English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113325/144300 (79%)
Visitors : 51177074      Online Users : 854
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/67563
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67563


    Title: 淘寶網負感受對於知覺風險與圖文評價內容參考之探討 -以服飾配件商品為例
    The Study of Negative Feelings of TAOBAO, Risk and the Product Feedback Mechanism -The Case of Clothes and Accessories
    Authors: 王方妘
    Wang, Fang Yun
    Contributors: 洪順慶
    Horng, Shun Ching
    王方妘
    Wang, Fang Yun
    Keywords: 知覺風險
    信任
    口碑評價
    淘寶網
    網路購物
    Risk
    Trust
    Product Feedback Mechanism
    Word-Of-Mouth
    TaoBao
    On-line auction
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2014-07-21 15:33:41 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 網際網路及電子商務的普及讓網路購物已經成為現代人生活的一部分,而近年來淘寶網在電子商務領域的創新使得淘寶網成為全球交易量最大的電子商務平台。但其實在跨國網購的過程中,是具有許多令消費者擔憂的風險,各種知覺風險也成為了跨國交易上的主要阻礙。根據研究者實際的網購流程,發現淘寶平台的商品評價機制對於消費者之知覺風險有其影響力,但在過去的文獻中,多以知覺風險與信任來探討對網路購物的影響,但其中較少談到關於評價機制與知覺風險之間的關聯性。本研究擬以對淘寶平台的信任感受、四個網購族群最在意的知覺風險構面以及淘寶上的商品評價機制為三大區塊,分別討論感受對於知覺風險的影響,以及知覺風險與評價機制之相關性後,歸納對於信任感受、知覺風險與商品評價機制之關聯。

    為了驗證本研究所提出之研究架構,以使用過淘寶的消費者為研究對象,並分成質化與量化兩階段進行。先透過質化深訪了解消費insight,再經由網路問卷蒐集樣本,並透過SPSS 模型進行回歸分析驗證假說,除了整體樣本分析,更進一步了解其行銷意涵。根據研究結果,本研究證實了對淘寶評價的負感受與知覺風險間的各個構面皆有顯著正相關,而知覺風險中的財務風險與商品評價資訊也存在顯著正相關。表示消費者在淘寶上失望的購物經驗將導致下次購物時,感受到更高的知覺風險,而知覺到越高的財務風險者,越會參考淘寶的口碑評價資訊。因此在實務管理上,本研究之結果提供了淘寶網業者日後在建置、改善其評價系統內容時的參考建議與改進方向,以及其他降低風險的配套方案與實行建議。

    關鍵字:知覺風險、信任、口碑評價、淘寶網、網路購物
    The diffusion of Internet and E-commerce has become a part of the modern society. In recent years Taobao has been rewarded as the top E-commerce platform, which takes the highest total trade volume in the world due to its innovation in the field. However, in the process of cross-nations Online Trading, many Risks, which hold consumers back, certainly exist and hinder the cross-nations transaction from success. According to observations on the process of Online trading, researcher found the Product Feedback Mechanism has a certain impact on Risks. Nevertheless, in former researches, the Risk and Trust instead of the relevance between Product Feedback Mechanism and Risk are the main two factors focused on when discussing the impact on Online Trading.

    In the following research, the Trust in Taobao by consumers, four of the most concerned Risk by online shopping groups, and the Product Feedback Mechanism are the main three issues to be discussed about the impact of feeling on Risk and the relevance between Risk and Product Feedback Mechanism to find out the relevance between Trust, Risk and Product Feedback Mechanism. In order to test the conceptual framework, the research targets Taobao users and is executed by both Qualitative Research and Quantitative Research. Starting from the In-depth interviews to understand consumer insights, the research collects specimen from online questionnaires and tests the hypothesis through SPSS Regression analysis in order to understand more of Taobao’s marketing strategies.

    Based on result of the research, the relevance of negative feedback on Taobao and Risk is proved significant. Besides, the relevance of Financial Risk and Feedback Mechanism is proved as the same result, representing higher Risk and Financial Risk caused by the negative experience on Taobao could lead consumers to refer to evaluation information on Taobao more.In aspect of practical Management, the result of research provides several suggestions and a guideline for Taobao in regard to the establishment and improvement on its Product Feedback Mechanism, and also offers other plans of substitute and executive suggestions for risk reduction.

    Keywords: Risk, Trust, Product Feedback Mechanism, Word-Of-Mouth, Taobao, On-line auction.
    Reference: Arndt, Johan (1967),“Role of Product-Related Conversations in the Diffusion of a New Product,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.4, No.1, August, 291-295.

    Assael, H. (1992). Consumer Behavior and Marketing Action. PWS-KENT.

    Ba, S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2002). Evidence of the Effect of Trust Building Technology in Electronic Markets: Price Premiums and Buyer Behavior. MIS Quarterly, 26 (3), 243-268.

    Bansal, H. S. & Voyer, P. A. (2003). ”World-of-mouth processes within a services purchase decision context,” Journal of Service Research, 3(2), 166-178.

    Bansal, Harvis S.& Peter A. Voyer (2000), “Word-of-Mouth Processes within a Services Purchase Decision Context,” Journal of Service Research, Vol.3,No.2,November, 166-177.

    Bauer, R. A. (1967). “Consumer behavior as risk taking,” In D. Cox (Ed.), Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior, Harvard University Press, Boston, MA, 23-33.

    Bettman, James R. & C. Whan Park. (1980). “Effect of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision processes: A protocol analysis,” Journal of Consumer Research, 7(3), 234-248.

    Bone, P. F. (1995). “Word-of-mouth effects on short-term and long-term product judgment,” Journal of Business Research, 32(3), 213–223.

    Bone, P. F., (1992), “Determinants of word-of-mouth communications during product consumption,” Advances in Consumer Research, Vol.19, 579-583.

    Buttle, Francis A. (1998), “Word of Mouth: Understanding and Managing Referral Marleting,” Journal of Strategic Marketing, 6(3), 241-254.

    Cox, D. F. & S. U. Rich. (1964). “Perceived risk and consumer decision making: The case of telephone shopping,” Journal of Marketing Research, 1(4), 32-39.

    Cox, D. F. (1967). Risk taking and information handling in consumer behavior. Boston: Graduate School of Business Administration, Harward University.

    Cunningham, S. M. (1967). The major dimensions of perceived risk. In D. F. Cox. (ed.), Risk-taking and information handling in consumer behavior(pp.82-108).

    Darley, W. K. & Smith, R. E. (1995). “Gender differences in information processing strategies: An empirical test of the selectivity model in advertising response,” Journal of Advertising, 24(1), 41-56.

    Dayal, S., Landesberg, H. & Zeisser, M. (1999). How to Build Trust Online. Marketing Management, 8(3), 64-69.

    Deighton, J. & Barwise, P. (2000). “Digital marketing communication,”Future Media Working Paper (No. 00-801). UK: London Business School.

    Dellarocas, C. (2003). “The digitization of word of mouth: promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms,” Management Science, 49(10), 1407–1424.

    Derbaix, C. (1983). “Perceived risk and risk relievers: An empirical investigation,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 3, 19-38.

    Doney, P. M., & Cannon, J. P. (1997). “An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationship,” Journal of Marketing, 61,35-51.

    Dowling, G. R. & Staelin, R. (1994).”A model of perceived risk and intended risk handling activity,” Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 119-134.

    Dowling, G. R. (1986). “Perceived risk: The concept and its measurement,” Psychology and Marketing, 3(3), 193-210.

    Featherman, M. S. & Pavlou, P. A. (2003). “Predicting e-services adoption: A perceived risk facets perspective,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 451-474.

    Forsythe, S. M. & Shi, B. (2003). “Consumer patronage and risk perceptions in internet shopping,” Journal of Business Research, 56(11), 867-875.

    Gefen, D. (2000). e-Commerce: the Role of Familiarity and Trust. Omega, 28, 725-737.

    Gelb, B. D. & Sundaram, S. (2002). “Adapting to word of mouse,” Business Horizon, 45(4), 21-25.

    Hartline, M. D. & Jones, K. C. (1996). “Employee performance cues in a hotel service environment: Influence on perceived service quality, value, and word-of-mouth intention,” Journal of Business Research, 35(3), 205–217.

    Henthorne, T. L., M. S. Latour., & A. J. Williams. (1993). “How organizational buyers reduce risk,” Industrial Marketing Management, 22(1), 41-48.

    Herr, P. M., Kardes, F. R., & Kim, J. (1991),“ Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility Perspective,” Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (March), 454-462.

    Herr, Paul, Frank Kardes & John Kim (1991), “Effect of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnostic Perspective,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.17, No.4, March, 454-462.

    Heskett, J. (1977), “Logistics–Essential tostrategy,” Harvard Business Review, Vol.55, No. 6, 85-96.

    Hong-Youl Ha. (2006). “The effects of consumer risk perception on pre-purchase information in online auctions: Brand, word-of-mouth, and customized information,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(1). Retrieved May 29, 2008, from http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/120837861/HTMLSTART

    Jacoby, J. & L. B. Kaplan. (1972). “The components of perceived risk,” Advance in Consumer Research, 13(1), 382-393.

    Jarvenpaa, S. L. & Todd, P. A. (1997). “Consumer reactions to electronic shopping on the World Wide Web,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 1(2), 59-88.

    Kotler P (1991). Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control. Sydney: Prentice Hall.
    Liaw, G. F., Zhu, Z. Wei & Lee, Y. H. (2005). “The effects of risk reduction strategies on consumers’ risk perceptions and online purchase intention,” Pan-Pacific Management Review, 8(1), 1-37.

    McCarthy, M. & S. Henson. (2005). “Perceived risk and risk reduction strategies in the choice of beef by Irish consumers,” Journal of Food Quality and Preference. 16(5), 435-445.

    McKnight, D. H., & Chervany, N. L. (2002). “What Trust Means in e-Commerce Customer Relationships: An Interdisciplinary Conceptual Typology,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(2), 35-59.

    Mitchell, V-W. & M. Greatorex. (1993). “Risk perception and reduction in the purchase of consumer service,” The Service Industries Journal, 13(4), 179-200.

    Mizerski RW (1982). “An attribution explanation of the disproportionate influence of unfavourable information,” Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (December), 301-310.

    Murray, Keith B. (1991), “A Test of Service Marketing Theory: Consumer New Product,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.4, No.1, August, 291-295.

    Peter, J. P. & Ryan, M. J. (1976). “An investigation of perceived risk at the brand level,” Journal of Marketing Research, 13(2), 184-188.

    Pires, G., Stanton, J., & A. Eckford. (2004). “Influences on the perceived risk of purchasing online,” Journal of Consumer Behavior, 4(2), 118-131.

    Reichheld, Frederick F., Sasser, W.Earl.,Zero Defections(1990), “Quality Comes to Services,” Harvard Business Review.105-111.

    Ridings, C. M., Gefen, D. & Arinze, B. (2002). “Some Antecedents and Effects of Trust in Virtual Communities,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11, 271–295.

    Roselius, T. (1971). “Consumer rankings of risk reduction methods,” Journal of Marketing, 35(1), 56-61.

    Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S. & Camerer, C. (1988). “Not so Different after All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust,” The Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 652.

    Shankar, V., Smith, A. K., Rangaswamy, A. (2000). “Customer satisfaction and loyalty in online and offline environments,” eBusiness Research Center Working Paper (No. 02-2000). Pennsylvania State University, University Park.

    Silverman George (1997a), “Harvesting the Power of Word-of-Mouth,” Direct Marketing, Vol. 30, No. 9, 14-16.

    Silverman, George (1997b), “How to Harness the Awesome Power of Word of Mouth,” Direct Marketing, Vol.60, No.7, 32-37.

    Simpson, L. & H. B. Lakner. (1993). “Perceived risk and mail order shopping for apparel,” Journal of Consumer Studies and Home Economics, 17(4), 377-398.

    Solomon M. R.(1999), Consumer Behavior, Fourth Edition, Englewood.

    Solomon, M. R. (1992). Consumer behavior: Buying, having, had being. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Stone, R. N. & K. Gronhaug. (1993). “Perceived risk: Further considerations for the marketing discipline,” Journal of Marketing Research, 27(3), 39-50.

    Swaminathan, V., Elzbieta, L. W. & B. P. Rao. (1999). “Browsers or buyers in cyberspace? An investigation of factors influencing electronic exchange,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5(2), Retrieved November 30, 2007, from http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/120837781/HTMLSTART

    Tan, S. J. (1999). “Strategies for reducing consumers’ risk aversion in internet shopping,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16(2), 163-180.

    Ward, J.C. & Reingen, P. H. (1990). “Sociocognitive analysis of group decision making among consumers,” Journal of Consumer Research, 17(3), 245–263.

    Westbrook, R. A. (1987). “Product consumption-based affective responses and postpurchase processes,” Journal of Marketing Research, 24(3), 258–270.

    Wilkie , W .L(1990), Consumer behavior, New York Wiley & Sons .

    Wirtz, Jochen & Patricia Chew (2002), “The Effects of Incentives, Deal Proneness,Satisfaction & Tie Strength on Word-of-Mouth Behaviour,” International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol.13, No.2, pp.141-162.

    洪順慶(2008)。《行銷管理》第四版。新陸書局股份有限公司。

    陳穎真(2004)。《線上拍賣市場消費者行為之研究》。義守大學管理研究所碩士論文。

    費翠(2001)。《網路市場行家理論驗證與延伸─其網路資訊搜尋、口碑傳播、線上購物行為及個人特質研究》。國立政治大學廣告研究所碩士論文。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    101355038
    102
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101355038
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback