政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/68525
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51026847      線上人數 : 916
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/68525


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/68525


    題名: 關係人交易、審計品質與會計師屬性
    Related Party Transactions, Audit Quality and Auditor Attributes
    作者: 熊芳瑩
    貢獻者: 周玲臺
    熊芳瑩
    關鍵詞: 關係人交易
    審計品質
    專業屬性
    四大事務所
    產業專家
    related party transactions
    audit quality
    auditor attributes
    big 4 audit firms
    industry specialist audit firms
    日期: 2013
    上傳時間: 2014-08-12 14:01:23 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 近來陸續爆出的舞弊案件已連帶引起了社會大眾對關係人交易行為的注意。本文先探討審計品質與關係人交易之關聯性，而實證結果顯示關係人銷貨、進貨、應收款項與應付款項交易與審計品質皆呈負向關係，足見關係人交易之查核是困難的。因此本文期望透過外部審計人員的專業屬性來降低關係人交易對審計品質產生的不良影響，提升投資人對公司財務報導的信任。過去文獻針對會計師專業屬性部分，指出會計師事務所規模愈大以及產業專精程度愈高者，具備較佳的查核品質。研究結果顯示當關係人銷貨、進貨及應收款項交易係由四大會計師事務所或產業專家會計師事務所查核時，因大型會計師事務所或產業專家會計師事務所具備較佳會計師專業屬性，能抑制或減少關係人交易對審計品質之負面影響，而提升財務報表之審計品質。
    Numerous financial reporting frauds over recent years have made related party transactions the center of public attention. We first investigate the association between related party transactions and audit quality (proxied by discretionary accruals), and find that four kinds of related party transactions (including sales to related parties, purchases from related parties, accounts receivable from related parties and payable to related parties) all have negative impacts on audit quality. We posit that (1) external auditing is a monitoring mechanism to reduce audit quality decline caused by related party transactions, and (2) auditor attributes including big 4 audit firms and industry specialist audit firms can mitigate the audit quality decline thereof. Empirical results show that companies audited by big 4 or industry specialist audit firms, whose sales to related parties, purchases from related parties and accounts receivable from related parties show significantly smaller negative impacts on audit quality than companies not audited by big 4 or industry specialist audit firms.
    參考文獻: 中文文獻
    1.李奕萱，2013，關係人交易與審計品質－以台灣高科技公司為例，國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    2.李建然、陳信吉與湯麗芬，2013，客戶重要性與審計品質－從簽證會計師角度分析，當代會計，第14 卷，第2 期：147-174。
    3.許智順、簡俱揚、黃媺婷與陳燕錫，2012，產業專家會計師事務所對關係人交易之影響，商管科技季刊，第13 卷，第2 期：99-129。
    4.葉銀華、蘇裕惠、柯承恩與李冠德，2003，公司治理機制對關係人交易的影響，證券市場發展季刊，第15 卷，第4 期：69-109。
    5.廖秀梅、王貞靜與戚務君，2012，一套臺灣完整的審計公費資訊告訴我們什麼？中華會計學刊，第8 卷，第1 期：49-88。
    6.廖秀梅、洪筱雯，2010，非審計服務、會計師任期與審計品質，當代會計，第11 卷，第2 期：151-178。
    References
    1.American Institute of Certified Public (AICPA). 2001. Accounting and Auditing for Related Party Transactions: A toolkit for accountants and auditors. New York, NY: AICPA.
    2.Ball, R. andG. Foster. 1982. Corporate financial-reporting -a methodological review of empirical-research. Journal of Accounting Research20(supplement): 161-234.
    3.Balsam, S., J.Krishnan,and J. S. Yang.2003. Auditor industry specialization and earnings quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice andTheory22(2):71-97.
    4.Beasley, M. S., J. V. Carcello, and D. R. Hermanson. 2001. Top 10 Audit Deficiencies: SEC Sanctions. Journal of Accountancy 191 (4): 63–67.
    5.Becker, C. L., M. L. DeFond, J. Jiambalvo, and K. R. Subramanyam. 1998. The effect of audit quality on earning management. Contemporary Accounting Research15 (spring): 1-24.
    6.Bedard, J., and S. Biggs. 1991. The Effect of Domain-Specific Experience on Evaluation of Management Representation in Analytical Procedures. Auditing:A Journal of Practice & Theory10 (Supplement): 77–95.
    7.Bell, T., and J. Carcello. 2000. A Decision Aid for Assessing the Likelihood of Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 19(1): 169-184.
    8.Bennouri,M., M.Nekhili,and P.Touron. 2012. Does Auditors’ Reputation DiscourageRelatedParty Transactions? The French Case. Working paper.
    9.Cahan, S., J. Godfrey, J. Hamilton, and D. Jeter. 2008. Auditor specialization, auditor dominance, and audit fees: The role of investment opportunities.The Accounting Review83 (6): 1393–1424.
    10.Chi, Hsin-Yi, and Chen-Lung Chin. 2011. Firm Versus Partner Measures of Auditor Industry Expertise and Effects on Auditor Quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 30 (2): 201–29.
    11.Chow, G. C. 1960.Tests of Equality between Sets of Coefficients in Two Linear Regression.Econometrica26(3): 591-605.
    12.Clatworthy, Mark A., Christopher K.M. Pong, and Woon K. Wong. 2012. Auditor Quality Effects on the Relationship Between Accruals, Cash Flows and Equity Returns: a Variance Decomposition Analysis.Accounting and Business Research42 (4): 419–439.
    13.DeAngelo, L. E. 1981. Audit size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics3 (December): 183-199.
    14.Dechow, P. M.,R. G. Sloan,andA. P. Sweeney. 1995.Detecting Earnings Management. The Accounting Review70: 193–225.
    15.DeFond, M. L., and J. M. Jiambalvo. 1994. Debt Covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics17 (January): 145-176.
    16.DeZoort, F. T., D. Hermanson, D. Archambeault, and S. Reed. 2002. Audit Committee Effectiveness:A Synthesis of the Empirical Audit Committee Literature. Journal of Accounting Literature21:38–75.
    17.Francis, J. R., E. L. Maydew, and H. C. Sparks. 1999. The role of big 6 auditors in the credible reporting of accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory18 (fall): 17-34.
    18.Francis, J.R., K.Reichelt, and D.Wang. 2005. The Pricing of National and City-Specific Reputations for Industry Expertise in the U.S. Audit Market.Accounting Review80 (1) (January): 113–136.
    19.Frankel, R. M., M. F. Johnson, and K. K. Nelson. 2002. The relation between auditors’ fees for nonaudit services and earnings management. The Accounting Review77 (Supplement): 71-105.
    20.Gordon, E.A., E.Henry, and D.Palia. 2004. Related Party Transactions and Corporate Governance. Advances in Financial Economics9 (December 1): 1–27.
    21.Gordon, E. A., E.Henry, and D. Palia. 2006. Related party transactions: Associations with corporate governance and firm value. Working paper.Rutgers University.
    22.Gordon, E. A., E. Henry, T. J. Louwers,and B. J. Reed. 2007. Auditing Related Party Transactions: A Literature Overview and Research Synthesis. Accounting Horizons21 (1) (March): 81-102.
    23.Gul F., B. L. Jaggi, and G. V. Krishnan. 2007. Auditor independence: Evidence on the joint effects of auditor tenure andnonaudit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory26 (2): 117-142.
    24.Henry, E., E. Gordon, B. Reed, and T. Louwers. 2012. The role of related party transactions in fraudulent financial reporting. Journal of Forensic andInvestigative Accounting4 (1): 186-213.
    25.Johnson, P., K. Jama1, and R. Berryman.1991. Effectsof FramingonAuditor Decisions. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (October):75-105.
    26.Johnson, V. E., I. K.Khurana, andJ. K. Reynolds.2002. Audit‐Firm Tenure and the Quality of Financial Reports. Contemporary accounting research19(4):637-660.
    27.Johnstone, K. M., C.Li, andS. Luo. 2011. Client-auditor supply chain relationships, audit quality, and audit pricing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory: forthcoming.
    28.Kothari, S. P., A. J. Leone, and C. E. Wasley. 2005. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics39 (January): 163-197.
    29.Krishnan, G. V.2003. Does big 6 auditor industry expertise constrain earnings management? Accounting Horizons17(Supplement):1-16.
    30.Louwers, T. J., E.Henry, B. J.Reed, andE. A.Gordon.2008. Deficiencies in auditing related-party transactions: Insights from AAERs. Current Issues in Auditing2(2):A10-A16.
    31.Reichelt, Kenneth J., and Dechun Wang. 2010. National and Office-Specific Measures of Auditor Industry Expertise and Effects on Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting Research48 (3) (June): 647–686.
    32.Reynolds,J., and J. Francis. 2001. Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office Level auditor reporting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics30 (3): 375-400.
    33.Simunic, D. A. 1980. The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of accounting research18 (1): 161-190.
    34.Solomon, Ira, Michael D. Shields, and O. Ray Whittington. 1999. What Do Industry-Specialist Auditors Know? Journal of Accounting Research37 (1) (April 1): 191–208.
    35.Watkins, A.L., W. Hillison, and S.E. Morecroft. 2004. Audit Quality: A Synthesis of Theory and Empirical Evidence. Journal of Accounting Literature23: 153–193.
    36.Wilks, T. Jeffrey, and Mark F. Zimbelman. 2004. Decomposition of Fraud-Risk Assessments and Auditors’Sensitivity to Fraud Cues. Contemporary Accounting Research21 (3): 719–7.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    99353013
    102
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0993530131
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[會計學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    013101.pdf921KbAdobe PDF2283檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋