English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113393/144380 (79%)
Visitors : 51239259      Online Users : 876
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/70838


    Title: 中國獨特的戰略文化？尋找理念的物質基礎
    Other Titles: Unique Chinese Strategic Culture? Uncover the Material Bases of Ideation
    Authors: 楊仕樂
    Yang, Shih-Yueh
    Contributors: 外交所
    Keywords: 理念;物質基礎;戰略文化
    Ideation;Material Bases;Strategic Culture
    Date: 2006.01
    Issue Date: 2014-10-28 15:25:55 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 中國時常被認為具有「不戰而屈人之兵」與「文化道德主義」等兩項獨特的戰略文化，但本文將依據物質條件的邏輯來檢視這兩個論點。文化是建立在物質條件下層結構之上的上層結構，本文據此主張，中國「不戰而屈人之兵」與「文化道德主義」這兩項戰略文化的背後，都有其物質條件為基礎，分別是「農業文明」與「單極」的權力結構。在農業文明之下，因為軍隊武器、編組、後勤、指揮等因素，使得武力無法成為一種有效的工具。在東亞區域中國呈單極獨霸的時代裡，中國作為霸權仍需要某種道德美化的包裝，來輔助單純的武力，因此中國強調儒家的以德服人。然而，這兩種物質條件卻不是中國所獨有。當西方世界也處於農業文明之際，西方世界也無法使武力成為一種有效的工具，也有著「不戰而屈人之兵」的觀念。而今，當美國在冷戰之後取得了單極的獨霸地位，也出現了美國式的「文化道德主義」，在世界上推動「民主」、「自由」\\r與「市場經濟」，做為純粹武力的美化包裝。因此，視「不戰而屈人之兵」與「文化道德主義」為中國獨特的戰略文化，其實只是時空的錯置。
    China is thought to have two unique strategic culture: “to defeat the enemy without combat” and “culture moralism”, but this article will reject them by a material logic. Culture is nothing more than a superstructure built on the material bases, so the two feature of Chinese strategic culture are both the products of some particular material structure. “To defeat the enemy without combat” is a strategic culture of agriculture civilization. The weaponry, organization, logistics, and commanding factors in agriculture civilization make the combat not a decisive tool. “Culture moralism” is a strategic culture of hegemon. Hegemon needs some moral appeals to modify the sheer violence. However, both agriculture civilization and hegemon are not the unique features of China. When the western world was also in the stage of agriculture civilization, “to defeat the enemy without combat” was also a creed of its military. And, when the US became a hegemon after the cold war, it also pursuits its moral appeals like freedom, democracy, and market economy. Accordingly, this article could conclude that, take “to defeat the enemy without combat” and “culture moralism” as Chinese unique strategic culture is a misplacement of time and space.
    Relation: 東亞研究, 37(1),197-230
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[外交學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    197-230.pdf1639KbAdobe PDF2792View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback