政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/71747
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51014088      Online Users : 953
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/71747


    Title: 都市計畫工業土地轉變使用交易成本之研究
    A Study of Transaction Costs from Conversing the Use of Urban Industrial Land
    Authors: 吳室滿
    Contributors: 邊泰明
    吳室滿
    Keywords: 交易成本
    土地轉變使用
    工業土地
    Transaction cost
    conversing use of land
    industrial land
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2014-12-01 14:24:38 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   全球化發展及產業結構轉型,造成都市計畫工業土地需求降低,導致工業土地閒置。再者,因都市地區快速發展,都會區住宅需求增加,房價高漲,致引發開發商對取得成本相對較低之都市計畫工業土地開發動機。土地開發過程中,自土地取得、規劃、興建等一連串交易行為所衍生之交易成本不容小覷。當交易成本為零的情況下,財產權得被清楚界定,故賦予財產權予任何人,資源分配結果均不會受影響,此時透過私下協商即可達最有效率之使用,無需政府干預。然在現實生活中,交易成本大於零,使得財產權界定困難度增加。土地使用分區管制界定了土地財產權,致開發商為尋求更大租利,而藉由尋租行為改變土地使用管制環境,進而影響土地使用分區管制決策與財產權結構。
      本研究從交易成本理論探討開發商就都市計畫工業土地轉變使用開發架構選擇,藉由就新北市都市計畫工業土地轉變使用與交易成本分析,瞭解開發商就該等土地進行開發時,採取合法或違規轉變使用開發架構選擇及其交易成本暨交易特性。再自土地開發過程、財產權界定、尋租及交易成本理論等相關文獻回顧及所蒐集之新北市都市計畫工業土地轉變使用建案資料中,選取適當變數,建立Logistic迴歸模型。經實證測試結果,影響開發商就都市計畫工業土地轉變使用開發架構選擇因素為建案規模之戶數、總樓地板面積、交易特性中資產特殊性之開發時機及時間之存續時間。最後,依據本研究成果,提供政府機關於管制都市計畫工業土地轉變使用之參考。
    As a result of the development of globalization and the industrial restructuring, the demand of urban industrial land decreased, leaving the industrial land unused. Moreover, because of the rapid development in urban areas, the housing requirements in metropolis increased and the price rose highly, triggering off the motive for developers exploiting relatively low cost urban industrial land. During the process of land development, the transaction cost deriving from a series of trade behaviors including the acquisition of land, planning, construction is high. When the transaction cost turned zero, the property right should be defined obviously; therefore, the property right endued with anyone and the resource-allocation consequence won’t be influenced. Under this circumstance, it can reach the most efficient using via private negotiation, without the government’s intervention. However, the transaction cost is greater than zero in the real life, leading the definition of property right too difficultly. Zoning defined the land property right. In order to obtain more benefits, the developers change the regulatory environment of land use by rent seeking and then affect the decision of zoning and the structure of property right.
    This study discusses the developers’ choices for converse structure of the urban industrial land based on the transaction cost. According to the New Taipei City conversing use of the urban industrial land and the transaction cost, we could analyzed the developers adopted legal or illegal choices for conversing the exploitative structure and its transaction cost of trade characteristic. Furthermore, the study selects the appropriate variables to establish logistic regression models from the related literature reviews such as the process of land development, property right definition, rent seeking and transaction cost theory and the collected data of the New Taipei City. After actual proof, the factors influence developers’ choices for conversing the use of urban industrial land including the household scale of building project, total floor areas, the development timing and durations of asset specificity for trade characteristic. Lastly, this study will be a reference to provide government in controlling conversion the use of urban industrial land.
    Reference: 一、中文文獻
    內政部營建署市鄉規劃局,2003,『全球化時代下都市計畫工業區規劃變更機制之研究-以高速公路中壢及內壢交流道附近特定區為例』。
    王濟川、郭志剛,2003,『Logistic迴歸模型-方法及應用』,台北,五南。
    石佾箴,2010,「寇斯定理對外部性問題解決策略之影響-以台北市輕井澤豪宅日照權問題為例」,逢甲大學土地管理學系碩士班碩士論文:台北。
    呂宗盈、林建元,2002,「由制度面探討台灣土地使用管理制度變遷之研究」,『建築與規劃學報』3(2):136-158。
    吳明隆,2008,『SPSS操作與應用問卷統計分析實務』,台北,五南。
    吳彩珠,2001,「開發管制對土地開發決策影響之研究」,頁1-13,收錄於『第二屆地政學術研討會論文集』,台北:政治大學地政系。
    林怡妏,2006,「應用交易成本理論檢討台灣現行土地開發機制-舊市區與新開發區之比較」,成功大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文:台南。
    林森田,2002,「土地使用分區之制度經濟分析」,『土地問題研究季刊』,1(1):9-18。
    柯伯煦、陳建元,2010,「社區環境品質自製或外購:交易成本的觀點」,『東吳會計學報』,2009諾貝爾得主Oliver Williamson論文獎專刊:29-59。
    陳建元,2006,「土地使用制度的選擇與產權結構關係之研究-制度經濟的觀點與應用」,頁359-375,收錄於『2006海峽兩岸土地學術研討會論文集』,台北:中國地政研究所。
    陳建元,2010,「變遷的公共財理論與都市治理結構-從新古典到新制度經濟學之引介」,『地理學報』,58:65-88。
    許惠珠,2003,「交易成本理論之回顧與前瞻」,『Journal of China Institute of Technology』,28:79-98。
    張剛維,2008,「土地使用分區管制制度之執行與制度變遷-財產權觀點之分析」,政治大學地政學系博士論文:台北。
    張剛維、林森田,2008,「尋租行為與土地使用分區管制-財產權觀點之分析」,『臺灣土地研究』,11(2):127-153。
    新北市政府城鄉發展局,2012,『新北市政府對內政部訂定「100年度地方政府執行防範都市計畫工業區變相做住宅使用督導查核計畫」報告』。
    新北市政府城鄉發展局,2013,『新北市工業區作住宅使用之變更策略規劃案』報告。
    葉百修,1988,『從財產權保障觀點論公用徵收制度』,台北,著者。
    熊秉元,1993,「「市場之尺」和「心中之尺」-論釋寇斯定理和布坎楠對寇斯定理的質疑」,『經濟論文』,21(2):331-356。
    劉瑞華譯(道格拉斯諾斯著,1990),1995,『制度、制度變遷與經濟成就』,台北,時報。
    顏愛靜,2001,「新制度經濟學的評價-【制度與經濟理論】導讀」,『人與地』,201:19-36。
    邊泰明,2008,『土地使用規劃與財產權理論與實務』,台北,詹氏書局。
    二、外文文獻
    Aldrich, J. and Nelson, F. D., 1984, Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Model, Newbury Park, CA:Sage Publications.
    Alexander, E. R., 2001a,“A transaction-cost theory of land use planning and development control: Towards the institutional analysis of public planning”, Town Planning Review, 72(1): 45-75.
    Alexander, E. R., 2001b,“Governance and transaction costs in planning systems: a conceptual framework for institutional analysis of land-use planning and development control - the case of Israel”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28: 755-776.
    Barzel, Y., 1997, Economic Analysis of Property right, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
    Buitelaar, E., 2004, “A Transaction-cost Analysis of the Land Development Process”, Urban Studies, 41(13): 2539-2553.
    Calabresi, J. M., 1968, “Transaction Costs, Resource Allocation and Liability Rules - A Comment”, Journal of Law and Economics, 11: 67-74.
    Cooter, R., 1982, “The Cost of Coase”, Journal of Legal Studies, 11:1-33.
    Dahlman, C. J., 1979, “The Problem of Externality”, Journal of Law and Economics, 22(1): 141-162.
    Demsetz, H., 1967, “Toward a Theory of Property Right”, American Economic Review, 57(2): 347-359.
    Keogh, G. and Evans, A. W., 1992, “The Private and Social Costs of Planning Delay”, Urban Studies, 29(5): 687-699.
    Lai, L. W. C., 1994, “The economics of land-use zoning:A literature review and analysis of the work of Coase”, Town Planning Review, 65(1): 77-98.
    Lai, L. W. C., 1996, Zoning and Property Rights:A Hong Kong Case study, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    North, D. C., 1990, “A Transaction Cost Theory of Politics”, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2: 355-367.
    Tan, R., Beckmann, V., Qu, F. and Wu, C., 2012,“Governing Farmland Conversion for Urban Development from the Perspective of Transaction Cost Economics”, Urban Studies, 49(10): 2265-2283.
    Williamson, O. E., 1975, Markets and Hierarchies, New York:Free Press.
    Williamson, O. E., 1985, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York:Free Press.
    Williamson, O. E., 1999, “Public and Private Bureaucracies: A Transaction Cost Economics Perspective”, The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 15(1): 306-342.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    地政學系碩士在職專班
    100923004
    102
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100923004
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Land Economics] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    300401.pdf1993KbAdobe PDF2129View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback