English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113485/144472 (79%)
Visitors : 51391026      Online Users : 715
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/70970


    Title: 部落格書寫者背後的力量與動機: 權力意識與社會資本面向
    The motive of blog writing-the power flow and the exchange of social capitalorientation
    Authors: 羅弘旭
    Contributors: 吳筱玫
    羅弘旭
    Keywords: 部落格
    網際權力
    社會資本
    blog
    cyber power
    social capital
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2014-11-03 10:07:02 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 書寫部落格的力量來自何處?從初步的田野調查以及文獻探討,歸納出「書

    寫自我建構」、「向外發聲」、「作為記憶裝置」、「分享交流」、「溝通世界」、「商業

    行銷」、「抒發情感」等商業以及社會學的面向,有研究者更以市場行家理論分析

    部落格書寫帶有「社交性的交流」、「成為互動圈中價值角色」、「投桃報李的心態」。

    但上述研究僅解答部分疑惑,無法全然解釋部落格書寫者的意圖,本研究試

    圖從權力意識與社會資本兩個面向,研究部落格書寫者透過書寫部落格的行為,

    與閱聽者(粉絲)間的權力流動與社會資本的交換。

    本研究採取參與觀察以及深度訪談兩種分式,訪問到台灣六位知名部落格書

    寫者,探討下述問題

    • 部落格書寫者如何在網路上重新建立認同和階級重塑。部落客如何在書

    寫中階級重塑?

    • 部落格書寫者如何以書寫換取權力和社會資本?

    • 實體世界內與虛擬世界裡的資本如何相互影響?

    從研究結果發現,「科技權力的確有為書寫者帶來賦權之可能」、「部落客以書

    寫建立社會資本,從而形塑自己的階級地位」、同時「實體與虛擬世界內社會資本

    相互拉抬,以提升個人資本總和」
    Where does the motive of blog writing come from? Preliminary field research and literature review have concluded the commercial and sociological motives of “self-construal via writing”, “outward expression”, “using blog as a memory device”, “sharing and idea exchange”, “communicating with the world”, “commercial marketing”, and “express one’s feelings.” Other studies used market maven theory to identify the motives of “social exchange”, “becoming a valuable role in the interactive circle” and “the mentality of returning a favor.”

    However the afore-mentioned studies only answered part of the questions and could not fully explain the intent of the bloggers. This study intends to study the power flow and the exchange of social capital between the bloggers and the audience (followers) from the perspectives of right consciousness and social capital.
    This study adopted the research methodologies of participant observation and in-depth interview to probe into the following questions by interviewing six famous bloggers in Taiwan

    ‧ How do bloggers rebuild identification and reshape class in the cyber space? How do bloggers reshape social status via writing?
    ‧ How do bloggers exchange their writings for power and social capital?
    ‧ How do the capitals in the physical and virtual world affect each other?

    The result of the study shows that “the power of technology could empower the writer”, “blogger creates social capital via writing and share his or her own social status”, and “the social capital in the physical and virtual world complement each other and increase personal capital in total.”
    Reference: 王逸舟譯、Mills原著(1994)。《權力菁英》。台北:桂冠。(原書Mills, C. W. [1956]. The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.)
    王修曉譯、Ruane原著(2008)。《研究方法概論》。台北:五南。(原書 Ruane, J. M. [2005]. Essentials of Research Methods: A Guide to Social Research. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.)
    中國大百科全書出版社編輯部(1993)。《中國大百科全書:社會學》。台北:錦繡。
    方怡文(2006)。《女性網路參與及增權之質性研究:以台灣婦女網路論壇「人身安全版」為例》。國立屏東教育大學社會科教育學系碩士論文。
    林祐聖、葉欣怡譯、林南原著(2005)。《社會資本》。台北:弘智文化。(原書:Lin, N. [2001]. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.)
    林佳靜(2005)。《Weblog使用者個人因素與書寫動機、書寫行為關聯性研究》。文化大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
    江靜之譯、Jordan原著(2003)。《網際網路的衝擊:網際空間與網際網路的文化與政治》。台北:韋伯文化。(原書Jordan, T. [1999]. Cyberpower: The Culture and Politics of Cyberspace and the Internet. London; New York: Routledge.)
    施瑞瑄譯、Fievet及Turrettini原著(2006)。《誰沒部落格:無形新大陸的無限可能》。台北:商周出版(原書 Fievet, C., & Turrettini, E. [2004]. Blog Story. Paris: Deuxième Tirage.)
    馬康莊、陳信木譯、Ritzer原著(1995)。《社會學理論》,上冊,台北:麥格羅希爾。(原書:Ritzer, G. [1995]. Sociological Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.)
    趙偉妏譯、Stokes原著(2008)。《教你如何作文話暨媒介研究》。台北:韋伯文化。(原書Stokes, J. [2003]. How to Do Media and Cultural Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.)
    管中琪、黃俊龍譯、Marx及Engels原著(2004)。《共產黨宣言》。台北:左岸文化。(原書Marx, K., & Engels, F. [1848]. Manifest der Kommunistischen Partei. London.)
    蔡文輝(1989)。《社會學理論》。台北:三民。
    謝宛蓉(2003)。《自我、書寫、網路:網路個人媒體自我書寫的意義初探》。國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
    施康強、顧良譯、Braudel原著(2006)。《15至18世紀的物質文明、經濟和資本主義》。台北:左岸文化。(原書Braudel, F. [1979]. Civilisation matérielle, Economie et capitalisme, XVe-XVIIIe siècle: Le Temps du Monde. New York: Harper & Row.)
    施佩君(2007)。《虛擬社群中的網絡個人主義》。元智大學資訊社會學研究所碩士論文。
    吳筱玫(2003)。《網路傳播概論》。台北:智勝文化。
    吳叡人譯、Anderson原著(2010)。《想像的共同體:民族主義的起源與散佈》。台北:時報。(原書Anderson, B. [1991]. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London; New York: Verso.)
    蕭瑞麟(2006)。《不用數字的研究:鍛鍊深度思考力的質性研究》。台北,台灣培生教育出版。
    孫非譯、Blau原著(1999)。《社會生活中的交換與權力》。台北:桂冠。(原書Blau, P. M. [1964]. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley and Sons.)
    尚衡譯、Foucault原著(1998)。《性意識史》,第一卷。台北:桂冠。(原書Foucault, M. [1976]. Histoire de la Sexualité. )
    翟本瑞(2001)。《網路文化》。台北:揚智文化。
    康樂等編譯(1996)。《支配的類型》。台北:遠流。(原書Weber, M. [1968]. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Paris: Gallimard.)
    竹科沒有新貴部落格。http://www.wretch.cc/blog/charlestyyeh/334003。
    部落格觀察。http://look.urs.tw/。
    Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital (R. Nice, Trans.). In L. C. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp.241-260). New York: Greenwood Press.
    Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
    Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
    Minkoff, D. C. (1997). Producing social capital: National social movement and civil society. American Behavioral Scientist, 40 (5), 606-619.
    Hills, M. (2002). Fan Cultures. London, UK: Routledge.
    Jordan, T. (1999). Cyberpower: The Culture and Politics of Cyberspace and the Internet. London; New York: Routledge.
    Robins, K., & Webster, F. (1999). Times of Technoculture: From the Information Society to the Virtual Life. London: Routledge.
    Wellman, B. (2001). Does the Internet Increase, Decrease, or Supplement Social Capital? Social Networks, Participation, and Community Commitment. Toronto: Centre for Urban and Community Studies, University of Toronto.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    傳播學院碩士在職專班
    96941021
    102
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096941021
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[傳播學院碩士在職專班] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    102101.pdf1201KbAdobe PDF21111View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback