政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/67566

政大典藏 > College of Commerce > Department of Business Administation > Theses > Item 140.119/67566

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67566

Title:	團隊認知需求及團隊合作性目標與交融記憶系統形成─資訊精緻化的中介效果 Need For Cognition , Team Cooperative Goal and the formation of Transactive Memory System: The Mediating Effects of Information Elaboration
Authors:	葉讚名
Contributors:	黃家齊葉讚名
Keywords:	認知需求團隊合作性目標資訊精緻化團隊交融記憶系統
Date:	2013
Issue Date:	2014-07-21 15:33:55 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	隨著時代不斷演進，現代企業裡的工作團隊大多面臨複雜、變動快速且競爭激烈的環境，因此，如何有效提升團隊績效已成為企業重視的一大課題。過去許多研究指出，團隊交融記憶系統(transactive memory system，簡稱TMS)能有效幫助團隊提升績效並提升團隊決策速度與品質，然而，一個團隊欲建立團隊交融記憶系統，必須先瞭解團隊交融記憶系統的形成前因為何。本研究以資訊處理動機模型為理論基礎，並以企業中之實務工作團隊為研究對象，探討團隊內成員之認知需求(知識動機)與團隊合作性目標(社會動機)如何促成團隊交融記憶系統的形成，並且在研究中加入團隊資訊精緻化作為中介變數，以探討團隊資訊精緻化在認知需求、團隊合作性目標與團隊交融記憶系統間之中介效果。另外，研究中亦將進一步探討團隊合作性目標對於認知需求與團隊資訊精緻化關係的調節效果。本研究以70個實際工作團隊(包含研發團隊與行銷團隊)作為研究樣本，並以層級迴歸分析及Sobel test進行假設驗證。經由實證分析結果，本研究發現團隊合作性目標與團隊資訊精緻化具有顯著的正向關係，而團隊資訊精緻化在團隊合作性目標與團隊交融記憶系統之關係間具有中介效果。此外，團隊合作性目標亦會調節團隊認知需求與團隊資訊精緻化間的正向關係。也就是說當團隊合作性目標高時，團隊認知需求與團隊資訊精緻化間的正向關係將高於團隊合作性目標低時。
Reference:	Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Alper, S., Tjosvold, D.,&Law, S. A. (1998). Interdependence and controversy in group decision making: Antecedents to effective self-managing teams, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74, 33-52. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182 Bentler, P. M. (1988). Theory and implementation of EQS: A structural equations program. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197-253. De Dreu, C. K. W. (2007). Cooperative outcome independence, task reflexivity, and team effectiveness: A motivated information processing perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 628-638. De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. A., & van Kinppenberg, D. (2008). Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 22-49. Delery, J. E., & Doty, D. H. (1996). Modes of Theorizing in strategic human resource management: Test of universalic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 802-835. Deutsch, M. (1990). Sixty years of conflict. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 1, 237-263. Donnellan, M. Brent., Oswald, Frederick L., Baird, Brendan M., & Lucas, Richard E. (2006). The Mini-IPIP Scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five Factors of Personality. Psychological Assessment, 18, 192-203. Fornell, Claes & David F. Larcker (1981), “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobervables and Measurement error,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50 Gladstein, D. L., (1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 499-517. Hair, J.F. Jr., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., Black, W.C., Multivariate Data Analysis（5th ed.）,Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice-Hall, 1998. Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 43-64. Hollingshead, A. B. (2000). Perceptions of expertise and transactive memory in work relationship. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3, 257-267. Hollingshead, A.B., & Brandon, D.P. (2003). Potential benefits of communication in transactive memory systems. Human Communication Research, 29, 607–615. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. Jackson, M., & Moreland, R.L. (2009). Transactive memory in the classroom. Small Group Research, 40, 508–534. James, L. R. 1982. Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 219-229. James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98. Janssen, O., Van De Vliert, E., & Veenstra, C. (1999). How Task and Person Conflict Shape the Role of Positive Interdependence in Management Teams. Journal of Management, 25, 117-141. Kearney, E., Gebert, D., & Voelpel, S. C. (2009). When and how diversity benefits teams: The importance of team members’ need for cognition. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 581-598. Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge. New York: Plenum Press. Lewis, K. (2003). Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 587–604. Lewis, K., Lange, D., & Gillis, L. (2005). Transactive memory systems, learning, and learning transfer. Organization Science, 16, 581–598. Liang, D.W., Moreland, R., & Argote, L. (1995). Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 384–393. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of the methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83-104. Moreland, R. L. (1999). Tranisactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. In L. Thompson, D. Messick & J. Levine (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 3-31). Lawrence Erlbaum. Moreland, R.L., & Myaskovsky, L. (2000). Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 117–133. Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Altine, J. V., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 430-445. Pearsall, M., & Ellis, A. (2006). The effects of critical team member assertiveness onteam performance and satisfaction. Journal of Management, 32, 575–594. Ren, Y., & Argote, L. (2011). Transactive memory systems 1985-2010: An integrative framework of key dimensions, antecedents, and consequences, Academy of Management Annuals, 5, 189-229. Ren, Y., Carley, K.M., & Argote, L. (2006). The contingent effects of transactive memory: When is it more beneficial to know what others know? Management Science, 52, 671–682. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290-312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Stewart, D. D. & Stasser, G. (1995). Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 619-628. Tjosvold, D., Tang, M. M. L., & West, M. (2004). Reflexivity for team innovation in China: The contribution of goal interdependence. Group and Organization Management, 29, 540-559. Van Ginkel, W. P., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2008). Group information elaboration and group decision making: The role of shared task representations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105, 82-97. Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 185-208). New York: Springer. Wegner, D. M. (1995). A computer network model of human transactive memory. Social Cognition, 13, 319-339. Wegner, D. M., Erber, R., & Raymond, P. (1991). Transactive memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 923-929. Wegner, D. M., Giuliano, T., & Hertel, P. (1985). Cognitive interdependence in closerelationships. In W J. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp.253-276). New York: Springer-Verlag. Yoo, Y., & Kanawattanachai, P. (2001). Developments of transactive memory systemsand collective mind in virtual teams. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9(2), 187. Zhang, Z., Hempel, P.S., Han, Y., & Tjosvold, D. (2007). Transactive memory systemlinks work team characteristics and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1722–1730.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學企業管理研究所 101355059 102
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101355059
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Business Administation] Theses

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

社群 sharing

Loading...