Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67175
|
| Title: | 都會區房價泡沫形成之研究-以台中市獨立式及集合式住宅為例
Research on the Bubble in Metropolitan Area-Cases of Detached Houses and Condominiums in Taichung |
| Authors: | 黃雅祺
Huang, Ya Chi |
| Contributors: | 李文傑
甯方璽
Lee, Wen Chieh
Ning, Fang Shii
黃雅祺
Huang, Ya Chi |
| Keywords: | 房價泡沫
住宅類型
特徵價格法
Housing Bubble
House Style
Hedonic Price Method |
| Date: | 2013 |
| Issue Date: | 2014-07-01 12:19:10 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 有鑒於以往房價泡沫文獻較少探討泡沫與房屋特徵間的關係，本文援引特徵價格法研究內外部特徵對房價泡沫的影響。藉由所建構之台中市房屋交易個案資料庫，將交易區分為獨立式住宅與集合式住宅，並考量明星學區環域的影響，全面納入「建築內部」、「教育」、「休閒」、「生活機能」、「區位」、「交通」、「安全」、「鄰避設施」八類衡量生活品質的房屋特徵，以房價泡沫取對數值作為應變數，住宅與各類設施距離取對數值為自變數，將樣本區分為六十五個學區進而實證歸納出學區環域內容易被炒作的特徵。
房地產市場中的獨立式住宅及集合式住宅兩大類商品，其在追求生活品質的同時符合Hotelling模型極小化產品差異的結果，由研究成果顯示集合式住宅渴望在繁榮的鬧區保有安靜的生活環境，而獨立式住宅則是在空曠的郊區追求生活機能，前者為「鬧中取靜」，後者為「靜中取鬧」，換言之集合式住宅與公園綠地等休閒設施距離越近泡沫越大，但對於會帶來大量車流和人潮的交通樞紐及大型遊樂場所等則是距離越遠，泡沫越大，獨立式住宅方面則是距離連鎖餐飲、便利商店等生活機能設施越近，泡沫越大。
Since there were not many papers focusing on the topic of the relationship between bubbles and housing characteristics, this paper studies the internal as well as the external causes of housing bubble by adopting the canonical Hedonic Pricing Method. By utilizing a constructed unique database composed of Taichung housing transactions, the detailed features of transactions on the detached houses and condominiums can be investigated. The "Building Interior", "Education", "Leisure", "Living Infrastructure", "Location", "Transportation", "Security", and "NIMBY" are collected as the measurement of quality of life in housing characteristics to complement the Star School District impact in the educational buffer. Using the level of house price bubbles as dependent variable and dividing the selected area into 65 school districts, and discover what factors are used for house price speculation.
The results show similar demand on the quality of life, in line with Hotelling Model, in both the transactions of detached houses and condominiums. The residents of condominium; however, prefers living in the prosperous urban area with Serene environment whereas the occupants of detached house would choose to live in the spacious suburban area with decent local living facilities. In other words, the closer the condominiums are with leisure facilities, such as public park, and the further they are with facilities that gathers crowd and traffic, such as transportation hub and entertainment facilities, the larger the bubble. The further the detached houses are with living function facilities such as chain restaurants, convenient stores, the larger the bubble. |
| Reference: | 1. 古美玉、廖峻谷、廖琢崴、陳瀅如、張淑娟 (2009)，〈住宅選擇與購屋能力分析之研究-以台中市為例〉，《萬能商學學報》，14，239-257
2. 吳知賢、段良雄 (1999 )，〈台灣地區公私立國中、國小學校選擇模式〉《人文及社會科學研究彙刊》9:2，254-268
3. 吳珮瑛、施伯宜 (1996)，〈台灣各縣市生活品質水準之表較〉，《台灣經濟》，240:26，26-38
4. 吳森田 (1994)，〈所得﹑貨幣與房價—近二十年台北地區的觀察〉，《住宅學報》，2，49-65
5. 宋超英、蘭艾麗 (2010)，〈非理性行為與迪拜房地產泡沫之形成-基於行為經濟學視角的分析〉，《商業研究》，398，6-8
6. 李泓見、張金鶚、花敬群 (2006)，〈台北都會區不同住宅類型價差之研究〉，《臺灣土地研究》，9:1，63-87
7. 李春長、游淑滿、張維倫 (2012)，〈公共設施、環境品質與不動產景氣對住宅價格影響之研究─兼論不動產景氣之調節效果〉，《住宅學報》，21:1，67-87
8. 李榮謙、黃麗倫、陳星豪 (2010)，〈愛爾蘭出了什麼問題？爆發主權債務危機的原因、解決方案與可能影響〉，《國際金融參考資料》，61，82-102
9. 林忠樑、林佳慧 (2014)， 〈學校特徵與空間距離對周邊房價之影響分析—以台北市為例〉，《經濟論文叢刊》
10. 林秋瑾﹑楊宗憲﹑張金鶚 (1996)，〈住宅價格指數之研究---以台北市為例〉，《住宅學報》，4，1-30
11. 林祖嘉;馬毓駿 (2009)，〈美國房地產市場泡沫現象之研究〉，《世記金融風暴學術研討會會議論文集》，11-31
12. 林祖嘉 (1990)，〈反向巢型多項式Logit模型下的住屋需求與租買選擇〉，《經濟論文》，18:1，137-158
13. 林祖嘉 (1992)，〈台灣地區房租與房價關係之研究〉，《台灣銀行季刊》，43:1，347-371。
14. 林祖嘉 (1994)，〈台灣地區住宅需求與租買選擇之聯合估計〉，《政大學報》，68，183-200
15. 林祖嘉、林素菁 (1995)，〈台灣地區住宅價格的泡沫現象〉，《台灣經濟學會年會論文集》，295-313
16. 林素菁 (2002)，〈台灣地區特徵性房價函數估計係數不一致性問題之探討〉，《2002年中華民國住宅學會第十一屆年會論文集》，268-277
17. 林素菁 (2004)，〈台北市國中小明星學區邊際願意支付之估計〉，《住宅學報》，13:1，15-34
18. 林啟淵、高文津 (2001)，〈住宅屬性與房價關係之研究〉，《台灣經濟金融月刊》，37:9，100-107
19. 林楨家、黃志豪 (2003)，〈台北捷運營運前後沿線房地屬性特徵價格之變化〉，《運輸計劃季刊》，32:4，777-800
20. 姚欣欣 (2013)，〈新加坡運用印花稅制抑制房地產價格〉，《當代財政》，27，99-102
21. 洪仁進、簡成熙、徐振邦、朱盈潔 (1999)，〈台灣升學機制及升學競爭之簡介〉，《教育研究資訊》，7:6，1-20
22. 洪得洋、林祖嘉 (1999)，〈臺北市捷運系統與道路寬度對房屋價格影響之研究〉，《住宅學報》，8，47-67
23. 張金鶚、范垂爐 (1993)，〈房地產真實交易價格之研究〉，《住宅學報》，1，75-97
24. 張金鶚、楊宗憲 (2000)，〈台北市成屋價格泡沫知多少？〉，《中華民國住宅學會第九屆年會論文集》，15-29
25. 張金鶚、楊宗憲、洪御仁 (2008)，〈中古屋及預售屋房價指數之建立、評估與整合-台北市之實證分析〉，《住宅學報》，17:2，13-34
26. 張晉銓、鍾懿萍 (2011)，〈物業管理業在不動產業之定位研究－以七期豪宅導入物業前期規劃為例〉，《物業管理學會論文集》，第五屆，71-80
27. 張梅英 (1992)，〈台灣地區都市地價變動分析〉，《經社法治論叢》，10，301-327
28. 張梅英、鍾陳佳 (2002)，〈住宅法拍屋屋屬性與拍定價格關係之研究--以台中市12樓以下集合住宅為例〉，《土地問題研究季刊》，1:2，12-20
29. 袁志剛、樊潇彦 (2003)，〈房地產市場理性泡沫分析〉，《經濟研究》，3，34-44
30. 許易民 (2012)，〈中國大陸房價泡沫可能破滅問題之探討〉，《經濟研究》，12，387-412
31. 陳章瑞、宋維真 (2007)，〈GIS調查方法於特徵價格法衡量都市綠地美質之影響與效益〉，《調查研究-方法與應用》，22，39-87
32. 陳莉雪、韓乾 (2011)，〈市地重劃與容積管制對住宅土地使用規劃關係之研究-以台中市改制前地區為例〉，《土地問題研究季刊》，10:4，75-87
33. 陳彥仲 (1997)，〈住宅選擇之程序性決策模式〉，《住宅學報》，5，37-49
34. 彭建文、楊宗憲、楊詩韻 (2009)，〈捷運系統對不同區位房價影響分析─以營運階段為例〉，《運輸計劃季刊》，38;3，275-296
35. 馮正民、曾平毅、王冠斐 (1994)，〈捷運系統對車站地區房價之影響〉，《都市與計劃》，21:1，25-45
36. 楊宗憲、蘇倖慧 (2011)，〈迎毗設施與鄰避設施對住宅價格影響之研究〉，《住宅學報》，20:2，61-80
37. 戴國正 (2012)，〈大眾捷運系統對房價影響效果之再檢視〉，《世界華人不動產學會》
38. 蔡金田 (2011)，〈國民小學學生家長知覺學校教育品質滿意度之探究—以彰化縣一所國民小學為例〉，《慈濟大學教育研究學刊》，7，101-132
39. 鄭吉延、羅紹麟 (2000)，〈特徵價格理論應用於都市林效益評估之研究〉，《林彙研究季刊》，22:1，1-10
40. 鄭雅蔚 (2012)，〈西班牙房地產泡沫破滅與銀行業危機之關聯－兼論歐盟援助西班牙銀行業計畫之評析〉，《國際金融參考資料》，64，76-91
41. 賴孚權、姚仁德、孫嘉宏、余家銘 (2011)，《區域經濟學》，台北市：翰蘆圖書出版有限公司
42. 謝明瑞 (2013)，〈房市泡沫化之探討〉，《2013 全方位成功國際學術研討會論文集》，37-49
43. 李怡婷 (2005)，〈大眾運輸導向發展策略對捷運站區房地產價格之影響分析〉，國立成功大學，都市計劃研究所，碩士論文
44. 周世賢 (1994)，〈台北市不動產泡沫現象之研究〉，國立台灣大學，商學研究所，碩士論文
45. 林炎欣 (2008)，〈房價特徵模型之空間自我相關問題分析〉，國立成功大學，都市計劃學系，碩士論文
46. 林崧麟 (1999)，〈成屋價格影響因素之研究〉，朝陽大學，企管系，碩士論文
47. 范垂爐 (1991)，〈房地產真實交易價格之研究〉，國立中興大學法商學院，都市計劃研究所，碩士論文
48. 陳威廷 (2012)，〈亞洲主要城市之房價與泡沫〉，國立台北大學，統計系，碩士論文
49. 彭宴玲 (2005)，〈台北市綠地效益之評價-特徵價格法之應用〉，中國文化大學，景觀學研究所，碩士論文
50. 黃于祐 (2008)，〈台北市房價影響因素之空間分析-地理加權迴歸方法之應用〉，國立臺北大學，都市計劃研究所，碩士論文
51. 蔡美惠 (2010)，〈不動產價格泡沫影響因素之研究─台北及上海之比較〉，國立屏東商業技術學院，不動產經營系(所)，碩士論文
52. 蘇京皓 (2003)，〈特徵價格法與地理資訊系統之應用-以輸變電設施對住宅價格影響為例〉，國立台北大學，地政學系，碩士論文
53. 蘇衍綾 (2011)，〈評估台中市捷運站據點規劃對住宅市場之研究〉，國立暨南國際大學，經濟學研究所，碩士論文
1. Abraham, J. M and Hendershott, H. P., “Bubble in Metropolitan Housing Markets,” Journal of Housing Research, 72:2 (1996), 191
2. Barrow, L., “School Choice through Relocation: Evidence from the Washington, D.C. Area,” Journal of Public Economics, 86 (2002), 155-189
3. B.C. Eaton, R.G. Lipsey, “Product differentiation,” R. Schmalensee, R.D. Willig (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, Volume 1North-Holland, New York (1989), 723-768
4. Belsley, D.A., Huh, E. and Welsch, R.E., “Regression Diagonstics: Identifying Influential Data and Source of Collinearity,” John Wiley and Sons: NY. (1980)
5. Bjorklund, K, and Soderberg, B., “Property Cycles, Speculative Bubbles and the Gross Income Multiplier,” The Journal of Real Estate Research, 18:1 (1999), 151-174
6. Black, A., Fraster, P. & Hoesli, “House Prices, Fundamentals and Bubbles,” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33:9-10 (2006), 1535-1555
7. Black, R.T., M. Wolverton, J.T. Warden, and R.H. Pittman, “Manufacturing versus Distribution: Implicit Pricing of Real Property Characteristics by Submarket,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 15:3 (1997), 271-285.
8. Black, S. E., “Do Better Schools Matter? Parental Valuation of Elementary Education,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114:2 (1999), 577-599
9. Blanchard, O. J and S. Fisher, “Lectures on Macroeconomics,” The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, (1989)
10. Bourassa, S.C., Hendershott, P.H. & Murphy, J., “Further Evidence on the Existence of Housing Market Bubbles,” Journal of Property Research, 18:1 (2001), 1-19
11. Brasington, D. and D. R. Haurin, “Educational Outcomes and House Values: A Test of the Value Added Approach,” Journal of Regional Science, 46:2 (2006), 245-268
12. Brasington, D. M., and D. Hite, “Demand for Environmental Quality: A Spatial Hedonic Analysis,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35 (2005), 57-82
13. Case, K.E. & Shiller, R.J., “The Efficiency of the Market for Single-Family Homes,” The American Economic Review, 79:1 (1989), 125
14. Chen, M. C. & Patel, K., “An Empirical Analysis of Determination of House Prices in the Taipei Area,” Taiwan Economic Review, 30:4 (2002), 563-595
15. Chi Man Hui and Qi Gu, “Study of Guangzhou House Price Bubble Based on State-Space Model,” International Journal of Strategic Property Managemen, 13 (2009), 287-298
16. Crone, T. M., “House Prices and the Quality of Public Schools: What Are Buying? ,” Business Review, Sep./Oct., (1998), 3-14
17. Diba, B. and Grossman, H., “Explosive Rational Bubble in Stock Prices,” American Economic Review, 78 (1988), 520-530
18. Downes, T. A. and Zabel, J. E., “The impact of school characteristics on house prices: Chicago 1987-1991,” Journal of Urban Economics, 52:1 (2002), 1-25
19. Edel, M. and E. Selar, “Taxes, Spending, and Property Values: Supply Adjustments in a Tiebout-Oates Model,” Journal of Political Economy, 82:5 (1974), 941-954
20. Fack, G. & Grenet, J., “When do better schools raise housing prices? Evidence from Paris public and private schools,” Journal of Public Economics, 94 (2009), 59-77
21. Fern’andez-Kranz, D. and Hon, M., “A Cross-Section Analysis of the Income Elasticity of Housing Demand in Spain: Is There a Real Estate Bubble? ,” The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 32:4 (2006), 449-470
22. Figlio, D. N. and M. E. Lucas, “What`s in a Grade? School Report Cards and the Housing Marke,” American Economic Review, 94:3 (2004), 591-604
23. Goetzmann, W. N., & Spiegel, M., “A spatial model of housing returns and neighborhood substitutability,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 14:1-2 (1997), 11-31
24. Graves, P. Murdoch, J.C. Thayer, M.A., and Waldman, D.,” The Robustness of Hedonic Price Estimation Urban Air Quality,” Land Economics, 64:3 (1988), 220-233
25. Hamilton, B. and Schwab, R. “Expected Appreciation in Urban Housing Markets,” Journal of Urban Economic, 18 (1985), 103-118
26. Haurin, D. R. and D. Brasington, “School Quality and Real House Prices: Inter- and Intra- Metropolitan Effects,” Journal of Housing Economics, 5 (1996), 351-368
27. Hayes, K. J. and L. L. Taylor, “Neighborhood School Characteristics: What Signals Quality to Homebuyers? ,” Economic Review- Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Fourth Quarter, (1996), 2-9
28. H. Hotelling, “Stability in competition,” Economic Journal, 39 (1929), 41-57
29. Hui, E. C. M and Yue, S., “Housing Price Bubbles in Hong Kong, Beijing and Shanghai: A Comparative Study,” The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 33:4 (2006),299-327
30. Jud, G. D. and J. M. Watts, “Schools and Housing Values,” Land Economics, 57 (1981), 459-470
31. Kain, J. F. and J. Quigley, “Measuring the Value of Housing Quality,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65 (1970), 532-548
32. Lancaster, K. J., “A New Approach to Consumer Theory,” Journal of Political Economy, 74 (1966), 132-157
33. Li, M. M. and H. J. Brown, “Micro-Neighborhood Externalities and Hedonic Housing Prices,” Land Economics, 56 (1980), 125-141
34. Lin, C.C., “The Relationship between Rents and Prices of Owner-Occupied Housing in Taiwan,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,” 6 (1993), 25-54
35. Melissa A. Boyle, Katherine A. Kiel, “A Survey of House Price Hedonic Studies of the Impact of Environmental Externalities,” Journal of Real Estate Literature, 9:2 (2001), 117-144
36. Oates, W., "The Effects of Property Taxes and Local Public Spending on Property Values: An Empirical Study of Tax Capitalization and the Tiebout Hypothesis," Journal of Political Economy, 77 (1969), 957-971
37. Phillips, P. C.B. and Yu, J., “Dating the Timeline of Financial Bubbles during the Subprime Crisis,” Working Paper, Singapore Management University (2010)
38. Rosen, S., “Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition,” Journal of Political Economy, 82:1 (1974), 34-55
39. Stiglitz, J. E., “Symposium on Bubbles,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4:2 (1990), 13-18
40. Tiebout, C.,“A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures,” Journal Political Economy, 64:5 (1956), 416-424
41. Tirole, Jean, “Asset Bubbles and Overlapping Generations,” Econometrica, 53 (1985), 1499-1528
42. Weil, Philippe, “Confidence and the Teal Value of Money in Overlspping Generation Models,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102 (1987), 1-22
43. Wu, Y., “Are there Rational Bubbles in Foreign Exchange Markets? Evidence from an Alternative Test,” Journal of International Money and Finance, 14:1 (1995), 27-46
44. Xiao, Q. and Tan, G.K.R, “Signal Extraction with Kalman Filter: A Study of the Hong Kong Property Price Bubbles,” Urban Studies, 44:4 (2007), 865-888
45. Zahirovic-Herbert, V. and G. K. Turnbull, “Public School Reform, Expectations, and Capitalization: What Signals Quality to Homebuyers,” Southern Economic Journal, 75:4 (2009), 1094-1113 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
經濟學系
101258032
102 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1012580321 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [經濟學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 032101.pdf | 1537Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 288 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
