Reference: | (一) 中文部份:
(1) 王行一,2008,數位落差狀態衡量、策略規劃及績效管理之整合性架構與模式研究,國立政治大學資訊管理研究所博士論文。
(2) 司徒達賢,2005,策略管理新論–觀念架構與分析方法(再版):智勝文化出版。
(3) 吳思華,2000,策略九說 – 策略思考的本質(三版):臉譜文化出版。
(4) 吳安妮,2003,平衡計分卡之精髓、範疇及整合(上),會計研究會刊,第211期(6月): 45-54。
(5) 吳伊茜,2012,策略性衡量指標之設計、診斷及回饋系統–以平衡計分卡個案為例,國立政治大學會技研究所碩士論文。
(6) 胡苾忻,2011,建立平衡計分卡基礎之策略績效管理架構–以A公司為例,國立政治大學商管專業學院碩士學位學程碩士論文。
(7) 陳文慶,2012,策略形成及執行系統設計–以食品業為例,國立政治大學商管專業學院碩士學位學程碩士論文。
(8) 陳澤義與陳啟斌,2012,企業診斷與績效評估: 平衡計分卡之應用(三版):華泰文化。
(9) 黃俊程,2003,平衡計分卡管理制度之設計及應用–以IC設計業為研究對象,國立政治大學經營管理碩士論文。
(10) 劉亭君,2010,策略與績效評估結合之研究–以國內某食品公司為例,國立政治大學會計研究所論文。
(11) Fleisher, C. S. and B. E. Bensoussan. 2007,企業策略與競爭分析 – 工具與應用 (張保隆、陳瑋玲,譯):台灣培生出版。
(12) TSIA,工研院IEK ITIS計畫,2013,2013年第一季我國半導體產業回顧與展望。
網址:
http://ssttpro.acesuppliers.com/semiconductor_news/hi_tech_enews_NewsId_6684.html
(二)英文部份:
(1) Biazzo, S. and P. Garengo. 2012. Performance Measurement with the Balanced Scorecard: A Practical Approach to Implementation within SMEs, Heidelberg and New York: Springer.
(2) Burney, L. L. and N. Swanson. 2010. The relationship between balanced scorecard characteristics and managers’ job satisfaction, Journal of Managerial Issues, 22(2) : 166-181.
(3) Coveney, M., D. Ganster, et al.. 2003. The Strategy Gap: Leveraging Technology to Execute Winning Strategies, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
(4) Desai, J.. 2013. Innovation Engine: Driving Execution for Breakthrough Results, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
(5) Firescu, V. and M. Bondoc. 2008. The scorecard, a fundamental strategic element of the performance management, Annals of the University of Craiova - Economic Sciences Series, 6(36): 2752-2759
(6) Gartner. 2013. Gartner Says Worldwide PC, Tablet and Mobile Phone Combined Shipments to Reach 2.4 Billion Units in 2013.
Available at: http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2408515
(7) Giannetto, D. F.. 2007. Beyond the balanced scorecard, U.S. Business Review, 8(9): 6-8.
(8) Henderson, B. D.. 1970. “The Product Porfolio”, Boston Consulting Group Perspectives.
(9) Hope, J. and S. Player. 2012. Beyond Performance Management: Why, When, and How to Use 40 Tools and Best Practices for Superior Business Performance: Harvard Business Review Press.
(10) IC Insights. 2012. U.S.-based Companies Held 12 of the Top 25 Fabless Spots in 2011.
Available at: http://www.icinsights.com/news/bulletins/USbased-Companies-Held-12-Of-The-Top-25-Fabless-Spots-In-2011/
(11) Irwin, D.. 2002. Strategy mapping in the public sector, Long Range Planning, 35(6): 637-647.
(12) Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton. 1996. The Balance Scorecard- Translating Strategy into Action: Harvard Business School Publish Press.
(13) Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton. 2000. “Having Trouble with Your Strategy? Then Map It.”, Harvard Business Review, 78(5): 167-176.
(14) Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton. 2001. Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balance Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment: Harvard Business School Publish Press.
(15) Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton. 2004. “The Strategy Map: Guide to Aligning Intangible Assets.”, Strategy & Leadership, 32(5): 10-17.
(16) Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton. 2006. Alignment: Using the Balance Scorecard to Create Corporate Synergies: Harvard Business School Publish Press.
(17) Malina, M. A.. 2013. The evolution of a balanced scorecard, The Journal of Applied Business Research, 29(3): 901-912.
(18) Porter, M. E.. 1985. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York: The Free Press.
(19) Prahalad, C. K. and G. Hamel. 1990. The core competence of the corporation, Harvard Business Review, 68(3): 79–91.
(20) Rompho, N.. 2011. Why the balanced scorecard fails in SMEs: a case study, International Journal of Business & Management, 6(11): 39-46.
(21) Valečková, L.. 2009. Application of the balanced scorecard into the formulation of the firm strategy, World Academy of Science, Engineering & Technology, 34: 1174-1179
(22) Werner, M.L. and F. Xu. 2012. Executing strategy with the balanced scorecard, International Journal of Financial Research, 3(1): 88-94.
(23) Yu, E. and K. Kamoche. 2011. Theorising strategy map, International Proceedings of Economics Development & Research, 11: 64-67. |