English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51041834      Online Users : 921
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/70268


    Title: 我國金控公司子公司組合與雙引擎策略對金控績效與風險影響之分析
    The Impact of Subsidiary Combination and Dual-Engine Strategies on Financial Holding Companies’ Performance and Risk
    Authors: 徐士閎
    Hsu, Shi Hong
    Contributors: 王儷玲
    彭金隆

    Wang, Li Ling
    Peng, Jin Lung

    徐士閎
    Hsu, Shi Hong
    Keywords: 金融控股公司
    多角化
    雙引擎策略
    子公司組合
    Financial Holding Company
    Diversification
    Dual-Engine Strategies
    Subsidiary Combination
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2014-10-01 13:33:41 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   本文探討我國金控公司在不同子公司組合以及考量雙引擎策略下,對各種績效指標以及風險指標影響。資料取樣我國2002年至2013年間15家金控公司之季度資料,在考量過去關於金融機構及金控公司多角化經營與子公司組合有關文獻後,選取適當控制變數搭配「以銀行搭配壽險為主」之虛擬變數進行分析,並以虛擬變數及三種集中率進行穩健度測試及並觀察不同面向影響;接著於雙引擎分析當中,試圖發展用於測量雙引擎策略程度之兩種平衡率變數,並且考量交叉項的效果,分別加入模型中進行分析分析。研究結果分為複迴歸、追蹤資料模型,以及關於落後一期自變數對當期應變數之延伸分析。
      在複迴歸及追蹤資料模型進行橫斷面及縱斷面之實證研究結果指出,金控投入的資源越分散(資產多角化程度越高)或是越集中(集中率越高)皆未能顯著提昇金控績效或降低風險;然而若考慮雙引擎策略時,則能顯著提昇EPS、P/B Ratio或RBC,同時,不論資產面或營收面建立的平衡率變數,皆可觀察出金控旗下兩大子公司在收益傾向越相等的情況下,具顯著改善金控整體獲利能力、投資人評價或是降低破產風險的情況。
      本研究對於各個金控公司前一期的自變數對當期應變數進行延伸分析,實證結果支持了本研究對於投入到產出存在時間落差的假設,亦即以資產平衡率而言,較屬於以資源「投入」概念觀察雙引擎策略程度,因此需要隔一段時間才能展現對於績效與風險的影響;而收益平衡率則偏向以當期「產出」的概念觀察雙引擎變數,此時用於衡量下一期之績效指標將會傾向不顯著,但對於風險方面則傾向能夠顯著降低破產風險。
      This study investigates the relationship of different subsidiary combination and dual-engine strategies on financial holding companies’ performance and risk. Using quarterly data for 15financial holding companies(FHCs)in the R.O.C for the period 2002Q1–2013Q4 and controlling for the size, size growth, equity ratio and diversification. In order to analysis the issue, we choose “the top-two subsidiaries are bank and life insurance” as a dummy variables, asset and revenue balance ratio as dual-engine variables. Also, the paper introduces several relevant variables to implement the robust tests. These relevant variables are “the FHC has subsidiary of life insurance”, three concentration ratios and two interaction variables. Our empirical finding can be divided into three parts: multiple regression, panel data and one-period lagged data analysis.
      In multiple regression and panel data, we find evidence that both higher diversification and concentration in subsidiary resource have an ambiguities relation for the performance and risk of financial holding companies. However, considering dual-engine strategies can significantly improve the EPS, P/B Ratio and RBC in empirical results. Also, both asset and revenue balance ratios have significant effect to improve the earning power, the valuation of investors and the insolvency risk.
      This paper also use the one time lagged data to conduct the extension study. The findings support the assumption of ours that FHCs exist time-lag between input and output. The asset balance ratio is more like the input concept and the revenue balance ratio is rather more like the output concept when we discuss the dual-engine strategies. In other words, there need more time to show the impact of performance and risk indicators when we use the asset balance ratio. However, output variable has insignificant relation to the performance indicators and significant effect to the risk indicator when we use the revenue balance ratio.
    Reference: 中文文獻

    1.李桐豪,2001,由美國服務業現代化法看我國的金融控股公司法,台灣金融財務季刊,2輯2期,1-17。

    2.李旭華、李珍穎,2012,財產保險經營績效財務面因素之探討─金融控股公司績效較好嗎,創新與管理,9卷1期,25-54。

    3.沈中華、彭金隆、陳業寧,2010,我國金融控股公司整體經營績效評比,前程文化事業有限公司。

    4.姜羚毓,2005台灣金融控股公司之範疇經濟分析,國立臺北大學經濟學系研究所碩士論文。

    5.陳怡凱、林詣宸,2010,台灣銀行業是否受惠於多角化經營?以收入與放款為例,管理評論,29卷4期,39-67。

    6.陳百華,2011,非金控公司銀行之經營策略探討,國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)碩士論文。

    7.許振明、林雅玲,2007,金融發展在經濟成長中所扮演的角色:台灣、韓國及日本的經驗(1980-2001),國改研究報告,財金(研) 095-018 號。

    8.張研婷,2002,台灣金融控股公司策略群組與績效關係之研究,國立政治大學企業管理學系碩士班論文。

    9.彭金隆,2004,金融控股公司法制監理與經營策略,智勝文化事業有限公司。

    10.黃台心,2009,計量經濟學,新陸書局股份有限公司。

    11.黃雪齡,2005,金融控股公司併購績效之研究—以富邦金控子銀行之併購為例,輔仁大學企業管理學系碩士班論文。

    12.蔡閔森,2005,我國金融控股公司經營績效之評比,國立政治大學金融學系碩士論文。

    13.劉景中,2009,銀行集中度、銀行市場競爭度與銀行風險-台灣實證研究,經濟論文,37卷1期,101-135。

    14.劉景中,2008,經濟論文叢刊,銀行集中度與台灣銀行業的獲利性及風險,36卷3期,327-355。

    15.劉彩卿、陳欽賢,2012,STATA基礎操作與統計模型應用,雙葉書廊有限公司。

    16.賴怡洵、林文昌、李佩純,2012,金融整合對金融控股公司資金成本之影響,中山管理評論,20卷4期,1177-1211。

    17.蕭文龍,2010,多變量分析最佳入門實用書(第二版):SPSS+LISREL,碁峰資訊股份有限公司。

    18.謝耀龍,2011,金融行銷,雙葉書廊。

    19.顏晃平、張靜文,2011,本國銀行業成本效率之研究-共同邊界函數應用,經濟研究,47卷1期,147-181。

    20.簡湘庭,2013,金控公司多角化程度對經營風險之影響,國立政治大學風險管理與保險學系碩士論文。


    英文文獻

    1. Berger, A. N., Hasan, I., and Zhou, M. (2010). "The effects of focus versus
    diversification on bank performance: Evidence from Chinese banks". Journal of
    Banking & Finance, vol. 34(7): 1417-1435.

    2. Brighi, P. and Venturelli V. (2014). "How do income diversification, firm size and capital ratio affect performance? Evidence for bank holding companies." Applied Financial Economics: 1-18.

    3. Demirgüç-Kunt, A., and Huizinga, H. (2010)."Bank activity and funding strategies: The impact on risk and returns". Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 98(3): 626-650.

    4. Elyasiani E. and Wang Y. (2012). "Bank holding company diversification and production efficiency ". Applied Financial Economics, vol. 22(17): 1409-1428.

    5. Shim, J. (2013). "Bank capital buffer and portfolio risk the influence of business cycle and revenue diversification". Journal of Banking & Finance: vol. 37(3): 761-772.

    6. De Haan, J. and Poghosyan, T.(2013)."Size and earnings volatility of US ank holding companies". Journal of Banking & Finance, vol. 36(11), 3008-3016.
    7. Kunt A.D. and Huizinga H., (2013)."Do we need big banks? Evidence on performance, strategy and market discipline," Journal of Financial Intermediation, vol. 22(4), 532-558.

    8. Gamra, S. B. and Plihon D., (2011)., "Revenue diversification in emerging market banks: implications for financial performance", arXiv.org, Papers 1107.0170: 1-42.

    9. Stiroh, K. J. and A. Rumble (2006). "The Dark Side of Diversification: The Case of US Financial Holding Companies." Journal of Banking & Finance vol. 30(8): 2131-2161.

    10. Stiroh, K. J. (2004). Revenue shifts and performance of US bank holding companies. The evolving financial system and public policy : proceedings of a conference held by the Bank of Canada, , 133-157.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    風險管理與保險研究所
    101358025
    102
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101358025
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[風險管理與保險學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback