政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/68294
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51022205      Online Users : 879
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/68294


    Title: 警察人員職場偏差行為及其因應對策之研究：以新北市政府警察局永和分局為例
    A Study on the Workplace Deviance of Police Personnel and its Counter-measures: Case on Yonghe Branch of New Taipei City Police Department.
    Authors: 陳奕頤
    Contributors: 成之約
    陳奕頤
    Keywords: 警察人員
    職場偏差行為
    新北市永和
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2014-08-06 11:53:11 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 隨著臺灣民主化的進步及社會風氣的開放，身為國家執法機關的警察組織也要因應環境的變動而採取各項的措施，以跟上及融入社會變遷的腳步，而個別的警察人員在面對這快速、巨變的社會，所表現出有關工作上的一舉一動，就顯得相當敏感且重要了。因此，了解警察人員的職場偏差行為與找出因應之對策，即成為政府及研究者關心的議題。
    但警察時不時仍有弊案傳出，顯示出組織現行防弊制度未發揮預期的效能。且目前對於警察人員偏差行為的管理及控制，仍然缺乏有系統的研究。
    因此，本研究之目的有：(1)根據警政署發行之風紀宣導手冊，分析其中的案例及現有文獻，歸納警察人員職場偏差行為之類型及特性。(2)透過問卷調查法蒐集新北市政府警察局永和分局所屬警察人員的人格特質、有無曾經從事過職場偏差行為及對於現行警察組織防弊制度了解程度。(3)綜上數據進行分析，探討各種警察人員職場偏差行為。(4)研究出警察人員職場偏差行為之因應對策及相關建議。
    本研究嘗試著了解每個擁有不同人格特質的警察人員，其人格特質是否會導致其職場上的偏差行為。再來，除了討論警察人員的人格特質有無影響其職場偏差行為產生，並進一步從警察人員對於組織現行防弊制度的了解來看，所從事各種警察人員職場偏差行為的類型及程度。本研究對於新北市政府警察局永和分局使用立意抽樣的調查方式，收回有效問卷392份。
    研究結果發現：(1)擁有不同人格特質的警察人員，確實會對於其職場上的偏差行為產生影響。(2)警察人員對於其組織現行防弊制度的了解程度，對於某些類型職場偏差行為有著明顯的負相關，但對於另一類型的職場偏差行為則無相關性。(3)最後還發現，警察人員的人格特質，並不影響其對於現行警察組織防弊制度的了解。
    最後，本研究希望能對警察人員職場偏差行為有更多的瞭解，進一步討論出因應的對策及未來研究的方向。
    Reference: 中文文獻
    1. 內政部警政署(2011)，風紀宣導手冊，內政部警政署發行。
    2. 內政部警政署(2012)，風紀宣導手冊，內政部警政署發行。
    3. 內政部警政署(2013)，風紀宣導手冊，內政部警政署發行。
    4. 內政部警政署政風室網站http://www.npa.gov.tw/NPAGip/wSite/lp?ctNode=12252&CtUnit=2288&BaseDSD=7。瀏覽日期2014年4月6日。
    5. 內政部警政署督察室網站http://www.npa.gov.tw/NPAGip/wSite/ct?xItem=42668&ctNode=12358。瀏覽日期2014年4月6日。
    6. 內政部警政署警政治安全球資訊網http://www.npa.gov.tw/NPAGip/wSite/mp?mp=1。瀏覽日期2014年3月17日。
    7. 王躍生 (2000)，「新制度主義」，臺北市，揚智文化事業股份有限公司。
    8. 吳萬益 (2011)，企業研究方法，第四版，台北市，華泰書局。
    9. 李湧清(1987)，臺灣省警察機關組織編制之研究，中央警察大學犯罪防治系印行。
    10. 李震山(1994)，警察任務法論，高雄市，登文書局。
    11. 施嘉文（2010），警察人員貪汙犯罪之研究，國立臺北大學犯罪學研究所碩士論文。
    12. 陳東升，(1992)，「制度學派對正式組織的解析」，社會科學論叢，第四十輯，第111-129 頁，臺大法學院。
    13. 陳秋佑(2013)，外派人員紀律管理與職場偏差行為之關聯性研究─以五大人格特質為調節變項，中原大學企業管理研究所論文。
    14. 劉瑞華(1994)，「制度、制度變遷與經濟成就」，臺北市，時報文化出版企業有限公司。
    15. 蔡欣嵐(2001)，工作特性、人格特質與工作滿意度之關係-以半導體業為例，碩士論文，國立中央大學企業管理研究所。
    16. 謝幸燕(1991)，「組織環境、結構與變遷：三個核心醫院與政策間的互動關係的個案分析」，全國博碩士論文，清華大學社會人類所。
    17. 韓朝華譯，Wolfgang Kasper、Manfred E. Streit 原著，(2000)，「制度經濟學：社會秩序與公共政策」，北京，商務印書館。
    西文文獻
    1. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta‐analysis. Personnel psychology, 44(1), 1-26.
    2. Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of applied psychology, 85(3), 349.
    3. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Transaction Publishers.
    4. Bolin, A., & Heatherly, L. (2001). Predictors of employee deviance: The relationship between bad attitudes and bad behavior. Journal of Business and Psychology, 15(3), 405-418.
    5. Bordia, P., Restubog, S. L. D., & Tang, R. L. (2008). When employees strike back: investigating mediating mechanisms between psychological contract breach and workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1104.
    6. Cattell, R. B. (1950). Personality: A systematic theoretical and factual study.
    7. Cattell, R. B. (1957). Personality and motivation structure and measurement.
    8. Cattell, R. B., & Kline, P. E. (1977). The scientific analysis of personality and motivation. Academic Press.
    9. Chiu, S. F., & Peng, J. C. (2008). The relationship between psychological contract breach and employee deviance: The moderating role of hostile attributional style. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(3), 426-433.
    10. Commons, J. R. (1931). Institutional economics. The American economic review, 648-657.
    11. De Lara, P. Z. M. (2006). Fear in organizations: does intimidation by formal punishment mediate the relationship between interactional justice and workplace internet deviance?. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(6), 580-592.
    12. Diefendorff, J. M., & Mehta, K. (2007). The relations of motivational traits with workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 967.
    13. Eysenck, H. J. (1952). The effects of psychotherapy: an evaluation. Journal of consulting psychology, 16(5), 319.
    14. Eysenck, H. J. (1961). Handbook of abnormal psychology: An experimental approach.
    15. Eysenck, H. J. (1991). Personality, stress, and disease: An interactionist perspective. Psychological Inquiry, 2(3), 221-232.
    16. Gleeson, E., & Grace, K. (2009). Police Complaints: Statistics for England and Wales 2008/09. Independent Police Complaints Commission.
    17. Griffin, R., & Moorhead, G. (2011). Organizational behavior. Cengage Learning.
    18. Hodgson, G. M. (1988). Economics and institutions. In Journal of Economic Issues.
    19. Hollinger, R. C., & Clark, J. P. (1982). Formal and Informal Social Controls of Employee Deviance. The Sociological Quarterly, 23(3), 333-343.
    20. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 2, 102-138.
    21. Judge, T. A., & Cable, D. M. (1997). Applicant personality, organizational culture, and organization attraction. Personnel Psychology, 50(2), 359-394.
    22. Mangione, T. W., & Quinn, R. P. (1975). Job satisfaction, counterproductive behavior, and drug use at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(1), 114.
    23. Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2007). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1159.
    24. Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., & Stewart, G. L. (1998). Five-factor model of personality and performance in jobs involving interpersonal interactions. Human performance, 11(2-3), 145-165.
    25. Newburn, T., & Webb, B. (1999). Understanding and preventing police corruption: lessons from the literature (No. 110). Home Office, Policing and Reducing Crime Unit, Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.
    26. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge university press.
    27. Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
    28. Pritchard, R. D. (2004). The dark side of organizational behavior (Vol. 24). R. W. Griffin, & A. O`Leary-Kelly (Eds.). John Wiley & Sons.
    29. Pulich, M., & Tourigny, L. (2004). Workplace deviance: strategies for modifying employee behavior. The Health Care Manager, 23(4), 290-301.
    30. Redeker, J. R. (1989). Employee discipline: Policies and practices. Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.
    31. Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of management journal, 38(2), 555-572.
    32. Robinson, S. L., & Greenberg, J. (1998). Employees behaving badly: Dimensions, determinants and dilemmas in the study of workplace deviance.
    33. Rousseau, D. M. (2001). Schema, promise and mutuality: The building blocks of the psychological contract. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 74(4), 511-541.
    34. Salgado, J. F. (2002). The Big Five personality dimensions and counterproductive behaviors. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10(1‐2), 117-125.
    35. Schultz, T. W. (1968). Institutions and the rising economic value of man. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 50(5), 1113-1122.
    36. Scott, W. R., & Christensen, S. (1995). The institutional construction of organizations: international and longitudinal studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    37. Skarlicki, D. P., & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of applied Psychology, 82(3), 434.
    38. Steers, R. M. (1984). Introduction to organizational behavior. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman.
    39. Tangirala, S., & Ramanujam, R. (2008). Employee silence on critical work issues: The cross level effects of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 61(1), 37-68.
    40. Turnley, W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2000). Re‐examining the effects of psychological contract violations: unmet expectations and job dissatisfaction as mediators. Journal of organizational behavior, 21(1), 25-42.
    41. Vardi, Y., & Weitz, E. (2003). Misbehavior in organizations: Theory, research, and management. Psychology Press.
    42. Wheeler, H. N. (1976). Punishment theory and industrial discipline. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 15(2), 235-243.
    43. Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1982). Broken windows. Atlantic monthly, 249(3), 29-38.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    行政管理碩士學程
    101921108
    102
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101921108
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Master for Eminent Public Administrators] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    110801.pdf1515KbAdobe PDF2159View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback