政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/67864

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/67864

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51098455 線上人數 : 942

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 資訊管理學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/67864

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67864

題名:	運用累積展望理論於創新服務之適當期調整 An Application of Cumulative Prospect Theory to Appropriate Expectation Positioning of New Service
作者:	王席筠 Wang, Hsi Yun
貢獻者:	苑守慈 Yuan, Soe Tysr 王席筠 Wang, Hsi Yun
關鍵詞:	顧客期望行為經濟學行為改變心理價值累積展望理論 Customer Expectations Behavior Economics Behavior Change Psychological value Cumulative Prospect Theory
日期:	2013
上傳時間:	2014-07-29 16:03:57 (UTC+8)
摘要:	在服務創新的時代，如何衡量以個人化的方式衡量新服務的價值是尚未被清楚定義的。尤其在涉及促進創新服務的有效性以及面臨決策時是處於不確定且具風險的情況下，個人化衡量顯得更為重要。舉例而言，服務提供商如何管理其服務質量並維持其競爭力；服務接收者如何有效且準確的衡量是否接受該創新服務。因此，本研究提出定位適當期望的機制與資訊系統設計，目的是滿足與服務相關之所有利害關係人的期望效益。收集服務接收者的心理資訊，換算其心理價值及機率權重來衡量決策效益。實現提供適當期望之目的，並獲取最大效益。 In the era of service innovation, the question of when to evaluate which innovation services and how to achieve personalized evaluation is still not clear. This is especially true under the situations of uncertainty and risk when it comes to bringing the effectiveness of service innovation promotion and decision making, i.e., for service providers to retain service quality and competitiveness and for service receivers to efficiently and accurately decide whether to try new service. Therefore, an appropriate expectation positioning mechanism proposed in this study aims to collect psychological information from service receivers to make service promotion decisions capable of achieving each stakeholder’s purposes as well as satisfying service receivers, utilizing the psychological information of psychological values and probability weights.
參考文獻:	[1] Abernathy, W. J. (1978). The productivity dilemma: Roadblock to innovation in the automobile industry. Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore, MD. [2] Alan, R. H., Salvatore, T. M., Jinsoo, P., and Sudha, R. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS QUART, 28 (1), 75-105. [3] Australian Federation of AIDS Organisations (AFAO) (1996). What do they want us to do now? [4] Bandura, A. and D. C. McClelland (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ. [5] Bernoulli, D. (Originally published in 1738); translated by Dr. Louise Sommer. (1954). Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk. Econometrica (The Econometric Society. 22 (1) 23-36. [6] C. Bonomelli (2010). Innovation and Industry Life Cycle: the Case of US Tire Industry (1901-1930). [7] Courtney, H., J. Kirkland, et al. (1997). Strategy under uncertainty. Harvard Business Review, 75: 67-79. [8] Design Council (2005). The design process. http://www.designcouncil.org.uk/designprocess [9] DiClemente CC, Schlundt D, Gemmell L. (2004). Readiness and stages of change in addiction treatment. Journal on Addictions. Mar-Apr;13(2):103-19 [10] DiClemente, C. C. and J. O. Prochaska (1998). Toward a comprehensive, transtheoretical model of change: Stages of change and addictive behaviors. Plenum Press. [11] Dwayne D. G. (2001), Customer expectations of service. McGraw Hill. [12] Feinberg, J. (1978). Psychological egoisms. In Reason & Responsibility: Readings in Some Basic Problems of Philosophy, edited by Joel Feinberg and Russ Shafer-Landau, 520-532. [13] Fellner, W. (1961). Two propositions in the theory of induced innovations. The Economic Journal, 71: 305-308. [14] Glanz, K., B. K. Rimer, et al. (2008). Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. John Wiley & Sons. [15] Gonzalez, R. and G. Wu (1999). On the shape of the probability weighting function. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Cognitive Psychology 38: 129–166. [16] Hammond, K. R. (1996) Human judgment and social policy. Oxford University Press. [17] Heskett, J. L. and L. A. Schlesinger (1994). Putting the Service-Profit Chain to Work. Harvard Business Review. 72: 164-174. [18] Hershey, J. C. and P. J. H. Schoemaker (1985). Probability versus certainty equivalence methods in utility measurement: Are they equivalent? Management Science, 31: 1213-1231. [19] Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation-level theory: an experimental and systematic approach to behavior. Harper & Row. [20] Johnson, S. P., L. J. Menor, et al. (2000). A critical evaluation of the new service development process. SAGE, 1-32. [21] Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Journal of the Econometric Society, 263-291. [22] Kahneman D. and A. Tversky (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychological Association, 39: 341. [23] Kahneman, D. and S. Frederick (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment, 49-81. [24] Kahneman, Daniel (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan. [25] Kahn, B. E. and R. K. Sarin (1998). Modeling ambiguity in decisions under uncertainty. Journal of Consumer Research, 265-272. [26] Kirkwood, C. W. (2002). Decision tree primer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ for further details. [27] Krzysztofowicz, R. and L. Duckstein (1980). Assessment errors in multiattribute utility functions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 26(3), 326-348. [28] Lleras, K. S. (2012). Asymmetric Gain/Loss Preferences: Beliefs and Endogenous Reference Point Determination. [29] Logvinenko, A. D., J. Kane, et al. (2002). Is lightness induction a pictorial illusion?. PION LTD. 31: 72-82. [30] Müller-Lyer, F. C. (1889) Optische Urteilstauschungen (optical illusions). Archiv fur Anatomie und Physiologie, Physiologische Abteilung, 2, 263-270. [31] Parasuraman, A., V. A. Zeithaml, & L. L. Berry (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49, 41-50. [32] Parasuraman, A., V. A. Zeithaml, et al. (1988). SERVQUAL. Journal of retailing, 64: 12-40. [33] Patten, S.,Vollman, A., & Thurston,W. (2000).The utility of the transtheoretical model of behavior change for HIV risk reduction in injection drug users. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care, 11(1), 57-66. [34] Plous, S. (1993). The psychology of judgment and decision making. Mcgraw-Hill Book Company. [35] Porter, M. E. (1986). Competition in global industries. Harvard Business Press. [36] Prochaska, J., DiClemente, C., & Norcross, J. (1992). In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. Journal of Addictions Nursing, 47(9), 1002-1114. [37] Prochaska, J.O. Johnson, S, & Lee, P. (1998). The Transtheoretical Model of Behavior Change. The Handbook of Health Behavior Change (Second Edition), 12: 38-48. [38] Quiggin, J. (1985). Subjective utility, anticipated utility, and the Allais paradox. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35(1), 94-101. [39] Reid Hastie and Robyn M. Dawes (2001). Rational Choice in an Uncertain World: The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making. SAGE, 195. [40] Richard H. Thaler (1999). Mental Accounting Matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12: 183-206. [41] S. Charles Maurice, Christopher R. T. (2001). Managerial Economics. McGraw-Hill Higher Education. [42] Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of communication. 49: 103-122 [43] Scholl, B. J. and K. Nakayama (2002) Causal capture: Contextual effects on the perception of collision events. Psychological Science, 13: 493-498. [44] Sheth J. N., B. I. Newman, et al. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: a theory of consumption values. Journal of business research, 22: 159-170. [45] Stanovich, K. E. and R. F. West (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and brain sciences. 23: 645-665. [46] Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and uncertainty. 5:297-323. [47] Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. Wiley. [48] Zeithaml, V. A. (1988) Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52: 2-22. [49] Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Addison-Wesley Press.
描述:	碩士國立政治大學資訊管理研究所 101356024 102
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101356024
資料類型:	thesis
顯示於類別:	[資訊管理學系] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
602401.pdf	5640Kb	Adobe PDF2	468	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋