政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/69175
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113303/144284 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50820375      線上人數 : 602
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/69175


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/69175


    題名: 企業因應競爭環境變動之下的敏捷策略應用之案例分析
    A Case Study on Agile Strategy used by Enterprises in Response to the Competitive Environment
    作者: 謝旻諺
    Shay, Jason S.
    貢獻者: 管康彥
    Kuan, Wellington K.
    謝旻諺
    Shay, Jason S.
    關鍵詞: 敏捷策略
    敏捷管理
    敏捷企業
    競爭環境
    Agile Strategy
    Agile Management
    Agile Enterprise
    Competitive Environment
    日期: 2014
    上傳時間: 2014-08-25 15:12:58 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 面對日趨活躍的跨領域互動潮流與日益縮短的產品生命週期及市場反應時間等三項因素，全球產業普遍面臨越來越嚴峻的競爭環境，企業因應變化和不確定性的挑戰越來越大。在這種情況下，企業為了能夠持續存活及維繫本身的競生優勢，他們必須要用一種更為敏捷的方式來回應環境中的變化和不確定性。敏捷策略代表的就是一種將「從市場上取得的訊息回饋並融入到公司的價值鏈內」的策略，它的目的是讓企業能夠更迅速調整自身的資源來回應市場的狀況。儘管目前對敏捷策略有許多不同的看法，但實際上「敏捷」所代表的意義仍然找不到一個如同「精實生產」一樣具體而明確的說法。本研究建立於個案研究的基礎之上，來找出企業在面對不同的競爭條件以及產業條件之下所會採用的敏捷策略的模式及作法。
    研究發現，即便是被認為敏捷範例的企業，它們仍然不一定全方位的採行敏捷策略。公司根據企業在管理上的複雜度，選擇專注於商業環境中的特定面向來導入敏捷作為。本研究發現，所有個案公司在四個敏捷面向中至少採行其中兩個面向。首先，內部組織和文化面向皆調整為允許並提升靈活性和適應性。接著，公司透過調整經營和生產面向來相增加企業的靈活性和適應性。除了調整內部的運作之外，這些公司會依據公司的核心優勢或是在其他面向管理的複雜度來決定應該處理哪一個外部運作面向。本研究發現當企業面臨複雜的供應網絡時，他們會嘗試將資源分配來跟合作夥伴建立敏捷關係;另外，只有企業只有在必須直接及快速面對並回應快速變化的客戶或市場的需求時，他們才會將資源分配以便能夠敏捷地將客戶的聲音和市場的訊息融入產品或服務。 
    As global business environment is experiencing much fiercer competitions from the increased interactions across country and industry boundaries, shorter product life cycle, shorter respond time, more variation and uncertainties are becoming major challenges to corporations nowadays. The increased competition forces companies to react to changes and uncertainties in an agile way, in terms of connecting resources internally and externally, in order to survive and to sustain their competitive advantages. Agility represents a strategy for companies to integrate information on the market into their value chain, making it easier and faster for the companies to leverage their resources and capabilities to respond to market situations in a quick manner. Despite the evolvement of different agility viewpoints, the concept of agility has yet to be solidly defines as it has been done on such concepts as lean manufacturing. On the basis of a multiple case study, this paper aims to identify the ways companies could adapt the agility strategy under different competitive circumstances based on the companies’ and their corresponding industries’ situation.
    The study finds that even companies recognized as agile examples are not performing all-around comprehensive across all aspects of agility. Companies choose to concentrate on specific agility dimensions based on the companies’ actual complications managing the business environment. However, commonalities exist when all case companies are found to perform practice agilely in two of the four dimensions. The internal organization and culture dimension is adjusted to allow flexibility and adaptability. Furthermore, the companies increase the companies’ versatility and adjustability by adjusting the operations and manufacturing dimension. On top of the adjusted internal operation, the companies should then decide to focus on the external environment that is complicated to manage or is fatally related to the companies’ core competencies. It is found only companies with complicated supply network would attempt to allocate resources into establishing agile relationship with their partners; and only companies with direct pressure to react to fast changing customer or market demand would allocate resources into agilely adapting customers’ voices and/or market information into their products or services.
    參考文獻: Axelsson, R., Blomqvist, B., 2012. Business Agility. Stockholm, Sweden: KTH Industrial Engineering and Management.
    Azevedo, S.G., Govindan, K., Carvalho, H., Cruz-Machado, C., 2012. An integrated model to assess the leanness and agility of the automotive industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 66, 85-94
    BCG , 2011. Adaptability: The New Competitive Advantage. The Boston Consulting Group.
    Blackbum, J.D., 1991. The Time Factor. In The Time-Based Competition, ed. Joseph D. Blackbum:3-23. Homewood, IL Business One Irwin.
    Burns, T., Stalker, G.M., 1961. The Management of Innovation. Tavistock Publications, London, UK.
    Bloomberg, 2012. Kodak Files for Bankruptcy as Digital Era Spells End to Film. Bloomberg.
    Chinnaiah, P.S.S., Kamarthi, S.V., 2000. Agile Manufacturing. Innovations in Competitive Manufacturing, 145-154.
    Davenport, T. 1993. Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    Dove, R., 1993. Lean and agile: synergy, contrast, and emerging structure. In: Proceedings of the Defense Manufacturing Conference 1993, San Francisco, CA.
    Dove, R., 1994. The Meaning of Life & The Meaning of Agile. Production 106 (11), 14-15.
    Dove, R., 1994a. Plumbing The Agile Organization. Production 106 (12), 14-15.
    Eisenhardt, K.M., 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 14, 532–550.
    FM Global, 2011. The Tangled Webs We Weave. Reason Magazine (4).
    Gartner, 2013. The Gartner Supply Chain Top 25 for 2013. Gartner Inc.
    GM Heritage Center, 2014. Opel, Adam. General Motor.
    Goldman, S.L., Nagel, R.N., 1993. Management, technology and agility: the emergence of a new era in manufacturing. International Journal of Technology Management 8, 18-38.
    Goldman, S.L., Nagel, R.N., Preiss, K., 1995. Agile Competitors and Virtual Organizations: Strategies
    Gunasekaran, A., 1999. Agile manufacturing: a framework for research and development. International Journal of Production Economics 62, 87-105.
    Gunasekaran, A., Tirtiroglu, E., Wolstencroft, V., 2002. An investigation into the application of agile manufacturing in an aerospace company. Technovation 22, 405-415.
    HBSP, 2014. Case Study Method. Harvard Business Publishing.
    Hugos, M.H., 2009 Business Agility: Sustainable Prosperity in a Relentlessly Competitive World (Microsoft Executive Leadership Series). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    IBM, 2011. Cutting through Complexity with Business Agility (Thought Leadership White Paper). IBM Global Business Services.
    Jackson, M., Johansson, C., 2003. Agility analysis from a production system perspective. Integrated Manufacturing Systems 14, 482-488.
    Kidd, P.T., 1994. Agile Manufacturing: Forging New Frontiers. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
    Lin, C. T., Chiu, H., Tseng, Y., 2005. Agility evaluation using fuzzy logic. International Journal of Production Economics, 101, 353-368.
    Lin, C. T., Chiu, H., Chu, P.-Y., 2006. Agility index in the supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics 100, 285-299.
    Meade, L.M.; Rogers, K.J., 1997. "Enhancing a manufacturing business process for agility," Innovation in Technology Management - The Key to Global Leadership. PICMET `97: Portland International Conference on Management and Technology , vol., no., pp.638,641, 27-31.
    Meade, L.M., Sarkis, J., 1999. Analyzing organizational project alternatives for agile manufacturing processes: an analytical network approach. International Journal of Production Research 37, 241-261.
    Mintzberg, H., Quinn, J.B., Voyer, J., 1995. The Strategy Process. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Rentice-Hall, Inc.
    Moore, R., Reff, K., Graham, J., Hackerson, B., 2007. Scrum at a Fortune 500 Manufacturing Company. Agile Conference (AGILE), 2007 , 175-180.
    Mothersell, W.M., Moore, M.L., Strolle, M., 2008. A Brownfield Lean Conversion: A Case Study of Opel Belgium. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 161-182.
    Mthupha, B., 2012. A Framework for the Development and Measurement of Agile Enterprise Architecture. Rhodes Island: Rhodes University.
    Reed, K., Blunsdon, B., 1998. Organizational flexibility in Australia. International Journal of Human Resource Management 9, 457-477.
    Ross, A., 2004. Creating Agile Supply Chain. IEEE Manufacturing Engineer 82 (6), 18-21.
    Rummler, G.A., Brache, A.P., 1990. Improving Peformance: How to Manage the White Space on the Organization Chart. Edited by Leonard Nadler. The Jossey-Bass Management Series. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
    Senge, P.M., 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday.
    Sharifi, H., Zhang, Z., 1999. A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organizations: an introduction. International Journal of Production Economics 62, 7-22.
    Sharifi, H., Zhang, Z., 2001. Agile manufacturing in practice-application of a methodology. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 21, 772-794.
    Sherehiy, B., Karwowski, W., Layer, J.K., 2007. A review of enterprise agility: Concepts, frameworks, and attributes. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 37, 445-460.
    Sherehiy, B., Karwowski, W., 2014. The relationship between work organization and workforce agility in small manufacturing enterprises. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 44, 466-473.
    Sidky, A., 2007. A Structured Approach to Adopting Agilt Practices: The Agile Adopaion Framework. Blacksburg, Virginia: Virginia Tech.
    The McKinsey Quarterly, 2006. Building a nimble organization: A McKinsey Global Survey. McKinsey & Company.
    Toni, D.A., Tonchia, S., 1998. Manufacturing—flexibility: a literature review. International Journal of Production Research 36, 1587-1617.
    Tseng, Y.H., Lin, C.T., 2011. Enhancing enterprise agility by developing agile drivers, capabilities, and providers. Information Science 181, 3693-3708.
    Tsourveloudis, N.C., Valavanis, K.P., 2002. On the measurement of enterprise agility. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems 33, 329-342.
    Vazquez-Bustelo, D., Avella, L., 2006. Agile manufacturing: Industrial case studies in Spain. Technovation 26, 1147-1161.
    Volberda, H.W., 1996. Toward the flexible form: how to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments. Organization Science 7, 359-374.
    Watson, G.H., 1994. Business Systems Engineering. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    Yin, R.K., 1989. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage, London.
    Yusuf, Y., Sarhadi, M., Gunasekaran, A., 1999. Agile manufacturing: the drivers, concepts and attributes. International Journal of Production Economics 62, 33-43.
    Yusuf, Y.Y., Adeleye, E.O., 2002. A comparative study of lean and agile manufacturing with related survey of current practices in the UK. International Journal of Production Research 40, 4545-4562.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    101355008
    103
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101355008
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    500801.pdf827KbAdobe PDF2138檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋