Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/68526
|
| Title: | 自由現金流量對內部股權結構與財報品質間的調節效果
The moderating effect of free cash flow on the relation between ownership structure and financial reporting quality |
| Authors: | 賴品蓁 |
| Contributors: | 張清福
賴品蓁 |
| Keywords: | 自由現金流量
財報品質
財報重編
內部股權結構
Free cash flow
Financial reporting quality
Financial restatements
Ownership structure |
| Date: | 2013 |
| Issue Date: | 2014-08-12 14:01:35 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究以財報重編為財報品質之代理變數，探討自由現金流量是否對內部股權結構與財報品質的關係具有調節效果，期望藉助對於自由現金流量調節效果之了解，以利報表閱讀者更適當地解讀財報訊息，瞭解財報之品質。
實證結果顯示，自由現金流量對內部股權結構與財報品質間確實具有顯著的調節效果，尤其是董、監持股率與董事兼任經理人這兩項因素對於財報品質之關係，很受到自由現金流量之影響。自由現金流量本身與財報重編呈顯著負相關，自由現金流量愈高，財報重編的可能性愈低。但自由現金流量所引發的代理問題，反而可能對董、監持股率、董事兼任經理人與財報品質間的關係產生負面的調節效果，即財報重編的可能性顯著提高。但自由現金流量對於經理人持股率與財報品質間的關係不具有顯著的調節效果。
This study examines whether free cash flow has the moderating effect on the relation between ownership structure and financial reporting quality, using financial restatements as a proxy for financial reporting quality. This study tries to interpret earnings information more appropriately through more understanding on the moderating effect of free cash flow.
The study shows that free cash flow exactly has the moderating effect on the relation between ownership structure and financial reporting quality, especially for stocks holding ratio by directors and supervisors and CEO duality. Firms having more free cash flow are less likely to restate statements. However, free cash flow might trigger agency problem, which might having negative moderating effects, causing higher possibilities to restate statements. Otherwise, the finding of this study shows that there is no significantly moderating effect on the relation between managerial ownership and financial reporting quality. |
| Reference: | 一、中文部分:
胡詠喬，2008，財務報表重編與舞弊風險因子關聯性之研究，私立中原大學會計研究所碩士論文。
陳志瑋，1996，台灣上市公司自由現金流量代理問題探討，國立中央大學財務管理學系之未出版碩士論文。
陳碧滋，2001，我國上市公司股價行為與董監因素關連性之探討，台灣大學會計學研究所未出版之碩士論文。
陳明輝，2009，企業社會責任與財務報表品質之關聯性分析-以財報重編為例。國立成功大學會計研究所碩士論文。
張明德，2010，股權集中度與自由現金流量對企業融資方式的影響－以台灣上市公司為例，朝陽科技大學財務金融系碩士論文。
詹玉霞，2003，盈餘管理與公司治理對財務報告重編影響之研究，私立東吳大學會計研究所碩士論文。
薛敏正與林嬋娟，2003，自由現金流量與盈餘管理關聯性之研究，台灣管理學刊，第3卷，第1期：151-168。
薛健宏，2008，董監事持股、盈餘平穩化與企業風險之關聯性研究，會計評論，第46期（1月）：107-130。
二、英文部分:
Beasley, M. S. 1996. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of directors composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review 71(4): 443-465.
Berle, A. A. and C. G. Means. 1932. The modern corporation and private property. New York: MacMillan.
Casey, C. J. and N. J. Bartczak. 1985. Using operating cash flow to predict financial distress: some extensions. Journal of Accounting Research 23(spring): 384-401.
Chan, K., N. Jegadeesh, and T. Sougiannis. 2004. The accrual effect on future earnings. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 22: 97-121.
Chung, R., M. Firth and J. Kim. 2005. Earnings management, surplus free cash flow, and external monitoring. Journal of Business Research 58: 766-776.
Claessens, S., S. Djankov. and L. H. P. Lang. 2000. The separation of ownership and control in east Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 58: 81-112.
Copeland, T., Koller, T. and J. Murrin. 2000. Valuation: measuring and managing the value of companies. 3rd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Cornell, B. 1993. Corporate valuation: tools for effective appraisal and decision making. Business One Irwin, New York, NY.
Crutchley, C. E. and R. S. Hansen. 1989. A test of the agency theory of managerial ownership, corporate leverage and corporate dividends. Financial Management (Winter): 36-46.
Damodaran, Aswath. 1996. Investment valuation-tools and techniques for determining the value of any Asset. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan and A. P. Sweeney. 1996. Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: an analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research 13(1): 1-36.
Fama, E. F. and M. C. Jensen. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics 26: 301-325.
Farber, D. B. 2005. Restroing trust after fraud: does corporate governance matter? The Accounting Review 80(2): 539-561.
Hackel, K. S. 1996. Cash flow and security analysis. McGraw-Hill.
Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305-60.
Miller, M. H. and F. Modigliani. 1958. The cost of capital, corporation finance and the Theory of investment. American Economic Review 48(3): 261-297.
Oziir Arslan and Mehmet Baha Karan. Does free cash flow anomaly exist in an emerging market? Evidence from the istanbul stock exchange. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, ISSN 1450-2887(11).
Palepu, K. G., V. L. Bernard and P. M. Healy. 2000. Business analysis and valuation : using financial statements, text and cases. Mason, Ohio: Thomson/South-Western.
Patton, A. and J. C. Baker. 1987. Why won’t directors rock the boat, Harvard Business Review ( Nov.-Dec.): 10-18.
Sharma, V. D. 2004. Board of director characteristics, institutional ownership and fraud : evidence from Australia. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23(2): 105-117.
Trueman, B., M. H. Franco Wong and X. J. Zhang. 2000. The eyeballs have it: searching for the value in internet stocks. Journal of Accounting Research 38(Supplement): 137-163.
Williams, J. B. 1938. The theory of investment value. Fraser Publishing Company. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
100353040
102 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1003530401 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [會計學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
