English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50799451      Online Users : 737
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/70986


    Title: 以決策樹及實質選擇權方法評估 ODM 專案
    ODM Projects Evaluation -- An Application of Decision Tree and Real Options Methods
    Authors: 梁豫清
    Contributors: 郭維裕
    梁豫清
    Keywords: ODM
    決策樹
    實質選擇權
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2014-11-03 10:10:16 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在以 ODM 為主要業務的公司中,通常會有下列特徵:
    1. 規格由客戶指定,無規格制定權;
    2. 產品價格和數量通常會事先談好,ODM 廠商只能在談定的售價上擠出利潤空間;
    3. 交貨時程配合客戶終端產品生產或上市,由客戶指定,通常都很緊迫;
    4. 除非專利保護,否則由於競爭者眾,客戶的對 ODM 廠商的選擇彈性大;
    5. 除非專利保護,通常 ODM 專案利潤低;
    6. 通常接案數量大,以便能擴展 ODM 產品的範圍與增加營收。
    由以上來看,ODM 廠商雖然沒有品牌商所面臨的高度市場不確定性,
    但卻面臨到利潤低、交期短、競爭者眾的問題。而這些問題的共同解決方
    式即在提升研發能力。若是 ODM 廠商的研發能力強的話,便可在現有售
    價及預訂時程內,以較低的零件成本設計出符合產品規格的成品,並且降
    低製造複雜度,提高品質,將競爭者排除在外。
    本文參考案例公司現況及現有 ODM 專案評估機制 , 參考決策樹法及實
    質選擇權,設計出研發單位的選擇方式,以便能在現有多個研發單位中,
    依照過去實績來挑出最佳承接專案的單位,冀能提升公司整體研發資源的
    效率,並進而增加公司的接案能量及獲利。
    摘要 摘要摘要 摘要........................................................................ I
    目錄 目錄目錄 目錄....................................................................... II
    圖目錄.................................................................................. III
    表目錄................................................................................... IV
    第一章 緒論 緒論緒論 緒論................................................................ 1
    第一節 研究動機.......................................................................... 1
    第二節 研究目的.......................................................................... 1
    第三節 研究範圍.......................................................................... 2
    第四節 本文架構.......................................................................... 2
    第二章 文獻探討.......................................................................... 3
    第一節 淨現值(NET PRESENT VALUE, NPV)法介紹............................................ 3
    第二節 決策樹法介紹...................................................................... 4
    第三節 實質選擇權介紹.................................................................... 5
    第三章 電源供應器產業分析及案例公司現況簡介.............................................. 7
    第一節 電源供應器產業現況................................................................ 7
    第二節 案例公司現況簡介.................................................................. 9
    第三節 案例公司 ODM 專案特徵............................................................ 20
    第四章 運用 運用運用 運用決策樹與實質選擇權觀念評估專案 決策樹與實質選擇權觀念評估專案.. 22
    第一節 ODM 專案評估方法................................................................. 22
    第二節 ODM 專案評估方法之應用........................................................... 27
    第五章 結論 結論結論 結論與建議 與建議.................................................. 34
    第一節 結論............................................................................. 34
    第二節 建議............................................................................. 36
    參考文獻................................................................................ 37
    Reference: 一、中文文獻:
    王瑞德 、 洪士軒 、 楊竣宇. 應用實質選擇權分析產品開發決策之彈性-以台
    灣微波產品公司為例
    劉翠玲. 2006. 無形資產與技術鑑價文獻回顧
    龔化中. 2010. 運用實質選擇權觀念分析手機 ODM 產業研發投資價值
    吳巧瑩、王寶慧、黃豐盛、吳吉政. 2012. 第十五屆決策分析研討會. 應用
    實質選擇權於智慧型手機市場研究之財務規劃
    吳巧瑩 、 吳吉政. 2012 第 15 屆科技整合管理研討會. 結合情境規劃與決策
    樹之行動通訊新產品開發財務規劃
    二、英文文獻:
    Alex Triantis, Adam Borison. 2001. Real Options: State Of The Practice.
    Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 2001, Vol-1 4, No 2
    Alvaro Cuervo-Cazurra*, C. Annique UN. 2010.
    Why Some Firms Never Invest In Formal R&D. Strategic Management
    Journal, 2010, 759-779
    Burcu Tan, Edward Anderson, James Dyer, geoffrey Parker.
    Using Binomial Decision Trees and Real Options Theo ry to Evaluate System
    Dynamics Models of Risky Projects
    Dan Latimore. Calculating value during uncertainty: Getting real with "real
    options".
    IBM Institute for Business Value
    Graham R. Mitchell and William F. Hamilton. 1988. MANAGING R&D AS A
    STRDTEGIC OPTION.
    Research Technology Management, May/Jun 1988.
    38
    JUNKUI YAO AND ALI JAAFARI. 2003.
    Combining Real Options and Decision Tree: An Integr ative Approach for
    Project Investment Decisions and Risk Managment.
    The Journal Of Structured And Project Finance.
    Luiz E. Brandão, James S. Dyer, Warren J. Hahn. 2005. Using Binomial
    Decision Trees to Solve Real-Option Valuation Problems.
    Decision Analysis, June 2005, Vol. 2, No. 2, 69 –88
    Adam Borison. 2005. Real Options Analysis: Where Arethe Emperor`s Clothes?
    Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 2005, Vol-1 7, No. 2
    Hakan Erdogmus. 1999 March 14. Valuation of Complex Options In Software
    Development.
    Han T.J. Smit, Lenos Trigeoris. Real Options: Examples And Principles Of
    Valuation And Strategy
    Johnathan C. Mun. Real Options Analysis vs. Traditional DCF Valuation in
    Layman`s Terms
    Keith J. Leslie, Max P. Michaels. 1997. The real power of real options.
    THE McKINSEY QUARTERLY 1997 NUMBER 3.
    Marisa Analía Sánchez, Gastón Silverio Milanesi.
    Evaluation of Software Development Investments: a Real Options Approach.
    Martha Amram, Fanfu Li, Cheryl A. Perkins. 2006.
    How Kimberly-Clark Uses Real Options. Journal of Ap plied Corporate
    Finance. Vol-18, No 2
    Michel Benaroch. 2001. Option-Based Management of Technology Investment
    Risk. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol.48, No. 4, pp.
    428-444, November 2001
    Peter Miller, Ted O`Leary. 2005. Managing Operational Flexibility in
    Investment Decisions: The Case of Intel.
    Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 2005, Vol-17, No 2
    39
    Raul Guerrero. 2007. The Case for Real Options Made Simple.
    Journal of Applied Corporate Finance. Vol-19, No 2
    Tom Copeland, Peter Tufano. 2004. A Real-World Way to Manage Real
    Options.
    Harvard Business Review, March 2004.
    Tao Wang, Richard de Neufville. Identification of Real Optios "in"Projects.
    Tao Chen, Jinlong Zhang, Kin-Keung Lai. 2009. An integrated real options
    evaluating model for information technology projects under multiple risks.
    International Journal of Project Management. 27 (2009) 776-786
    Vasiliki Makropoulou. 2011. Decision Tree Analysis and Real Options: A
    Reconciliation.
    Managerial And Decision Economics. Feb 2011 261-2 64
    三 、網頁資料:
    http://www.credit.com.tw/newweb/market/weekly/index.cfm?sn=51
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)
    100932070
    102
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100932070
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[經營管理碩士學程EMBA] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2469View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback