政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/65440
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51061183      Online Users : 1006
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/65440


    Title: 道南與湖湘──朱熹《四書章句集注》義理進程分析
    Other Titles: Daonan and Huxiang──Analysis of the Process of the Principles in Zhu Xi’s Exegesis of the Collections of Texts from the Four Books (Sishu zhangju jizhu)
    Authors: 陳逢源
    Chen, Feng-Yuan
    Contributors: 中文系
    Keywords: 朱熹;四書;道南之學;湖湘之學;理學
    Zhu Xi;The four books;Daonan study;Huxiang study;the philosophy of principle (lixue)
    Date: 2012.06
    Issue Date: 2014-04-16 17:17:37 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 楊時「氣柔」、謝良佐「氣剛」,所傳道南與湖湘兩系各走一端,於儒學各自經營,成為南宋最重要之學術流派,朱熹從道南到湖湘,從「靜」入「敬」,又以「敬」攝「靜」,由本體以見工夫,又由工夫以見本體,完成工夫論的思考,於儒學心性、本體,終於有清楚的觀察。從佛入儒是朱熹標示儒學事業的開始,「中和」新說確立二程學術之究竟,無疑是理學事業的完成,往復之間,朱熹融鑄超越,用心至微,不僅匯整兩系心法,也逐步完成四書體系的建構,《四書章句集注》保留朱熹諸多思考,檢覈其中,得見朱熹承繼與發展方向,從義理講論而及經義的思考,遂有進一步檢證的依據。
    Yang Shi stood for feminineness, which became one of the Confucian systems, named Daonan, while Xie Liang-Zuo stood for virility, which became another of the Confucian systems, named Huxiang. These two systems were two of the most important academic schools of Confucianism in South Song Dynasty. Zhu Xi pursued his study from Daonan to Huxiang. In fact, he first understood esteem through tranquility and then subdued tranquility by esteem. In other words, he made the substance and skills (gongfu) reveal each other and accomplished the theory of skill through observing mind and substance in Confucianism. The beginning of Zhu’s Confucian study is from Buddhism to Confucianism. The hybrid of these two isms established the foundation of Cheng Yi and Cheng Hao’s academics, which was the fulfillment of Philosophy of Principle (lixue). Zhu not only assembled and marshaled the way of mind (xinfa) in these two systems attentively but also constructed the system of the Four Books step by step. A lot of Zhu’s thoughts were kept in the Exegesis of the Collections of Texts from the Four Books (Sishu zhangju jizhu). As a result, we can discover the origin of Zhu’s study and the orientation of his expansion through looking into the discourse of ordinance and reflection upon the principles in the Exegesis of the Collections of Texts from the Four Books.
    Relation: 東華漢學, (15), 89-129
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Chinese Literature] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    89-129.pdf3309KbAdobe PDF2921View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback