English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51038387      Online Users : 952
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67983


    Title: 新公共管理與鄰避政治─以嘉義縣市跨域合作為例
    Other Titles: New Public Management and NIMBY Politics: The Case of Garbage Management Cooperation between Chia-yi City and County
    Authors: 湯京平;陳金哲
    Tang, Ching-Ping
    Contributors: 政治系
    Keywords: 鄰避情結;公私協力;多中心治理
    NIMBY syndrome;public-private synergy;polycentric governance
    Date: 2005
    Issue Date: 2014-07-29 17:59:55 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 台灣以較有彈性的治理模式來追求更高效率的成果已於近年逐漸浮現。以民生廢棄物的終端處理為例，焚化爐以BOT的方式興建確實已為政府節省不少公帑。然而，這項財貨的供給有相當大的規模經濟之要求，但多年前中央政府欲克服鄰避現象而採取了「一縣市一焚化爐」、各自管理自己垃圾的分權政策，以政治外力限制財貨供給者尋求最適規模經濟的可能。時至今日，全國焚化廠的處理總量已超過需求量，而行政疆界的隔閡卻導致縣市間焚化設備分佈不均，使部分地區有垃圾處理危機，有些地方卻出現沒有垃圾燒的窘境。在環保團體停止興建焚化爐的訴求下，環保署又朝向上集權的方式修正政策，希望透過強制性的「垃圾跨區域處理機制」來解決垃圾處理能力分佈不均問題。但當初因集權而讓環保單位焦頭爛額的鄰避問題，如今可曾因為時空條件的改變而能避免？答案似乎是否定的。本研究以嘉義縣鹿草焚化廠的運作為例，提供了另類的思考途徑。嘉義縣市同時委託達和公司操作焚化爐，在嘉義縣尚有處理餘裕，嘉義市卻有爆發垃圾處理危機的狀況下，縣市政府透過協商的過程，建構起有利的誘因結構，達成一個縣、市政府與民營公司三贏的協議，也避免了可能發生的鄰避衝突，顯示新公共管理對於化解鄰避衝突似有意想不到的效果。本研究雖因地方特殊情境而有其適用的侷限性，但透過民營化降低政治爭端、避免中央集權、由地方主動尋求合作伙伴、共同謀求協商雙方共同利益等原則，應可普遍適用於所有跨區域處理一般廢棄物的情境。
    The application of New Public Management (NPM) in Taiwan`s governance has attracted significant attention recently. One field left to be further elaborated is the potential of NPM in solving not-in-my-back-yard (NIMBY) conflicts that have prevailed in many localities. This study delineates the development of a cooperation agreement in garbage management between Chia-yi County and City in order to illustrate how the involvement of a private business via a build-operate-transfer (BOT) contract might break through the political boundaries of a public service (garbage incineration) to reach an better economy of scale. This agreement proves to benefit all three parties and improves efficiency by reaching a Pareto optimal. The case also demonstrates the advantage of a polycentric governing arrangement that has been advocated by many political economists.
    Relation: 政治科學論叢, 23, 101-132
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政治學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    101132.pdf664KbAdobe PDF21183View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback