政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/67655
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113392/144379 (79%)
Visitors : 51194158      Online Users : 932
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67655


    Title: 兩人團隊創意交融系絡之比較個案研究
    Creative collaboration within two-person teams: A comparative case study
    Authors: 樊學良
    Fan, Hsueh Liang
    Contributors: 吳靜吉
    Wu, Jing Jyi
    樊學良
    Fan, Hsueh Liang
    Keywords: 兩人團隊
    交融記憶系統
    溝通互動
    創意交融的情境
    two-person team
    transactive memory system
    dialogue communication
    a context for creative collaboration
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2014-07-21 15:48:33 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 「兩人」是團隊組成的最小單位，回顧人類社會經濟活動的發展，許多重要的創新，經常是從兩人團隊開始。特別是以創意為核心的任務或作為，更易於以兩人為基礎，個別尋覓契合自我價值觀、專業能力，和人格特質的合作搭檔。雖然兩人團隊是人類社會經濟活動的常態，存在著重要的學理和實務意涵需要探討；但是，目前有關兩人團隊的文獻仍不多見。本研究的目的，即在回應此一文獻缺口，探討兩人團隊創意交融的系絡。

    研究採取比較個案研究法，以八個兩人設計團隊進行半結構的深度訪談，正式研究前則進行了兩個前導個案的研究。經彙整訪談逐字稿之文本分析內容後，本研究有三個主要發現。第一，兩人設計團隊創意協作的歷程，從成員對產品核心概念的探索開始，之後會經歷共同建構創意、精緻化創意和實踐創意等過程。而產品核心概念的頓悟，通常是兩人在相近的問題意識下，從參與共享的情境當中浮現。此一情境浮現之頓悟並不專屬哪一方，但又必須仰賴兩人共同參與情境而獲得。第二，友誼是促進兩人設計團隊發展交融記憶系統的重要因素，友誼不僅帶動了兩人從玩票接案到正式形成團隊，同時也在團隊運作過程中，增強交融記憶系統本身的能量。第三，成員會透過不同形式的溝通互動，促進資訊的交流並精緻彼此的創意，這些形式包括了競爭型互動、合作型互動，和基於玩興的互動。

    整體而言，本研究拓展了吾人對於兩人團隊及其創意交融的理解，也對團隊經營和團隊創意管理的實務有所貢獻。團隊發展實務上，可培養交融記憶系統成為團隊賴以運作的核心能耐，並透過成員共同參與情境的方式，營造有利於兩人從事創意交融活動的場域。
    ‘Two person’ is a basic unit of the composition of a team. Looking back on the historical development of the social and economic activities of the human, many radical innovations were often invented by two-person teams. Especially, creative workers, based on the two-person team structure, are more likely to search for the right partner that whose vision, value, expertise, and personality are best fit with each other. Despite the research on two-person team could provide valuable theoretical and practical implications for team literature; very little attention has given to such phenomena. Using a multi-case of eight two-person design teams, this dissertation explores the creative collaboration within the two-person teams.

    Through the qualitative analysis of the data, this dissertation provides three major findings. First, the creative collaboration processes within the two-person team contain four stages which begin exploring the core concept of the product. Then, team members collectively co-construct, elaborate and execute the core concept of the product. The insight of core concept of the product usually emerges from the two persons who have similar problem awareness and collectively engage in a shared context. This insight is not exclusive which party, but must rely on both sides to collectively engage in the shared context to develop. Second, friendship plays an important role for facilitating the development of the team’s transactive memory system (TMS). Friendship not only helps the two persons to build a team, help the team’s TMS function well in the team development processes. Third, members within the two-person team use three kinds of dialogue communication for exchanging information and elaborating creative ideas of the members. The three kinds of dialogue are: competitive dialogue, collaborative dialogue, and playfulness dialogue.

    Overall, this dissertation extends the current knowledge in management area about the creative collaboration within the two-person teams. Results of this dissertation also contribute to the management for two-person teams and the management of team members’ creative ideas. This dissertation suggests the two-person teams can build TMS as a team’s core capability and engage in shared contexts where beneficial for the creative collaboration.
    Reference: 壹、中文部分
    ‵0416×1024（2014）。設計好品。取自http://www.hi‵0416.com/‵0416/category.php?pc_id=pc00001
    Forbes（2012）。福布斯2012年中国家族企业调查报告。取自http://www.forbeschina.com/review/201209/0019773.shtml
    Harris, M.（1993）。人類學導論（蕭秀玲等譯）。台北市：五南圖書。
    Kuei（2011）。專訪視覺藝術家雙人檔Kuntzel + Deygas。取自http://www.mydesy.com/kuntzel-deygas
    MOT/TIMES（2013）。細節裡藏魔鬼，兩個八月到日本學習對生活的敏銳度。取自http://www.mottimes.com/cht/interview_detail.php?serial=207
    Senge, P. M.（2006）。第五項修練II實踐篇(下)：共創學習新經驗（齊若蘭翻譯）。台北市：天下。
    Strauss, A., & Corbin, J.（1998）。質性研究入門：紮根理論研究方法（吳芝儀、廖梅花翻譯）。台北市：濤石。
    中子創新（2012）。《我的生活寫真》‵0416x1024 愛邊玩邊畫。取自 http://simplelife.streetvoice.com/simplepeople/bg_spring_‵0416x1024.html
    台北科技大學工業設計系（2012）。I Power。取自http://www.dt.ntust.edu.tw/content/tools-pen
    台灣心理學會（2013）。心理學專業人員倫理準則。取自http://www.psy.ntu.edu.tw/cpa/心理學專業人員倫理準則.pdf‎
    台灣科技大學工商業設計系（2014）。Tools pen。取自http://www.dt.ntust.edu.tw/content/tools-pen
    余嬪、吳靜吉、陳以亨、區衿綾（2011）。不同年齡男女專業工作者之玩興與工作創新。教育心理學報，42（3）， 423-444。
    林果良品（2014）。店面資訊。取自http://www.oringoshoes.com/
    林淑媛、黃憶婷（2007）。設計合作學。設計研究，7，68-75。
    物外設計（2013）。商品。取自http://www.ystudiostyle.com/chinese/products/tag/stationery
    花生騷（2014）。商品目錄。取自http://wasangshow.shop.rakuten.tw/c/0000152751/
    徐聯恩（2002）。組織知識創造情境之建構。研習論壇，14，25-32。
    馬岳琳（2011）。兩個八月：生命與感動，用童趣面對環保真相。取自http://topic.cw.com.tw/design/designer/designer4.aspx
    陳文誌、游萬來（2008）。網路輔助跨校合作設計學習專案的問題與影響。藝術教育研究，15，105-137。
    陳明哲（2013）。動態競爭：中西合璧。哈佛商業評論，2月號，14-15。
    陶作坊（2014）。Tea Party「Slow and Flow」竅門設計×陶作坊榮獲2013亞洲最具影響力設計獎品牌與形象類金獎。取自http://www.aurlia.com.tw/news_detail.php?id=52
    黃漢華（2011）。用刺繡做設計，名列最有影響力的印度人。取自http://www.gvm.com.tw/Boardcontent_17338_2.html
    潘怡靜（2013）。血統領創業方向，潮牌T恤說原民故事。取自http://www.appledaily.com.tw/appledaily/article/finance/20130616/35087278/
    器研所（2012）。都會自行車。取自http://www.gearlab.com.tw/2316/2013-11-mottimes/
    竅門設計事務所（2014）。公司介紹。取自http://www.qiaodesign.com/Index.htm 
    貳、英文部分
    Amabile, T. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder: Westview Press.
    Amabile, T., Fisher, C. M., & Pillemer, J. (2014). IDEO`s Culture of Helping. Harvard Business Review, 92(1-2), 54-61.
    Argote, L., & Ren, Y. Q. (2012). Transactive memory systems: A microfoundation of dynamic capabilities. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1375-1382.
    Bakker, A. B., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2009). The crossover of daily work engagement: Test of an actor-partner interdependence model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1562-1571.
    Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 377-391.
    Bluhm, D. J., Harman, W., Lee, T. W., & Mitchell, T. R. (2011). Qualitative research in management: A decade of progress. Journal of Management Studies, 48(8), 1866-1891.
    Brand, S., & Opwis, K. (2007). Effects of mood and problem solving in dyads on transfer. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 66(1), 51-65.
    Brandon, D. P., & Hollingshead, A. B. (2004). Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organization Science, 15(6), 633-644.
    Chen, X. G., Li, X., Clark, J. G., & Dietrich, G. B. (2013). Knowledge sharing in open source software project teams: A transactive memory system perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 33(3), 553-563.
    Chiang, Y. H., Shih, H. A., & Hsu, C. C. (2014). High commitment work system, transactive memory system, and new product performance. Journal of Business Research, 67(4), 631-640.
    Christian, J. S., Pearsall, M. J., Christian, M. S., & Ellis, A. P. J. (2014). Exploring the benefits and boundaries of transactive memory systems in adapting to team member loss. Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice, 18(1), 69-86.
    Cooper, D. J., & Kagel, J. H. (2005). Are two heads better than one? Team versus individual play in signaling games. American Economic Review, 95(3), 477-509.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention (1st ed.). New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
    Curral, L. A., Forrester, R. H., Dawson, J. F., & West, M. A. (2001). It`s what you do and the way that you do it: Team task, team size, and innovation-related group processes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(2), 187-204.
    De Bono, E. (1971). Lateral thinking for management: A handbook of creativity. New York: American Management Association.
    De Stobbeleir, K. E. M., Ashford, S. J., & Buyens, D. (2011). Self-regulation of creativity at work: The role of feedback-seeking behavior in creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4), 811-831.
    Decuyper, S., Dochy, F., & Van den Bossche, P. (2010). Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning: An integrative model for effective team learning in organisations. Educational Research Review, 5(2), 111-133.
    Dobao, A. F. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(1), 40-58.
    Drucker, P. F. (1996). The executive in action (1st ed.). New York: Harper Business.
    Dyer, J. H., Gregersen, H. B., & Christensen, C. M. (2009). The Innovator`s DNA. Harvard Business Review, 87(12), 60-67.
    Edmondson, A. C. (2012). Teaming: How organizations learn, innovate, and compete in the knowledge economy (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case-Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
    Ekvall, G., & Ryhammar, L. (1999). The creative climate: Its determinants and effects at a Swedish university. Creativity Research Journal, 12(4), 303-310.
    Ellis, A.P.J., Porter, C.O.L.H., & Wolverton, S.A. (2008). Learning to work together: An examination of transactive memory system development in teams. In V.I. Sessa & M. London (Eds.), Work group learning: Understanding, improving, and assessing how groups learn in organizations (pp. 91-115). New York: Taylor & Francis.
    Elsbach, K. D. (2009). Identity affirmation through `signature style`: A study of toy car designers. Human Relations, 62(7), 1041-1072.
    Elsbach, K. D., & Flynn, F. J. (2013). Creative collaboration and the self-concept: A study of toy designers. Journal of Management Studies, 50(4), 515-544.
    Elsbach, K. D., & Kramer, R. M. (2003). Assessing creativity in Hollywood pitch meetings: Evidence for a dual-process model of creativity judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 46(3), 283-301.
    Farrell, M. P. (2001). Collaborative circles : Friendship dynamics & creative work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Fliaster, A., & Schloderer, F. (2010). Dyadic ties among employees: Empirical analysis of creative performance and efficiency. Human Relations, 63(10), 1513-1540.
    Florida, R. L. (2004). The rise of the creative class: And how it`s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.
    Francis, D. H., & Sandberg, W. R. (2000). Friendship within entrepreneurial teams and its association with team and venture performance. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 25(2), 5-25.
    Gallupe, R. B., Dennis, A. R., Cooper, W. H., Valacich, J. S., Bastianutti, L. M., & Nunamaker, J. F. (1992). Electronic brainstorming and group-size. Academy of Management Journal, 35(2), 350-369.
    Gockel, C., & Brauner, E. (2013). The benefits of stepping into others` shoes: Perspective taking strengthens transactive memory. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35(2), 222-230.
    Goldberg, D. E. (2009). The importance of pairwork in educational and interdisciplinary initiatives. Paper presented at the 39th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX.
    Goncalo, J. A., & Kim, S. H. (2010). Distributive justice beliefs and group idea generation: Does a belief in equity facilitate productivity? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(5), 836-840.
    Goncalo, J. A., & Staw, B. M. (2006). Individualism-collectivism and group creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100(1), 96-109.
    Goncalo, J. A., Flynn, F. J., & Kim, S. H. (2010). Are two narcissists better than one? The link between narcissism, perceived creativity, and creative performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(11), 1484-1495.
    Gooty, J., & Yammarino, F. J. (2011). Dyads in organizational research: Conceptual issues and multilevel analyses. Organizational Research Methods, 14(3), 456-483.
    Griffith, T. L., & Neale, M. A. (2001). Information processing in traditional, hybrid, and virtual teams: From nascent knowledge to transactive memory. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 379-421.
    Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1997). Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), 716-749.
    Hoever, I. J., van Knippenberg, D., van Ginkel, W. P., & Barkema, H. G. (2012). Fostering team creativity: Perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity`s potential. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 982-996.
    Hollingshead, A. B. (1998a). Communication, learning, and retrieval in transactive memory systems. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34(5), 423-442.
    Hollingshead, A. B. (1998b). Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 659-671.
    Hollingshead, A. B., & Brandon, D. P. (2003). Potential benefits of communication in transactive memory systems. Human Communication Research, 29(4), 607-615.
    Hulsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94（5), 1128-1145.
    Hunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Climate for creativity: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 19(1), 69-90.
    Ilgen, D. R. (1999). Teams embedded in organizations: Some implications. American Psychologist, 54（2), 129-139.
    Jackson, B., Dimmock, J. A., Gucciardi, D. F., & Grove, J. R. (2011). Personality traits and relationship perceptions in coach-athlete dyads: Do opposites really attract? Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12（3), 222-230.
    Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365-379.
    John-Steiner, V. (2000). Creative collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press
    Kamm, J. B., & Nurick, A. J. (1993). The stages of team venture formation: A decision-making model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 17(2), 17-27.
    Kamm, J. B., Shuman, J. C., Seeger, J. A., & Nurick, A. J. (1990). Entrepreneurial teams in new venture creation: A research agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14(4), 7-17.
    Kelley, T., & Littman, J. (2001). The art of innovation: Lessons in creativity from IDEO, America`s leading design firm (1st ed.). New York: Currency/Doubleday.
    Kraiger, K., & Wenzel, L. H. (1997). Conceptual development and empirical evaluation of measures of shared mental models indicators of team effectiveness. In M. K. Brannick, E. Salas & C. Prince (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Kurtzberg, T. R., & Amabile, T. M. (2000). From Guilford to creative synergy: Opening the black box of team-level creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13（3-4), 285-294.
    Lee, T. W. (1999). Using qualitative methods in organizational research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
    Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., & Sablynski, C. J. (1999). Qualitative research in organizational and vocational psychology: 1979-1999. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55(2), 161-187.
    Leonard-Barton, D., & Swap, W. C. (1999). When sparks fly: Igniting creativity in groups. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    Lewis, K. (2003). Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 587-604.
    Lewis, K., & Herndon, B. (2011). Transactive memory systems: Current issues and future research directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1254-1265.
    Lewis, K., Lange, D., & Gillis, L. (2005). Transactive memory systems, learning, and learning transfer. Organization Science, 16(6), 581-598.
    Liang, D. W., Moreland, R., & Argote, L. (1995). Group versus individual training and group-performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(4), 384-393.
    Liao, J., Jimmieson, N. L., O`Brien, A. T., & Restubog, S. L. D. (2012). Developing transactive memory systems: Theoretical contributions from a social identity perspective. Group & Organization Management, 37(2), 204-240.
    Maitlis, S. (2005). The social processes of organizational sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 21-49.
    Marques-Quinteiro, P., Curral, L., Passos, A. M., & Lewis, K. (2013). And now what do we do? The role of ransactive memory systems and task coordination in action teams. Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice, 17(3), 194-206.
    Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 273-283.
    Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410-476.
    Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis : an expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
    Miller, C. C., Burke, L. M., & Glick, W. H. (1998). Cognitive diversity among upper-echelon executives: Implications for strategic decision processes. Strategic Management Journal, 19(1), 39-58.
    Minson, J. A., & Mueller, J. S. (2012). The cost of collaboration: Why joint decision making exacerbates rejection of outside information. Psychological Science, 23(3), 219-224.
    Moreland, R. L., & Myaskovsky, L. (2000). Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 117-133.
    Munkes, J., & Diehl, M. (2003). Matching or competition? Performance comparison processes in an idea generation task. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6(3), 305-320.
    Murnieks, C. Y., Haynie, J. M., Wiltbank, R. E., & Harting, T. (2011). `I like how you think`: Similarity as an interaction bias in the investor-entrepreneur dyad. Journal of Management Studies, 48(7), 1533-1561.
    Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
    Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.
    Nonaka, I. o., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company : how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of "ba": Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 40-54.
    Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, ba and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 33(1), 5-34.
    Osborn, A. F. (1963). Applied imagination; principles and procedures of creative problem-solving (3rd ed.). New York: Scribner.
    Palazzolo, E. T., Serb, D. A., She, Y. C., Su, C. K., & Contractor, N. S. (2006). Coevolution of communication and knowledge networks in transactive memory systems: Using computational models for theoretical development. Communication Theory, 16(2), 223-250.
    Peltokorpi, V. (2004). Transactive memory directories in small work units. Personnel Review, 33(4), 446-467.
    Pirola-Merlo, A., & Mann, L. (2003). Validation of a new instrument for measuring organisational supports for innovation: The OSIQ. Australian Journal of Psychology, 55, 141-141.
    Ren, Y. Q., & Argote, L. (2011). Transactive memory systems 1985-2010: An integrative framework of key dimensions, antecedents, and consequences. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 189-229.
    Richard, O. C., Ismail, K. M., Bhuian, S. N., & Taylor, E. C. (2009). Mentoring in supervisor-subordinate dyads: Antecedents, consequences, and test of a mediation model of mentorship. Journal of Business Research, 62(11), 1110-1118.
    Rulke, D. L., & Rau, D. (2000). Investigating the encoding process of transactive memory development in group training. Group & Organization Management, 25(4), 373-396.
    Ruscher, J. B., Santuzzi, A. M., & Hammer, E. Y. (2003). Shared impression formation in the cognitively interdependent dyad. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 411-425.
    Salas, E., ickinson, T. L., Converse, S. A., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1992). Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In I. R. W. S. E. Salas (Ed.), Teams: Their training and performance (pp. 3-29). Norwood: Ablex.
    Sawyer, R. K. (2007). Group genius: The creative power of collaboration. New York: Basic Books.
    Schumpeter, J. A., & Opie, R. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline : The art and practice of the learning organization (1st ed.). New York: Currency/Doubleday.
    Shin, S. J., Kim, T. Y., Lee, J. Y., & Bian, L. (2012). Cognitive team diversity and individual team member creativity: A cross-level interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 197-212.
    Showers, B., & Joyce, B. (1996). The evolution of peer coaching. Educational Leadership, 53(6), 12-16.
    Simonton, D. K. (1999). Creativity as blind variation and selective retention: Is the creative process Darwinian? Psychological Inquiry, 10(4), 309-328.
    Solomon, D., & Theiss, J. (2013). Interpersonal communication: Putting theory into practice. New York: Routledge.
    Sosa, M. E. (2011). Where do creative interactions come from? The role of tie content and social networks. Organization Science, 22(1), 1-21.
    Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Tadmor, C. T., Satterstrom, P., Jang, S. J., & Polzer, J. T. (2012). Beyond individual creativity: The superadditive benefits of multicultural experience for collective creativity in culturally diverse teams. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(3), 384-392.
    Ten Velden, F. S., Beersma, B., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2010). It takes one to Tango: The effects of dyads` epistemic motivation composition in negotiation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(11), 1454-1466.
    Timmons, J. A. (1990). New venture creation: Entrepreneurship in the 1990s (3rd ed.) Homewood: Irwin.
    Tsai, W. P., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464-476.
    Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W., Segers, M., Woltjer, G., & Kirschner, P. (2011). Team learning: Building shared mental models. Instructional Science, 39(3), 283-301.
    Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. London: J. Cape.
    Warr, A., & O`Neill, E. (2005). Understanding design as a social creative process. Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Creativity & Cognition (pp. 629-642). London: ACM.
    Watson, W. E., Ponthieu, L. D., & Critelli, J. W. (1995). Team interpersonal process effectiveness in venture partnerships and Its connection to perceived success. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(5), 393-411.
    Wegner, D. M. (1986). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185-208). New York: Springer-Verlag.
    Wegner, D. M. (1995). A computer network model of human transactive memory. Social Cognition, 13(3), 319-339.
    Wegner, D. M., Erber, R., & Raymond, P. (1991). Transactive memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(6), 923-929.
    Wegner, D.M., Giuliano, T., & Hertel, P. (1985). Cognitive interdependence in close relationships. In W.J. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 253–276). New York: Springer.
    Weinstein, N., Hodgins, H. S., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Autonomy and control in dyads: Effects on interaction quality and joint creative performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1603-1617
    West, M. A., & Anderson, N. R. (1996). Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 680-693.
    West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1990). Innovation and creativity at work : psychological and organizational strategies. New York: Wiley.
    Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2009). Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy. Language Testing, 26(3), 445-466.
    Wilson, K. S., Sin, H. P., & Conlon, D. E. (2010). What about the leader in leader-member exchange? The impact of resource exchanges and substitutability on the leader. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 358-372.
    Yang, H. D., Kang, H. R., & Mason, R. M. (2008). An exploratory study on meta skills in software development teams: antecedent cooperation skills and personality for shared mental models. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(1), 47-61.
    Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
    Zheng, Y. F., & Mai, Y. Y. (2013). A contextualized transactive memory system view on how founding teams respond to surprises: Evidence from China. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(3), 197-213.

     
    參、網站部分
    ‵0416x1024：http://www.hi‵0416.com/‵0416/
    兩個八月：http://www.biaugust.com/
    林果良品：http://www.oringoshoes.com/
    物外設計：http://www.ystudiostyle.com/
    花生騷：http://wasangshow.shop.rakuten.tw/gold/
    器研所：www.gearlab.com.tw/
    竅門設計：http://www.qiaodesign.com/
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理與智慧財產研究所
    97359503
    102
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0973595034
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of TIPM] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    503401.pdf2785KbAdobe PDF21068View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback