政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/67561
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造访人次 : 50961635      在线人数 : 919
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/67561


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67561


    题名: 已開發國家食品產業跨國購併宣告效果之研究
    Announcement Effect of Food Industry Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions - Evidence from Developed Countries
    作者: 吳宜頻
    Wu, I Pin
    贡献者: 吳啟銘
    Wu, Chi Ming
    吳宜頻
    Wu, I Pin
    关键词: 食品業
    跨國購併
    事件研究法
    宣告效果
    雀巢集團
    Food Industry
    Cross-border M&A
    Event Study
    Announcement Effect
    Nestle S.A.
    日期: 2013
    上传时间: 2014-07-21 15:33:18 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究以2002年至2012年已開發國家食品產業跨國購併案為樣本，以事件研究法，比較已開發國家食品產業跨國購併已開發國家及開發中國家企業的購併宣告效果，去看在跨國購併的文獻議題上和實證結果是否相符。並以雀巢集團為收購公司之案例，比較其進軍已開發國家(美國惠氏營養品)及開發中國家(中國徐福記)的策略及收購後營運與財務績效，可否套用於產業研究結果，希望為後續食品產業購併提供研究參考。
    本研究有以下三點發現：1.食品產業自已開發國家購併已開發國家對收購公司的股價宣告效果，較購併開發中國家對收購公司的股價宣告效果佳。2.已開發國家之食品產業收購與該產業相關性越高的企業，對其收購公司的股價宣告效果並無重大顯著之影響。3.無法將雀巢集團收購惠氏營養品之個案套用於產業研究結果，收購徐福記之個案則與實證結果相似，無正向顯著的宣告效果。此二個案皆著重搶攻新興國家市場，並以水平整合及策略互補方式，擴大市佔率及強化產品線，近五年之財務狀況，與同業相比有較佳之獲利表現，且繼續經營之價值。
    已開發國家食品產業在選擇跨國購併對象時，可以已開發國家企業為主要收購對象，降低文化及地理距離帶來的資訊不對稱問題及取得策略性資產，投資人對其有較佳的預期，在選擇向前垂直整合策略時需留意，因零售通路需較大規模之經營整合，對於該市場需有更深入之了解，才適合投入至通路端。
    This paper treated cross-border Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) cases of developed countries’ food industry over the period of 2002 to 2012 with event study.
    We compared the announcement effects of acquired companies following developed or developing countries M&A and to confirm that whether the empirical results are consistent with the literature. We used Nestle S.A. as acquiring company to compare its M&A’s strategies and performance when acquiring Wyeth Nutrition and Hsu Fu Chi. Hope to be the reference for the following food industry M&A research.
    The major research finding as follows. First, the announcement effects of developed countries’ food industry following developed countries M&A are better than developing countries M&A. Second, the results demonstrated that the announcement effect had no significant difference among different industrial relevance of target companies. Third, the case of Hsu Fu Chi acquisition is similar with the empirical results but Wyeth Nutrition acquisition cannot. Furthermore, both cases were focused on the emerging markets and complementary strategies.
    Developed countries’ food industry can chooses the developed countries’ firms as target companies to decrease asymmetric information which caused by cultural, economic and geographic distance and to acquire strategic assets. They also should have enough acquaintance of the markets before they invest in the channel.
    參考文獻: 一、英文部分
    Antoniou, A., P. Arbour, and H. Zhao. (2008). How much is too much: Are merger premiums too high? European Financial Management, 14, pp. 268-287.
    Bulent, A. and A. Ficici. (2009). Cross-border acquisitions and firm value: An analysis of emerging-market multinationals. Journal of International Business, 40, pp. 1317-1338.
    Chari, A., P. Ouimet and L. Tesar. (2004). Acquiring control in emerging markets: Evidence from the stock market. National Bureau of Economic Research, 10872.
    Charles, W. L. and G. R. Jones. (2012). Theory of Srategic Management (10 ed.). Singapore: Gengage Learning.
    Chen, Y. Y. and M. N. Yang. (2009). Cross-border mergers and acquisitions by Chinese listed companies: A principal-principal perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, pp. 523-539.
    China Food & Drink Report Q4 2013. (2013). United Kingdom: Business Monitor Internaitonal.
    Clark, R. C. (1986). Corporate Laws. United Kingdom: Little, Brown Book Group Limited.
    Company Profile: Nestle S.A. (2013). United Kingdom: Market Line.
    Das, N. (2013). Importance of corporate governance: Case of US-China cross border M&A. International Journal of Business Strategy, pp. 102-110.
    Datta, D.K., and G. Puia. (1995). Cross-border acquisitions: An examination of the influence of relatedness and cultural fit on shareholder value creation in US acquiring firms. Management International Review, 35(4), pp. 337-359.
    Doukas, J., and N. G. Travlos. (1988). The effect of corporate multinationalism on shareholders’ wealth effect: evidence from international acquisitions. Journal of Finance, 43, pp. 1165-1175.
    Harrison, J. S., M. A. Hitt, R. E. Hoskisson and R.D. Ireland . (1991). Synergies and post-acquisition performance: Differences versus similarities in resource allocations. Journal of Management, 17(1), pp. 173-190.
    Harzing, A. (2002). Acquisitions versus greenfield investments: International strategy and management of entry modes. Strategic Management Journal, 23(3), pp. 211-227.
    Jovanovic, B. and P. L. Rousseau. (2008). Mergers as reallocation. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(4), pp. 765-776.
    Lamacchia, T. F. (1997). Cross-border M&A: A guide to global strategic direct investment for Asian companies. Hong Kong: Asia Law & Practice Publishing.
    Liu, Q. and L. D. Qiu. (2013). Characteristics of acquirers and targets in domestic and cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Review of Development Economics, 17(3), pp. 474-493.
    Mike, W. P. (2006). Making M&A fly in China. Harvard Business Review, 84(3), pp. 26-27.
    Moeller, S. B. and F. P. Schlingemann. (2005). Global diversification and bidder gains: A comparison between cross-border and domestic acquisitions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 29, pp. 533-564.
    Morosini, P., S. Shane and H. Singh. (1998). National cultural distance and cross-border acquisition performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1), pp. 137-158.
    Mulherin, J. H. and A. L. Boone. (2000). Comparing acquisitions and divestitures. Journal of Corporate Finance, 6, pp. 117-139.
    Myers, S. C. and N. S. Majluf. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13, pp. 187-221.
    Nicholson, R. R. & J. Salaber. (2013). The motives and performance of cross-border acquirers from emerging economies: Comparison between Chinese and Indian firms. International Business Review, 22, pp. 963-980.
    Pradhan, J.P. and V. Abraham. (2005). Overseas mergers and acquisitions by Indian enterprises: Patterns and motivations. Indian Journal of Economics, 85(33), pp. 365-386.
    Protiti, D. and Z. Srilata. (2010). Dealing with information asymmetry in cross-border acquisitions: Distance matters. Academy of Management, 8(1), pp. 1-6.
    Rani, N., S. Yadav and P. Jain. (2009). The role of corporate givernance on financial performance changes associated with mergers and acquisitions. Global Journal of Business Excellence, pp. 7-13.
    Rappaport, A.and M. L. Sirower. (1999). Stock or cash? The trade-offs for buyers and sellers in mergers and acquisitions. Harvard Business Review, 77(6), pp. 147-217.
    Shimizu, K., M. Hitt, D. Vaidyanath and V. Pisano. (2004). Theoretical foundations of cross-border mergers and acquisitions: A review of current research and recommendations for the future. Journal of International Management, 10, pp. 7-353.
    Stiebale, J. (2013). The impact of cross-border mergers and acquisitions on the acquirers` R&D-Firm-level evidence. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 31(4), pp. 307-321.
    Travlos, N. G. (1987). Corporate takeover bids, methods of payment & bidding firms’ stock returns. Journal of Finance, 3, pp. 943-963.
    UNCTAD. (2000). World investment report 2000, cross-border mergers and acquisitions and development. New York and Geneva: United Nations.
    UNCTAD. (2013). World investment report 2013, global value chain: investment and trade for development. New York and Geneva: United Nations.
    Wang, C. and F. Xie. (2009). Corporate governance transfer and synergistic gains from mergers and acquisitions. The Review of Financial Studies, 22, pp. 830-858.

    二、中文部分
    Chris Z. and A. James. (2001). 從核心擴張. (楊幼蘭, 譯者) 台北: 商智文化.
    台灣併購金鑫獎. (2011). 案例解析：雀巢參股徐福記-參股事件. 台北: 台灣併購與私募股權協會.
    甘文光. (2005). 地主國吸引外人直接投資的決定性因素. 國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文.
    伍忠賢. (2000). 企業購併-理論與實務. 台北: 樂觀文化.
    吳啟銘. (2013). 企業評價-個案實證分析. 台北: 智勝文化.
    沈中華、李建然. (2000). 事件研究法-財務與會計實證研究必備. 台北: 華泰文化.
    財團法人食品工業發展研究所. (2013). 2013食品產業年鑑. 經濟部技術處產業技術知識服務計畫.
    財團法人食品工業發展研究所. (2012). 2012食品產業年鑑. 經濟部技術處產業技術知識服務計畫.
    潘麗仙. (2008). 台灣企業跨國併購宣告效果與資訊內涵. 國立台灣大學國際企業學系碩士論文.
    鄭帝允. (2007). 購併動機之實證研究-以美國上市上櫃公司為例. 國立政治大學國際貿易學系碩士論文.
    薛伊琇. (2011). 開發中國家企業進行跨國購併對公司股東價值之實證研究. 國立政治大學國際貿易學系碩士論文.
    謝劍平. (2010). 現代投資銀行. 台北: 智勝文化.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    101355013
    102
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101355013
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    501301.pdf1638KbAdobe PDF2410检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈