政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/70467
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113324/144300 (79%)
Visitors : 51129782      Online Users : 856
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/70467


    Title: 工程承攬契約中情事變更之適用問題
    Other Titles: The Application of the Doctrine of Changed Circumstances in Taiwan’s Work Contracts
    Authors: 黃立
    Hwang, Li
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 行為基礎之變更;情事變更原則;為契約基礎之重要想法事後確認非屬正確;契約之調整;解除契約;終止契約
    Interference with the basis of the contract;Doctrine of changed circumstances;Material assumptions that have become the basis of the contract subsequently turn out to be incorrect;Adaptation of the contract;Terminatation of the contract;The right to terminate on notice
    Date: 2011.02
    Issue Date: 2014-10-06 17:13:42 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 法律認為，於契約中對所有必要之點，已達成協議，但契約常以某些情況為基礎，卻未在契約的內容中表達出來，這些情況可能是當事人認為是現存或未來必然發生或不發生的，這種情況，在德國法上被稱為行為基礎（die Geschäftsgrundlage）。由於我國民法第二二七條之二對於情事變更的規定，不若德國法完整，使情事變更之適用問題在我國工程承攬契約中，爭議甚多。本文的解析希望能對立法者與實務界有所幫助。
    Art.313/1 regulates: “If circumstances upon which a contract was based have materially changed after conclusion of the contract and if the parties would not have concluded the contract or would have done so upon different terms if they had foreseen that change, adaptation of the contract may be claimed in so far as, having regard to all the circumstances of the specific case, in particular the contractual or statutory allocation of risk, it cannot reasonably be expected that a party should continue to be bound by the contract in its unaltered form.” Art. 227 b of Taiwan’s Civil Law has the same regulation, but does not apply it. If material assumptions that have become the basis of the contract subsequently turn out to be incorrect, they are treated in the same way as a change in circumstances. The flaw of the regulation causes numerous problems in work contracts.
    Relation: 法學評論 , 119, 189-234
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Law] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    189-234.pdf1203KbAdobe PDF23818View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback