政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/69197
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113160/144130 (79%)
造访人次 : 50753459      在线人数 : 702
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 資訊管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/69197


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/69197


    题名: 企業創新持續性之探討與研究
    An understanding of the sustainability of business innovation
    作者: 蔡鎔任
    贡献者: 尚孝純
    蔡鎔任
    关键词: 創新
    持續性
    innovation
    sustainability
    日期: 2013
    上传时间: 2014-08-25 15:16:40 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 在競爭激烈的環境中，企業不僅要主動創新，而且還必須不斷創新以保持競爭力。在快速發展成熟和新興技術的不斷帶給企業新的挑戰，因此更新和追踪企業如何持續創新是非常重要的。
    本研究的目的是要了解，衡量，並保持業務創新的可持續性。本研究的核心探討：（1）如何衡量企業創新，（2）公司有什麼需要注意的，以持續創新，以及（3）識別在以前未被研究討論到的創新影響因素。
    總而言之，本研究分為三個階段。第一階段旨在展示如何衡量企業創新和研究的相關文獻。分析了影響創新的成功經驗，研究已國際性創新競賽的創新所採用的標準，綜合分析出以下這些因素：企業文化和管理，以市場為導向的產品和服務，管理良好的客戶關係，資訊技術，創新戰略，人力資源管理和企業流程管理的明確的方向。第二階段旨在:企業在獲獎多年之後如何持續創新。這項研究追蹤在2009-2012年期間各獲獎企業的財務表現，並選擇性能較差的企業作為選擇的個案樣本。結果顯示，如果經濟表現之上的第一年和第二年維持在高於產業類別平均水平，則在第三年仍可保持住續性。第3階段為影響創新的可持續發展，通過深度訪談的結果，結果表明，良好的客戶關係和明確創新方向對創新的可持續性有較高的影響性，此外，結果發現了一個潛在因素 - 知識管理。
    In a highly competitive environment, companies must not only initiate innovation but also must continue to innovate to maintain competitiveness. Rapid advances in both established and emerging technologies continue to bring new challenges to companies and so updating and tracking how companies sustain innovation is very important.
    The purpose of this study is to understand, measure, and maintain the sustainability of business innovation. The core of this research explores: (1) how to measure business innovation, (2) what companies need to pay attention in order to sustain innovation, and (3) how to identify factors that have not been mentioned in previous studies.
    In summary, this study is divided into three phases. Phase 1 seeks to show how to measure business innovations and investigate the relevant literature. This studt then sorts and analyzes the factors that affect the success of innovations, examine the criteria that have been used in innovation competition between nations, and summarize those factors based on the following categories: Business Culture and Management, Market-Oriented Products and Services, Well-Managed Customer Relationships, Information Technology, Clear Direction of Innovation Strategies, Human Resources Management, and Company Process Management. Phase 2 seeks to provide understanding of how firms can sustain innovation over years time and how companies that have won national awards are faring four years later. The study also compares the industry it belongs to in terms of revenue performance during the period 2009–2012 and chooses poor-performing companies as selected case samples. The result shows that if financial performance is sustained above the industry section in the first and second year, it usually remains above average in the third year. Phase 3 provide understanding of the factors affecting the innovation sustainability, through deep interviews, the result shows that Well-Managed Customer Relationship and Clear Direction of Innovation Strategies are most likely have a great impact of innovation sustainability, besides, the result found a potential factor - Knowledge Management.
    參考文獻: Anderson, G., 1993. Fundamentals of Educational Research. Falmer Press, London, pp: 152-160.
    Atuahene-Gima (1995). "Developing and marketing successful product and service innovations: the role of human resource strategy." Proceedings of European Marketing Academy Conference, Paris, pp. 49-66.
    Chakrabarti (1974). "The Role of Champion in Product Innovation," California Management Review 17(1), pp. 58-62.
    Cooper (1999). "The invisible success factors in product innovation." Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16 (2), pp. 115-133.
    Cooper and Kleinschmidt (1996). "Winning businesses in product development: Critical success factors." Research-Technology Management, 39(4), pp. 18-29.
    Cooper, Edgett and Kleinschmidt (1999). "New product portfolio management: practices and performance", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16(4), pp. 333-51.
    De Brentani (1989). "Success and Failure in New Industrial Services." The Journal of Product Innovation Management 6(4), pp. 239.
    De Brentani (1995). "New Industrial Service Development: Scenarios for Success and Failure." Journal of Business Research 32, pp. 93-103.
    De Brentani (2001). "Innovative versus incremental new business services: Different keys for achieving success." The Journal of Product Innovation Management 18, pp. 169-187.
    De Brentani and Ragot (1996) "Developing new business-to-business professional services: What factors impact performance?" Industrial Marketing Management, 25(6), pp. 517-530.
    Edvardsson and Olsson (1996), “Key concepts in new service development”, Service Industries Journal, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 140-64.
    Goldstein Johnston Duffy and Rao 2002. The service concept: The missing link in service design research? Journal of Operations Management, 20(2), 121-134.
    Griffin (1997). "PDMA research on new product development practices: updating trends and benchmarking best practices", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14, pp. 429-58.
    Griffin and Page (1993), “An interim report on measuring product development success and failure”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 281-308.
    Heiskanen, Eva, Pirkko Kasanen and Päivi Timonen (2004), Consumer Participation inSustainable Technology Development, National Consumer Research Center
    Johne (1999). "Successful market innovation." European Journal of Innovation Management 2(1), pp. 6-11.
    Johne and Storey (1998). "New Service Development: A Review of the Literature and Annotated Bibliography." European Journal of Marketing 32(3/4), pp. 184-251.
    King & Lyytinen (2005). "Automotive Informatics: Information Technology and Enterprise Transformation in the Automotive Industry." Transforming Enterprise: The Economic and Social Implications of Information Technology, pp. 283-333
    Maidique and Zirger (1984). "A study of success and failure in product innovation: The case of the U.S. electronics industry." IEEE Trans. Engineering Management, (EM-31), pp. 192-203.
    Markham and Griffin (1998). "The Breakfast of Champions: Associations between Champions and Product Development Environments, Practices and Performance," Journal of Product Innovation Management 15(5), pp. 436-454.
    Martin (1996). "Retail Service Innovation: Input for Success", Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, No. 3 (2), pp. 63-71.
    Martin and Horne (1993). "Services Innovation: Successful versus Unsuccessful Firms," International Journal of Service Industry Management 4(1), pp.
    Oke (2007), "Innovation Types and Innovation Management Practices in Service Companies." International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(6), pp. 564-587.
    Oke and Goffin (2001). "Innovation management in the service sector", Management Focus, Summer issue.
    Patton (1987). How to Use Qualitative Methods in Evaluation. Sage Publication, California, pp: 18-20.
    Schneider and Bowen (1984), “New service design, development and implementation and the employee”, in George, W.R. and Marshall, C.E. (Eds), Developing New Services, American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL, pp. 82-101.
    Shane (1994). "Are Champions Different from Non-champions?" Journal of Business Venturing 9(5), pp. 397-421.
    Song and Parry (1996). "What separates Japanese new product winners from losers. Journal of Product Innovation Management." 13(5), pp. 422-439.
    Storey and Easingwood (1994). "New service success and the augmented service offering." Proceedings of Product Development & Management Association 18th International Conference, Boston, 5-10 November, pp. 178-89.
    Vermeulen (2005), “Uncovering Barriers to Product Innovation in Small and Medium Sized Financial Services Firms”, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 432-452
    Veryzer (1998). "Key factors affecting customer evaluation of discontinuous new products." Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(2), pp. 136-150.
    Yao-Sheng (2007). "The Effects of knowledge management strategy and organization structure on innovation." International Journal of Management, 24(1), pp. 53-60
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    資訊管理研究所
    101356027
    102
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1013560272
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[資訊管理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    027201.pdf893KbAdobe PDF2345检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈