Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/70346
|
| Title: | 著作權作為創作誘因？：以台灣獨立音樂人為對象的實證研究
Copyright as an Incentive of Creation?: An Empirical Study of Independent Musicians in Taiwan |
| Authors: | 戴雅彣 |
| Contributors: | 李治安
戴雅彣 |
| Keywords: | 著作權
誘因理論
創作誘因
著作權立法政策
獨立音樂
赫茲伯格雙因子理論
copyright
the incentive theory
incentives of creation
copyright policy
independent music
Herzberg`s Two-Factor Theory |
| Date: | 2013 |
| Issue Date: | 2014-10-01 13:46:58 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 傳統著作權誘因理論係以市場失靈的角度切入論述著作權保護之必要性。該理論存在三大假設：第一，著作市場在缺乏著作權制度管制下，會發生外部性和公共財市場失靈現象，創作者會缺乏生產社會最適產量的誘因，而發生「過低生產」之情形；第二，政府應設計介入市場之機制，而賦予創作者著作權為最有效率、成本最低之市場介入手段；第三，著作權保護可以提供著作權人創作誘因。近年來，出現不少反對著作權過度擴張保護的聲音，除了擔憂公眾領域和利用人權益遭著作權外溢現象侵襲，部分論者也開始質疑誘因理論的假設前提。
本研究希望透過實證研究，探詢誘因理論之三大假設前提是否得一體適用於所有創作環境中。本研究選擇以台灣獨立音樂人為研究對象，蓋著作權為音樂產業三大核心價值之一，而獨立音樂作為音樂產業的重要創意動能，對於著作權制度的反饋尤其重要。本研究以心理學動機和誘因理論為基礎，透過訪談台灣獨立音樂人之方式，探討著作權是否確為保障創作誘因之必要條件。訪談設計上，將獨立音樂人的創作活動切割成「創意源頭」、「創作過程」、「創作產出」三個時期，並將各時期的行為切割觀察，探討各階段的創作動機及誘因。
研究結果顯示，傳統誘因理論強調的經濟誘因保障，在獨立音樂創作者的創作活動中，較不具有重要性。首先，許多受訪者對於音樂產品的外部性和公共財特性展現不在意之態度，故音樂消費市場的搭便車現象不會發生如誘因理論論者主張之外部性和公共財之市場失靈現象。其次，訪談結果顯示獨立音樂人的創作活動或多或少受先前創作影響，故著作權的絕對保護可能減少音樂人接觸其他音樂作品的機會，而不利於初起步的音樂人累積創作實力。最後，分析創意活動三階段的創作誘因可以發現，不論在「創意源頭」、「創作過程」或「創作產出」階段，受訪之獨立音樂人的創作誘因多與著作財產權無涉，只有少數誘因與著作人格權的保護有關。訪談結果亦顯示獨立音樂人對特定著作權保護（如「姓名表示權」）的態度較其他著作權保護更為重視，而著作財產權所提供的經濟誘因，則較近似於赫茲伯格理論中的「保健因子」角色，並非能真正激勵創作的要素。
Traditional incentive theory of copyright is based on the theory of market failure. The incentive theory has three premises about the world of creation: First, without any intervention, an externality and market failure of public goods shall occur, making potential inventors lack incentives to create a socially optimal quantity of works, leading to an undersupply of creative works. Second, an intervention is therefore required, and copyright protection is the most efficient measures with low cost. Third, copyright protection, in this regard, provide incentives for inventors to create. Recently, not only have there been more concerns about the over expansion of copyright protections and the following results of erosion of public domain and users’ interests, questions have also been raised with respect to the premises of the incentive theory.
This study is aimed at providing insights into the three premises of the incentive theory through empirical research. To start with, independent musicians in Taiwan were chosen as the research target in that copyright is one of the most essential value of the music industry and thus independent music, being the thriving power of the music industry, is crucial for the inspection of the current copyright regime. This study examine the premises by interviewing independent musicians in Taiwan and analyzing the results based on theories of motivation in psychology. This study further divides the creating process into three periods— the origins of creativity, the creating process and the output—and observe motivations period by period.
The result indicates that monetary incentive, which is a great emphasis in the traditional incentive theory, is not as important as expected in the creative process of the independent musicians in Taiwan. First of all, many respondents hold indifferent attitudes towards the externalities and characteristics of public goods that occurred in the music market, thus the phenomenon of free-riders may not contribute to market failure. Second of all, the result shows that almost all created activities were more or less affected by prior works. An absolute protection of copyright is very likely to deprive musicians of their accesses to other musical works, impeding the cumulative process of creativity. Last and most importantly, the incentives for independent musicians to create, be that during the origins of creativity, the creating process or the output period, have little to do with copyright protection. Only a few incentives are associated with moral rights. The result also shows that independent musicians value certain moral rights, such as right of attribution, more than other rights protected by copyright law. As for the economic rights under current copyright law, the result indicates that they appear more of “hygiene factors,” as defined in Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory, than incentives of creation in the process of creativity. |
| Reference: | 一、中文部分
專書
FORAY, D.，周宜芳譯，知識經濟學，台北：天下遠見，2007年。
LESSIG, L.，劉靜怡譯，誰綁架了文化創意：一場數位時代的財產戰爭，台北：早安財經文化，2008年。
MASLOW, A.H.等人，李美華、吳凱琳譯，馬斯洛人性管理經典，台北：商業周刊，2007年。
SMITH, E.E.等人，洪光遠譯，普通心理學（下），台北：桂冠，2006年。
李安德，超個人心理學，台北：桂冠，1992年。
張清溪、許嘉棟、劉鶯釧、吳聰敏，經濟學：理論與實際，台北：翰蘆圖書，2004年。
楊雲明，個體經濟學。台北：智勝文化，四版，2008年。
專書論文
章忠信，臺灣地區1949年後著作權法制之發展變遷，載：中國著作權法律百年國際論壇論文集，2010年，www.copyrightnote.org/paper/pa0058.doc（最後瀏覽日：2014/1/7）。
期刊文章
卞宗瑩，數位音樂時代下獨立音樂產業的新經營模式：以「城市音樂」網路平台為例，中華傳播學會年會119期，2009年。
李治安，著作權法中的灰姑娘：利用人地位之探討，臺大法學論叢41卷3期，頁931-979，2012年。
林暐哲訪談，獨立青年，音樂創業 INSIDE SPIRIT，誠品好讀47期，2004年。
張瓊華，專利制度之再思考－新興科技衝擊下的迷思與困境，智慧財產權月刊55期，頁17-55，2003年。
許牧彥，從知識的經濟本質談知識產權的原理，科技發展政策報導，頁442-455，2003年6月。
楊智傑，智慧財產權差別取價之研究－以藥物專利與電影著作為例，財產法暨經濟法，頁73-128，2010年。
蔡岳勳、胡心蘭，從法律與經濟學的角度分析美國著作權法之科技保護措施及合理使用原則，中原財經法學14卷，頁157-243，2005年。
博士論文
楊佳蓉，自由文化中的音樂商業模式初探：以獨立音樂為例，國立政治大學新聞研究所博士論文，2012年。
蔡惠如，著作權合理使用之價值創新與未來展望，國立交通大學科技管理研究所博士論文，2006年8月。
碩士論文
李劍非，論著作權與資訊流通自由的衝突與解決－從真實空間到網路空間，國立台灣大學法律學系研究所碩士論文，2010年。
林咏芬，論著作權法中之接觸權，私立逢甲大學財經法律研究所碩士論文，2006年。
林怡瑄，台灣獨立唱片研究，國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文，2003年。
陳思豪，自由軟體發展與智慧財產權制度互動之觀察，國立政治大學法律科際整合研究所碩士論文，2013。
曾裕恒，台灣唱片產業之研究：主流與非主流之比較分析，國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，2008年。
黃詩雯，台灣獨立音樂發展與文化政策，國立台南藝術大學博物館學研究所碩士論文，2010年。
黃韻蓉，原住民傳統知識保護法制研究--聚焦於財產權面向之研討，國立交通大學科技法律研究所碩士論文，2011年。
鄭淑儀，臺灣流行音樂與大眾文化（1982-199年)，私立輔仁大學大眾傳播研究所碩士論文，1992年。
鄭凱同，主流與獨立的再思考：文化價值、音樂產業與文化政策的思辨與探討，私立淡江大學大眾傳播研究所碩士論文，2005年。
戴昀，台灣獨立唱片廠牌實作：以小白兔橘子唱片為例，國立政治大學社會學研究所碩士論文，2006年。
網路資料
StreetVoice朱約信簡史，http://tw.streetvoice.com/pigheadskin/articles/75245（最後瀏覽日2013/11/29）。
中華百科全書，http://ap6.pccu.edu.tw/Encyclopedia_media/main-soc.asp?id=5957（最後瀏覽日：2013/12/15）。
文化部台灣大百科全書，http://taiwanpedia.culture.tw/web/content?ID=10840（最後瀏覽日：2013/11/22）。
台灣創用CC計畫網站，http://creativecommons.tw/license（最後瀏覽日：2013/11/14）。
社團法人中華有聲出版錄音著作權管理協會（RPAT）官網，http://www.rpat.org.tw（最後瀏覽日：2013/10/30）。
社團法人中華音樂著作權協會（MÜST）官網，http://www.must.org.tw（最後瀏覽日：2013/10/30）。
社團法人台灣音樂著作權人聯合總會（MCAT）官網，http://www.mcat.org.tw（最後瀏覽日：2013/10/30）。
社團法人台灣音樂著作權協會（TMCS）官網，http://www.tmcs.org.tw（最後瀏覽日：2013/10/30）。
社團法人台灣錄音著作權人協會（ARCO）官網，http://www.arco.org.tw（最後瀏覽日：2013/10/30）。
陳盈竹，智慧財產權保護與網路外部效益性，行政院經濟建設委員會綜合計劃處綜合規劃研究，http://www.cepd.gov.tw/m1.aspx?sNo=0016911（最後瀏覽日：2013/12/20）。
雷射的歷史，http://www.ieo.nctu.edu.tw/~ieofuture/102/LZhis.html（最後瀏覽日：2013/12/20）。
賴品瑀，「晚安，各位農友」骯髒而真誠的濁水溪公社，http://e-info.org.tw/node/86525（最後瀏覽日2013/11/29）。
二、外文文獻
專書
ELKIN-KOREN, N. & E. SALZBERGER, THE LAW AND ECONOMICS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN THE DIGITAL AGE: THE LIMITS OF ANALYSIS, ROUTLEDGE, NEW YORK. (2012).
GEOFFREY, P. H., THE RECORDING INDUSTRY, ALLYN AND BACON, BOSTON. (1998).
GILLETT, C., THE SOUND OF THE CITY: THE RISE OF ROCK AND ROLL, SOUVENIR, LONDON. (1983).
GOLDSTEIN, P., COPYRIGHT`S HIGHWAY, HILL AND WANG, NEW YORK. (1994).
Kosslyn, S. M. & Rosenberg, R. S., Psychology In Context, Allyn And Bacon, Boston. (2006).
LESSIG, L., REMIX: MAKING ART AND COMMERCE THRIVE IN THE HYBRID ECONOMY, PENGUIN PRESS, NEW YORK. (2008).
MASLOW, A. H., THE FARTHER REACHES OF HUMAN NATURE, VIKING COMPASS, NEW YORK. (1973), Retrieved from
http://www.humanpotentialcenter.org/Articles/FartherReaches.pdf
NEGUS, K., POPULAR MUSIC IN THEORY: AN INTRODUCTION, BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, OXFORD. (1996).
O’SULLIVAN, T. ET AL., KEY CONCEPTS IN COMMUNICATION AND CULTURAL STUDIES, ROUTLEDGE, NEW YORK. (1997).
PATTERSON, L. R. & S. W. LINDBERG, THE NATURE OF COPYRIGHT: A LAW OF USERS RIGHTS, UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA PRESS, ATHENS. (1991).
POSNER, R. A., ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF LAW, LITTLE, BROWN AND COMPANY, NEW YORK. (3d ed. 1986).
RAUSTIALA, K. & C. SPRIGMAN, THE KNOCKOFF ECONOMY: HOW IMITATION SPARKS INNOVATION, OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, NEW YORK. (2012).
ROWE, D., POPULAR CULTURES: ROCK MUSIC, SPORT AND THE POLITICS OF PLEASURE, SAGE, LONDON. (1995).
SCOTCHMER, S., INNOVATION AND INCENTIVES, THE MIT PRESS, CAMBRIDGE. (2006).
SHUKER, R., KEY CONCEPTS IN POPULAR MUSIC STUDIES, ROUTLEDGE, NEW YORK. (1998).
WALLIS, R. & K. MALM, BIG SOUNDS FROM SMALL PEOPLES: THE MUSIC INDUSTRY IN SMALL COUNTRIES, PENDRAGON PRESS, NEW YORK. (1984).
專書論文
ARNÖ, K. (2005). DUAL LICENSING: A BUSINESS MODEL FROM THE SECOND GENERATION OF OPEN-SOURCE COMPANIES IN HOW OPEN IS THE FUTURE? ECONOMIC, SOCIAL & CULTURAL SCENARIOS INSPIRED BY FREE & OPEN-SOURCE SOFTWARE 479-488 (M. WYNANTS & J. CORNELIS EDS.). RETRIEVED FROM
http://ebooksgo.org/open-access/crosstalks_book1.pdf
Fisher, W. W. (2001). Theories of Intellectual Property, in NEW ESSAYS IN THE LEGAL AND POLITICAL THEORY OF PROPERTY 168-199 (Stephen Munzer ed.). Retrieved from
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/tfisher/IP/Fisher%20IP%20Theory.pdf
GALLINI, N. & S. SCOTCHMER (2002). INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: WHEN IS IT THE BEST INCENTIVE SYSTEM? IN INNOVATION POLICY AND THE ECONOMY 51-77 (ADAM B. JAFFE ET AL., EDS.). RETRIEVED FROM
http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~scotch/G_and_S.pdf
Ryan, J. & R. A. Peterson (1982). The Product Image: The Fate of Creativity in Country Music Songwriting in Individuals in MASS MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS: CREATIVITY AND CONSTRAINT 11-32 (James. S. Ettema & D.C. Whitney eds.).
判決
Twentieth Century Music Corp. v. Aiken, 422 U.S. 151, 156 (1975).
Sony Corp. of Amer. v. Universal City Studios Inc., 464 U.S. 417, 450 (1984)
Eldred v. Ashcroft, 537 U.S. 186, 201 (2003)
期刊論文
Balkin, J. M. (2009). The Future of Free Expression in a Digital Age. Pepperdine Law Review, 36, 427-444. Retrieved from
http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1222&context=fss_papers
Barnett, J. M. (2009). Is Intellectual Property Trivial?. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 157, 1691-1742. Retrieved from
https://www.law.upenn.edu/live/files/75-barnett157upalrev16912009pdf
Breyer, S. (1970). The Uneasy Case for Copyright: A Study of Copyright in Books, Photocopies and Computer Programs. Harvard Law Review, 84, 281-351. Retrieved from
http://www.jstor.org/stable/1339714
Demsetz, H. (1969). Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint. Journal of Law & Economics, 12, 1-22. Retrieved from
http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/724977?uid=2&uid=4&sid=21103250005297
DePoorter, B. et al. (2009). Copyright Abolition and Attribution. Review of Law and Economics, 5, 1063-80.
Fisher, W. W. (1998). Property and Contract on the Internet. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 73, 1203-56. Retrieved from
http://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3147&context=cklawreview
Foster, S. E. (2009). Invitation to a Discourse Regarding the History, Philosophy, and Social Psychology of a Property Right in Copyright. Florida Journal of International Law, 21, 171-208.
Fromer, J. (2010). A Psychology of Intellectual Property. Northwestern University Law Review, 104, 1441-1510. Retrieved from
http://legalworkshop.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/LR104n4Fromer.pdf
Gordon, W. J. (1989). An Inquiry into the Merits of Copyright: The Challenges of Consistency, Consent, and Encouragement Theory. Stanford Law Review, 41, 1343-1469. Retrieved from
http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1228805?uid=2&uid=4&sid=21103250005297
Gordon, W. J. (2004). Rendering Copyright unto Caesar: On Taking Incentives Seriously. University of Chicago Law Review, 71, 75-92. Retrieved from
http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1600511?uid=2&uid=4&sid=21103250005297
Heald, P. J. (2008). Property Rights and the Efficient Exploitation of Copyrighted Works. Minnesota Law Review, 92, 1031-63. Retrieved from
http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Heald_FinalPDF.pdf
Herzberg, F. (1987). One More Time: How do you motivate employees?. Harvard Business Review, 9, 5-16. Retrieved from
http://www.facilitif.eu/user_files/file/herzburg_article.pdf
Hughes, J. (1988). The Philosophy of Intellectual Property. Georgetown Law Journal, 77, 287-360. Retrieved from
http://www.justinhughes.net/docs/a-ip01.pdf
Kaldor, N. (1939). Welfare Propositions of Economics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility. The Economic Journal, 49, 549-552. Retrieved from
http://www.hujingbei.net/upload/2007_11/07110714361173.PDF
Ku, R. S. R. et al. (2009). Does Copyright Law Promote Creativity? An Empirical Analysis of Copyright’s Bounty. Vanderbilt Law Review, 62, 1669-1746. Retrieved from
http://www.vanderbiltlawreview.org/articles/2009/11/Ku-et-al.-Does-Copyright-Law-Promote-Creativity-62-Vand.-L.-Rev.-1669-2009.pdf
Lacey, L. J. (1989). Of Bread and Roses and Copyrights. Duke Law Journal, 1989, 1532-96. Retrieved from
http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3098&context=dlj
Landes, W. M. & R. A. Posner (1989). An Economic Analysis of Copyright Law. The Journal of Legal Studies, 18, 325-53. Retrieved from
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/IPCoop/89land1.html
Lee, S. (1995). Re-examining the Concept of the “Independent” Record Company: The Case of Wax Trax! Records. Popular Music, 14, 13-31.
Liebowitz, S. J. & S. Margolis (2005). Seven Famous Economists Weigh in on Copyright: The Role of Theory, Empirics, and Network effects. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 18, 435-57. Retrieved from
http://jolt.law.harvard.edu/articles/pdf/v18/18HarvJLTech435.pdf
Liebowitz, S. J. (2009). Thy Myth of Copyright Inefficiency. Regulation 32, 28-34. Retrieved from
http://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/regulation/2009/2/v32n1-4.pdf
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-96. Retrieved from
http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Maslow/motivation.htm
Merges, R. P. (1993). Are You Making Fun of Me: Notes on Market Failure and the Parody Defense in Copyright. The American Intellectual Property Law Association Quarterly Journal, 21, 305-12. Retrieved from
http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/facpubs/459
Png, Ivan P. L. (2006). Copyright: A Plea for Empirical Research. Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 3, 3-13. Retrieved from
http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~ipng/research/copyright_RERCI.pdf
Samuelson, P. (2006). Enriching Discourse on Public Domains. Duke Law Journal, 55, 783-841. Retrieved from
http://people.ischool.berkeley.edu/~pam/papers/enriching%20PD%202d%20edit.pdf
Silbey, J. (2011). Harvesting Intellectual Property: Inspired Beginnings and “Work-Makes-Work,” Two Stages in the Creativity Processes of Artists and Innovators. Notre Dame Law Review, 86, 2091-132. Retrieved from
http://www3.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_public/86ndlr5/Silbey.pdf
網路資料
MACAULAY, T. B., SPEECHES ON COPYRIGHT (C. GASTON ED. 1914), Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/macaulaysspeeche00maca
Jefferson, T., letter to Isaac McPherson, 13 Aug. 1813 in THE WRITINGS OF THOMAS JEFFERSON. (Andrew A. Lipscomb & Albert Ellery Bergh eds., 1905), Retrieved from
http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/a1_8_8s12.html
Villano, M., Ecommerce Trend for 2014: Buying Into the Subscription Service Model, Entrepreneur Magazine, (2013). Retrieved from
HTTP://WWW.ENTREPRENEUR.COM/ARTICLE/229852 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
科技管理與智慧財產研究所
100361014
102 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100361014 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 101401.pdf | 3575Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 923 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
