政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/68231

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/68231

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文笔数/总笔数 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造访人次 : 51075590 在线人数 : 937

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜寻范围

查询小技巧：

您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果

若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据

进阶搜寻

主页 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上传 ‧ 说明 ‧ 关于政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手机版

政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 財務管理學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/68231

请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/68231

题名:	合理性意見書是否具有資訊意涵?-以台灣上市公司併購案為例 Does Fairness Opinion Contain Useful Information? - The cases of M&A in Taiwan
作者:	林宇軒
贡献者:	岳夢蘭林宇軒
关键词:	獨立專家認證效果事件研究法併購綜效 Independent expert Certification effect Event study M&A synergy
日期:	2013
上传时间:	2014-08-06 11:40:30 (UTC+8)
摘要:	本研究以2002年至2012年台灣主併公司為上市公司的併購案件為樣本，探討合理性意見書評價內容和主併公司短期股價影響及併購後綜效之關聯性。研究結果發現，於意見書揭露日時，若獨立專家評估價格高於雙方約定交易價格愈多時，即評價溢酬愈大，或是評價報告由高聲譽獨立專家所出具，主併公司會有正向的累積異常報酬率；且在此情況下，主併公司併購後綜效亦會愈大。故本研究認為，合理性意見書中的評價資訊，於揭露時具有訊號發射效果，可以幫助外部股東及投資人判斷交易是否對其有利，降低內外資訊不對稱，同時亦具有認證併購後公司會產生合併綜效之功能。因此，併購時獨立專家所出具之合理性意見書確實具有資訊意涵。 This study analyses the relation between target firm valuations disclosed in the fairness opinions and acquiring firm performances by using the samples of Taiwanese listed company in M&A transaction between 2002 and 2012. We find that the stock price reactions to the public disclosure of fairness opinions are positively related to the difference between target firms valuations contained in the fairness opinion and the merger offer price and the reputation of independent experts. Under these conditions, the synergy in the M&A may be higher than others. Therefore, we suggest that the information contained in the fairness opinions can not only reduce information asymmetry between management and stockholders, but also certify that the M&A transaction will produce synergy. We conclude that fairness opinion does contain useful information to market participants.
參考文獻:	林嬋娟、吳安妮(1992)，台灣企業併購綜效及績效之實證研究，會計評論，第26期(4月)，1-23。孫梅瑞、陳隆麒(2002)，台灣地區上市公司從事併購活動對經營績效影響之研究，中山管理評論，第10卷第1期，155-184。孫梅瑞、陳雅君(2010)，公司融資決策與併購績效關聯性之研究，商略學報，第2卷第3期，199-215。陳傳毅(2010)，企業併購交易中獨立專家意見之功能與法律責任，東吳大學法律學系碩士在職專班法律專業組碩士論文。陳楷仁(2011)，企業併購法第六條獨立專家相關問題之研析，國立臺北大學法律學系碩士論文。黃玉雯(2012)，併購獨立專家之選擇及併購後綜效之探討，國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。 Bowers, H. M. (2002). Fairness opinions and the business judgment rule: an empirical investigation of target ﬁrms` use of fairness opinions. Northwestern University Law Review, 96, 567–578. Bowers, H. M., & Latham, W. R. (2004). Value of Fairness Opinions in US Mergers and Acquisitions,1980-2003. Working Paper, University of Delaware. Brickley, J. A., Lease, R. C., & Smith Jr, C. W. (1988). Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments. Journal of Financial Economics, 20(0), 267-291. Cain, M. D., & Denis, D. J. (2013). Information production by investment banks: evidence from fairness opinions. Journal of Law and Economics, 56(1), 245-280. Carney, W. J. (1992). Fairness opinions: How fair are they and why we should do nothing about it. Washington University Law Quarterly, 70, 523. Chen, K. Y., & Wu, S.-Y. (2002). The effect of industry specialization on audit fees in Taiwan: The role of industry type. Working Paper. National Cheng Kung University. Chen, L. H., & Sami, H. (2010). Does the Use of Fairness Opinions Impair the Acquirers` Abnormal Returns? The Litigation Risk Effect. Advances in Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management, 4, 81-112. Elson, C. M. (1992). Fairness opinions: Are they fair or should we care? Ohio State Law Journal, 53, 951-970. Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417. Francis, J. R., & Wilson, E. R. (1988). Auditor Changes: A Joint Test of Theories Relating to Agency Costs and Auditor Differentiation. The Accounting Review, 63(4), 663-682. Hudson, C. D., Jahera, J. S., Jr., & Lloyd, W. P. (1992). Further Evidence on the Relationship Between Ownership and Performance. The Financial Review, 27(2), 227. Kisgen, D. J., Qian, J. Q., & Song, W. (2009). Are fairness opinions fair? The case of mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics, 91(2), 179-207. Klein, B., & Leffler, K. B. (1981). The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance. Journal of Political Economy, 89(4), 615. Liu, T. (2013). The Bidder`s Choice of a Fairness Opinion in Mergers and Acquisitions: The Impact on Value Creation. Working Paper. Makhija, A. K., & Narayanan, R. P. (2007). Fairness Opinions in Mergers and Acquisitions. Working Paper. Mayhew, B. W., & Wilkins, M. S. (2003). Audit Firm Industry Specialization as a Differentiation Strategy: Evidence from Fees Charged to Firms Going Public. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(2), 33-52.
描述:	碩士國立政治大學財務管理研究所 101357005 102
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101357005
数据类型:	thesis
显示于类别:	[財務管理學系] 學位論文

文件中的档案:

档案	描述	大小	格式	浏览次数
700501.pdf		1878Kb	Adobe PDF2	255	检视/开启

在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回馈