Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/69259
|
| Title: | 情緒在最後通諜賽局中的影響及預測
Emotions and Economic Decision Making in Ultimatum Game Experiments: An Approach based on Artificial Emotional Agents |
| Authors: | 林家仰
Lin, Chia Yang |
| Contributors: | 陳樹衡
Chen, Shu Heng
林家仰
Lin, Chia Yang |
| Keywords: | 人工情緒
交易媒介
性別
最後通諜賽局
artificial emotion
medium
gender
ultimatum game |
| Date: | 2013 |
| Issue Date: | 2014-08-25 15:27:47 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 關於情緒和決策的相關討論，在近期實驗經濟學的研究上，一直是非常熱絡的課題。在各種研究的方法中，最後通牒賽局一直是文獻上一種最廣為使用來探究情緒和決策之間關係的實驗方法。本研究利用最後通牒賽局實驗的結果，建構出一套人工情緒模型，來反推並探究受試者互動過程中，內生產生的情緒對決策的影響。在不受外力干擾下，我們假設受試者的情緒在最後通牒賽局中，可能在兩個情況下被觸發，其一是當提案被接受或拒絕時，以及，當提案的數字和心中設想有落差時都可能產生情緒。同時在我們的最後通牒賽局中，也設計使用金錢和巧克力進行實驗，以嘗試了解貨幣與非貨幣在決策中，是否帶來差異性的情緒刺激。我們的研究採用智慧型代理人基模型，並透過蒙地卡羅模擬，來測試不同參數下我們設定的人工情緒是否能對決策產生影響。借由模擬的方式，不僅讓我們可以借此檢驗情決策行為受情緒改變的顯著程度，更能進一步的觀察不同的交易媒介和受試者性別差異帶來的行為改變。
The ultimatum game has been frequently used as an economic laboratorial environment to study the significance of emotions in economic decision making. While in the ultimatum game literature it has been often argued that respondents may react emotionally to the unfair offers made by the proposer, in this article we make the first attempt to propose a model of the artificial emotional agent to examine the empirical relevance of the emotional behavioral model using data from the ultimatum game experiments. The artificial-agent approach allows us to hypothesize each kind of possible interaction between the proposer and the respondent that may be emotionally cueing. In this article, we build our artificial agents with two possible emotionally cueing mechanisms: one is called the nay-based emotion and the other is called the reference-based emotion. Both emotions can be quantified with different behavioral parameters. Using Monte Carlo simulation, we are able to examine how strongly these two emotions can affect how proposer announces his/her offers and why responder considers accepting or rejecting the offer. The artificial agent approach is applied to a fine analysis by taking into account the exchange medium, i.e., money and chocolate, as well as gender. Hence, not only can we examine generally the significance of emotions in decision making, but also can have a fine look at the difference caused by the exchange medium and gender. |
| Reference: | Abbink, K., Bolton, G. E., Sadrieh, A., & Tang, F.-F. (2001). Adaptive Learning versus Punishment in Ultimatum Bargaining. Games and Economic Behavior, 37(1), 1-25. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/game.2000.0837
Andrade, E. B., & Ariely, D. (2009). The enduring impact of transient emotions on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(1), 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.02.003
Arrow, K. J. (1958). Utilities, Attitudes, Choices: A Review Note. Econometrica, 26(1), 1-23. doi: 10.2307/1907381
Bandelj, N. (2009). Emotions in economic action and interaction. Theory and Society, 38(4), 347-366. doi: 10.1007/s11186-009-9088-2
Beaudoin, L. J., Sloman, A., & Wright, I. (1996). Towards a design-based analysis of emotional episodes. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 3(2), 101-126.
Bell, D. E. (1982). Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty. Operations Research, 30(5), 961-981. doi: 10.2307/170353
Bentham, J. (1789). The principles of morals and legislation. Bowring, ed, 1Works of Bentham1, 92-93.
Berezin, M. (2009). Exploring emotions and the economy: new contributions from sociological theory. Theory and Society, 38(4), 335-346.
Berezin, M. (2010). Emotions and the Economy. In N. J. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The handbook of economic sociology (pp. 109-127): Princeton University Press.
Binmore, K., Shaked, A., & Sutton, J. (1985). Testing Noncooperative Bargaining Theory: A Preliminary Study. The American economic review, 75(5), 1178-1180. doi: 10.2307/1818658
Blount, S. (1995). When Social Outcomes Aren′t Fair: The Effect of Causal Attributions on Preferences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(2), 131-144. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1068
Bowles, S., Boyd, R., Fehr, E., & Gintis, H. (1997). Homo reciprocans: A research initiative on the origins, dimensions, and policy implications of reciprocal fairness. Working paper.
Brandstätter, H., & Königstein, M. (2001). Personality influences on ultimatum bargaining decisions. European Journal of Personality, 15(S1), S53-S70. doi: 10.1002/per.424
Brody, L. R., & Hall, J. A. (2010). Gender, emotion, and socialization Handbook of gender research in psychology (pp. 429-454): Springer.
Camerer, C. (2003). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction: Princeton University Press.
Camurri, A., & Coglio, A. (1998). An architecture for emotional agents. IEEE MULTIMEDIA, 5(4), 24-33.
Chapman, H. A., Kim, D. A., Susskind, J. M., & Anderson, A. K. (2009). In Bad Taste: Evidence for the Oral Origins of Moral Disgust. Science, 323(5918), 1222-1226. doi: 10.1126/science.1165565
Chen, S.-h. (2008). Software-Agent Designs in Economics: An Interdisciplinary [Research Frontier]. Computational Intelligence Magazine, IEEE, 3(4), 18-22. doi: 10.1109/MCI.2008.929844
Chen, S.-H. (2012). Varieties of agents in agent-based computational economics: A historical and an interdisciplinary perspective. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 36(1), 1-25. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2011.09.003
Chen, S.-H. (2013). REASONING-BASED ARTIFICIAL AGENTS IN AGENT-BASED COMPUTATIONAL ECONOMICS. In K. Nakamatsu & L. C. Jain (Eds.), The Handbook on Reasoning-based Intelligent Systems (pp. 575-602): World Scientific.
Civai, C., Corradi-Dell’Acqua, C., Gamer, M., & Rumiati, R. I. (2010). Are irrational reactions to unfairness truly emotionally-driven? Dissociated behavioural and emotional responses in the Ultimatum Game task. Cognition, 114(1), 89-95. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.001
Cooper, D. J., & Dutcher, E. G. (2011). The dynamics of responder behavior in ultimatum games: a meta-study. Experimental Economics, 14(4), 519-546. doi: 10.1007/s10683-011-9280-x
Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender Differences in Preferences. Journal of economic literature, 47(2), 448-474. doi: 10.1257/jel.47.2.448
de Sousa, R. (2014). Emotion. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 ed.).
DiMaggio, P. (2002). Endogenizing ‘animal spirits’: Toward a sociology of collective response to uncertainty and risk. The new economic sociology: Developments in an emerging field, 79-100.
Duffy, J., & Engle-Warnick, J. (2002). Using symbolic regression to infer strategies from experimental data Evolutionary computation in Economics and Finance (pp. 61-82): Springer.
Duffy, J., & Feltovich, N. (1999). Does observation of others affect learning in strategic environments? An experimental study. International Journal of Game Theory, 28(1), 131-152. doi: 10.1007/s001820050102
El-Nasr, M., Yen, J., & Ioerger, T. (2000). FLAME—Fuzzy Logic Adaptive Model of Emotions. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 3(3), 219-257. doi: 10.1023/A:1010030809960
El-Nasr, M. S., & Yen, J. (1998). Agents, emotional intelligence and fuzzy logic. Paper presented at the Fuzzy Information Processing Society-NAFIPS, 1998 Conference of the North American.
Elster, J. (1998). Emotions and economic theory. Journal of economic literature, 36(1), 47-74.
Falk, A., Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003). On the Nature of Fair Behavior. Economic Inquiry, 41(1), 20-26. doi: 10.1093/ei/41.1.20
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature, 425(6960), 785. doi: 10.1038/nature02043
Fehr, E., & Gachter, S. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415(6868), 137.
Frank, R. H. (1987). IF HOMO-ECONOMICUS COULD CHOOSE HIS OWN UTILITY FUNCTION, WOULD HE WANT ONE WITH A CONSCIENCE. American Economic Review, 77(4), 593-604.
Frank, R. H. (1988). Passions within reason: The strategic role of the emotions. New York, NY, US: W W Norton & Co.
Frank, R. H. (2011). The Strategic Role of the Emotions. Emotion Review, 3(3), 252-254. doi: 10.1177/1754073911402375
Güth, W., Schmidt, C., & Sutter, M. (2003). Fairness in the Mail and Opportunism in the Internet: A Newspaper Experiment on Ultimatum Bargaining. German Economic Review, 4(2), 243-265. doi: 10.1111/1468-0475.00081
Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of economic behavior & organization, 3(4), 367-388. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7
Gale, J., Binmore, K. G., & Samuelson, L. (1995). Learning to be imperfect: The ultimatum game. Games and Economic Behavior, 8(1), 56-90. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0899-8256(05)80017-X
García-Gallego, A., Georgantzís, N., & Jaramillo-Gutiérrez, A. (2012). Gender differences in ultimatum games: Despite rather than due to risk attitudes. Journal of economic behavior & organization, 83(1), 42-49. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.06.012
Gmytrasiewicz, P., & Lisetti, C. (2002). Emotions and Personality in Agent Design and Modeling. In J.-J. Meyer & M. Tambe (Eds.), Intelligent Agents VIII (Vol. 2333, pp. 21-31): Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Gratch, J., & Marsella, S. (2005). Evaluating a Computational Model of Emotion. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 11(1), 23-43. doi: 10.1007/s10458-005-1081-1
Harlé, K. M., & Sanfey, A. G. (2007). Incidental sadness biases social economic decisions in the Ultimatum Game. Emotion, 7(4), 876-881. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.876
Harle, K. M., & Sanfey, A. G. (2010). Effects of approach and withdrawal motivation on interactive economic decisions. Cogn Emot, 24(8), 1456-1465. doi: 10.1080/02699930903510220
Haselhuhn, M. P., & Mellers, B. A. (2005). Emotions and cooperation in economic games. Cognitive Brain Research, 23(1), 24-33. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.01.005
Heilman, R. M., Crişan, L. G., Houser, D., Miclea, M., & Miu, A. C. (2010). Emotion regulation and decision making under risk and uncertainty. Emotion, 10(2), 257.
Hennig-Schmidt, H., Li, Z.-Y., & Yang, C. (2008). Why people reject advantageous offers—Non-monotonic strategies in ultimatum bargaining: Evaluating a video experiment run in PR China. Journal of economic behavior & organization, 65(2), 373-384. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2005.10.003
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., & McElreath, R. (2001). In Search of Homo Economicus: Behavioral Experiments in 15 Small-Scale Societies. The American economic review, 91(2), 73-78. doi: 10.2307/2677736
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., . . . Ensminger, J. (2007). " Economic Man" in Cross-Cultural Perspective: Behavioral Experiments in 15 Small-Scale Societies. INTERNATIONAL LIBRARY OF CRITICAL WRITINGS IN ECONOMICS, 204, 343.
Hewig, J., Kretschmer, N., Trippe, R. H., Hecht, H., Coles, M. G. H., Holroyd, C. B., & Miltner, W. H. R. (2011). Why humans deviate from rational choice. Psychophysiology, 48(4), 507-514. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01081.x
Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Shachat, K., & Smith, V. (1994). Preferences, Property Rights, and Anonymity in Bargaining Games. Games and Economic Behavior, 7(3), 346-380. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/game.1994.1056
Jiang, H., & Vidal, J. M. (2006). From rational to emotional agents. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Agent-based Social Simulation.
Kaufman, B. E. (2006). Integrating Emotions into Economic Theory. In M. Altman (Ed.), Handbook of Behavioral Economics (pp. 78-98). Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe.
KENNEDY, S. H., EINSTEIN, G., & DOWNAR, J. (2013). Gender/sex differences in emotions. Medicographia, 35, 271-280.
Kirchsteiger, G. (1994). The role of envy in ultimatum games. Journal of economic behavior & organization, 25(3), 373-389.
Loewenstein, G. (2000). Emotions in Economic Theory and Economic Behavior. The American economic review, 90(2), 426-432. doi: 10.2307/117263
Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1982). Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice Under Uncertainty. The Economic Journal, 92(368), 805-824. doi: 10.2307/2232669
McGee, P., & Constantinides, S. (2013). Repeated play and gender in the ultimatum game. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 42(0), 121-126. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2012.11.012
McRae, K., Ochsner, K. N., Mauss, I. B., Gabrieli, J. J., & Gross, J. J. (2008). Gender differences in emotion regulation: An fMRI study of cognitive reappraisal. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11(2), 143-162.
Mill, J. S. (1863). Utilitarianism. London: Parker, Son and Bourn, West Strand.
Minsky, M. (2006). The emotion machine. New York: Pantheon.
Murnighan, J. K., & Saxon, M. S. (1998). Ultimatum bargaining by children and adults. Journal of Economic Psychology, 19(4), 415-445. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(98)00017-8
Mussel, P., Hewig, J., Allen, J. J. B., Coles, M. G. H., & Miltner, W. (2014). Smiling faces, sometimes they don`t tell the truth: Facial expression in the ultimatum game impacts decision making and event-related potentials. Psychophysiology, 51(4), 358-363. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12184
Neelin, J., Sonnenschein, H., & Spiegel, M. (1988). A Further Test of Noncooperative Bargaining Theory: Comment. The American economic review, 78(4), 824-836. doi: 10.2307/1811179
Nelissen, R., Leliveld, M. C., van Dijk, E., & Zeelenberg, M. (2011). Fear and guilt in proposers: using emotions to explain offers in ultimatum bargaining. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(1), 78-85.
Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2012). Emotion regulation and psychopathology: The role of gender. Annual review of clinical psychology, 8, 161-187.
Oosterbeek, H., Sloof, R., & van de Kuilen, G. (2004). Cultural Differences in Ultimatum Game Experiments: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis. Experimental Economics, 7(2), 171-188. doi: 10.1023/B:EXEC.0000026978.14316.74
Page, K. M., & Nowak, M. A. (2001). A Generalized Adaptive Dynamics Framework can Describe the Evolutionary Ultimatum Game. J Theor Biol, 209(2), 173-179. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2000.2251
Pamela Johnston, C., & Feldman, S. (1986). Emotional Reactions to the Economy: I`m Mad as Hell and I`m not Going to Take it Anymore. American Journal of Political Science, 30(1), 50-78. doi: 10.2307/2111294
Picard, R. W. (2000). Affective computing: MIT press.
Picard, R. W. (2003). Affective computing: challenges. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(1–2), 55-64. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00052-1
Pillutla, M. M., & Murnighan, J. K. (1996). Unfairness, Anger, and Spite: Emotional Rejections of Ultimatum Offers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68(3), 208-224. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0100
Pixley, J. (2002). Emotions and economics. The Sociological Review, 50(S2), 69-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2002.tb03592.x
Pixley, J. (2004). Emotions in finance: Distrust and uncertainty in global markets: Cambridge University Press.
Pixley, J. (2009). Time orientations and emotion-rules in finance. Theory and Society, 38(4), 383-400.
Read, D. (2007). Experienced utility: utility theory from Jeremy Bentham to Daniel Kahneman. Thinking & Reasoning, 13(1), 45-61.
Rick, S., & Loewenstein, G. (2008). The role of emotion in economic behavior. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), (3rd ed., Vol. Handbook of Emotions, pp. 138-156). New York: The Guilford Press.
Roth, A. E., Prasnikar, V., Okuno-Fujiwara, M., & Zamir, S. (1991). Bargaining and Market Behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An Experimental Study. The American economic review, 81(5), 1068-1095. doi: 10.2307/2006907
Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game. Science, 300(5626), 1755-1758. doi: 10.1126/science.1082976
Schank, R. C., Colby, K. M., & Newell, A. (1973). Computer models of thought and language: WH Freeman San Francisco.
Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less.
Slembeck, T. (1999). Reputations and fairness in bargaining-experimental evidence from a repeated ultimatum game with fixed opponents: EconWPA.
Sloman, A., & Croucher, M. (1981). Why robots will have emotions.
Slonim, R., & Roth, A. E. (1998). Learning in High Stakes Ultimatum Games: An Experiment in the Slovak Republic. Econometrica, 66(3), 569-596. doi: 10.2307/2998575
Solnick, S. J., & Schweitzer, M. E. (1999). The Influence of Physical Attractiveness and Gender on Ultimatum Game Decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79(3), 199-215. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1999.2843
Steunebrink, B. R., Dastani, M., & Meyer, J.-J. C. (2010). Emotions to control agent deliberation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: volume 1 - Volume 1, Toronto, Canada.
Sutter, M. (2007). Outcomes versus intentions: On the nature of fair behavior and its development with age. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(1), 69-78. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2006.09.001
Takahashi, T. (2007). Economic decision-making in the ultimatum game by smokers. Neuro endocrinology letters, 28(5), 659-661.
Toda, M. (1980). Emotion and decision making. Acta Psychologica, 45(1), 133-155.
Toda, M. (1982). Man, Robot and Society (M. Toda Ed.). Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff Publishing.
van `t Wout, M., Kahn, R. S., Sanfey, A. G., & Aleman, A. (2006). Affective state and decision-making in the Ultimatum Game. Exp Brain Res, 169(4), 564-568. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0346-5
Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior (2d rev. ed.). Princeton, NJ, US: Princeton University Press.
Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (2007). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (60th Anniversary Commemorative Edition): Princeton university press.
Xiao, E., & Houser, D. (2007). Emotion Expression and Fairness in Economic Exchange: George Mason University, Interdisciplinary Center for Economic Science.
Uncategorized References
Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2008). What`s in a name? Anonymity and social distance in dictator and ultimatum games. Journal of economic behavior & organization, 68(1), 29-35.
Damasio, A. (2008). Descartes` error: Emotion, reason and the human brain: Random House.
Marchetti, A., Castelli, I., Harlé, K. M., & Sanfey, A. G. (2011). Expectations and outcome: The role of Proposer features in the Ultimatum Game. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(3), 446-449. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.03.009
Pfister, H.-R., & Böhm, G. (2008). The multiplicity of emotions: A framework of emotional functions in decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(1), 5-17.
Zak, P. J., Stanton, A. A., & Ahmadi, S. (2007). Oxytocin increases generosity in humans. PLoS One, 2(11), e1128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001128 |
| Description: | 博士
國立政治大學
經濟學系
94258505
102 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094258505 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [經濟學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 850501.pdf | 6570Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 501 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
