English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113325/144300 (79%)
Visitors : 51157566      Online Users : 885
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/65147


    Title: 國際海洋法法庭與第一、二號塞加輪案
    Other Titles: The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea and the M/V "Saiga" Cases
    Authors: 孫光民
    Sun, Kuan-ming
    Contributors: 國關中心
    Keywords: 國際法;國際海洋法;國際海洋法法庭;塞加輪案;迅速釋放船舶程序
    international law;international law of the sea;the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea;the M/V "Saiga" Cases;the prompt release procedure
    Date: 2000-10
    Issue Date: 2014-04-01 17:25:46 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 國際海洋法法庭是一九八二年聯合國海洋法公約中爭端解決制度的最重要機制。法庭之管轄權、組成與程序規定於公約之附件六。在有些案件中，公約要求被扣船、人在提交合理金錢保證後，立刻獲釋。當船、人因違反公約而被旦扣時，船旗國有權依照公約之規定，提請法庭決定何為合理之金錢保證，而下令交保放人。在一九九七年十一月十三日，法庭受理了第一樁案件，即塞加輪（M/V “Saiga”）案。本案及外國船舶、人員立即釋放之請求。事實證明，法庭在第一號及第二號塞加輪案中之判決，成功地維繫了國際司法的一致性。
    The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea-established in 1996 in Hamburg-is constituted and functions in accordance with the provision of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The Tribunal, in particular, deals with the uses and resources of the sea and the setting of the limits of national maritime zones. Its competence, organization, and the trial procedures are regulated in Annex 6 of the Convention. On November 13, 1997, the Tribunal received its first case – the M/V“Saiga” Case. This case was concerned with the interpretation and application of Article 292 of the Convention, which embodies a novel procedure for effecting the prompt release of detained vessels. This was the first time that this difficult provision had been examined by an international tribunal. Following a description of the dispute and an analysis of Article 292 of the Convention, this author concludes that the Tribunal has successfully preserved the judicial consistency.
    Relation: 問題與研究, 39(10), 1-43
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[問題與研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    1-43.pdf3058KbAdobe PDF2919View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback