政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/65110

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/65110

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51717269 Online Users : 523

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of International Affairs > Department of Diplomacy > Theses > Item 140.119/65110

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/65110

Title:	攻勢現實主義與新自由制度主義的交鋒：2000-2008年的美韓關係 The Confrontation of Offensive Realism and Neoliberal Institutionalism: the U.S.-South Korea Relations from 2000 to 2008
Authors:	汪源晧 Wang, Yuan Hao
Contributors:	李明 Lee, Ming 汪源晧 Wang, Yuan Hao
Keywords:	美韓關係攻勢現實主義新自由制度主義小布希金大中盧武鉉 the U.S.-South Korea realtions offensive realism neoliberal institutionalism George W. Bush Kim Dae-jung Roh Moo-hyun
Date:	2013
Issue Date:	2014-04-01 11:22:10 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	二次世界大戰時，美國擊敗日本，使朝鮮半島脫離殖民統治，然而隨後的美蘇冷戰，使得朝鮮半島分裂成南北兩韓，而美國與南韓簽訂條約，成立美韓同盟(U.S.–South Korea Alliance)，成為繼日本之後，美國在亞洲的另一個戰略同盟。冷戰與後冷戰期間，美韓關係雖有波折，但不影響美韓同盟的強度。直到2000年美國小布希就任，其強硬的北韓政策與南韓金大中的陽光政策形成對比，成了美韓關係不協調的開端。而後連任的小布希延續其北韓政策，南韓繼任的盧武鉉將陽光政策擴大實施，推出和平繁榮政策，美韓兩國的北韓政策再度不同調，兩國關係持續跌宕起伏至2008年。本研究試圖以攻勢現實主義分析美國此時期的北韓政策；以新自由制度主義檢視南韓的交往政策，透過理論交鋒研究兩國利益的差異，並檢視外部因素如中國、日本、俄羅斯的影響，進而解釋此時期美韓關係不協調的原因。 In 1945, the U.S. defeated Japan. The Korean peninsula was liberated from Japanese colonization at the end of World War II. However, the confrontation between the U.S. and the Soviet Union left two Koreas separated by the Demilitarized Zone from the Cold War to the present. In addition, based on the Mutual Defense Treaty Between the United States of America and the Republic of Korea, the U.S.–South Korea Alliance was established. During the Cold War and Post Cold War era, the U.S.-South Korea relations faced hard times, but the alliance remained strong. When George W. Bush became the president of the U.S. in the year 2000, his hardline policy toward North Korea collided with South Korea’s Sunshine Policy, which was made by the president Kim Dae-jung. These different policies toward the North caused tensions to the U.S.-South Korea relations. Then the re-elected Bush continued hardline policy against North Korea, but South Korea’s new president—Roh Moo-hyun—decided to inherit the sunshine policy and develop Peace and Prosperity Policy. Washington and Seoul still failed to reach a consensus on how to deal with Pyongyang. The U.S.-South Korea relations continued to fluctuate until 2008. This study tries to analyze the U.S. policy toward North Korea through offensive realism and examine South Korean engagement policy through neoliberal institutionalism from 2000 to 2008. Besides, this thesis also considers exogenous factors such as China, Japan, and Russia, trying to explain the inconstancy of the U.S.-South Korea relations.
Reference:	一、中文部分（一）專書王文科等，《教育研究法》。台北：五南圖書出版公司，2006。李明，《南北韓政經發展與東北亞安全》。台北：五南圖書出版公司，1998。呂亞力，《政治學方法論》。台北：三民書局，1997。林子洋，《飛彈防禦與國家安全》。台北：幼獅文化，2000。金大中著，王坤譯，《金大中自述：為了民主，我不後悔》。北京：中央編譯出版社，2010。易君博，《政治理論與研究方法》。台北：三民書局，1993。哈拉利(Oren Harari)著，樂為良譯，《鮑爾風範：迎戰變局的領導智慧與勇氣》。台北：美商麥格羅．希爾出版社，2002。胡春惠等編，《東北亞發展的回顧與展望國際學術討論會論文選集》。台北縣新店市：正中書局，2003。徐家仁，《彈道飛彈與彈道飛彈防禦》。台北：麥田出版，2003。劉德海，《八〇年代中期以來的南韓對外關係：經貿外交成功的實例》。台北：作者自印，1997。關中，《意識形態與美國外交政策》。台北：台灣商務印書館，2005。簡江作，《韓國歷史》。台北：五南圖書出版公司，1998。（二）期刊文正仁，〈金大中、盧武鉉政府時期『和解合作』政策的重新認知—超越歪曲，發現真相〉。《韓國研究論叢》，第20輯，頁12-29。王傳劍，〈朝鮮半島問題與中美關係〉。《國際政治研究》，第3期，2005年，頁46-53。巨克毅，〈當前美國的東亞戰略分析〉。《全球政治評論》，第21期，2008年，頁19-44。石源華、汪偉民，〈美日、美韓同盟比較研究—兼論美日韓安全互動與東北亞安全〉。《國際觀察》，2006年第1期，頁61-68。朱松柏，〈南北韓高峰會的意義與前景〉。《問題與研究》，第30卷，第10期，2000年10月，頁46-56。朱松柏，〈南北韓的軍備競賽與區域安全〉。《問題與研究》，第35卷，第期，1996年4月，頁17-27。朱松柏，〈南北韓新政府的統一政策及其進展〉。《問題與研究》，第38卷，第11期，1999年11月，頁19-30。安成日，〈關於當代日韓關係研究中的若干問題〉。《當代韓國》，2010年夏季號，頁89-100 。朱峰，〈第三輪朝核六方會談與美國的策略變化〉。《現代國際關係》，第7期，2004，頁1-7。河凡植，〈和平繁榮政策與韓中關係的發展〉。《問題與研究》，第47卷，第1期，2008年3月，頁127-149。李明，〈「信心建立措施」在朝鮮半島：實踐與成效〉。《戰略與國際關係》第2卷，第1期，2000年1月，頁56-82。李明，〈金大中總統陽光政策的績效與評價〉。收錄在《東北亞發展的回顧與展望國際學術討論會論文選集》。台北縣新店市：正中，2003，頁215-230。李明，〈六方會談共同文件與北韓終止核武計畫〉。《戰略安全研析》，第31 期，2007年11月，頁38-41。李明，〈兩韓第二次高峰會後的東北亞局勢〉。《展望與探索》，第5卷，第11期，2007年，頁11-15。李軍，〈試析盧武鉉政府的「均衡者外交」〉。《現代國際關係》，第12期，2005年，頁29-34。沈定昌，〈陽光政策的出台背景〉。《當代韓國》，冬季號，2006，頁14-19。李雪威，〈韓日矛盾以及韓美日同盟變化評析〉。《延邊教育學院學報》，第19卷，第5期，2005年10月，頁37-38。李華，〈冷戰後駐韓美軍調整評述〉。《國際觀察》，第1期，2004年，頁56-63。林正義，〈美國、北韓與「二一三聯合聲明」〉。《戰略安全研析》，第24期，2007年4月，頁 6-9。林博文，〈美政壇的黑玫瑰傳奇〉。《亞洲週刊》，第19卷，第7期，2005，頁14-16。陳世民，〈美國亞太駐軍的戰略調整與台海安全〉。《全球政治評論》，第9期，2005年，頁85-99。黃奎博，〈論新保守主義及其對美國東南亞外交與安全政策之影響〉。《全球政治評論》，第16期，2006年10月，頁49-72。黃益盟，顧長永，〈從國際關係理論檢視中國與緬甸的反毒合作〉。《全球政治評論》，第44期，2013年，頁19-46。盛海燕，〈俄羅斯在朝鮮半島：現狀及前景〉。《遼東學院學報(社會科學版)》，第12卷，第5期，2010年10月，頁23-28。鄭端耀，〈國際關係「新自由制度主義」理論之評析〉。《問題與研究》，第36卷，第12期，1997年12月，頁1-22。鄭端耀，〈布希政府安全戰略發展評析〉。《遠景基金會季刊》，第4卷，第2期，2003年3月，頁1-37。鄭端耀，〈國際關係攻勢與守勢現實主義理論爭辯之評析〉。《問題與研究》第42卷，第2期，2003年3、4月，頁1-18。盧業中，〈論國際關係理論之新自由制度主義〉。《問題與研究》，第41卷，第2期，2002年，頁43-66。賴榮偉，〈新功能主義與兩岸關係發展〉。《龍華科技大學學報》，第三十三期，6月，2013，頁192-218。韓獻棟，〈駐韓美軍與韓美同盟〉。《當代亞太》，第11期，2004，頁25-32。魏志江，〈論韓國盧武鉉的「和平繁榮」政策及其對東北亞戰略格局的影響〉。《當代韓國》，秋季號，2006年，頁22-28。（三）報紙《聯合報》《經濟日報》（四）網路資料中華人民共和國常駐聯合國代表團 http://www.china-un.org/chn/ 亞太和平研究基金會 http://www.faps.org.tw/index.aspx 新紀元週刊 http://epochweekly.com 國防新聞網 http://www.ewdefense.com 朝鮮日報中文網 http://cn.chosun.com/big5/ 二、英文部分（一）專書 Art, Robert J. and Patrick M. Cronin. The United States and Coercive Diplomacy. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 2003. Brzezinski, Zbigniew. The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives. New York: Basic Books, 1998. George, Alexander and William Simons. The Limits of Coercive Diplomacy: Second Edition. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1994. Hunt, Michael H. Ideology and U.S. Foreign Policy. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 1987. Keohane, Robert O. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1984. Krasner, Stephen. ed. International Regimes. New York: Cornell University Press, 1983. Mearsheimer, John J. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton& Company, 2003. Moen, James. Rise of the Vulcans: The History of Bush’s War Cabinet. New York: Penguin Books, 2004. Perry, William J. Review of United States Policy toward North Korea: Findings and Recommendations. Office of the North Korea Policy Coordinator, U.S. Department of State, October 12, 1999. Ragin, Charles C. The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkley: University of California Press, 1987. Schelling, Thomas. Arms and Influence. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood, 1976. Waltz, Kenneth N. Theory of International Politics. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1979. （二）期刊 Cha, Victor. “Hawk Engagement Preventive Defense on the Korean Peninsula.” International Security, vol. 27, no. 1, Summer 2002, pp. 40-78. Cha,Victor D. “The Debate over North Korea.” Political Science Quarterly, vol. 119, no. 2, Summer 2004, pp. 229-254. Cho, llsoo David and Meredith Jung-En Woo. “North Korea in 2006: The Year of Living Dangerously.” Asian Survey, vol. 47, no.1, pp. 68-73. Chung, Oknim. “The 21st Century International Security Outlook and the U.S.-ROK Military Alliance.” Korea and World Affairs, Fall 2003, pp. 329-341. Eberstadt, Nicholas. “Reflections on the Bush Administration`s North Korea Policy.” Korea and World Affairs, Spring 2009, pp. 45-60. Harrison, Selig S. “Did North Korea Cheat?” Foreign Affairs, vol. 84, no.1, January/ February, 2005, pp. 99-110. Hong, Hyun-lk. “Evolving U.S.-ROK-DPRK Relations and the Future of the ROK-U.S. Alliance.” Korea and World Affairs, Winter 2002, pp. 484-498. Ikenberry, G. John. “America’s Imperial Ambition.” Foreign Affairs, vol. 81, no. 5, 2002, pp. 44-60. Jung, Heon-joo. “The Rise and Fall of Anti-American Sentiment in South Korea.”Asian Survey, vol. 50, no. 5, 2010, pp. 946-964. Keohane, Robert. “International Institutions: Two Approaches.” International Studies Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 4, 1988, pp. 379-396. Kim, Changsu. “Korea-U.S. Relations in the Second Bush Administration.” Korea and World Affairs, Winter 2004, pp. 361-390. Kim, Hakjoon. “Sunshine or Thunder? Tension between the Kim and Bush Administrations in Historical Perspective.” Korea Observer, vol. 34, no. 1, Spring 2003, pp. 1-40. . Kim, Woosang. “The ROK-U.S. Alliance and Korea’s Security Strategy for the 21st Century.” Korea Observer, vol. 36, no. 3, Autumn 2005, pp. 429-443. Koh, Yu-hwan. “Roh Moo-hyun Administration’s North Korea Policy and Nuclear Crisis Management.” Korea and World Affairs, Spring 2006, pp. 5-30. Kotch, John Barry. “U.S. Policy toward the Korean Peninsula.” Korea and World Affairs, Summer 2006, pp. 165-184. Olsen, Edward A. “‘Axis of Evil’: Impact on U.S.-Korean Relations.” Korea and World Affairs, Summer 2002, pp. 184-197. Park, Jongchul. “Seoul’s Engagement Policy towards Pyongyang—Setting, Framework and Conditions.” Korea and World Affairs, Spring 1999, pp. 5-25. Park, Jongchul. “North Korea’s Nuclear Crisis and the Six-Party Talks: Issues and Prospects.” International Journal of Korean Unification Studies, vol. 13, no. 1, 2004, pp. 85-112. Park, Kyung-Ae. “North Korea in 2003: Pendulum Swing between Crisis and Diplomacy.” Asian Survey, vol. 44, no.1, 2004, pp. 139-146. Park, Kyung-Ae. “North Korea in 2004: From Brisk Diplomacy to Impasse.” Asian Survey, vol. 45, no. 1, 2005, pp. 14-20. Powell, Robert. “Absolute and Relative Gains in International Relations Theory.” The American Political Science Review, vol. 85, no. 4, 1991, pp. 1303-1320. Park, Young-Ho. “U.S.- North Korea Relations and ROK-U.S. Policy Cooperation.” Korea and World Affairs, Spring 2002, pp. 5-19. Rice, Condoleezza. “Promoting National Interests.” Foreign Affairs, No. 79, vol. 1, January/ February, 2000, pp. 45-62. Scobell, Andrew. “Crouching Korea, Hidden China: Bush administration policy toward Pyongyang and Beijing.” Asian Survey, vol. 42, no. 2, 2002, pp. 343-368. Snyder, Scott. “New Challenges for U.S.-ROK Relations.” Korea and World Affairs, Spring 2000, pp. 29-45. Zhu, Zhiqun. “Small Power, Big Ambition—South Korea’s Role in Northeast Asian Security under President Roh Moo-hyun.” Korea and World Affairs, Summer 2007, pp. 146-171. （三）報章雜誌 Newsweek《新聞週刊》 New York Times《紐約時報》 The Guardian《衛報》 Time《時代雜誌》 Washington Monthly《華盛頓月刊》 Washington Post《華盛頓郵報》（四）網路資料 Fox News 福斯新聞網 http://www.foxnews.com GlobalSecurity. org 全球安全網站 http://www.globalsecurity.org Korean Central News Agency 北韓中央通訊社網站 http://www.kcna.co.jp/index-e.htm The East Asia Institute 東亞研究院網站 http://www.eai.or.kr/english/ The Rand Corporation 蘭德公司網站 http://www.rand.org United Nations 聯合國網站 http://www.un.org/en/ Yale Law School, Lillian Goldman Law Library 耶魯大學法學院利廉・戈德曼圖書館網站 http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/kor001.asp （五）官方資料 Bush, George. W., Statement on the Completion of the North Korean Policy Review. June 6, 2001. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PPP-2001-book1/pdf/PPP-2001-book1-doc-pg620.pdf International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA Inspection Team Conducting Investigation in South Korea. September 2, 2004. http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/pressreleases/2004/prn200408.html Ministry of National Defense, Republic of Korea, Defense White Paper 2008. http://www.mnd.go.kr/cop/pblictn/selectPublicationsUser.do?siteId=mnd_eng&componentId=51&id=mnd_eng_021400000000 Ministry of National Defense, Republic of Korea, Defense White Paper 2012. http://www.mnd.go.kr/cop/pblictn/selectPublicationsUser.do?siteId=mnd_eng&componentId=51&id=mnd_eng_021400000000 Powell, Collin L., Remarks With Foreign Minister Han Seung-soo of South Korea After Their Meeting. September 18, 2001. http://2001-2009.state.gov/secretary/former/powell/remarks/2001/4937.htm The United States of America and the Republic of Korea, US-ROK Status of Forces Agreement Amendments 2001. http://www.usfk.mil/usfk/sofa.2001.revised.agreements.78 The White House, The National Security Strategy of the United States of America. September 2002. http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/63562.pdf U.S. Department of Defense, Quadrennial Defense Review Report. September 30, 2001. http://www.defense.gov/qdr/ 三、韓文部分（一）官方資料《남북기본합의서》《南北基本協議書》《대한민국헌법》《大韓民國憲法》《노동당 규약》《北韓勞動黨規約》《사회주의헌법》《北韓社會主義憲法》 통일부, 국민의 정부 5년 평화와 협력의 실천, 서울: 통일부, 2003. 統一部，《國民的政府五年和平與合作的實踐》。首爾：統一部，2003。 통일부, 참여정부3년 평화번영정책 성과, 서울: 통일부 통일교육원, 2006. 統一部，《參與政府三年和平繁榮政策成果》。首爾：統一部統一教育院， 2006。 참여정부 4년 대북정책성과 홍보책자. 參與政府四年對北政策成果宣傳小冊子。 http://www.unikorea.go.kr/board/view.do?boardId=BO0000000077&menuCd=DOM_000000105003004000&startPage=7&dataSid=216017 （二）報紙《중앙일보》《中央日報》《동아일보》《東亞日報》《한겨레》《韓民族新聞》
Description:	碩士國立政治大學外交研究所 99253006 102
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099253006
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Diplomacy] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
300601.pdf	7809Kb	Adobe PDF2	214	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback