Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/68150
|
| Title: | 全球化；中國大陸學者的觀點 |
| Other Titles: | Globalization: Perspectives from Mainland Chinese scholars |
| Authors: | 徐斯儉
Hsu, Szu-Chien |
| Contributors: | 政大國研中心 |
| Keywords: | 全球化;國家主權;中國大陸對外關係;中國大陸的政治改革;兩岸關係
globalization;state sovereignty;Mainland China`s foreign relations;Mainland China`s Domestic political reform;cross-strait relations |
| Date: | 2000-04 |
| Issue Date: | 2014-08-05 10:41:41 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 自從中國大陸採取了改革開放的政策以來，其自身的變化和發展就一直與整個世界的變話與發展密不可分。自九O年代以來，隨著經濟活動與科技在全世界的快速發展，在國際社會中掀起了一股所謂「全球化」的浪潮。這股浪潮一方面衝擊了中國大陸與世界既有的關係，另一方面也快速地改變了中國大陸對世界及其與自身關係的認知圖像。這種衝擊與認知產生了交互影響的作用，衝擊影醒了原有的認知，而認知的重新調整又產生了對衝擊的調整，進一步回頭改變中國大陸與世界的關係。本文一方面大致介紹中國大陸學者對全球化的觀點，另一方面著重討論分析其中不同觀點之間的對照與意涵。本文以美國學者郝爾德〈David Held〉等所整理出之對全球化的三種觀點，即「全球化進步論」、「全球化懷疑論」、和「全球化轉化論」，以及國際政治經濟學中的「現實主義」、「自由主義」、與「馬克思主義」等兩組理論分類架構來區分並觀察中國大陸學者在各種不同全球化議題上的觀點。本文之討論所涵蓋的全球化議題包括：「經濟全球化」、「全球化與文化」、「全球化與國家主權」、「全球化與國內政治改革」、「全球化與中國大陸對外關係」。此外，本文也提到從若干外國學者眼中，對中國大陸之全球化觀點的一些觀察。簡言之，本文認為在中國大陸學者中，一方面對全球化的觀點有一些共通性，但也存在這相當程度的多元性，並且不乏針鋒相對的辯論。根據此一觀察，本文最後將大陸學者這種對全球化的多原觀點，導向對兩岸關係的思考，嘗試從中國大陸此種多原觀點中找出對兩岸關係另類思考的可能。
Ever since adopting the open-door policy of reform, Mainland China’s developments and changes have been closely connected with those of the outside world. Since 1990s, “globalization: has become a hot topic, as economic and technological developments bring the whole world more closely together. The trend of globalization has tremendously affected Mainland China’s relations with the world, and the discussion on globalization has also had a great impact on China’s perception of the world and of itself.This article introduces and compares the perspectives that Mainland Chinese scholars have on globalization, seeking to find out the implications hidden in the debate among these different views. The discussion of this article will be based on two sets of theoretical frameworks. The first proposed by David Held and his colleagues, contains three general perspectives on globalization, that is, the “hyperglobalist perspective,” the “sceptical perspective,” and the “transformationalist perspective.” The second is the three theoretical perspectives in international political economy: realism, liberalism, and Marxism. Based on these two sets of theoretical frameworks, this article will discuss the different perspectives two sets of theoretical frameworks, this article will discuss the different perspectives on Mainland Chinese scholars on such relevant issues as “economic globalization,” “globalization and culture,” “globalization and state sovereignty,” “globalization and domestic political reform,” and “globalization and foreign relations.” This article also includes observations made by some western scholars on Chinese perspectives of globalization.This article finds that although there are some commonalties among Mainland Chinese scholars, there also exists an obvious plurality of perspectives on various issues regarding globalization. Based on this observation, the article applies this plurality of views on globalization to the discussion of “cross-strait relations,“ and proposes some alternative thinking in order to solve problems in cross-strait relations that parallel the logic of globalization. |
| Relation: | 中國大陸研究, 43(4), 1-26 |
| Source URI: | http://iiro.nccu.edu.tw/attachments/journal/add/2/10132716-200004-43-4-1-26-a.zip |
| Data Type: | article |
| Appears in Collections: | [中國大陸研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 1-26.pdf | | 2032Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 2420 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
