政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/69365
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 114401/145431 (79%)
造訪人次 : 53126924      線上人數 : 1066
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/69365


    題名: 技術創造力特性與開發研究---各類創意領域之間比較---子計畫IV：科技創造的本質與脈絡
    其他題名: The Nature and Context of Creativity in Science & Technology
    作者: 詹志禹
    貢獻者: 教育學系
    關鍵詞: 科學發現;知識成長;科技創造;科學哲學;科學思考;批判思考;創造思考
    Scientific discovery;Knowledge growth;Technology creation;Philosophy of science;Scientific thinking;Critical thinking;Creative thinking
    日期: 1999
    上傳時間: 2014-08-27 17:36:30 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本文順著科學哲學發展的歷史脈落,以各派科學哲學的觀點分析科學思考中的創意來源與創造性歷程;到目前為止,分析的結果發現:第一,傳統所謂的歸納法其實是一種「假設-驗證」的歷程,但對於如何創造假設,卻沒有任何說明;第二,邏輯實證論對「發現之脈落」存而不論,造成許多人將科學創造的歷程視為神祕、非理性的歷程;第三,批判思考與創造思考之間,可能具有互相抑制、也可能具有互相助發的關係,總之兩者之間具有密切而難以分割的互動關係,任何有價值的創造都同時需要這兩者;第四,典範既會束縛創造,也會幫助創造,其創造性可能表現在應用、詮釋和預測,但典範之更新則需要危機的刺激;第五,科學發現與科學創造是兩個難以區分的歷程,新事實的發現通常借助於新理論的發明;第六,科學理論與科學方法的多元化,有助於科學創造與科學革命;第七,領域發展與創新是一個拔靴自助的歷程,科學發現雖無邏輯可尋,卻有理由可尋。
    This article analyze the possible process and context of creativity in scientific thinking according to the viewpoints from historical development of philosophy of science. It was found that: (1) The so called "inductive reasoning" is actually a "hypothesis-testing" process; (2) Logical positivism leave the "context of discovery" in black box and therefore leave a mysticism about scientific discovery; (3) Creative and critical thinking can facilitate and inhibit each other, resulting an intimate relationship and essential tension between the two; (4) Paradigms can constrain as well as facilitate creativity with possible facilitating effects from helping novel prediction, interpretation, and application; (5) Since the discovery of new facts is usually through the invention of new theory, the distinction between so called "scientific discovery" and "scientific creativity" is blurred; (6) Theoretical and methodological pluralism in science can promote the probability of scientific discovery and revolution; (7) The growth and innovation of a knowledge domain is a bootstrapping process, in which there can be no logic but there should be some good reasons.
    關聯: 行政院國家科學委員會
    計畫編號NSC88-2519-S004-004-C
    資料類型: report
    顯示於類別:[教育學系] 國科會研究計畫

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML2832檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋