政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/67190

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/67190

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51275747 線上人數 : 912

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 國際事務學院 > 外交學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/67190

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67190

題名:	新保守主義與小布希政府的國家安全戰略 Neoconservatism and the National Security Strategy of G. W. Bush Administration
作者:	張智瑋 Chang, Chi Wei
貢獻者:	姜家雄 Chiang, Chia Hsiung 張智瑋 Chang, Chi Wei
關鍵詞:	新保守主義國家安全戰略布希主義國家安全決策智庫反彈道飛彈條約彈道飛彈防禦 Neoconservatism national security strategy Bush Doctrine national security policymaking think tank Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty Ballistic Missile Defense
日期:	2012
上傳時間:	2014-07-01 12:22:32 (UTC+8)
摘要:	作為意識形態，新保守主義具有相當的影響力，是美國對外關係中相當重要的元素，它決定了美國決策者的價值觀，並且形成具體的政策。「新保守主義」在小布希政府上台之後成為影響美國國家安全戰略和政策的決定性力量。本論文主要探討新保守主義以及它對於小布希政府國家安全戰略的影響，並以美國退出反彈道飛彈條約作為檢驗的案例。發展飛彈防禦與否從冷戰時期即為爭議性的議題，也是美國國家安全政策中相當重要的一環，小布希政府對彈道飛彈防禦議題的重視在其競選時便開始，待小布希上任後，小布希在美國國防大學發表演說，揭示美國將退出反彈道飛彈條約，發展國家飛彈防禦系統，引起舉世關注。本論文以飛彈防禦議題中極具重要性的反彈道飛彈條約來研究新保守主義對小布希政府國家安全戰略之影響。本論文主旨在討論新保守主義對於小布希政府國家安全戰略的影響，以及影響國家安全政策的方式，主要討論的問題有二：一、新保守主義是否影響小布希政府國家安全戰略；二、新保守主義如何形塑美國國家安全戰略。本論文經由新保守主義的發展歸納出新保守主義中與國家安全相關的思維，並將之比對小布希政府的國家安全戰略，視其是否符合；另再檢視小布希政府內國家安全決策團隊是否為新保守主義的成員，希冀能對新保守主義對於小布希政府國家安全戰略的影響性及影響方式進行詳盡的探討，最後再以此種影響方式探討美國將退出反彈道飛彈條約的案例。 Neoconservative political ideology influences US foreign affairs significantly. It affects policymakers’ sense of value; thus, the policies are formed and implemented accordingly. Neoconservatism became crucial in the term of national security strategy in GW Bush administration. The paper aims to discuss the impact of Neoconservatism in GW Bush administration’s national security strategy, and use the case of the withdrawal of Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty in 2001 as the validation of the research. The development and deployment of missile defense system has been controversial since Cold War, yet it is a major national security policy in the United States. G.W. Bush had paid attention to this subject ever since he announced running for president of the U.S. And soon after taking the office, Bush delivered a speech in National Defense University and declared withdrawing from ABM treaty, which has an extremely important role of arm control. The paper uses this withdrawal as a case study to verify the impact of Neoconservatism in GW Bush administration. Both what and how Neoconservatism influences GW Bush administration’s national security strategy are to be studied in this paper. Firstly, this research will conclude the thoughts that related to national security by examining the development of Neoconservatism,and compare them with the national strategy of GW Bush overnment. Secondly, the paper will observe the policymakers in the administration, and see if they are Neocons by matching them with the Neoconservatism cabal. Finally, the paper will use the significant case of U.S. withdrawing from ABM treaty to exam the influence of Neoconservatism and its way on GW Bush administration.
參考文獻:	參考書目壹、中文部分一、專書日本岡崎研究所彈道飛彈防禦小組。《新核武戰略及日本彈道飛彈防禦》。台北：國防部史政編譯室，2004 年。王皖強譯，Roger Scruton。《保守主義》。新北：立緒文化，2006。王緝思。《冷戰後美國的全球戰略和世界地位》。台北：生智出版社，2001。北京太平洋國際戰略研究所。《應付危機─美國國家安全決策機制》。北京：時事出版社，2001。任曉、沈丁立主編。《保守主義理念與美國的外交政策》。上海：三聯書局， 2003。何思因編。《美國》。台北：國立政治大學國際關係研究中心，1994。呂磊。《美國的新保守主義》。南京：江蘇人民出版社，2003。林子洋。《飛彈防禦與國家安全》。台北：幼獅文化事業，2000。林宗達。《戰區飛彈防禦與台海安全》。台北：時英出版社，2000。孟令士。《新世紀全球爭霸：美國退出反彈道飛彈條約之分析並兼論臺灣因應之道》。台北：黎明文化事業，2006。韋洪武譯，M.J.C. Vile。《最新美國政治》。新北：韋伯文化國際，2004。胡祖慶譯，Kenneth Waltz。《國際政治體系理論解析》。台北：五南，1997。姜琳。《美國保守主義及其全球戰略》。北京：社會科學文獻出版社，2008。134 高一中譯，David R. Tanks。《國家飛彈防禦：政策議題與技術能力》。台北：國防部史政編譯室，2002。高德源譯，布里辛斯基（Zbigniew Brzezinski）著。《美國的危機與轉機：從老布希、柯林頓到小布希的外交成績單看超級強權的未來走向》。新北：左岸文化，2008。徐家仁。《彈道飛彈與彈道飛彈防禦》。台北：麥田出版社，2003。袁誠，《飛彈歷史的研究與發展》。台北：世界書局，1960。郭家琪、林宜瑄、李延輝譯，Sam C. Sarkesian, John Allen Williams, and Stephen J. Cimbala。《美國國家安全》。台北：國防部史政編譯室，2005。陳治世。《美國政府與政治》。台北：台灣商務印書館，1991。陳福成。《國家安全與戰略關係》。台北：時英出版社，2000。曹雄源、黃文啟譯，Strategy Studies Institute。《布希政府時期國家安全戰略》。桃園：國防大學，2008。曹雄源。《戰略解碼：美國國家安全戰略的布局》。台北：五南文化事業， 2009。曾祥穎譯，K. Scott McMahon。《美國飛彈防禦的過去與現在》。台北：麥田，2001。黃延齡。《美國政治發展的特質：從《獨立宣言》與《聯邦憲法》探究》。台北：歷史智庫出版，2006。曾祥穎。《飛彈防禦的迷思》。新北：天箭資訊，2005。彭懷恩編。《國際關係與國際現勢 Q&A》。台北：風雲論壇出版社，2005 楊紫函、高一中等譯，Robert Kagan, William Kristol。《當前威脅：美國外交與國防政策的危機與契機》。台北：國防部史政編譯局，2002。蔡政文。《核子時代國際關係的特質》。台北：三民書局，1977。135 劉丹曦等譯，Hedrick Smith 著。《權力遊戲》（The Power Game）。台北：時報文化出版社，1991。劉慶忠、楊家祺著。《美軍海外征戰記（下）》。重慶：重慶出版社，2007。關中。《意識型態和美國外交政策》。台北：台灣商務印書館，2005。鄭保國，《美國霸權探析》。台北：秀威出版社，2009。羅清俊、陳志瑋譯，Thomas R. Dye 著。《公共政策新論》。台北：韋伯， 2010。羅慶生、許競任。《國家安全概論》。台北：全華圖書，2006。二、期刊論文、報紙王國璋。〈當代美國國會的次級問政團體及其對立法的影響〉。《問題與研究》卷 36 第 1 期（1997 年 1 月），頁 1-17。朱強國。〈美國退出反導條約的動因及潛藏的戰略意圖〉。《外交評論：外交學院學報》（2002 年 1 月），頁 62-69。李大中。〈後冷戰時期美國飛彈防禦政策：爭辯與邏輯〉。《問題與研究》卷 39 第 5 期（2000 年），頁 17-46。辛本健。〈美國新保守派與布什政府的－新帝國大戰略〉。《二十一世紀評論雙月刊》第 76 期（2003 年），頁 5-15。林正義。〈美國國家安全會議及對台灣的啟示〉。《新社會》第 25 期（2012 年 12 月 15 日），頁 23-27。許國賢。〈多元主義與民主〉。《行政暨政策學報》第 50 期（2000 年 6 月），頁 1-31。邵崇章。〈美國星戰防禦〉。《全球防衛雜誌》第 57 期（1989 年 5 月），頁 30-33。136 陳文政。〈檢討『四年期國防總檢討』：從政軍關係的角度〉。《新社會政策雙月刊》第 27 期（2013 年 4 月），頁 32-41。陳勁甫、邱榮守。〈論析美國『四年期國防總檢』的立法要求與影響〉。《問題與研究》第 46 卷第 3 期（2007 年），頁 1-29。蔡明彥。〈布希外交決策與行政部門角色以國務院、五角大廈與國安會為例〉。《臺灣國際研究季刊》第 1:3 期（2005 年 9 月），頁 83-101。劉復國。〈綜合性安全與國家安全：亞太安全概念適用性之探討〉。《問題與研究》第 38 卷第 2 期（1999 年 2 月），頁 21-37。黎成龍。〈現代兵器的神兵－彈道導彈漫談〉。《航天雙月刊》第 4 期（1995 年 5 月 11 日），頁 15。鍾樹人譯，Richard Garwin。〈飛彈防禦網罩門多多〉。《科學人》（2004 年 12 月），頁 76-90。關中。〈美國要當太空殺手？〉。中央日報（2001 年 7 月 9 日），10 版。三、網站資料于仁壽。「新保守主義與小布希政府的北韓核武政策」。2005 年 11 月 11 日。 <http://www2.nsysu.edu.tw/sis/discuss/3C-1.pdf>（檢索於 2014 年 2 月 10 日）。王友仁。「和解政策」。中華百科全書。 <http://ap6.pccu.edu.tw/Encyclopedia/data.asp?id=1484> （檢索於 2014 年 4 月 26 日）。「美戰略導彈防禦受限基金會，稱智庫操控反導政策」。搜狐軍事。 <http://mil.sohu.com/20130220/n366501561.shtml> （檢索於 2014 年 3 月 9 日）。「俄美《反導條約》之爭」。人民網。 <http://www.people.com.cn/BIG5/junshi/192/6063/index.html> （檢索於 2013 年 6 月 18 日）。137 國防大學國防決策研究所。「飛彈系統介紹」。< http://www.lee- mil.site90.com/search/weapon/missle.htm> （檢索於 2014 年 2 月 9 日）。鄭大誠。「美國國防部長倫斯斐之思維與其分析」。知遠防務論壇 <http://forum.defence.org.cn/viewthread.php?tid=8417 > （檢索於 2014 年 3 月 8 日）。四、書籍中論文林正義。〈美國國家安全政策〉。在《美國》，何思因編，頁 505-555。台北：國立政治大學國際關係研究中心，1992。〈國防科技〉。在《大學軍訓》，幼獅軍訓編輯小組編，頁 138-140。台北：幼獅，2000 年。楊明德。〈彈道飛彈與飛彈防禦系統之探討〉。在《軍訓人員論文著作精選》。台北：教育部軍訓處，2000 年。貳、英文部分一、專書 Abelson, Donald E. A Capitol Idea: Think Tank & US Foreign Policy. Toronto: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2006. ______. American Think-Tanks and Their Role in US Foreign Policy. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1996. Bailyn, Bernard. The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992. Bloom, Alexander. Prodigal Sons: The New York Intellectuals and Their World. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986. Broad, William J. Teller`s War: The Top-Secret Story Behind the Star Wars Deception. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1992.138 Brodie, Bernard, and Rand Corporation. Strategy in The Missile Age. Vol. 959. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1959. Bush, George W. The National Security Strategy of the United States of America. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President, 2002. ______. Decision points. New York: Random House Digital, 2010. Caldicott, Helen. The New Nuclear Danger: George W. Bush`s Military-Industrial Complex. New York: The New Press, 2002. Drew, Dennis M. and Donald M. Snow. Making Strategy: An Introduction to National Security Processes and Problems. Maxwell Air Force Base Montgomery, Alabama: Air University, 1988. Department of Defense. Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms. Arlington County, VA: DoD, 1998. Dickson, Paul. Think Tanks. Kingsport: Kingsport Press, 1971. Domhoff, William. Who Rules America Now? A View for the 1980s. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1983. Dorrien, Gary. The Neoconservative Mind: Politics, Culture, and the War of Ideology Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1993. ______. Imperial Designs: Neoconservatism and the New Pax Americana. New York: Routledge, 2004. Drew, Dennis M., and Donald M. Snow. Making Strategy: An Introduction to National Security Processes and Problems. Maxwell Air Force Base Montgomery, Alabama: Air University, 1988. Ehrenreich, Barbara. Power Trip: US Unilateralism and Global Strategy After September 11. New York: Seven Stories Press, 2011.139 Ehrman, John. The Rise of Newconservatism: Intellectuals and Foreign Affairs, 1945- 1994. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995. Fukuyama, Francis. America at the Crossroads: Democracy, Power, and the Neoconservative Legacy. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006. Friedman, Murray. The Neoconservative Revolution: Jewish Intellectuals and the Shaping of Public Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005. Graham, Bradley. Hit to Kill: the New Battle over Shielding America from Missile Attack. New York: Public Affairs, 2001. Gaddis, John Lewis. Strategies of Containment: A Critical Appraisal of American National Security Policy during the Cold War. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005. Halper, Stefan and Jonathan Clarke. America Alone. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Held, David. Models of Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2006. The Heritage Foundation 1994 Annual Report. Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation, 1995. Hilsman, Roger. The Politics of Policy Making in Defense and Foreign Affairs 2 nd edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1990. Hodgson, Godfrey. The World Turned Right Side Up: A History of the Conservative Ascendancy in America. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1996. Horsman, Reginald. Race and Manifest Destiny: The Origins of American Racial Anglo-Saxonism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981. Jordan, Amos A. American National Security. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2009. Kagan, Robert and William Kristol. Present Dangers: Crisis and Opportunity in American Foreign and Defense Policy. San Francisco: Encounter Books, 2000.140 Kristol, Irving. Reflections of a Neoconservative. New York: Basic Books, 1983. ______. Neoconservatism: The Autobiography of an Idea. New York: The Free Press, 1995. Leonard, Barry. History of Strategic and Ballistic Missile Defense: Volume I: 1944- 1955. Darby: DIANE Publishing, 2010. Lindsay, James M. and Michael E. O`Hanlon. Defending America: The Case for Limited National Missile Defense. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2002. Lipset, Seymour Martin. American Exceptionalism: A Double-edged Sword. New York: WW Norton & Company, 1997. Lyons, Paul. New Left, New Right and the Legacy of the Sixties. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1996. Mann, James. Rise of the Vulcans: The History of Bush’s War Cabinet. New York: Penguin Books, 2004. Marty, Martin E. Righteous Empire: The Protestant Experience in America. New York: Dial Press, 1970. McClosky, Herbert, J. Z. The American Ethos: Public Attitudes Toward Capitalism and Democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1984. McCormick, Thomas J. America`s Half-Century: United States Foreign Policy in the Cold War and After. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1995. McGann, James G. and R. Kent Weaver. Think Tank and Civil Societies: Catalysts for Ideas and Actions. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 2002. Micklethwait, John and Adrian Wooldridge. The Right Nation. New York: The Penguin Press, 2004.141 Milton, Friedman. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: Chicago University of Chicago Press, 1962. ______. The Neoconservative Revolution: Jewish Intellectuals and the Shaping of Public Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005. Newmann, William W. Managing National Security Policy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, 2003. Nitze, Paul H. SALT II--the Objectives Vs. the Results. Washington, DC: Committee on the Present Danger, 1978. Payne, Keith B. Deterrence in the Second Nuclear Age. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1996. Porter, Roger B. Presidential Decision Making: The Economic Policy Board. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982. Reagan, Ronald W. An American Life. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1990. Rumsfeld, Donald. Quadrennial Defense Review Report. Washington, DC: Department of Defense, 2001. Ricci, David. The Transformation of American Politics: The New Washington and the Rise of American Politics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993. Rich, Andrew. Think Tanks, Public Policy, and the Politics of Expertise. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Rothkopf, David. Running the World: The Inside Story of the National Security Council and the Architects of American Power. New York: Public Affairs, 2009. Saloma, John. Ominus. Politics: The New Conservative Labyrinth. New York: Hill & Wang, 1984. Sanders, Jerry Wayne. Peddlers of Crisis: The Committee on The Present Danger And The Politics Of Containment. Brooklyn: South End Press, 1983. Scruton, Roger. The Meaning of Conservatism. Hampshire: Palgrave, 2001.142 Shoup, L and Minter, W. Imperial Brain Trust: The Council on Foreign Relations and United States Foreign Policy. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1977. Smith, James. Idea Brokers: Think Tanks and The Rise Of The New Policy Elite. New York: Free Press, 1993. Stone, Diane. Capturing the Political Imagination: Think-tanks and the Policy Process. London: Frank Cass, 1996. Schafer, Mark and Stephen G. Walker, eds. Beliefs and Leadership in World Politics: Methods and Applications of Operational Code Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006. Tait, Peter. Introduction to radar target recognition. in Radar, Sonar, and Navigation Series 18. London: Institute of Engineering and Technology, 2005. United States Commission to Assess the Ballistic Missile Threat to the United States, and Donald Rumsfeld. Executive Summary of the Report of the Commission to Assess the Ballistic Missile Threat to the United States. Washington DC: Commission to Assess the Ballistic Missile Threat to the United States, 1998. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. Ballistic Missile Defense Technologies. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, September 1985. United States General Accounting Office. Ballistic Missile Defense: Evolution & Current Issues. Darby: DIANE Publishing, 1994. US Joint Chiefs of Staff. Dictionary of Military Terms: US Department of Defense. London: Greenhill Books, 1995. Velasco, Jesus. Neoconservatives in U.S. Foreign Policy under Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush: Voices behind the Throne. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 2010. Wald, Alan M. The New York Intellectuals: The Rise and Decline of the Anti-Stalinist Left from the 1930`2 to the 1980`s. Chapel Hill: UNC Press Books, 1987.143 Wedel, Janine R. Shadow Elite. New York: Basic Books, 2009. The White House. A National Security Strategy of Engagement and Enlargement. Washington, DC: The White House, 1995. ______. A National Security Strategy of Engagement and Enlargement. Washington, D.C.: The White House, 1996. Wilson, James Q. John J. DiIulio Jr. and Meena Bose. American Government: Institutions and Policies: The Essentials. Boston: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 2012. Whittaker, Alan G., Frederick C. Smith, and Elizabeth McKune. The National Security Policy Process: The National Security Council and Interagency System. Washington, DC: Industrial College of The Armed Forces, 2008. Wittkopf, Eugene, Christopher Jones, and Charles Kegley Jr. American Foreign Policy: Pattern and Process. Stamford: Cengage Learning, 2007. Yanarella, Ernest. The Missile Defense Controversy: Technology in Search of A Mission. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2010. Zarchan, Paul. Tactical And Strategic Missile Guidance. Vol. 176. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1997. 二、專書文章 Dvorak, Jaroslav, and G. Paul. "Committee on the Present Danger." In Cold War: The Essential Reference Guide, pp.38-40. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, 2012. Kaufmann, William W. "The Requirements of Deterrence." In Military Policy and National Security. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1956. Saperstein, Alvin M. "Complexity, Chaos, and National Security Policy: Metaphors or Tools." In Complexity, Global Politics, and National Security, pp. 101-134. Washington, DC: National Defense University, 1997.144 Robinson, William H., “The Congressional Research Service: Policy Consultant, Think Tank, and Information Factory” In Organizations for Policy Analysis: Helping Government Think, pp. 185-225. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1992. Zagoria, Donald S., “The Changing U.S. Role in Asian Security in the 1990s”, In Sheldon W. Simon ed., East Asian Security in the Post-Cold War Era, pp. 44- 58. New York: Library of Congress, 1993. 三、期刊論文、報紙 Abelson, Donald E. "From Policy Research to Political Advocacy: The Changing Role of Think Tanks in American Politics." Canadian Review of American Studies 25, no.1 (1995), pp. 93-126. Andrade, Lydia, and Garry Young. "Presidential Agenda Setting: Influences On The Emphasis Of Foreign Policy." Political Research Quarterly 49, no.3 (1996), pp. 591-605. Anselmo, Joseph C. “U.S. Faces Growing Arsenal of Threats.” Aviation Week & Technology 146, no.8 (February 24, 1997), p. 44. “Appendix A: 1972 ABM Treaty and 1974 ABM Treaty Protocol.” Comparative Strategy 16, no.2 (1997 special issue), pp. 205-206. Bell, Daniel. “The Cultural Wars: American Intellectual Life, 1965-1992.” Wilson Quarterly 16, no. 3 (Summer 1992), pp. 74-107. Boot, Max. “Neocons.” Foreign Policy 140 (January-February, 2004), pp. 20-28. ________. “What the Heck is a ‘Neocon’?” Wall Street Journal 30 (2002), p. 22. Borhi, László. “Rollback, Liberation, Containment, or Inaction? U.S. Policy and Eastern Europe in the 1950s.” Journal of Cold War Studies 1, no. 3 (1999), pp 67-110 Brinkley, Douglas. “Democratic Enlargement: The Clinton Doctrine.” Foreign Policy 106 (1997), pp. 111-127. Bundy, MG, GF Kennan, RS McNamara, and G Smith . "Nuclear Weapons And The Atlantic Alliance." Foreign Affairs 60, no.4 (1982), pp. 753-768.145 Burris, Val, and Sara Diamond. “Academic Freedom, Conspicuous Benevolence, and the National Association of Scholars.” Critical Sociology 18, no.3 (1991), pp. 125-142. Buzan, Barry. "Rethinking Security after the Cold War." Cooperation and Conflict 32, no.1 (1997), pp. 5-28. Carter, Ashton. "Adapting US Defense to Future Needs." Survival 41, no.4 (1999), pp. 101-123. Cutler, Lloyd N, and Roger C. Molander. “Is There Life After Death for SALT?” International Security 6, no2 (Fall 1981), pp. 3-20. Freedman, Lawrence. “Does Deterrence Have a Future?” Arms Control Today 30, no. 8 (October, 2000), pp. 3-9. Fukuyama, Francis. “The End of History?” The National Interest 16 (Summer 1989), pp. 3-18. Gaddis, John Lewis. “A Grand Strategy of Transformation.” Foreign Policy 133 (2002), pp. 50-53. Gamson, William A. and Andre Modigliani. “Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach.” American Journal of Sociology 95 (1989), pp. 1-37. Carter, Ashton. "Adapting US Defense to Future Needs." Survival 41, no.4 (1999), pp. 101-123. Hermann, Margaret G. and Thomas Preston. “Presidents, Advisers, and Foreign Policy: The Effect of Leadership Style on Executive Arrangements.” Political Psychology 15, no.1 (1994), pp. 75-96. Huntington, Samuel. “The Erosion of American National Interests.” Foreign Affairs 76, no.5 (1997), pp. 28-49. ________. “Conservatism as an Ideology.” The American Political Science Review 51, no.2 (1957), pp. 454-473.146 ________. "Political Development And Political Decay." World Politics 17, no.3 (1965), pp. 386-430. Hurst, Steven. “Myths of Neoconservatism: George W. Bush`s Neo-conservative` Foreign Policy Revisited.” International Politics 42, no.1 (2005), pp. 75-96. Jervis, Robert. “Understanding the Bush Doctrine.” Political Science Quarterly 118, no.3 (2003), pp. 365-388. Jordan, Grant. "Sub-Governments, Policy Communities and Networks Refilling the Old Bottles?" Journal of theoretical politics 2, no.3 (1990), pp. 319-338. Krauthammer, Charles. “Bless Our Pax Americana.” The Washington Post March 25, 1991, A. 25. ________. “The Lonely Superpower.” The New Republic 205, no.5, (July 29, 1991), pp. 23-27. ________. “The Bush Doctrine: ABM, Kyoto and the New American Unilateralism.” Weekly Standard 6, no. 36 (2001), pp. 21-25. Krahmann, Elke. "Conceptualizing Security Governance." Cooperation and Conflict 38, no.1 (2003), pp 5-26. Kristol, William and Robert Kagan. “Toward a Neo-Reaganite Foreign Policy.” Foreign Affairs 75, no. 4 (1996), pp. 18-32. Keller, Bill. “The Sunshine Warrior.” The New York Times Magazine (September 22, 2002), p.84. ________. “Missile Defense: The Untold Story.” The New York Times (December 29, 2001), p. A 30. Knudsen, Olav F. "Post-Copenhagen Security Studies: Desecuritizing Securitization." Security Dialogue 32, no. 3, (2001), pp. 355-368. Koh, Harold Hongju. “On American Exceptionalism.” Stanford Law Review 55 (2003), pp. 1479-1527. Lipset, Seymour Martin. “Neoconservatism: Myth or Reality.” Society, 25, no.5 (July- August 1988), pp. 29-37. Lieber, Keir A. and Robert J. Lieber. “The Bush National Security Strategy.” US Foreign Policy Agenda 7, no.4 (2002), pp 32-35.147 Mann, Paul. "ABM Treaty at 25: Relic or rebirth?." Aviation Week & Space Technology 146, no.8 (1997), pp 50-53. Martin, Cathie Jo. “Business and the New Economic Activism: the Growth of Corporate Lobbies in the Sixties.” Polity 27 (1994), pp. 49-76. Massing, Michael. “Trotsky’s Orphan: From Bolshevism to Reaganism.” New Republic 196 (June 22, 1987), pp. 18-22. McGann, James. “Academics to Ideologues: A Brief History of the Public Policy Research Industry.” Political Science and Politics 25, no. 4 (1992), pp. 733- 40. Moe, Ronald C., and Steven C. Teel." Congress As Policy-Maker: A Necessary Reappraisal." Political Science Quarterly 85, no.3 (1970), pp. 443-470. ________. “Academics to Ideologues: A Brief History of the Public Policy Research Industry.” Political Science and Politics 25, no. 4 (1992), pp. 733-740. Monten, Jonathan. “The Roots of the Bush Doctrine: Power, Nationalism, and Democracy Promotion in US Strategy.” International Security 29, no.4 (2005), pp. 112-156. Miller, Benjamin. “Explaining Changes in US Grand Strategy: 9/11, the Rise of Offensive Liberalism, and the War in Iraq.” Security Studies 19 no.1 (2010), pp. 26-65. Mills, C. Wright. "Letter to the New Left." New Left Review no. 5 (September- October 1960), pp. 18-23. Mufson, Steven. “ABM Treaty May be History, but Deterrence Doctrine Lives.” Washington Post December 16, 2001, A37. Muravchik, Joshua. "The Neoconservative Cabal." Commentary 116, no. 2 (2003), pp. 26-33. Mitchell, Alison. “Bush Says U.S. Should Reduce Nuclear Arms.” New York Times May 24, 2000, A1. Myers, Steven Lee. “Bush Repeats Call for Arms Reduction and Missile Shield.” New York Times January 27, 2001, A11.148 Neal, Terry M. “Bush Backs Wider Missile Defenses.” Washington Post May, 24, 2000, A01. Pierre, Andrew J. “The Diplomacy of SALT.” International Security 5, no.1 (Summer 1980), pp. 178-197. Podhoretz, Norman. “The Neo-Conservative Anguish over Reagan’s Foreign Policy.” New York Times Magazine (May 2, 1982), pp. 30-33, 96-98. Podvig, Pavel. "History And The Current Status Of The Russian Early-Warning System." Science and Global Security 10, no.1 (2002), pp. 21-60. Polsby, Nelson. “Tanks but No Tanks.” Public Opinion 6 (1983), pp.2-14. Postol, Theodore A. "Lessons of the Gulf War Experience with Patriot." International Security 16 (1991), pp. 119-171. Ray, Saumyajit. "New Conservatives or Old Liberals?: Neocons and the Republican Internationalist Revival." India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs 61, no.1 (2005), pp. 118-141. Rhinelander, John B. “The ABM Treaty-Past, Present and Future (Part I).” Journal of Conflict & Security Law 6, no.1 (2001), pp. 91-114. Russo, Robert. “Bush Battling Questions of Brain Power.” London Free Press December 13, 1999. Simon, Steven and Jonathan Stevenson. “Thinking Outside the Tank.” National Interest 78 (2004), pp. 90-98. Slocombe, Walter B. "The administration`s approach." Washington Quarterly 23, no.3 (2000), pp. 77-85. Smith, David. "ABM Treaty Expansion Would Entangle Missile Defense." Defense News 12 (October 20-26, 1997), p.21. Spring, Baker. “The Heritage Foundation: Influencing the Debate on Missile Defense.” US Foreign Policy Agenda: The Role of Think Tanks in US Foreign Policy 7, no.3 (November, 2002), pp. 32-34.149 Stone, Diane. “Think Tank Transnationalisation and Non-profit Analysis, Advice and Advocacy.” Global Society 14, no. 2 (2000), pp. 153-172. ________. “Old Guard versus New Partisans: Think Tanks in Transition.” Politics 26 no.2 (1991), pp.197-215. ________, “Recycling Bins, Garbage Cans or Think Tanks? Three Myths Regarding Policy Analysis Institutes." Public Administration 85, no.2 (2007), pp. 259- 278. “U.S. Draft Protocol to the ABM Teaty and Associated ‘Talking Points.’” Arms Control Today 30, no.4 (May, 2000), pp.16-20. Vest, Jason A. “The Men From JINSA and CSP.” The Nation 275, no.7 (September 2, 2002), p.17. Walt, Stephen M. “Two Cheers for Clinton’s Foreign Policy.” Foreign Affairs 79, no.2 (March-April, 2000), pp. 63-79. Wanis-St. John, Anthony. “The National Security Council: Tool of Presidential Crisis Management.” Journal of Public and International Affairs 9, no. 1 (1998), pp.102-124. Wattenberg, Ben J. “Neo-Manifest Destinarianism.”` National Interest 21 (Fall 1990), pp.51-53. Wolfensberger, Donald R. “The Return of the Imperial Presidency?” The Wilson Quarterly 26, no.2 (2002), pp. 36-41. Wolfwitz, Paul. “Beyond ABM Treaty.” Wall Street Journal June 6, 2002, Op-ed. Wright, Robin. “Top Focus Before 9/11 Wasn`t on Terrorism: Rice Speech Cited Missile Defense.” Washington Post April 1, 2004, Page A01. 四、網站資料150 “A New Covenant for American Security," (speech, Washington, DC, December 12, 1991. <http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/academic/political- science/speeches/clinton.dir/c28.txtp> (accessed March 14, 2014) Barry, Tom and Jim Lobe. “The Men Who Stole the Show.” Foreign Policy in Focus, Special Report #18 October 2002. <http://www.fpif.org/papers/02men/index_body.htm> (accessed May 27, 2013). Corn, David. “Bush Gets an F in Foreign Affairs.” Salon November 6, 1999, <http://www.salon.com/1999/11/05/bush_35/> (accessed 10 March 2014) Excerpt from “1992 Draft Defense Planning Guidance.” <http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/nukevault/ebb245/doc03_extract_nytedit.pdf > (accessed 1, June, 2013). “Foreign Policy Issue.” George W. Bush for President Official Site <http://www.georgewbush.com/issues/foreignpolicy.html> (accessed December 17, 2013). “Important Figures in the NSC.” The Brookings Institution. <http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Projects/nsc/KeyPeople.pdf> (March 7, 2014) Johnston, Wm. Robert. “Database of Nuclear Tests, USSR/Russia: Introduction.” Johnston’S Archive <http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/nuclear/tests/USSR- ntests0.html> (retrieved on 14 Feb 2014) Lobe, Jim, “All in the Neocon Family,” Alternet, 26, March, 2003, <http://www.alternet.org/print.html?StoryID=15481> (April 17, 2013). National Security Council, “Defense Planning Guide”, National Archive <http://www.archives.gov/declassification/iscap/pdf/2008-003-docs1-12.pdf> (June 1, 2013) “The Neocons: An Illustrated Progression”, The Washington Post, <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp- dyn/content/graphic/2008/02/01/GR2008020102389.html>151 PBS Frontline, "Excerpts from 1992 Draft `Defense Planning Guide`", PBS, <http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/iraq/etc/wolf.html> (April 2 2013). Perle, Richard. “A Better Way to Build a Missile Defense.” CIAO Aug, 2000, <http://www.ciaonet.org/pbei/aei/oti/per01/> (accessed June 17, 2013). Project of New American Century, “Statement of Principles”, Project of New American Century, 1997, <http://www.newamericancentury.org/statementofprinciples.htm> (accessed April 10, 2013) “Republican Party Platform of 2000.” <http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=25849> (accessed Feb 26, 2014) “Richard Perle: The Making of a Neoconservative.” Think Tank with Ben Wattenberg. <http://www.pbs.org/thinktank/transcript1017.html> (23th May 2013). Savage, Charlie. "Bush Challenges Hundreds of Laws." Boston Globe April 30, 2006. <http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2006/04/30/bush_challenge >(June 17, 2013). “Speech at the National Defense University.” May 1, 2001. <http://www.fas.org/nuke/control/abmt/news/010501bush.html> (accessed October 15, 2013) Tierney, John J. “Abolish the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency.” The Heritage Foundation 9, February, 1995. <http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/1995/02/em404nbsp-abolish-the- arms-control> (accessed June 6, 2013) “THAAD.” Encyclopedia Astronautica <http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/thaad.htm> (accessed March 9, 2014) “Think Tanks.” NYTimes <http://ideas.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/10/think- tanks/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0> (March 8, 2014) US Arms Control and Disarmament Agency (ACDA). “The Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty.” Fact Sheet, May 20, 1996, <http://www.fas.org/nuke/control/abmt/docs/abmtrea3.htm>“U.S. Withdrawal From the ABM Treaty: President Bush’s Remarks and U.S. Diplomatic Notes.” <https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2002_01- 02/docjanfeb02> (accessed Feb 26, 2014) “Weapons of Mass Destruction, Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START I).” <http://www.fas.org/nuke/control/start1/news/strtbasi.htm> (accessed 1, June, 2013) “Weapons of Mass Destruction, Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START II).” <http://www.fas.org/nuke/control/start2/docs/start-95.htm> (accessed 1, June, 2013) The White House Press Secretary. “Announcement of Withdrawal from the ABM Treaty.” The White House <http://georgewbush- whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2001/12/20011213-2.html> (accessed June 21, 2013). Paul Wolfowitz. “Prepared Testimony on Ballistic Missile Defense to the Senate Armed Services Committee.” (speech, Washington, DC, July 12, 2001) <http://www.defense.gov/speeches/speech.aspx?speechid=399 > (accessed January 10, 2014)
描述:	碩士國立政治大學外交研究所 98253035 101
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0982530351
資料類型:	thesis
顯示於類別:	[外交學系] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
035101.pdf	5427Kb	Adobe PDF2	210	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋