English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51599963      Online Users : 767
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/65086


    Title: 影響大眾環境風險認知及政策支持因素之跨層次分析
    Predicting Environmental Risk Perception and Policy Support: A Multilevel Model
    Authors: 蘇民欣
    Su, Min Hsin
    Contributors: 施琮仁
    Shih, Tsung Jen
    蘇民欣
    Su, Min Hsin
    Keywords: 環境風險認知
    環境政策支持
    個人價值觀
    文化取向
    發展程度
    environmental risk perception
    policy support
    self-transcendence
    self-enhancement
    cultural orientation
    development levels
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2014-04-01 11:17:50 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在探討利己及利他價值觀如何影響大眾環境風險認知及政策支持,並進一步探討其影響是否受到風險規模、文化取向、及國家發展程度之影響。資料來源為世界價值觀調查(World Value Survey)第五波資料,以Schwartz的「人類價值觀理論」為理論基礎,測量個人利己及利他價值觀,並依風險規模將環境風險認知分為全球性及地區性。統計方法使用層級迴歸,同時檢驗國家層級變項(文化取向及發展程度)對個人層級變項之跨層級調節效果。研究結果顯示大眾對環境風險的感知及反應,受到其價值觀的影響,但針對不同規模的風險議題,在不同文化取向及發展程度的國家,其影響有顯著不同。
    Environmental issues have received much public and media attention abroad and at home. With the increased environmental awareness, there is a strong call for relevant policies and regulations aimed at sustainable development. To ensure sufficient public support, it is crucial to develop a fuller understanding of factors and processes underlying people’s willingness to help protect the environment when making decisions as consumers and citizens.
    This study aims to predict people’s environmental risk perception and policy support as a function of their values. Specifically, Schwartz’s self-transcendence and self-enhancement value clusters will be examined as determinants to understand why few people choose to make collectively beneficial decisions.
    Three extensions were made. First, instead of focusing on low-cost lifestyle changes, this study examined policy support that requires substantial personal costs. Second, global and local environmental risk perceptions are treated as two qualitatively different constructs according to their geographical scales. Finally, this study moves beyond an individualistic approach, incorporating country-level forces into the model.
    Information about the individuals are based on variables measured in the World Value Survey (2005), while cultural orientations and levels of development are measured by the Schwartz Value Survey (2005) and the Human Development Index (2005) respectively. Hierarchical regression are employed, with the nature of interaction being revealed by plotting techniques.
    The results suggested that perception and responses to environmental risks reflect their most basic value priorities and life goals. Consequently, environmental persuasive messages are most effective when intended behaviors are framed as fulfilling important life goals. However, the effects of person-level constructs greatly vary with social contexts and issue scales, suggesting that different strategies are preferred when dealing with risks associated with different geographical frame. Finally, cultural orientations and levels of development will influence the way members of a society respond to environmental threats. Practical implications for environmental risk communication are proposed and discussed.
    Reference: Adeola, F. O. (2007). Nativity and environmental risk perception: An empirical study of native-born and foreign-born residents of the USA. Human Ecology Review 14 (1): 13-25.
    Amerigo, M., & Gonzalez, A. (2001). Environmental values and beliefs in relation to decisions on ecological dilemmas. Estudios de Psicologia, 22, 65-73.
    Anderson, B. A., Romani, J. H., Phillips, H., Wentzel, M., & Tlabela, K. (2007). Exploring environmental perceptions, behaviors and awareness: water and water pollution in South Africa. Population and Environment, 28(3), 133-161.
    Antweiler, W., Copeland, B. and Taylor, S. (2001). Is Free Trade Good for the Environment? American Economic Review, 91 (4), 877-908.
    Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta‐analytic review. British journal of social psychology, 40(4), 471-499.
    Armitage, C. J., & Christian, J. (2003). From attitudes to behaviour: Basic and applied research on the theory of planned behaviour. Current Psychology, 22(3), 187-195.
    Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of environmental psychology, 27(1), 14-25.
    Banerjee, B., & McKeage, K. (1994). How green is my value: exploring the relationship between environmentalism and materialism. Advances in consumer research, 21, 147-147.
    Barr, S. (2007). Factors Influencing Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors A UK Case Study of Household Waste Management. Environment and behavior, 39(4), 435-473.
    Beckmann, S. C., Kilbourne, W. E., van Dam, Y., & Pardo, M. (1997).
    Anthropocentrism, Value Systems, and Environmental Attitudes: A Multi-National Comparison. Australasian Marketing Journal 13 (2), 2005
    Beck, U., Lash, S., & Giddens, A. (1997). Reflexive modernization: politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Polity.
    Berger, I. E. (1997). The demographics of recycling and the structure of environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 29(4), 515-531.
    Bickerstaff, K. (2004). Risk perception research: socio-cultural perspectives on the public experience of air pollution. Environment international, 30(6), 827-840.
    Biel, A., & Nilsson, A. (2005). Religious Values and Environmental Concern: Harmony and Detachment. Social Science Quarterly, 86(1), 178-191.
    Blocker, T. J., & Ekberg, D. L. (1997). Gender and environmentalism: Results from the 1993 general social survey. Social Science Quarterly, 78(4), 842-858.
    Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2010). A cross-national perspective on youth environmental attitudes. The Environmentalist, 30(2), 133-144.
    Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2013). A Cross-Cultural Study of Environmental Values and Their Effect on the Environmental Behavior of Children. Environment and Behavior, 45(5), 551-583.
    Bond, M. H. (2002). Reclaiming the individual from Hofstede`s ecological analysis — a 20-year odyssey: comment on Oyserman et al.(2002), Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 73-77.
    Bonnes, M., Uzzell, D., Carrus, G., & Kelay, T. (2007). Inhabitants` and experts` assessments of environmental quality for urban sustainability. Journal of Social Issues, 63(1), 59-78.
    Brechin, S. R., & Kempton, W. (1994). Global environmentalism: A challenge to the postmaterialism thesis?. Social Science Quarterly, 75(2), 245-269.
    Brody, G. H., Stoneman, Z., & Gauger, K. (1996). Parent‐Child Relationships, Family Problem‐Solving Behavior, and Sibling Relationship Quality: The Moderating Role of Sibling Temperaments. Child Development, 67(3), 1289-1300.
    Brody, S. D., Zahran, S., Vedlitz, A., & Grover, H. (2008). Examining the
    relationship between physical vulnerability and public perceptions of global climate change in the United States. Environment and behavior, 40(1), 72-95.
    Carlisle, J., & Smith, E. R. (2005). Postmaterialism vs. Egalitarianism as Predictors of Energy-related Attitudes 1. Environmental Politics, 14(4), 527-540.
    Chung, S. S., & Leung, M. M. Y. (2007). The value-action gap in waste recycling: The case of undergraduates in Hong Kong. Environmental management, 40(4), 603-612.
    Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Psychology Press.
    Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.
    Collins, C. M., Steg, L., & Koning, M. A. (2007). Customers` values, beliefs on sustainable corporate performance, and buying behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 24(6), 555-577.
    Contorno, L. (2012). The Influence of Cosmopolitan Values on Environmental Attitudes: An International Comparison. Res Publica-Journal of Undergraduate Research, 17(1), 7.
    Cordano, M., Welcomer, S., Scherer, R. F., Pradenas, L., & Parada, V. (2011). A Cross-Cultural Assessment of Three Theories of Pro-Environmental Behavior A Comparison Between Business Students of Chile and the United States. Environment and Behavior, 43(5), 634-657.
    Corraliza, J. A., & Berenguer, J. (2000). Environmental Values, Beliefs, and Actions A Situational Approach. Environment and Behavior, 32(6), 832-848.
    Costarelli, S., & Colloca, P. (2004). The effects of attitudinal ambivalence on pro-environmental behavioural intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(3), 279-288.
    Davis, D. W. (2000). Individual Level Examination of Postmaterialism in the US: Political Tolerance, Racial Attitudes, Environmentalism, and Participatory Norms. Political Research Quarterly, 53(3), 455-475.
    Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual review of psychology, 31(1), 169-193.
    De Clercq, S., Fontaine, J. R., & Anseel, F. (2008). In search of a comprehensive value model for assessing supplementary person—organization fit. The Journal of psychology, 142(3), 277-302.
    De Groot, J. & Steg, L. (2007). General beliefs and the theory of planned behavior: The role of environmental concerns in the TPB. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(8), 1817-1836.
    De Groot, J. I., & Steg, L. (2008). Value Orientations to Explain Beliefs Related to Environmental Significant Behavior How to Measure Egoistic, Altruistic, and Biospheric Value Orientations. Environment and Behavior, 40(3), 330-354.
    DeHaven-Smith, L. (1988). Environmental belief systems. Environment and Behavior, 20(2), 176-199.
    Deng, J., Walker, G. J., & Swinnerton, G. (2006). A comparison of environmental values and attitudes between Chinese in Canada and Anglo-Canadians. Environment and Behavior, 38(1), 22-47.
    De Young, R. (2000). New ways to promote proenvironmental behavior: expanding and evaluating motives for environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 509-526.
    Dietz, T., Dan, A., & Shwom, R. (2007). Support for Climate Change Policy: Social Psychological and Social Structural Influences*. Rural Sociology, 72(2), 185-214.
    Dietz, T., Fitzgerald, A., & Shwom, R. (2005). Environmental values. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 30, 335-372.
    Dietz, T., Kalof, L., & Stern, P. C. (2002). Gender, values, and environmentalism. Social Science Quarterly, 83(1), 353-364.
    Dunlap, R. E., & Scarce, R. (1991). Poll trends: Environmental problems and protection. The public opinion quarterly, 55(4), 651-672.
    Dunlap, R. E., & York, R. (2008). The globalization of environmental concern and the limits of the postmaterialist values explanation: Evidence from four multinational surveys. The Sociological Quarterly, 49(3), 529-563.
    Ehrhardt‐Martinez, K., Crenshaw, E. M., & Jenkins, J. C. (2002). Deforestation and the Environmental Kuznets Curve: A Cross‐National Investigation of Intervening Mechanisms. Social Science Quarterly, 83(1), 226-243.
    Eriksson, L., Garvill, J., & Nordlund, A. M. (2006). Acceptability of travel demand management measures: The importance of problem awareness, personal norm, freedom, and fairness. Journal of environmental psychology, 26(1), 15-26.
    Fairbrother, M. (2012). Rich people, poor people, and environmental concern: Evidence across nations and time. European Sociological Review.
    Fauber, R., Forehand, R., Thomas, A. M., & Wierson, M. (1990). A mediational model of the impact of marital conflict on adolescent adjustment in intact and divorced families: The role of disrupted parenting. Child development,
    61(4), 1112-1123.
    Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U., & Gächter, S. (2002). Strong reciprocity, human cooperation, and the enforcement of social norms. Human nature, 13(1), 1-25.
    Felix, A. T., Asuamah, S. Y., & Darkwa, B. (2013). Are Demographic Variables Determinants Of Recycling Behaviour In Ghana?. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 2(7).
    Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. The handbook of attitudes, 173-222.
    Flaccus, G. (2006). Latino environmental activists shaping urban agenda. People’s World. Retrieved from http://www.peoplesworld.org/latino-environmental-activists-shaping-urban- agenda/
    Flint, S., Markle, T., Thompson, S., & Wallace, E. (2012). Bisphenol A exposure, effects, and policy: A wildlife perspective. Journal of environmental management, 104, 19-34.
    Tronu, G. (2012). General Environmental Attitudes and Beliefs: The Spatial Bias and the NHIP Scale.
    Fontaine, J. R., Poortinga, Y. H., Delbeke, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2008). Structural Equivalence of the Values Domain Across Cultures Distinguishing Sampling Fluctuations From Meaningful Variation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(4), 345-365.
    Fransson, N., & Gärling, T. (1999). Environmental concern: Conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings. Journal of environmental psychology, 19(4), 369-382.
    Franzen, A. (2003). Environmental attitudes in international comparison: An analysis of the ISSP surveys 1993 and 2000*. Social Science Quarterly,84(2), 297-308.
    Franzen, A., & Meyer, R. (2010). Environmental attitudes in cross-national perspective: A multilevel analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000. European Sociological Review, 26(2), 219-234.
    Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of counseling psychology, 51(1), 115.
    Fuhrman, T., & Holmbeck, G. N. (1995). A Contextual‐Moderator Analysis of Emotional Autonomy and Adjustment in Adolescence. Child development, 66(3), 793-811.
    Gardner, B., & Abraham, C. (2010). Going green? Modeling the impact of environmental concerns and perceptions of transportation alternatives on decisions to drive. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(4), 831-849.
    Gatersleben, B., Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2002). Measurement and determinants of environmentally significant consumer behavior. Environment and Behavior,34(3), 335-362.
    Gelissen, J. (2007). Explaining Popular Support for Environmental Protection A Multilevel Analysis of 50 Nations. Environment and Behavior, 39(3), 392-415.
    George, D., & Mallery P. (2009). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Study Guide and Reference, 17.0 Update, 10/e. Pearson Education.
    Gifford, R. (2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist, 66(4), 290.
    Gifford, R., Scannell, L., Kormos, C., Smolova, L., Biel, A., Boncu, S., ... & Uzzell, D. (2009). Temporal pessimism and spatial optimism in environmental assessments: An 18-nation study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 1-12.
    Gouveia, V. V. (2002). Self, culture, and sustainable development. In Psychology of sustainable development (pp. 151-174). Springer US.
    Grendstad, G., & Selle, P. (1997). Cultural theory, postmaterialism and environmental attitudes. Culture matters: Essays in honor of Aaron Wildavsky, 151-168.
    Guber, D. L. (2002). The grassroots of a green revolution: Polling America on the environment. MIT Press.
    Gupta, S., & Ogden, D. T. (2009). To buy or not to buy? A social dilemma perspective on green buying. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(6), 376-391.
    Gärling, T., Fujii, S., Gärling, A., & Jakobsson, C. (2003). Moderating effects of social value orientation on determinants of proenvironmental behavior intention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(1), 1-9.
    Gökşen, F., Adaman, F., & Ünal Zenginobuz, E. (2002). On environmental concern, willingness to pay, and postmaterialist values evidence from Istanbul. Environment and Behavior, 34(5), 616-633.
    Hansen, T., Risborg, M. S., & Steen, C. D. (2012). Understanding consumer purchase of free‐of cosmetics: A value‐driven TRA approach. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11(6), 477-486.
    Hansla, A., Gärling, T., & Biel, A. (2013). Attitude toward environmental policy measures related to value orientation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(3), 582-590.
    Hansla, A., Gamble, A., Juliusson, A., & Gärling, T. (2008). The relationships between awareness of consequences, environmental concern, and value orientations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(1), 1-9.
    Harris, P. G. (2006). Environmental Perspectives and Behavior in China Synopsis and Bibliography. Environment and Behavior, 38(1), 5-21.
    Hatfield, J., Job, R., Carter, N. L., Peploe, P., Taylor, R., & Morrell, S. (2001). The influence of psychological factors on self-reported physiological effects of noise. Noise and health, 3(10), 1.
    Head, L., Trigger, D., & Mulcock, J. (2005). Culture as concept and influence in environmental research and management. Conservation and Society, 3(2), 251.
    Hechavarria, D. M., & Reynolds, P. D. (2009). Cultural norms & business start-ups: the impact of national values on opportunity and necessity entrepreneurs. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 5(4), 417-437.
    Hersch, J., & Viscusi, W. K. (2006). The generational divide in support for environmental policies: European evidence. Climatic Change, 77(1-2), 121-136.
    Hine, D. W., Marks, A. D., Nachreiner, M., Gifford, R., & Heath, Y. (2007). Keeping the home fires burning: The affect heuristic and wood smoke pollution. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 26-32.
    Hinds, J., & Sparks, P. (2008). Engaging with the natural environment: The role of affective connection and identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(2), 109-120.
    Hofstede, G. (2001), Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations, 2nd ed. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
    Hunter, L. M., Hatch, A., & Johnson, A. (2004). Cross‐National Gender Variation in Environmental Behaviors*. Social Science Quarterly, 85(3), 677-694.
    Inglehart, R., & Abramson, P. R. (1994). Economic Security and Value Change. American Political Science Review, 88(02), 336-354.
    Inglehart, R. (1995). Public support for environmental protection: Objective problems and subjective values in 43 societies. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(01), 57-72.
    Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies (Vol. 19). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Jakovcevic, A., & Steg, L. (2013). Sustainable transportation in Argentina: Values, beliefs, norms and car use reduction. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 20, 70-79.
    James, L. R., & Brett, J. M. (1984). Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2), 307.
    Jansson, J., Marell, A., & Nordlund, A. (2011). Exploring consumer adoption of a high involvement eco‐innovation using value‐belief‐norm theory. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 10(1), 51-60.
    Jain, S. K., & Kaur, G. (2006). Role of socio-demographics in segmenting and profiling green consumers: an exploratory study of consumers in India. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 18(3), 107-146.
    Jen, M. H., Jones, K., & Johnston, R. (2009). Global variations in health: evaluating Wilkinson`s income inequality hypothesis using the World Values Survey. Social science & medicine, 68(4), 643-653.
    Johnson, C. Y., Bowker, J. M., & Cordell, H. K. (2004). Ethnic Variation in Environmental Belief and Behavior An Examination of the New Ecological Paradigm in a Social Psychological Context. Environment and Behavior, 36(2), 157-186.
    Kaiser, F. G. (2006). A moral extension of the theory of planned behavior: Norms and anticipated feelings of regret in conservationism. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(1), 71-81.
    Kemmelmeier, M., Krol, G., & Kim, Y. H. (2002). Values, economics, and proenvironmental attitudes in 22 societies. Cross-Cultural Research, 36(3), 256-285.
    Khanna, N., & Plassmann, F. (2004). The demand for environmental quality and the environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis. Ecological Economics,51(3), 225-236.
    Kilbourne, W., & Pickett, G. (2008). How materialism affects environmental beliefs, concern, and environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Business Research, 61(9), 885-893.
    Kilbourne, W. E., Suzanne C., Beckmann, A. L., & Ynte van Dam (2001). A Multi-National Examination of the Role of the Dominant Social Paradigm in Environmental Attitudes of University Students, Environment & Behavior, 33 (2): 209-28.
    Kalof, L., Dietz, T., Guagnano, G., & Stern, P. C. (2002). Race, gender and environmentalism: The atypical values and beliefs of white men. Race, Gender & Class, 112-130.
    Kaplan, S. (2000). New ways to promote proenvironmental behavior: Human nature and environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of social issues,56(3), 491-508.
    Kilbourne, W., Grünhagen, M., & Foley, J. (2005). A cross-cultural examination of the relationship between materialism and individual values. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(5), 624-641.
    Kline, P. (2013). Handbook of psychological testing. Routledge.
    Lai, C. L. J., Brennan, A., Chan, H. M., & Tao, J. (2003). Disposition toward environmental hazards in Hong Kong Chinese: Validation of a Chinese version of the environmental appraisal inventory (EAI-C). Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(4), 369-384.
    Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro-Forleo, G. (2001). Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. Journal of consumer marketing, 18(6), 503-520.
    Larock, S., & Baxter, J. (2013). Local facility hazard risk controversy and non-local hazard risk perception. Journal of Risk Research, 16(6), 713-732.
    Lazo, J. K., Kinnell, J. C., & Fisher, A. (2000). Expert and layperson perceptions of ecosystem risk. Risk Analysis, 20(2), 179-194.
    Lea, E., & Worsley, T. (2005). Australians` organic food beliefs, demographics and values. British food journal, 107(11), 855-869.
    Lehman, D. R., Chiu, C. Y., & Schaller, M. (2004). Psychology and culture. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 55, 689-714.
    Leiserowitz, A. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic change, 77(1-2), 45-72.
    Leiserowitz, A. A., Kates, R. W., & Parris, T. M. (2006). Sustainability values, attitudes, and behaviors: A review of multinational and global trends. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 31, 413-444.
    Lerner, J. S., Gonzalez, R. M., Small, D. A., & Fischhoff, B. (2003). Effects of Fear and Anger on Perceived Risks of Terrorism A National Field Experiment. Psychological science, 14(2), 144-150.
    Leslie, K. E. (2013). Mending the gap: Latino involvement with mainstream and local environmental organizations a pilot study in Los Angeles County, California (Doctoral dissertation, Humboldt State University).
    Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. (2004). Social Axioms: A Model for Social Beliefs in Multicultural Perspective, Advances in experimental social psychology, 36, 119-197.
    Lima, M. L., & Castro, P. (2005). Cultural theory meets the community: Worldviews and local issues. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(1), 23-35.
    Lindeman, M., & Verkasalo, M. (2005). Measuring values with the short Schwartz`s value survey. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85(2), 170-178.
    Liu, J. H., & Sibley, C. G. (2012). Hope for the Future? Understanding Self‐Sacrifice Among Young Citizens of the World in the Face of Global Warming. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 12(1), 190-203.
    Lubell, M. (2002). Environmental activism as collective action. Environment and Behavior, 34(4), 431-454.
    Luo, Y. (2001). Antecedents and consequences of personal attachment in cross-cultural cooperative ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), 177-201.
    Lynch, B. D. (1993). The garden and the sea: US Latino environmental discourses and mainstream environmentalism. Social Problems, 108-124.
    Marquart-Pyatt, S. T. (2007). Concern for the environment among general publics: A cross-national study. Society & natural resources, 20(10), 883-898.
    Marquart-Pyatt, S. T. (2012). Contextual influences on environmental concerns cross-nationally: A multilevel investigation. Social science research, 41(5), 1085-1099.
    Marris, E. (2006). Putting the carbon back: Black is the new green. Nature, 442(7103), 624-626.
    Matsumoto, D., & Juang, L. (2012). Culture and psychology. Cengage Learning.
    McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological bulletin, 114(2), 376.
    McLeod, J., Pan, Z., & Rucinski, D. (1995). Levels of analysis in public opinion research. Public opinion and the communication of consent, 55-85.
    Menzel, S., & Bögeholz, S. (2010). Values, beliefs and norms that foster Chilean and German pupils` commitment to protect biodiversity. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 5(1).
    Mertig, A. G., & Dunlap, R. E. (2001). Environmentalism, New Social Movements, and the New Class: A Cross‐National Investigation*. Rural Sociology, 66(1), 113-136.
    Milfont, T. L., Duckitt, J., & Wagner, C. (2010). A Cross‐Cultural Test of the Value–Attitude–Behavior Hierarchy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(11), 2791-2813.
    Milfont, T. L., & Sibley, C. G. (2012). The big five personality traits and environmental engagement: Associations at the individual and societal level. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(2), 187-195.
    Milfont, T. L., Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2010). Testing the moderating role of the components of norm activation on the relationship between values and environmental behavior. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 41(1), 124-131.
    Milfont, T. L., Wilson, J., & Diniz, P. (2012). Time perspective and environmental engagement: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Psychology, 47(5), 325-334.
    Montano, D. E., & Kasprzyk, D. (2008). Theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behavior, and the integrated behavioral model. Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice, 4, 67-95.
    Mukherjee, S., & Chakraborty, D. (2010). Do Non-Economic Factors Influence Environmental Performance of a Country?, In Asia Pacific Economic Association Sixth Annual Conference (APEA 2010).
    Noe, F. P., & Snow, R. (1990). The new environmental paradigm and further scale analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 21(4), 20-26.
    Nordlund, A. M., & Garvill, J. (2002). Value structures behind proenvironmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 34(6), 740-756.
    Nordlund, A. M., & Garvill, J. (2003). Effects of values, problem awareness, and personal norm on willingness to reduce personal car use. Journal of environmental psychology, 23(4), 339-347.
    Olli, E., Grendstad, G., & Wollebaek, D. (2001). Correlates of environmental behaviors bringing back social context. Environment and behavior, 33(2), 181-208.
    Olofsson, A., & Ö hman, S. (2006). General Beliefs and Environmental Concern Transatlantic Comparisons. Environment and Behavior, 38(6), 768-790.
    Onur, A., Sahin, E., & Tekkaya, C. (2012). An investigation on value orientations, attitudes and concern towards the environment: the case of Turkish elementary school students. Environmental Education Research, 18(2), 271-297.
    Oreg, S., & Katz-Gerro, T. (2006). Predicting proenvironmental behavior cross-nationally values, the theory of planned behavior, and value-belief-norm theory. Environment and Behavior, 38(4), 462-483.
    Pahl, S., Harris, P. R., Todd, H. A., & Rutter, D. R. (2005). Comparative optimism for environmental risks. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(1), 1-11.
    Park, H., Russell, C., & Lee, J. (2007). National culture and environmental sustainability: A cross-national analysis. Journal of Economics and Finance,31(1), 104-121.
    Pelletier, L. G., Legault, L. R., & Tuson, K. M. (1996). The Environmental Satisfaction Scale A Measure of Satisfaction with Local Environmental Conditions and Government Environmental Policies. Environment and Behavior, 28(1), 5-26.
    Perrinjaquet, A., Furrer, O., Usunier, J. C., Cestre, G., & Valette-Florence, P. (2007). A test of the quasi-circumplex structure of human values. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(4), 820-840.
    Poortinga, W., Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2004). Values, Environmental Concern, and Environmental Behavior A Study into Household Energy Use. Environment and behavior, 36(1), 70-93.
    Poortinga, W., Spence, A., Whitmarsh, L., Capstick, S., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2011). Uncertain climate: An investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change. Global Environmental Change, 21(3), 1015-1024.
    Reser, J. P., Bradley, G. L., Glendon, I., Ellul, M., & Callaghan, R. (2012). Public risk perceptions, understandings, and responses to climate change and natural disasters in Australia and Great Britain.
    Roccas, S., & Sagiv, L. (2010). Personal values and behavior: Taking the cultural context into account. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(1), 30-41.
    Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. Free press.
    Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Cultural values in organisations: insights for Europe. European Journal of International Management, 1(3), 176-190.
    Sagiv, L., & Lee, F. (2006). Organizational artifacts: a window to organizational values. In Roccas, R. and Sagiv, L.(Chairs): Understanding Social Collectives in Terms of their Values, 18th Meeting of the International Congress of Cross Cultural Psychology, July, Spetses, Greece.
    Saunders, D. R. (1956). Moderator variables in prediction. Educational and Psychological Measurement.
    Schelhas, J., & Pfeffer, M. J. (2005). Forest values of national park neighbors in Costa Rica. Human Organization, 64(4), 386-398.
    Schiefer, D. (2012). The Value of Cultural Values Reinvestigating the Relationship Between Culture-Level Values and Individual-Level Psychological Phenomena (Doctoral dissertation, Bremen, Jacobs Univ., Diss., 2012).
    Schmitt, M. J., Schwartz, S., Steyer, R., & Schmitt, T. (1993). Measurement models for the Schwartz values. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 9(2), 107-121.
    Schultz, P. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of environmental psychology, 21(4), 327-339.
    Schultz, P. W., Gouveia, V. V., Cameron, L. D., Tankha, G., Schmuck, P., & Franěk, M. (2005). Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behavior. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 36(4), 457-475.
    Schultz, P. W., Milfont, T. L., Chance, R. C., Tronu, G., Luís, S., Ando, K., ... & Gouveia, V. V. (2012). Cross-Cultural Evidence for Spatial Bias in Beliefs About the Severity of Environmental Problems. Environment and Behavior, 0013916512458579.
    Schultz, P. W., & Zelezny, L. (2003). Reframing environmental messages to be congruent with American values. Human Ecology Review, 10(2), 126-136.
    Schwartz, S. H. (1994a). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values?. Journal of social issues, 50(4), 19-45.
    Schwartz, S. H. (1994b). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. Sage Publications, Inc.
    Schwartz, S. H. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. International Studies in Sociology and Social Anthropology, 104, 33.
    Schwartz, S. H. (2008). Cultural value orientations: Nature and implications of national differences. Moscow: SU HSE, 8.
    Schwartz, S. H., Bardi, A., & Bianchi, G. (2000). Value adaptation to the imposition and collapse of communist regimes in East-Central Europe. Political psychology: Cultural and cross-cultural foundations, 217-237.
    Schwartz, S. H., & Boehnke, K. (2004). Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of research in personality, 38(3), 230-255.
    Schwartz, S. H., Sagiv, L., & Boehnke, K. (2000). Worries and values. Journal of personality, 68(2), 309-346.
    Selle, P., Bortne, O., & Strømsnes, K. (2006). Unique environmentalism: A comparative perspective. Springer.
    Shah, D. V., McLeod, J. M., & Yoon, S. H. (2001). Communication, Context, and Community An Exploration of Print, Broadcast, and Internet Influences. Communication Research, 28(4), 464-506.
    Shen, J., & Saijo, T. (2007). The socioeconomic determinants of individual environmental concern: evidence from Shanghai data (No. 07E003). Osaka School of International Public Policy, Osaka University.
    Shen, J., & Saijo, T. (2008). Reexamining the relations between socio-demographic characteristics and individual environmental concern: Evidence from Shanghai data. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(1), 42-50.
    Sjöberg, L., Moen, B. E., & Rundmo, T. (2004). Explaining risk perception. An evaluation of the psychometric paradigm in risk perception research. Trondheim.
    Slimak, M. W., & Dietz, T. (2006). Personal values, beliefs, and ecological risk perception. Risk analysis, 26(6), 1689-1705.
    Slovic, P. (2010). The feeling of risk: New perspectives on risk perception. Routledge.
    Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk analysis, 24(2), 311-322.
    Smallbone, T. (2005). How can domestic households become part of the solution to England`s recycling problems?. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14(2), 110-122.
    Smith, K. R., & Ezzati, M. (2005). How environmental health risks change with development: the epidemiologic and environmental risk transitions revisited. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 30, 291-333.
    Song, Z., Wanberg, C., Niu, X., & Xie, Y. (2006). Action–state orientation and the theory of planned behavior: A study of job search in China. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 490-503.
    Spence, A., & Pidgeon, N. (2010). Framing and communicating climate change: The effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 656-667.
    Spence, A., Poortinga, W., Butler, C., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2011). Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nature Climate Change, 1(1), 46-49.
    Spini, D. (2003). Measurement equivalence of 10 value types from the Schwartz Value Survey across 21 countries. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 34(1), 3-23.
    Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of social issues, 56(3), 407-424.
    Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of social issues, 50(3), 65-84.
    Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and behavior, 25(5), 322-348.
    Steg, L. (2008). Promoting household energy conservation. Energy policy, 36(12), 4449-4453.
    Steg, L., Dreijerink, L., & Abrahamse, W. (2005). Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(4), 415-425.
    Steg, L., & Sievers, I. (2000). Cultural theory and individual perceptions of environmental risks. Environment and Behavior, 32(2), 250-269.
    Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309-317.
    Story, P. A., & Forsyth, D. R. (2008). Watershed conservation and preservation: Environmental engagement as helping behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(4), 305-317.
    Teal, G. A., & Loomis, J. B. (2000). Effects of gender and parental status on the economic valuation of increasing wetlands, reducing wildlife contamination and increasing salmon populations. Society & natural resources, 13(1), 1-14.
    Theodori, G. L., & Luloff, A. E. (2002). Position on environmental issues and engagement in proenvironmental behaviors. Society & Natural Resources, 15(6), 471-482.
    Thøgersen, J., & Grunert-Beckmann, S. C. (1997). Values and Attitude Formation Towards Emerging Attitude Objects: From Recycling to General, Waste Minimizing Behavior. Advances in consumer research, 24(1).
    Tilikidou, I. and Delistavrou, A. (2004). The Influence of the Materialistic Values on Consumers’ Pro-Envrionmental Post-Purchase Behavior. In: Cron,W.L. and Low, G.S. (Eds.)Marketing Theory and Applications, Proceedings of the 2004 American Marketing Association Winter Educators’ Conference, vol. 15, Chicago IL., A.M.A.,pp. 42-49.
    Tindall, D. B., Davies, S., & Mauboules, C. (2003). Activism and conservation behavior in an environmental movement: The contradictory effects of gender. Society & Natural Resources, 16(10), 909-932.
    Uzzell, D. L. (2000). The psycho-spatial dimension of global environmental problems. Journal of environmental psychology, 20(4), 307-318.
    Vining, J., & Ebreo, A. (2002). Emerging theoretical and methodological perspectives on conservation behaviour. Urbana, 51, 61801.
    Vogel, D. (2001). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of environmentalism: The cultural roots of green politics and policies. Unpublished data.
    Wesley Schultz, P., & Zelezny, L. (1999). Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of environmental psychology, 19(3), 255-265.
    White, K., & Peloza, J. (2009). Self-benefit versus other-benefit marketing appeals: Their effectiveness in generating charitable support. Journal of Marketing, 73(4), 109-124.
    Whitfield, S. C., Rosa, E. A., Dan, A., & Dietz, T. (2009). The future of nuclear power: Value orientations and risk perception. Risk Analysis, 29(3), 425-437.
    Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., Thermenos, H. W., Milanovic, S., Tsuang, M. T., Faraone, S. V., McCarley, R. W., ... & Seidman, L. J. (2009). Hyperactivity and hyperconnectivity of the default network in schizophrenia and in first-degree relatives of persons with schizophrenia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(4), 1279-1284.
    Whittaker, M., Segura, G. M., & Bowler, S. (2005). Racial/ethnic group attitudes toward environmental protection in California: Is “environmentalism” still a white phenomenon?. Political Research Quarterly, 58(3), 435-447.
    Wildavsky, A., & Dake, K. (1990). Theories of risk perception: Who fears what and why?. Daedalus, 41-60.
    Xiao, C., & Dunlap, R. E. (2007). Validating a Comprehensive Model of Environmental Concern Cross‐Nationally: A US‐Canadian Comparison*. Social Science Quarterly, 88(2), 471-493.
    Xiao, C., & McCright, A. M. (2007). Environmental concern and sociodemographic variables: A study of statistical models. The Journal of Environmental Education, 38(2), 3-14.
    Xiao, C., & McCright, A. M. (2012). Explaining gender differences in concern about environmental problems in the United States. Society & Natural Resources, 25(11), 1067-1084.
    York, R., Rosa, E. A., & Dietz, T. (2003). Footprints on the earth: The environmental consequences of modernity. American Sociological Review, 68(2), 279-300.
    Zagata, L. (2012). Consumers’ beliefs and behavioural intentions towards organic food. Evidence from the Czech Republic. Appetite, 59(1), 81-89.
    Zelezny, L. C., Chua, P. P., & Aldrich, C. (2000). New ways of thinking about environmentalism: Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 443-457.
    Lin, Mei-Yin(林美吟)(2009)。利他、利己綠色廣告訴求之廣告效果研究—以綠色生活型態為干擾變數(碩士論文)。
    Xu, Mei-Lian & Shi, Cong-Re(徐美苓、施琮仁)(2013)。台灣氣候變遷全國民眾電話調查計畫。財團法人達電子文教基金會委託計畫成果報告。台北市:財團法人台達電子文教基金會。
    Zhou, Gui-Tian(周桂田)(2012)。2012年台灣氣候變遷風險研究調查報告。台灣大學氣候變遷與永續發展中心。台北市:國立台灣大學社會科學院風險政策與政策研究中心。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際傳播英語碩士學位學程(IMICS)
    98461003
    102
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098461003
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[國際傳播英語碩士學程] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    100301.pdf8296KbAdobe PDF2221View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback