政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/67502

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/67502

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113392/144379 (79%)
Visitors : 51197019 Online Users : 915

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Social Science > Department of Land Economics > Theses > Item 140.119/67502

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67502

Title:	產業地域土地使用制度厚實之研究-以內湖輕工業區與大彎北段為例- The study of land usage of institutional thickness in industrial area- Take Neihu light industry and Northern Dawan as an example
Authors:	林志銘 Lin, Chih Ming
Contributors:	邊泰明 Ben, Tai Ming 林志銘 Lin, Chih Ming
Keywords:	制度厚實路徑依賴公共利益內湖輕工業區大彎北段 institutional thickness path dependent public interest Taipei Neihulight industry Northern Dawan
Date:	2013
Issue Date:	2014-07-14 11:36:31 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	科技產業崛起已逐漸蠶食輕工業區原先土地利用制度安排，台北市內湖輕工業區自市地重劃完成後，經由行動者興建廠辦大樓形塑科技園區意象，供廠商違規使用，接著再由園區內廠商自發性成立「台北市內湖科技園區發展協會」與台北市政府定期召開座談會，並配合修正「台北市內湖輕工業區輔導管理辦法」共同治理園區內土地利用方向，締造科技產業經濟奇蹟，成為活化產業用地新典範，變更為名符其實「台北市內湖科技園區」。然而，毗鄰地區大彎北段商業區、娛樂區行動者藉以放寬產業進駐內湖輕工業區為由，衝擊大彎北段商業機能，因而產生替代效果，陸續將商業用地及娛樂用地，興建住宅社區違規供住宅使用，截至今日該地區約已達3,000戶，實際使用狀況，與都市計畫呈現明顯不符，已造成商業區、娛樂區與住宅使用衍生嚴重互斥等現象。本文將以「制度厚實」、「路徑依賴」、「公共利益」等相關理論分析案例，透過公、私部門專業人士進行深度訪談提供卓見，作為本文研究過程中相互辯證及立論參考依據，進一步釐清兩地區制度變遷分歧原因，加以探索大彎北段商業區、娛樂區供住宅使用之正當性，抑或回歸商業及娛樂使用，並將研究結論提出建議事項，落實產業用地「公共利益」之精神。 The rise of technology industry has gradually eroded the arrangement of original land utilization. Therefore, the land of light industry was replotting in Neihu. The actors wanted the area to be Technology Park, so the buildings were used inappropriately for firms. The firms in park established an association spontaneously and named “Taipei Neihu technology park development association. “Taipei city hall made the regular meetings with the association and coordinated to revise the counseling regulations of Taipei Neihu light industry. Government and companies managed the direction of land`s usage together and make the economic miracle of technology. Thus, it’s a model to activate industrial land. The land named “Taipei NeiHu Technology Park” However, according to this reason, the commercial function of Northern Dawan has been impacted. In order to find alternatives, the land of commercial and entertainment was supplied to residence use. As of today, it’s over 3,000 houses in the region. The actual situation of usage is not identical with the city plans, which causes mutual exclusion among the region of commercial, entertainment, and residences area. This study used those theories (for institutional thickness, path dependent and Public Interest) to analyze some cases. Through the deep interview by experts which come from public and private departments, they provide some advice as mutual dialectical reference; we will also clarify the reasons of rule discrepancy between two regions in order to further explore the legitimacy of the usage in Northern Dawan commercial area and entertainment area, or return to commercial and entertainment use. We’ll submit conclusions and bring suggestion to implement the spirit of public interest on industrial estate.
Reference:	一、中文文獻王明雪，2004，『台北古蹟偵探遊』二刷，台北：遠流出版事業股份有限公司。台北市建築開發商業同業公會，2013，「台北市基隆河(中山橋至成美橋段 )附近地區(大彎北段地區)都市計畫檢討案」，<都市計畫檢討案>，台北市政府：台北，2013年4月。金家禾、徐欣玉，2006，「影響創意服務業空間群聚因素之研究-以台北中山北路婚紗攝影業為例」，『國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報』，第十三期：第1~16頁。吳定、張潤書、陳德禹、陳維堯，1996，『行政學』(二)修訂版，新北，國立空中大學。吳定、張潤書、陳德禹、陳維堯、許立一，2008，『行政學』(下)修訂再版，新北：國立空中大學。吳育昇，2002，『新世紀．台北．思想起』下冊，台北：台北市政府新聞處。林亭汝、虞孝成，2008，「發展台灣生技產業區域創新系統之要因研究」，『ISSN 創業管理研究』，第三卷(第二期)：第89~124頁。林毅夫，1995，『關於制度變遷的經濟學理論：誘致性變遷與強制性變遷』二版，上海，三聯書店上海人民出版社。周俊吉，2010，『臺灣地區房地產年鑑』，台北：行義文化出版有限公司。思多葛市場研究股份有限公司，2011，『101年度臺北內湖科技園區、南港軟體輕工業區暨大彎南段工業區廠商調查分析報告』，台北：臺北市政府產業發展局。洪英勝，2003，『台北市地名探索-情歸故鄉』二版，台北：時報文化出版企業股份有限公司。秦海，2004，『制度、演化與路徑依賴』，北京：中國財政經濟出版社，第188頁。胡婉玲，2001，「論歷史制度主義的制度變遷理論」，『新世紀智庫論壇』，第十六期，第86~95頁。陳坤森、廖揆祥、李培元譯，2000，Leon P.原著：『政治意識形態進代思潮』，台北：韋伯文化出版社。黃大洲，2001，『改照-基隆河截彎取直記實』，新北：正中書局股份有限公司。張峻豪、徐正戎，2007，「閣揆角色的受限或突破-政黨輪替後我國行政院院長與總統互動之研究」，『臺灣民主季刊』，第四卷(第一期)：第 51~108頁。楊友仁，2004，「經濟地理學的制度轉向：一個理論性回顧與研究取向的建議」，『國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報』，第十二期：第69~80 頁。廖皇傑，2012，「產業地域演化與路徑依賴-以台北科技走廊為例」，國立政治大學地政學系博士論文：台北。黎春瑩，2010，「台北市內湖科學園區發展初探」，國立臺灣科技大學設計學院建築研究所碩士論文：台北。蔡汝玫，2008，「內湖科技園區發展之研究」，國立台北科技大學設計研究所碩士論文：台北。蔡相廷，2000，「歷史制度主義的興起與研究取向-政治學研究途徑的探討」，『台北教育大學學報』，第四十一卷(第二期)：第39~76頁。劉瑞華譯，1995，North D.原著，『制度、制度變遷與經濟成就』，台北：時報文化出版企業有限公司。邊泰明，2008，『土地使用規劃與財產權-理論與實務』，台北：詹氏書局。邊泰明、麻匡復，2005，「南港軟體園區產業群聚與制度厚實」，『地理學報』，四十期：45~67。邊泰明、麻匡復，2006，「無須政府的產業群聚？內湖科技園區發展的公共領域」，『公共行政學報』‧第二十期：第1~32頁。蕭全政、林鐘沂、江岷欽、黃朝盟譯，2001，Nicholas H.原著，『行政學新論』，新北：韋伯文化事業出版社。戴曉霞，2002，「從福特主義到後福特主義及其對高等教育課程之影響」，『教育研究集刊』，第四十八輯(第二期)：第199~231頁。二、外文文獻 Amin, A., and Thrift, N, 1995a,“Globalisation, Institutional thickness and the local economy”,In:Healey,p.(eds.)Manoging Cities: Tihe New Urban Context,West Sussex,England John Wiley & Sons ltd. Andrew, C., and Caterina, F., 2007,“Institutional Thickness:Local Governance and Economic Development in Birmingham,England”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,591~613. Cooke, P., and Morgan,K.,1993,“The network paradigm Environment and Planning”, Society and Space, Vol.11:543–641. Carlsson, B., 2007, The role of public policy in emerging clusters. In Cluster genesis: Technology based industrial development,EDP. Braunerhjelm and Feldman, M.,265–78. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Doloreux, D., 2002, “What We Should Know about Regional System of Innovation”,Technology in Society, Vol. 24(3):243-263. Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R., 1996,“Political science and the three new Institutionalisms”, Political Studies,Vol. 44: 936-957. Immergut, Ellen M., 1998,“The Theoretical Core of the New Institutionalism” , Politics and Society, Vol. 26:23. Jeppesen, R. L., 1991,Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalization. In W.W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational Analysis:143-163. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Krasner,S.D., 1984, “Approaches to the State: Alternative Conception and Historical Dynamics”, Comparative Politics Vol.16:240-242. Krasner,S.D., 1984,“Sovereignty: An institutional perspective”, Comparative Political Studies,Vol.(1):66-94. North, DC., 1990, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Macleod, G. and M. Goodwin., “1999 Space,scale and state strategy: rethinking urban and regional governance”, Progress in Human Geography, Vol.23:4- 513. March, J. G., & Olsen, J., 1984, “The new institutionalism: Organisational factors in political life”, American Political Science Review, Vol.78:734-749. Meyer, M. and Persson, O., 1998,“Nanotechnology – Interdisciplinarity, Patterns of Collaboration and Differences in Application”, Scientometrics, Vol. 42: 195-205. Peters, B. G.,1999, Institutional theory in political science: The new institutionalism. London: Pinter Press . Porter, P., 1998 Clusters and the New Economics of Competitiveness, Harvard Business Review,December, 77-90. Rom, M., 2010,“ Geography-Rethinking Regional Path Dependence: Beyond Lock-in to Evolution”, Roepke Lecture in Economic.,Clark University, Vol. 86 (1):1-12. Sternberg, R., 1996,“ Technology Policies and Growth Regional: Evidence From Four Countries”, Small Business Economics, Vol. 8(2):75-86. Thelen, K., & Steinmo, S., 1992, Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Steinmo,S., Thelen,K., & Longstreth,F., (Eds.), Structuring politics: Historical Institutionalism in comparative analysis:2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學地政學系碩士在職專班 100923007 102
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100923007
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Land Economics] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
300701.pdf	3094Kb	Adobe PDF2	903	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback