政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/70240
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51037262      線上人數 : 950
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/70240


    題名: 刑法第二二二條第一項第一款「二人以上共同犯之」之適用思考
    其他題名: A Study on Violent Sexual Offences Committed by More than Two Perpetrators
    作者: 李聖傑
    Lee, Sheng-Chieh
    貢獻者: 法律系
    關鍵詞: 複行為人強制性交罪;共同強制性交;必要共同正犯;性價值;刑法解釋
    Violent sexual offences;Necessary joint principles;Value of sex;Interpretive methods of criminal law
    日期: 2010.06
    上傳時間: 2014-09-30 17:50:19 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 刑法第二二二條第一項第一款「二人以上共同犯之」的行為樣態，不論是在實務應用或學說的釋義，都還存在著相當的爭議。相對於學說對於規範適用的不同闡釋主張，就相關實務判決的分析呈現上，最高法院顯然傾向以行為人是否有「二人以上共同參與」的文義認定，作為規範適用的主要判斷標準。從罪質加以觀察，刑法第二二二條第一項第一款之複行為人強制性交罪，為必要共同正犯之聚合犯。然而所謂必要共同正犯的罪質，不能只是來自於刑法的文義規定，更應該有其犯罪型態所必須具備的行為模式。本文因此在整理近來最高法院的相關判決後，先以經過簡化的案例事實，介紹我國實務對於刑法第二二二條「二人以上共同犯之」的應用立場。其次再利用刑法各種解釋方法，探求該規範合理的應用空間。本文並且考量性自主法益的特殊價值，論述刑法第二二二條第一項第一款之行為類型的罪質，希望能因此釐清我國刑法第二二二條第一項第一款在實務應用的疑義。
    How does one interpret “more than two individual committing a crime” in section 1 of paragraph 1 of Article 222 of the Criminal Law has been hotly debated in theory and practice. The Supreme Court, in contrast to the theoretical interpretations, is obviously in favor of focusing on the literal meaning of the Article to see whether the crime is committed by more than two individuals. However, if we look into the nature of violent sexual offences, group offenders, a type of the necessary joint principles, can better meet the requirements of section 1 of paragraph 1 of Article 222.This essay will review recent decisions made by the Supreme Court, and, based on the interpretive methods of criminal law, analyze how the clause “more than two perpetrators committing a crime” of Article 222 is applied in practice. The value of self-determination involving sexual activities will also be discussed in this essay to clarify the meaning of section 1 of paragraph 1 of Article 222. In short, this essay aims to provide a new way examine the aforementioned debate.
    關聯: 法學評論 , 115 , 1-54
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    1-54.pdf779KbAdobe PDF25091檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋