives of Victorian Literary Figures: Eliot, Dickens and Tennyson by Their Contemporaries. Vol. 1. Ed. Gail Marshall. London: Pickering & Chatto, 2003. 125-26. Print. Macaulay, Thomas Babington. “Lord Bacon.” Henderson and Sharpe 1377-78. Print. Macherey, Pierre. A Theory of Literary Production. Trans. Geoffrey Wall. London: Routledge, 1980. Print. McGinn, Colin. “Beauty of Soul.” Ethics, Evil, and Fiction. Oxford: California UP, 1999. 92-122. Print. McHugh, John W. “Relaxing A Tension in Adam Smith’s Account of Sympathy.” The Journal of Scottish Philosophy 9.2 (2011): 189-204. Print. Millgram, Elijah. “Was Hume a Humean?” Hume Studies 21.1: 75-93. Rpt. in Hume: Moral and Political Philosophy. Ed. Rachel. Cohon. Dartmouth: Ashgate, 2001. 43-57. Print. Montégut, Émile. “North and South.” Revue des Deux Mondes 12(1855): 115-46. Rpt. in Elizabeth Gaskell: The Critical Heritage. Ed. Angus Easson. London: Routledge, 1991. 354-66. Print. Newman, John Henry Cardinal. “Apologia Pro Vita Sua.” Henderson and Sharpe 1390-97. Print. Newton, K. M. “Introduction.” George Eliot. Ed. K. M. Newton. London: Longman, 1991. 1-28. Print. ---. George Eliot: Romantic Humanist: A Study of the Philosophical Structure of Her Novels. London: Macmillan, 1981. Print. Norman, Edward. The Victorian Christian Socialists. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1987. 14-34. Print. Nowak, Magdalena. “The Complicated History of Einfühlung.” Argument 1 (2011): 301-26. Print. Ogden, R. M. Review. “Beauty and Ugliness, and Other Studies in Psychological Aesthetics.” By Vernon Lee and Anstruther-Thompson. The Philosophy Review 23.3 (1914): 365-66. EBSCO. Web. 10 Mar. 2013. Paroissien, David. “‘Faithfully Yours, Charles Dickens’: The Epistolary Art of the Inimitable.” A Companion to Charles Dickens. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2008. 33-46. Print. Pike, E. Holly. Family and Society in the Works of Elizabeth Gaskell. New York: Peter Lang, 1995. Print. Qualls, Barry. “George Eliot and Religion”. The Cambridge Companion to George Eliot. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001. 119-37. Print. Queen Victoria. “Letters and Journal Entries on the Position of Women.” The Longman Anthology of British Literature. Ed. Heather Henderson and William Sharpe. 3rd ed. New York: Longman, 2006. 1651-56. Print. Raynor, David. “Adam Smith and the Virtues.” The Adam Smith Review. Vol. 2. Ed. Vivienne Brown. 239-45. Print. Rev. of North and South. By Elizabeth Gaskell. Examiner (1855) Rpt. in Elizabeth Gaskell: The Critical Heritage. Ed. Angus Easson. London: Routledge, 1991. 339-44. Print. Rev. of North and South. By Elizabeth Gaskell. Leader 6. 356 (1855) Rpt. in Elizabeth Gaskell: The Critical Heritage. Ed. Angus Easson. London: Routledge, 1991. 354-66. Print. Ruskin, John. The Crown of Wild Olive: Three Lectures on Work, Traffic, and War. New York: John Wiley & Son, 1866. Print. Rudd, Andrew. Sympathy and India in British Literature, 1770-1830. London: Palgrave, 2011. Print. Ryan, Vanessa L. Thinking without Thinking in the Victorian Novel. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins UP, 2012. Print. Schellekens, Elisabeth. Aesthetics and Morality. London: Continuum, 2007. Print. Schwartz, Laura. “Feminist Thinking on Education in Victorian England.” Oxford Review of Education 37.5 (2011): 669-82. EBSCO. Web. 17 Sep. 2013. Shaftesbury, Anthony Ashley Cooper. Characteristicks of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times: Volume II. Chicago: Liberty Fund, 2001. Print. ---. Characteristicks of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times: Volume III: Miscellaneous Reflections on the Preceding Treatises. Ed. John M. Roberston. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1964. Print. Siegel, Daniel. “Charity through Dissociation: The Task of the Bible-Woman.” Gender and Victorian Reform. Ed. Anita Rose. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Pub., 2008. Print. Simcox, Edith. “George Eliot.” Nineteenth Century 9 (1881). Rpt. in Lives of Victorian Literary Figures: Eliot, Dickens and Tennyson by Their Contemporaries. Vol. 1. Ed. Gail Marshall. London: Pickering & Chatto, 2003. 43-66. Print. Slater, Michael. Dickens and Women. London: J. M. Dent & Sons Ltd, 1983. Print. Smiles, Samuel. Self-Help: with Illustrations of Conduct and Perseverance. London: John Murray, 1908. Print. Smith, Adam. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Ed. Knud Haakonssen. New York: Cambridge UP, 2002. Print. ---. “The Imitative Arts.” Essays on Philosophical Subjects. Ed. W .P. D. Wightman and J. C. Bryce. Oxford: Clarendon, 1980. 176-209. Print. ---. “The History of Astronomy.” Essays on Philosophical Subjects. Ed. W .P. D. Wightman and J. C. Bryce. Oxford: Clarendon, 1980. 33-105. Print. ---. “To [Gilbert Elliot].” Letter 40 of The Correspondence of Adam Smith. Ed. Ernest Campbell Mossner and Ian Simpson Ross. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1977. 48-57. Print. ---. “To Lord Kames.” Letter 195 of The Correspondence of Adam Smith. Ed. Ernest Campbell Mossner and Ian Simpson Ross. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1977. 234. Print. Snow, Nancy E. “Compassion.” American Philosophical Quarterly 28.3 (1991): 195-205. EBSCO. Web. 6 Apr. 2013. Stephen, Leslie. Review of Middlemarch. By George Eliot. George Eliot. (London, 1902) Rpt. in Middlemarch: An Authoritative Text, Backgrounds, Reviews and Criticism. New York: Norton, 1977. 657-63. Print. Stockton, Kathryn Bond. God between Their Lips in Irigaray, Brontë, and Eliot. Standfor: Standford UP, 1994. Print. Stolnitz, Jerome. “On the Significance of Lord Shaftesbury in Modern Aesthetic Theory.” The Philosophical Quarterly 11.43 (1961): 97-113. EBSCO. Web. 26 Apr. 2013. Stoneman, Patsy. Elizabeth Gaskell. 2nd ed. Manchester: Manchester UP, 2006. Print. Stroud, Barry. Hume: The Arguments of the Philosophers. London: Routledge, 1988. Print. “Sympathy.” Oxford English Dictionary. Online Website. 2013. Web. Taylor, C. “Sympathy.” The Journal Ethics 3 (1999): 73-87. EBSCO. Web. 12 Jan. 2013. Tennyson, Lord Tennyson. “In Memoriam A. H. H.” Henderson and Sharpe 1261-91. Print. Teukolsky, Rachel. “Pictures in Bleak House: Slavery and the Aesthetics of Transatlantic.” ELH 76.2 (2009): 491-522. EBSCO. Web. 23 Mar. 2013. Townsend, Dabney. Hume’s Aesthetic Theory: Taste and Sentiment. London: Routledge, 2001. Print. Turner, Frank M. “Science and Religious Freedom.” Freedom and Religion in the Nineteenth Century. Ed. Richard Helmstadter. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997. 54-86. Print. “Unsigned review.” Bentley’s Miscellany 34 (1853): 372-74. Rpt. in Dickens: The Critical Heritage. Ed. Philip Collins. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1986. Print. Vitz, Rico. “Sympathy and Benevolence in Hume’s Moral Psychology.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 42.3 (2004): 261-75. Print. Waters, Catherine. Dickens and the Politics of the Family. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1997. Print. Weber, Cara. ““The Community of Married Companionship”: Marriage, Sympathy, and the Self in Middlemarch.” Nineteenth-century Literature 66.4 (2012): 494-530. Print. Wenzel, Christian Helmut. An Introduction to Kant’s Aesthetics: Core Concepts and Problems. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2005. Print. Wicks, Robert. Kant on Judgment. London: Routledge, 2007. Print. Williams, Raymond. Culture and Society: 1780-1950. New York: Columbia UP, 1983. Print. ---. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. Revised ed. New York: Oxford UP, 1983. Print. Woolf, Virginia. “George Eliot.” TLS 20 (1919) Rpt. in Lives of Victorian Literary Figures: I, George Eliot, Charles Dickens and Alfred, Lord Tennyson by Their Contemporaries. Ed. Ralph Pite. London: Pickering & Chatto, 2003. Print. Wordsworth , Williams. “The Sublime and the Beautiful.” The Prose Works of William Wordsworth. Vol. 2. Ed. W. J. B. Owen and Jane Worthington Smyser. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1974. 349-60. Print. Wright, John P. Hume’s ‘A Treatise of Human Nature’. New York: Cambridge UP, 2009. Print. Zahavi, Dan, and S. Overggard. “Empathy without Isomorphism: A Phenomenological Account.” Empathy: from Bench to Bedside. Ed. J. Decety. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press. Print. Zuckert, Rachel. “The Purposiveness of Form: A Reading of Kant’s Aesthetic Formalism.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 44.4 (2006): 599-622. EBSCO. Web. 29 Apr. 2013.
描述:	博士國立政治大學英國語文學研究所 97551503 103
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097551503
数据类型:	thesis
显示于类别:	[英國語文學系] 學位論文

文件中的档案:

档案	描述	大小	格式	浏览次数
150301.pdf		1857Kb	Adobe PDF2	167	检视/开启

在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回馈