Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/65430
|
Title: | 政治發展與政商關係:新加坡的政聯企業與政商互動 |
Other Titles: | Government-Linked Companies and State-Business Relations in Singapore |
Authors: | 施奕任 Shih,Yi-Jen |
Contributors: | 國發所 |
Keywords: | 政商關係;政聯企業;新加坡;發展型國家;華人家族企業 Singapore;Government-Linked Company;Chinese Family Business;State-Business Relations;Statutory Board |
Date: | 2009.03 |
Issue Date: | 2014-04-16 16:51:24 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 東亞國家的發展路徑經常被認為呈現著發展型國家的特徵。新加坡與這些國家都具有高度的國家相對自主性,但是不同於其他發展型國家偏重透過政商間建立制度性協商機制來形塑產業政策,新加坡的經濟發展模式卻是獨特地偏重政聯企業,而鮮少仰賴私人資本。規模龐大的政聯企業成為國家權力在市場活動中最直接的先鋒,也成為國家權威跨過了政策規範的角色,進而成為市場行動者的具體力量。新加坡政府藉由淡馬錫控股與諸多政聯企業有效主導國家產業政策與資本市場。政聯企業的形成背後又聯繫著新加坡建國以來特殊的政經運作與歷史脈絡。 Like many East and Southeast Asia countries, Singapore has the similar developmental approach, especially in his strong state autonomy. But compared to other countries, the number and size of government-linked companies (GLCs, or state-owned enterprises) are larger than any other countries in its neighborhood regions. Singapore government highly relies on GLCs, but not local enterprises, to promote its economic growth and capital market. The development of GLCs is embedded Singapore political and economic context.Based on the assumption that economic activities might link with specific historical and environmental conditions, this paper would not only analyze GLCs structures and operations, but also discuss the political and economic reasons that Singapore government must format lots of GLCs. Furthermore, because both GLCs and local enterprises are part of Singapore economy, we cannot discuss the influence of GLCs without thinking about the change of local enterprises operations. These research methods will help us illustrate the whole picture of GLCs and their change.The development GLCs involve that the political elites of People`s Action Party (PAP) how to consolidate their power, and sensitive ethnic issues. After independence, Singapore government distrust Chinese and their community and local enterprises is not large enough to support national industrialization plans, so political elites recognize that if Singapore must rely on government capacity to promote industrialization and economic growth. In the 1980`s, Singapore government faced the challenges economic recession and lower support rates. Therefore, PAP elites change their attitude toward local enterprises, and they try to foster promising local enterprise, formulate regionalization policy and many kinds of support strategies. But government strategies seems useless for local enterprises and GLCs still be unbeatable. It is because GLCs emphasize interest-orientation, and these government enterprises have sufficient resource, information access, and government endorsement. These advantages strongly increase GLCs competitiveness and crowd many local enterprises out rising business opportunities. Furthermore, the pressure of GLCs performance enforce local enterprises to replace Chinese family business model with professionalized directorships and senior managers. |
Relation: | 政治科學論叢, 39(1), 159-202 |
Data Type: | article |
Appears in Collections: | [國家發展研究所] 期刊論文
|
Files in This Item:
File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
159-202.pdf | | 518Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 830 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|