English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51036757      Online Users : 968
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 教育學院 > 教育學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/67923
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67923


    Title: 獎賞類別、成就目標取向與情緒對頓悟性問題解決表現之效果
    The Interactions of Reward Contingencies, Achievement Goals, and Emotions on Insight Problem Solving Tasks
    Authors: 吳曉安
    Wu, Hsiao An
    Contributors: 葉玉珠
    Yeh, Yu Chu
    吳曉安
    Wu, Hsiao An
    Keywords: 獎賞類別
    成就目標
    情緒
    頓悟性問題
    reward contingency
    achievement goal
    emotion
    insight problem
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2014-07-29 16:15:45 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在探討獎賞、成就目標取向與情緒與大學生頓悟性問題表現之關係,以及這些變項對大學生頓悟性問題的影響。本研究以台北地區的154位大學生為研究對象,其中男性有35位,女性有119位。研究工具包含創造性頓悟問題測驗、目標導向量表、以及三維情緒量表。本研究採單因子共變數分析與二因子共變數分析方式進行資料分析,研究發現陳述如下:
    一、大學生之頓悟性問題解決表現在不同獎賞類型下沒有差異。
    二、大學生之頓悟性問題解決表現在不同獎賞類型與四種成就目標取向交互作用
    下沒有差異。
    三、大學生之頓悟性問題解決表現在不同獎賞類型與八種情緒交互作用下沒有差
    異。
    四、四種成就目標取向與八種情緒對大學生之頓悟性問題解決表現有複雜的交互
    作用效果;在成就目標取向與正向情緒交互作用下,頓悟性問題並無差異,但
    在成就目標取向與負向情緒交互作用下,當負向情緒程度較低時,有較佳的頓
    悟性問題表現。
    The main purpose of this study was to explore the relationships among rewards, achievement goals, and emotions in insight problem solving performances of college students. The participants in this study were 154 college students from Taipei area. Among the participants, 35 were males and 119 were females. Moreover, the employed instruments included Creative Insight Problem Test, The multiple Goals Scale, and The Inventory of Three-dimention Emotions. The collected data was analyzed by one-way ANCOVA and two-way ANCOVA. The main findings of this study were as follows:
    1. Reward types did not have effects on college students’ insight problems performances.
    2. The interactions of reward types and achievement goals did not have effects on college students’ insight problems performances.
    3. The interactions of reward types and emotions did not have effects on college students’s insight problem performances.
    4. The interactions of achievement goals and emotionshad complex effects on college students’ insight problem performances. Specifically, the interactions of achievement goals and positive eomotoions did not have effects on college students’ insight problem solving performances. On the contray, the interactions of achievement goals and negative eomotoions had effects on college students’ insight problem solving performances; those who with a low-degree of negative emotions had better insight problem solving performances than their counterparts.
    Reference: 中文參考文獻
    1.王力(譯)(2008)。數學隨筆(原作者:伊庫納契夫)。臺北市:五南。
    2.王文科、王智弘(2008)。教育研究法。臺北市:五南。
    3.王惠芳(譯)(2006)。鍛鍊腦力的數學謎題(原作者:中村義作、阿邊惠
    一)。臺北市:尖端。
    4.何南輝(主編)(2007)。全世界都在玩的有趣數學題(原作者:亨利恩斯
    特杜德耐)。臺北市:宇河文化。
    5.吳靜吉(2002)。華人學生創造力的發掘與培育。應用心理研究。15,17-
    42。邢濤(主編)(2011)。全世界優秀學生都在玩的1001個思維遊戲:右
    腦開發。新北市:禾風車書版。
    6.邱發忠、陳學志、徐芝君(2007)。軍事獎懲促發對創造力表現的影響。復興
    崗學報。90,73-103。
    7.邱發忠、陳學志、徐芝君、吳相儀、卓淑玲(2008)。內隱與外顯因素對創造作
    業表現的影響。中華心理學刊。50,125-145。
    8.李仁豪、余民寧(2003)。2x2 成就目標理論架構之驗證。教育與心理研究。
    26,433-470。
    9.洪淑惠(主編)(2007)。THE BEST益智數學推理篇。臺北市:核心文化。
    10.洪淑惠(主編)(2007)。THE BEST益智數學邏輯篇。臺北市:核心文化。
    11.施淑慎(2004)。成就目標、自我效能、以及策略使用在考試焦慮上所扮演之
    角色。國立臺北師範學院學報。17(1),355-387。
    12.施淑慎(2006)。教室目標結構與成就目標取向對國小兒童自我阻礙行為及考
    試焦慮之預測作用。教育心理研究,29(3),517-546。
    13.徐政萍(譯)(2005)。探索右腦的奇妙圖形遊戲(原作者:逢澤明)。臺北
    市:究竟。
    14.袁長瑞(2005)。靈光乍現-袁大頭的推理時間。臺北市:天下遠見。
    15.張旭中、邱發忠、陳學志、徐芝君 (2011):調整焦點、目標成功預期對創造
    力與批判性思考表現的影響。教育心理學報,43(2),499-520。
    16.許建銘(2007)。超級推算王。臺北市:五南。
    17.陳玉樹、周志偉(2009)。目標導向對創造力訓練效果之影響:HLM 成長模式
    分析。課程與教學。12(2)。19-45。
    18.陳學志、彭淑玲、吳清麟(2011)。純頓悟與假頓悟中文遠距聯想測驗之創造
    力解題歷程。創造學刊, 2(2),25-51。
    19.程炳林(2003)。四向度目標導向模式之研究。師大學報:教育類,
    48(1),15-40。
    20.林易慧、程炳林(2006)課室目標線索與個人目標導向對國小學童解題成就及
    自我調整學習之交互效果。教育心理學報,37(3),231-255。
    21.林宴瑛、程炳林(2007)。個人目標導向, 課室目標結構與自我調整學習策略
    之潛在改變量分析。教育心理學報,39(2)。
    22.郭生玉(1991)。心理與教育測驗。臺北市:精華。
    23.葉玉珠(2000)。 「創造力發展的生態系統模式」 及其應用於科技與資訊領
    域之內涵分析。教育心理學報。 32(1), 95-121。
    24.葉玉珠(2006)。創造力教學:過去,現在與未來。臺北市:心理。
    25.葉玉珠等(2010)。教育心理學。臺北市:心理。
    26.葉玉珠、賴桂珍(2012)。創造力認知歷程之解構與重構:以數位遊戲為
    媒介(1/3)。 國科會專案(NSC 100-2511-S-004 -002 -MY3)
    27.劉佩雲(2009)。目標導向與趨向或逃避行為之關係探討。課程與教學季刊。
    12(3)。213-240。
    28.謝岱陵(2003)。國中生四向度目標導向之中介效果分析。國立成功大學教育研
    究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。

    英文參考文獻:
    1.Aarts, H., Custers, R., & Veltkamp, M. (2008). Goal priming and the affective-motivational route to nonconscious goal pursuit. Social Cognition, 26(5), 555-577.
    2.Aitken Harris, J. (2004). Measured intelligence,achievement,openness to experience,and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(4), 913-929.
    3.Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componen- tial conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357–376.
    4.Ambady, N., & Gray, H. M. (2002). On being sad and mistaken: mood effects on the accuracy of thin-slice judgments. Journal of personality and social psychology, 83(4), 947.
    5.Ansburg, P. I., & Dominowski, R. L. (2000). Promoting insightful problem solving. The Journal of Creative Behavior. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 34(1), 30-60.
    6.Ashby, F. G., & Isen, A. M. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological review, 106(3), 529.
    7.Ashby, F. G., Valentin, V. V., & Turken, A. U. (2002). The effects of positive affect and arousal on working memory and executive attention. ADVANCES IN CONSCIOUSNESS RESEARCH, 44, 245-288.
    8.Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64(6p1), 359.
    9.Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus?.Psychological bulletin, 134(6), 779.
    10Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K., & Nijstad, B. A. (2011). When prevention promotes creativity: the role of mood, regulatory focus, and regulatory closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(5), 794.
    11.Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends in cognitive sciences, 4(11), 417-423.
    12.Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2008). Gender differences in creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 75-105.
    Barrett, L. F. (2006). Valence is a basic building block of emotional life. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 35–55.
    13.Batchelder, W. H., & Alexander, G. E. (2012). Insight Problem Solving: A Critical Examination of the Possibility of Formal Theory. The Journal of Problem Solving, 5(1), 6.
    14.Beal, D. J., Weiss, H. M., Barros, E., & MacDermid, S. M. (2005). An episodic process model of affective influences on performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1054.
    15.Belenky, D. M., & Nokes-Malach, T. J. (2012). Motivation and transfer: The role of mastery-approach goals in preparation for future learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(3), 399-432.
    16.Berridge, C. W., & Waterhouse, B. D. (2003). The locus coeruleus– noradrenergic system: Modulation of behavioral state and state- dependent cognitive processes. Brain Research Reviews, 42, 33–84.
    17.Bettinger, E. P. (2012). Paying to learn: The effect of financial incentives on elementary school test scores. Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(3), 686-698.
    18.Bjørnebekk, G., Gjesme, T., & Ulriksen, R. (2011). Achievement motives and emotional processes in children during problem-solving: Two experimental studies of their relation to performance in different achievement goal conditions.Motivation and emotion, 35(4), 351-367.
    19.Bowden, E. M., & Beeman, M. J. (1998). Getting the right idea: Semantic activation in the right hemisphere may help solve insight problems. Psychological Science, 9(6), 435-440.
    20.Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003). Aha! Insight experience correlates with solution activation in the right hemisphere. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(3), 730-737.
    21.Bowden, E. M., Jung-Beeman, M., Fleck, J., & Kounios, J. (2005). New approaches to demystifying insight. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(7), 322-328.
    22.Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2000). Emotion and motivation. Handbook of psychophysiology, 2, 602-642.
    23.Brennan, T. P., & Glover, J. A. (1980). An examination of the effect of extrinsic reinforcers on intrinsically motivated behavior: Experimental and theoretical. Social 24.Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 8(1), 27-32.
    25.Brockner, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Regulatory focus theory: Implications for the study of emotions at work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(1), 35-66.
    26.Brockner, J., Paruchuri, S., Idson, L. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2002). Regulatory focus and the probability estimates of conjunctive and disjunctive events.Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 87(1), 5-24.
    27.Burroughs, J. E., Dahl, D. W., Moreau, C. P., Chattopadhyay, A., & Gorn, G. J. (2011). Facilitating and rewarding creativity during new product development. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 53-67.
    28.Byron, K., & Khazanchi, S. (2012). Rewards and creative performance: A meta-analytic test of theoretically derived hypotheses. Psychological Bulletin, 138(4), 809.
    29.Cameron, J., & Pierce, W. D. (1994). Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 64(3), 363-423.
    30.Carver, C. S.(2003). Pleasure as a sign you can attend to something else: Placing positive feelings within a general model of affect. Cognition & Emotion, 17(2), 241-261.
    31.Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2004). Self-regulation of action and affect. Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications, 13-39.
    32.Carver, C. S. (2006). Approach, avoidance, and the self-regulation of affect and action. Motivation and Emotion, 30(2), 105-110.
    33.Chamberlain, S. R., Müller, U., Blackwell, A. D., Clark, L., Robbins, T. W., & Sahakian, B. J. (2006). Neurochemical modulation of response inhibition and probabilistic learning in humans. Science, 311(5762), 861-863.
    34.Chen, C. X., Williamson, M. G., & Zhou, F. H. (2012). Reward system design and group creativity: An experimental investigation. The Accounting Review, 87(6), 1885-1911.
    35.Chen, P.-H., & Wu, J.-R. (2010). Rewards for reading: their effects on reading motivation. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 31(8), 1-8.
    36.Chiew, K. S., & Braver, T. S. (2011). Positive affect versus reward: emotional and motivational influences on cognitive control. Frontiers in psychology, 2.
    37.Chu, Y., & MacGregor, J. N. (2011). Human performance on insight problem solving: A review. The Journal of Problem Solving, 3(2), 6.
    38.Collins, M. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1999). I5 motivation and creativity. Handbook of Creativity, 297.
    39.Colzato, L. S., van Wouwe, N. C., & Hommel, B. (2007). Spontaneous eyeblink rate predicts the strength of visuomotor binding. Neuropsychologia, 45(10), 2387-2392.
    40.Colzato, L. S., Kool, W., & Hommel, B. (2008). Stress modulation of visuomotor binding. Neuropsychologia, 46(5), 1542-1548.
    41.Covington, M. V. (2000). Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: An integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 171-200.
    42.Cron, W. L., Slocum, Jr, J. W., VandeWalle, D., & Fu, Q. (2005). The role of goal orientation on negative emotions and goal setting when initial performance falls short of one`s performance goal. Human Performance, 18(1), 55-80.
    43.Cury, F., Elliot, A. J., Da Fonseca, D., & Moller, A. C. (2006). The social-cognitive model of achievement motivation and the 2× 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 666.
    44.Danner, F. W., & Lonky, E. (1981). A cognitive-developmental approach to the effects of rewards on intrinsic motivation. Child Development, 1043-1052.
    45.Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627.
    46.De Dreu, C. K., Baas, M., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: toward a dual pathway to creativity model.Journal of personality and social psychology, 94(5), 739.
    47.Delgado, M. R. (2007). Reward‐Related Responses in the Human Striatum. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1104(1), 70-88.
    48.Dietrich, A. (2004). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 11(6), 1011-1026.
    49.Dietrich, A., & Kanso, R. (2010). A review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 822.
    50.Dreisbach, G., & Goschke, T. (2004). How positive affect modulates cognitive control: reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 343.
    51.Duchesne, S., & Ratelle, C. (2010). Parental behaviors and adolescents` achievement goals at the beginning of middle school: Emotional problems as potential mediators. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 497.
    52.Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., & Pretz, J. (1998). Can the promise of reward increase creativity? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 714-714.
    53.Eisenberger, R., & Aselage, J. (2009). Incremental effects of reward on experienced performance pressure: Positive outcomes for intrinsic interest and creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(1), 95-117.
    54.Eisenberger, R., & Cameron, J. (1996). Detrimental effects of reward: Reality or myth? American Psychologist; American Psychologist, 51(11), 1153.
    55.Eisenberger, R., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Incremental effects of reward on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 728-741.
    56.Eisenberger, R., & Shanock, L. (2003). Rewards, intrinsic motivation, and creativity: A case study of conceptual and methodological isolation. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2-3), 121-130.
    57.Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2× 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501.
    58.Elliot, A. J., Shell, M. M., Henry, K. B., & Maier, M. A. (2005). Achievement Goals, Performance Contingencies, and Performance Attainment: An Experimental Test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(4), 630.
    59.Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(5), 804.
    60.Elliott, R., Friston, K. J., & Dolan, R. J. (2000). Dissociable neural responses in human reward systems. The Journal of Neuroscience, 20(16), 6159-6165.
    61.Elsbach, K. D., & Hargadon, A. B. (2006). Enhancing creativity through “mindless” work: A framework of workday design. Organization Science, 17(4), 470-483.
    62.Eum, K., & Rice, K. G. (2011). Test anxiety, perfectionism, goal orientation, and academic performance. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 24(2), 167-178.
    63.Fiedler, K. (2000). Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgment biases. Psychological review, 107(4), 659
    64.Flaherty, A. W. (2005). Frontotemporal and dopaminergic control of idea generation and creative drive. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 493(1), 147-153.
    65.Floresco, S. B., & Phillips, A. G. (2001). Delay-dependent modulation of memory retrieval by infusion of a dopamine D₁ agonist into the rat medial prefrontal cortex. Behavioral neuroscience, 115(4), 934.
    66.Forgas, J. P. (2008). Affect and cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(2), 94-101.
    67.Förster, J., Friedman, R. S., & Liberman, N. (2004). Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking: consequences for insight and creative cognition.Journal of personality and social psychology, 87(2), 177.
    68.Forgeard, M. J., Jayawickreme, E., Kern, M. L., & Seligman, M. E. (2011). Doing the right thing: Measuring wellbeing for public policy. International Journal of Wellbeing, 1(1).
    69.Förster, J., Grant, H., Idson, L. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Success/failure feedback, expectancies, and approach/avoidance motivation: How regulatory focus moderates classic relations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(3), 253-260. .
    70.Foxall, G. R. (2008). Reward, emotion and consumer choice: From neuroeconomics to neurophilosophy. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 7(4‐5), 368-396.
    71.Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American psychologist,56(3), 218.
    72.Friedman, R. S., & Forster, J. (2000). The effects of approach and avoidance motor actions on the elements of creative insight. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 477-492.
    73.Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of personality and social psychology, 81(6), 1001.
    74.Friedman, R. S., & Fo ̈rster, J. (2002). The influence of approach and avoidance motor actions on creative cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 41–55.
    75.Friedman. R. S. & Förster, J. (2005). The influence of approach and avoidance cues on attentional flexibility. Motivation and Emotion, 29, 69-81.
    76.Friedman, R. S., Fo ̈rster, J., & Denzler, M. (2007). Interactive effects of mood and task framing on creative generation. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 141–162.
    77.Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions.Philosophical transactions-royal society of london series b biological sciences, 1367-1378.
    78.Frijda, N. H. (1988). The laws of emotion. American psychologist, 43(5), 349.
    79.Fryer, R. G. (2011). Financial incentives and student achievement: Evidence from randomized trials. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(4), 1755-1798.
    80.Gable, P., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2010). The blues broaden, but the nasty narrows attentional consequences of negative affects low and high in motivational intensity. Psychological Science.
    81.Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self‐determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331-362.
    82.Gailliot, M. T., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Maner, J. K., Plant, E. A., Tice, D. M., . . . Schmeichel, B. J. (2007). Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: willpower is more than a metaphor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 325.
    83.Gee, J. P. (2004). Learning by design: Games as learning machines. Interactive Educational Multimedia(8), 15-23.
    84.George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2002). Understanding when bad moods foster creativity
    and good ones don`t: The role of context and clarity and feeling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 687- 697.
    85.Gick, M. L., & Lockhart, R. S. (1995). Cognitive and affective components of insight.
    In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp.197-228).Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    86.Gilhooly, K., & Fioratou, E. (2009). Executive functions in insight versus non-insight problem solving: An individual differences approach. Thinking & Reasoning, 15(4), 355-376.
    87.Gilhooly, K., & Murphy, P. (2005). Differentiating insight from non-insight problems. Thinking & Reasoning, 11(3), 279-302.
    88.Goetz, E. L., Hariri, A. R., Pizzagalli, D. A., & Strauman, T. J. (2013). Genetic moderation of the association between regulatory focus and reward responsiveness: a proof-of-concept study. Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders, 3(1), 3.
    89.Grant, E. R., & Spivey, M. J. (2003). Eye movements and problem solving guiding attention guides thought. Psychological Science, 14(5), 462-466.
    90.Gray, J. R., & Braver, T. S. (2002). Personality predicts working-memory—related activation in the caudal anterior cingulate cortex. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2(1), 64-75.
    91.Greene, D., & Lepper, M. R. (1974). Effects of extrinsic rewards on children`s subsequent intrinsic interest. Child Development, 1141-1145.
    92.Hagger, M. S., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. (2011). Causality orientations moderate the undermining effect of rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(2), 485-489.
    93.Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. . Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 638–645.
    94.Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2002). Predicting success in college: A longitudinal study of achievement goals and ability measures as predictors of interest and performance from freshman year through graduation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 562.
    95.Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Tauer, J. M. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 105.
    96.Hebb, D. O. (2002). The organization of behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory: Psychology Press.
    97.Hélie, S., & Sun, R. (2010). Incubation, insight, and creative problem solving: A unified theory and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 117(3), 994.
    98.Henderlong, J., & Lepper, M. R. (2002). The effects of praise on children`s intrinsic motivation: A review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 128(5), 774.
    99.Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300.
    100.Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R. S., Harlow, R. E., Idson, L. C., Ayduk, O. N., & Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(1), 3-23.
    101.Higgins, E. T. (2005). Value from regulatory fit. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(4), 209-213.
    102.Hirst, G., Van Knippenberg, D., Chen, C. H., & Sacramento, C. A. (2011). How does bureaucracy impact individual creativity? A cross-level investigation of team
    contextual influences on goal orientation–creativity relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 624-641.
    103.Idson, L. C., Liberman, N., & Higgins, E. T. (2000). Distinguishing gains from nonlosses and losses from nongains: A regulatory focus perspective on hedonic intensity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(3), 252-274.
    104.Isen, A. M. (2000). Some perspectives on positive affect and self-regulation. Psychological Inquiry, 184-187.
    105.Isen, A. M., & Daubman, K. A. (1984). The influence of affect on categorization. Journal of personality and social psychology, 47(6), 1206.
    106.Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of personality and social psychology, 52(6), 1122.
    107.Izard, C. E., Ackerman, B. P., Schoff, K. M., & Fine, S. E. (2000). Self-organization of discrete emotions, emotion patterns, and emotion-cognition relations. Emotion, development, and self-organization: Dynamic systems approaches to emotional development, 15-36.
    108.Lang, P. J., & Bradley, M. M. (2008). Cortex-Reflex Connections Appetitive and Defensive Motivation Is the Substrate of Emotion. Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation, 51.
    109.Schultz, D., Izard, C. E., & Ackerman, B. P. (2000). Children’s anger attribution bias:
    Relations to family environment and social adjustment. Social Development,9(3), 284-301.
    110.Jones, G. (2003). Testing two cognitive theories of insight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition; Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(5), 1017.
    111.Kershaw, T. C., & Ohlsson, S. (2004). Multiple Causes of Difficulty in Insight: The Case of the Nine-Dot Problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(1), 3-13.
    112.Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., Haider, H., & Rhenius, D. (1999). Constraint relaxation and chunk decomposition in insight problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 25, 1534-1556.
    113.Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., & Raney, G. E. (2001). An eye movement study of insight problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 29(7), 1000-1009.
    114.Lee, J. Q., McInerney, D. M., Liem, G. A. D., & Ortiga, Y. P. (2010). The relationship between future goals and achievement goal orientations: An intrinsic–extrinsic motivation perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(4), 264-279.
    115.Liberman, N., Molden, D. C., Idson, L. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Promotion and prevention focus on alternative hypotheses: implications for attributional functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 5.
    116.Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Achievement goal theory and affect: An asymmetrical bidirectional model. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 69-78.
    117.Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2008). When are achievement goal orientations beneficial for academic achievement? A closer look at main effects and moderating factors. Revue 118.Internationale de Psychologie Sociale(1), 19-70.
    MacGregor, J. N., Ormerod, T. C., & Chronicle, E. P. (2001). 119.Information processing and insight: a process model of performance on the nine-dot and related problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(1), 176.
    120.Mai, X. Q., Luo, J., Wu, J. H., & Luo, Y. J. (2004). “Aha!” effects in a guessing riddle task: An event‐related potential study. Human Brain Mapping, 22(4), 261-270.
    121.McClelland, D. C. (1956). Risk-taking in children with high and low need for achievement: DTIC Document.
    122.McGraw, K. O., & McCullers, J. C. (1979). Evidence of a detrimental effect of extrinsic incentives on breaking a mental set. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15(3), 285-294.
    123.Mitchell, R. L., & Phillips, L. H. (2007). The psychological, neurochemical and \\ functional neuroanatomical mediators of the effects of positive and negative mood on executive functions. Neuropsychologia, 45(4), 617-629.
    124.Murayama, K., & Elliot, A. J. (2009). The joint influence of personal achievement goals and classroom goal structures on achievement-relevant outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 432.
    125.Murayama, K., & Elliot, A. J. (2012). The competition–performance relation: A meta-analytic review and test of the opposing processes model of competition and performance. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1035.
    126.Ohlsson, S. (1992). Information-processing explanations of insight and related phenomena. Advances In The Psychology of Thinking.
    127.Öllinger, M., Jones, G., & Knoblich, G. (2008). Investigating the effect of mental set on insight problem solving. Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie), 55(4), 269-282.
    128.Orlick, T. D., & Mosher, R. (1978). Extrinsic awards and participant motivation in a sport related task. International Journal of Sport Psychology.
    129.Ormerod, T. C., MacGregor, J. N., & Chronicle, E. P. (2002). Dynamics and constraints in insight problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(4), 791.
    130.Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2006). Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 583.
    131.Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 115.
    132.Perkins, D. N. (1995). Insight in minds and genes.
    133.Pessoa, L. (2009). How do emotion and motivation direct executive control?.Trends in cognitive sciences, 13(4), 160-166.
    134.Pierce, W. D., Cameron, J., Banko, K. M., & So, S. (2003). Positive effects of rewards and performance standards on intrinsic motivation. The Psychological Record, 53(4), 4.
    135.Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 544.
    136.Poortvliet, P. M., Janssen, O., Van Yperen, N. W., & Van de Vliert, E. (2007). Achievement goals and interpersonal behavior: How mastery and performance goals shape information exchange. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(10), 1435-1447.
    137.Priester, J. R., Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1996). The influence of motor processes on attitudes toward novel versus familiar semantic stimuli. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 442-447.
    138.Raynor, J. O., & Rubin, I. S. (1971). Effects of achievement motivation and future orientation on level of performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17(1), 36.
    139.Rietzschel, E. F., De Dreu, C. K., & Nijstad, B. A. (2007). Personal need for structure and creative performance: The moderating influence of fear of invalidity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(6), 855-866.
    140.Rolls, E. T. (2000). On the brain and emotion. Behavioral and brain sciences, 23(02),
    219-228.
    141.Roskes, M., Elliot, A. J., Nijstad, B. A., & De Dreu, C. K. (2013). Avoidance motivation and conservation of energy. Emotion Review, 5(3), 264-268.
    142.Rosenfield, D., Folger, R., & Adelman, H. F. (1980). When rewards reflect competence: A qualification of the overjustification effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(3), 368.
    143.Rowe, G., Hirsh, J. B., & Anderson, A. K. (2007). Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(1), 383-388.
    144.Ruder, M., & Bless, H. (2003). Mood and the reliance on the ease of retrieval heuristic. Journal of personality and social psychology, 85(1), 20.
    145.Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
    146.Savine, A. C., & Braver, T. S. (2010). Motivated cognitive control: reward incentives modulate preparatory neural activity during task-switching. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30(31), 10294-10305.
    147.Schilling, M. A. (2005). A" small-world" network model of cognitive insight. Creativity Research Journal, 17(2-3), 131-154.
    148.Schwarz, N. (2011). Feelings-as-information theory. Handbook of theories of social
    psychology, 1, 289-308.
    149.Seifert, C. M., Meyer, D. E., Davidson, N., Patalano, A. L., & Yaniv, I. (1994). Demystification of cognitive insight: Opportunistic assimilation and the prepared-mind hypothesis. In R. J. Steraberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 65-124). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    150.Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creative productivity: A predictive and explana- tory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104, 66–89.
    151.Soldat, A. S., & Sinclair, R. C. (2001). Colors, smiles, and frowns: External affective cues can directly affect responses to persuasive communications in a mood-like manner without affecting mood. Social Cognition, 19(4), 469-490.
    152.To, M. L., Ashkanasy, N. M., Fisher, C. D., & Rowe, P. A. (2010). Creativity as mood regulation. Research on Emotion in Organizations, 6, 279-307.
    153.Tyson, D. F., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Hill, N. E. (2009). Regulating debilitating emotions in the context of performance: Achievement goal orientations,achievement-elicited emotions, and socialization contexts. Human Development,52(6), 329-356.
    154.Verhaeghen, P., Joorman, J., & Khan, R. (2005). Why we sing the blues: the relation between self-reflective rumination, mood, and creativity. Emotion, 5(2), 226.
    155.Wang, Y., & Guo, D. J. (2008). The effects of positive emotions on task switching. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 40(3), 301-306.
    156.Weibel, A., Rost, K., & Osterloh, M. (2010). Pay for performance in the public sector—Benefits and (hidden) costs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(2), 387-412.
    157.Weisberg, R. W. (1992). Metacognition and insight during problem solving: Comment on Metcalfe. Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 18(2), 426-431.
    158.Weisberg, R. W. (1995). Prolegomena to theories of insight problem solving: A taxonomy of problems. In R. J. Sternberg and J. E. Davidson. The nature of insight. Cambridge,Mass.: MIT Press.
    159.Weller, A., Villejoubert, G., & Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2011). Interactive insight problem solving. Thinking & Reasoning, 17(4), 424-439.
    160.Wen, M. C., Butler, L. T., & Koutstaal, W. (2013). Improving insight and non‐insight problem solving with brief interventions. British Journal of Psychology, 104(1), 97-118.
    161.Wiersma, U. J. (1992). The effects of extrinsic rewards in intrinsic motivation: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65(2), 101-114.
    162.Wieth, M., & Burns, B. D. (2006). Incentives improve performance on both incremental and insight problem solving. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(8), 1378-1394.
    163.Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing Achievement Goal Theory: Using Goal Structures and Goal Orientations to Predict Students` Motivation, Cognition, and Achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 236.
    164.Zachopoulou, E., & Makri, A. (2005). A developmental perspective of divergent movement ability in early young children. Early Child Development and Care,175(1), 85-95
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    教育研究所
    100152009
    102
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100152009
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[教育學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    200901.pdf2818KbAdobe PDF2670View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback