English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51079204      Online Users : 950
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/66448


    Title: 整合理論與歐盟條約修改之研究－以歐盟憲法條約與里斯本條約爲例
    Other Titles: Integration Theory and Treaty Reform in the EU-The Cases of the Constitutional Treaty and the Treaty of Lisbon
    Authors: 盧倩儀
    Lu,Chien-Yi
    Contributors: 國關中心
    Keywords: 歐盟;憲法條約;里斯本條約;制度主義;自由派政府間主義
    the EU;Constitutional Treaty;Lisbon Treaty;Institutionalism;Liberal Intergovernmentalism
    Date: 2010-12
    Issue Date: 2014-06-04 11:27:40 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 二○○一年以來歐洲聯盟諸多歷史發展軸線中，以制憲爲底蘊但以里斯本條約收場的歐盟制度改革發展軸線，不僅整段發展完整屬於二○○一年至二○○九年這個歷史片段，同時亦是最爲清晰可辨並且最具歐洲區域整合里程碑意義的一條歷史軸線。此一歷史發展軸線該用什麼樣的理論來解釋？本文沿襲國際關係理論及區域整合研究中國家中心(state-centered)理論與制度主義對話的思辯輪廓，比較自由派政府間主義與制度主義對二○○一年至二○○九年歐盟制度改革歷史發展之解釋力。文章之理論探討部份首先對於兩大學派之共同點加以描述，按著從「國家是否爲單一行爲者」、「政府間談判是否獨佔性地決定整合結果」、以及「超國家機構有無獨立自主影響力」三個面向切入，剖析兩大學派不相容之處。文章隨後評估兩大學派對於二○○一年至二○○九年歐盟制度改革經過之解釋力，發現制度主義能夠對這段整合歷史提供較理想的解釋，因爲從拉肯到里斯本的歷史發展顯示：會員國並非單一行爲者、整合結果也並非單獨由政府間談判排他性地決定、而超國家機構在這十年的制度改革過程中亦明顯發揮了獨立自主的影響力。
    Among the various historic developments that have taken place in the European Union in the past decade, the Constitution-making endeavors and the subsequent reform of the institutions through the Lisbon Treaty are the most prominent. Not only was the time line of the reform process more or less contained within the decade, but the impact of the reform-both in terms of results and processes-is also far-reaching. This article assesses the strengths and weaknesses of different integration theories in explaining this Treaty reform process. Following conventional debates in international relations and EU studies, state-centered liberal intergovernmentalism is pitted against institutionalism. After singling out three main differences between these two theoretical camps, i.e., state as unitary actor, intergovernmental negotiations determining integration results, and role of supranational institutions, the article examines actual developments in the Treaty reform process against both theories. It finds that on all three points, institutionalism provides a more satisfactory explanation than liberal intergovernmentalism.
    Relation: 政治科學論叢,46,111-157
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[國際關係研究中心] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    111-157.pdf487KbAdobe PDF2716View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback