English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51018513      Online Users : 830
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/69792


    Title: 從同情共感到效益：論《人性論》與《道德原理探索》的異與同
    Other Titles: Sympathy and Utility: A Comparison between A Treatise of Human Nature and An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals
    Authors: Chen, Brian Chien-Kang
    陳建綱
    Contributors: 政治系
    Keywords: 休謨;描述性;同情共感;效益
    David Hume;Descriptive;Sympathy;Utility
    Date: 2011.09
    Issue Date: 2014-09-11 11:18:39 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 《人性論》與《道德原理探索》之間存在微妙的轉變，認真看待這些轉變有助於我們理解休謨的道德哲學。本文以同情共感與效益為線索，仔細比較了休謨於前述兩書中對於德行的觀察與闡釋，進以指出兩書之間的差異並非來自於休謨在輿論的壓力下被迫修改其理論，而是由於其立論觀點發生了變化，即從著重於探索德行的根源過渡為彰顯德行的效用。然而，在差異之外，休謨的基本立場在兩部著作之間並無實質的改變，他始終以人性的解剖學家自居而致力於建立一個描述性的理論。
    While there are some delicate differences between Hume`s Treatise of Human Nature and his Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, to take these differences seriously is essential to an adequate understanding of Hume`s moral thought. This essay examines Hume`s ideas of justice and benevolence elaborated in those works. My main contention is that the differences between the two works are caused not by Hume`s revision of his theory under the pressure of public opinion, but by the change of the perspective from which he observes virtues, namely his focus has been transferred from the different origins of virtues to the utility they bring about. In spite of the differences, however, the nature of Hume`s theory remains the same. Hume is faithful to his position as an anatomist of human nature, and his aim is to provide a descriptive rather than prescriptive theory.
    Relation: 政治與社會哲學評論, 38, 1-56
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政治學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    1-56.pdf4060KbAdobe PDF21062View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback