English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51098679      Online Users : 966
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 傳播學院 > 新聞學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/65052
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/65052


    Title: 更好或更壞?電視新聞人情趣味的決定與採用
    Better or worse? A perspective of human interest and news
    Authors: 陳家倫
    Chen, Chia Lun
    Contributors: 蘇蘅
    Su, Herng
    陳家倫
    Chen, Chia Lun
    Keywords: 電視新聞
    人情趣味
    市場化
    新聞價值
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2014-04-01 11:13:20 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在新聞邁向市場化的過程中,本研究以參與觀察、深度訪談法了解記者對於新聞的採訪與文本生成。有別於以往市場化研究的小報化、娛樂化、感官化觀點,本研究提出人情趣味化的現象來解釋,指出現在的電視新聞更喜歡強調世俗面、經驗性、活潑、臨場感、氣氛等,文末點出人情趣味是一頻譜,可能讓新聞通俗,也可能讓新聞變得煽色腥。
    Reference: 中文部分

    牛隆光(2005)。《電視新聞「小報化」及其守門行為研究》。台北:政治大學新聞所博士論文。
    牛隆光(2009)。《新聞採訪與寫作》。台北:學富文化。
    牛隆光、林靖芬(2006)。《透視電視新聞:實務與研究工作談》。台北:學富文化。
    王昭正、朱瑞淵譯(1999)。《參與觀察法》。台北:宏智文化。(原書 Jorgensen, D. L. Participant observation a methodology for human studies)
    王泰俐 (2013)。《電視新聞感官主義》。台北:五南。
    王泰俐(2004)。〈電視感官主義之初探研究〉,《新聞學研究》,81:1-41。
    王泰俐(2006)。〈電視新聞「感官主義」對閱聽人接收分析的影響〉,《新聞學研究》,86:91-133。
    何國華(2002)。〈電視新聞引導全民辦案〉,《目擊者雜誌》,31:8-23。
    吳曼寧。〈李安批台灣新聞台「能做卻沒做好」〉(2013.05.13)。上網日期:2013年5月13日,取自:http://udn.com/NEWS/ENTERTAINMENT/ENT1/7893005.shtml。
    吳曼寧。〈李安批台灣新聞台「能做卻沒做好」〉(2013.05.13)。上網日期:2013年5月13日,取自:http://udndata.com/。
    呂雅雯、盧鴻毅、侯心雅(2010)。〈再現貧窮:以電視新聞為例〉,《新聞學研究》,102:73-111。
    李艷紅(2003)。〈政治新聞的模糊表述:從中國大陸兩家報紙對克林頓訪華的報導看市場化的影響〉,《新聞學研究》,75:169-199。
    林思平(2008)。《通俗新聞:文化研究的觀點》。台北:五南出版社。
    林照真(2009)。《收視率新聞學:台灣電視新聞商品化》。台北:聯經。
    邱宜儀、蘇蘅(2009)。〈政治名人與媒體:馬英九報導的新聞框架初探〉,《新聞學研究》,99:1-45。
    邱鈺婷(2007)。《台灣電視記者一窩蜂新聞產製下的死結與活路 : 以重大社會事件報導為例》。台北:政治大學廣電所碩士論文。
    胡幼慧、姚美華 (1996)。〈一些質性方法上的思考:信度與效度?如何抽樣?如何集資料、登錄與分析?〉。胡幼慧編,《質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》(頁141-158)。台北:巨流。
    徐志偉(2010)。《新聞記者尋人行為硏究 以小人物消息來源採訪為例》。台北:政治大學新聞所碩士論文。
    徐慰真(1993)。《我國報業守門人對人情趣味新聞之認知差距》。台北:文化大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
    徐慰真(2001)。《人情趣味新聞料理》。台北:三民。
    高淑清(2008)。《質性研究的18堂課:首航初探之旅》。高雄:麗文
    許瓊文(2009)。〈新聞記者採訪報導受害者應面對的新聞倫理:多元觀點的論證〉,《新聞學研究》,100:1-55。
    陳向明(2002)。《社會科學質的研究》。台北:五南。
    陳芸芸譯(2004)。《電視的社會學分析》。台北:韋伯。(原書 Abercrombie N. (1996). Television and Society. UK: Polity Press.)。
    陳炳宏(2001)。《傳播產業研究》。台北:五南。
    陳家倫。〈老妻杯弓蛇影,老公導演抓假蛇〉(2012.07.13)。上網日期:2012年7月13日,取自:http://udndata.com/。
    陳憶寧(2011)。〈電視新聞戲劇化效果研究:由議題設定與收視動機角度來看〉,《新聞學研究》,109:77-120。
    彭家發(1992)。《新聞論》。台北:三民。
    曾國峰(2010)。〈有線電視新聞台的賽局競爭分析〉,《新聞學研究》,103:88-131。
    賀文發譯(2010)。《為什麼民主需要不可愛的新聞界》。華夏出版社。(原書Schudson, M. (2008). Why democracies needs an unlovable press?)
    臧國仁(1999)。《記者與消息來源互動》。台北:三民。
    潘淑滿(2003)。《質性硏究 : 理論與應用》。台北:心理。
    鄭宇君(2009)。《新聞專業中的眞實性一種倫理主體的探究模式》。台北:政治大學新聞所博士論文。
    戴定國(2005)。《新聞編輯與標題寫作》。台北:五南
    謝臥龍(2008)。《質性研究》。台北:心理。
    顏章聖(2003)。《從新聞產製之觀點探討影響台灣電視地方新聞產製之因素》。新竹:交通大學傳播所碩士論文。
    羅文輝(1991)。《精確新聞報導》。台北:正中。
    羅文輝、蘇蘅、林書煒、呂惠敏、高明慧、盧聖芬(2009)。《主播解碼》。台北:台灣商務。
    蘇蘅(2003)。〈電視新聞在台灣的發展〉,《台灣電視四十年回顧與前瞻研討會論文集》。頁165-192,台北:政大傳播學院。
    蘇蘅、陳家倫、王思勻(2011)。〈爆料新聞─爆什麼? 怎麼爆?〉,台灣新竹,2011中華傳播學會年會暨學術研討會。
    蘇鑰機(2011)。〈什麼是新聞〉,《傳播研究與實踐》,1:1-24。
    劉蕙苓(2012)。《為公共?為方便?電視新聞使用網路影音之研究》,中華傳播學會年會論文,2012年7月8日,台中。
    皇甫河旺(2013)。《新聞價值的反思:人情趣味的探討》,廈門大學新聞傳播學院。2013年“兩岸資訊一體化與新聞事業發展”兩岸四地學術研討會。2013年9月28日。


    英文部分

    Abercrombie, N. (1996). Television and society. Cambridge Mass: Blackewll Publishers.
    Barkin, S. M. (2003). American television news: The media marketplace and the public interest, (Ch. 9 Celebrity News). New York: M. E. Sharpe.
    Baum, M. (2007). Hard and soft news. In T. Schaefer & T. Birkland (Eds.), Encyclopedia of media and politics (pp. 106-107). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
    Beaudoin, C. E. (2007). SARS news coverage and itsdeterminants in China and the US. The International Communication Gazette, 69(6), 509-524.
    Bird, S. D. (2009). Tabloidization: What is it, and does it really matter? In B. Zelizer (ed), The changing Faces of Journalism: Tobloidization, Technology and Truthiness (pp.40-50). London and New York: Routledge.
    Boczkowski, P. J. (2009). Rethinking hard and soft news production: From common ground to divergent paths. Journal of Communication, 59, 98-116.
    Boczkowski, P. J., & Mitchelstein, E. (2010). Is there a gap between the news choices of journalists and consumers? A relational and dynamic approach. International Journal of Press/Politics, 15(4), 420-440.
    Camaj, L. (2010). Media framing through stages of a political discourse: International news agencies` coverage of Kosovo`s status negotiations. International Communication Gazette, 72(7), 635-653.
    Cottle, S. (2001). `Television news and citizenship: Packaging the public sphere`, in M. Bromley (ed.) No news is bad news: Radio, television and the public(pp. 61-79). Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited.
    Curran, J. (1996). `Mass media and democracy: A reappraisal`, in J. Curran and M. Gurevitch (eds.) Mass Media and Society (pp. 82-117). New York: St Martins Press.
    Curran, J., Salovaara-Moring, I., Coen, S., & Iyengar, S. Crime, foreigners and hard news: A cross-national comparison of reporting and public perception. Journalism, 11(3), 3-19.
    D’Angelo, P. & Kuypers, J. A. (2010). Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives. New York: Routledge.
    d`Haenens, L. & Lange, M. d. (2001). Framing of asylum seekers in Dutch regional newspapers. Media Culture Society, 23, 847-860.
    Ekström, M. (2000). Information, storytelling and attractions: TV journalism in three modes of communication. Media, Culture, & Society, 22, 465-492.
    Franklin, B. (1997). Newszak and news media. London: Arnold.
    Gans, H. J. (1979). Deciding what`s news : a study of CBS evening news, NBC nightly news, Newsweek, and Time. New York: Vintage.
    Gans, H. J. (2009). Can popularization help the news media? In B. Zelizer (ed), The changing faces of journalism: Tobloidization, technology and truthiness (pp.17-28). London and New York: Routledge.
    Gripsrud, J. (2000) ‘Tabloidization, popular journalism, and democracy’, in C. Sparks and J. Tulloch (eds), Tabloid Tales (pp. 285-300). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
    Hallin, D. (1992). The passing of the ‘high modernism’ of American journalism. Journal of Communication, 42(3), 14-25.
    Harrington, S. (2008). Popular news in the 21st century: time for a new critical approach? Journalism, 9(3), 266-284.
    Harrison, J. (2009). Exploring news value: the ideal and the real. In Chapman, J. & Kinsey, M. (ed), Broadcasting Journalism (pp. 59-68). New York: Routledge.
    Hughes, H. M. (1981). News and the human interest story. Transaction, Inc.
    Iyengar, S. (1987). Television news and citizens’ explanations of national affairs. American Political Science Review 81(3): 815–831.
    Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    Iyengar,S., & Kinder D.R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    Jorgensen, Danny. (1989). Participant observation: A methodology for human studies. London: Sage.
    Kerbel, M. R. (2000). If it bleeds, it leads: An anatomy of television news. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
    Kitch, C. (2009). Tears and trauma in the news. In B. Zelizer (ed), The changing Faces of Journalism: Tobloidization, Technology and Truthiness (pp.29-39). London and New York: Routledge.
    Kostadinova, P. & Dimitrova, D. (2012). Communicating policy change: Media framing of economic news in post-communist Bulgaria. European Journal of Communication, 27( 2), 171-186.
    Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Langer, J. (1998). Tabloid television: Popular journalism and the “Other News”. Sage Publications, Inc.
    Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H. (1984). Analyzing social settings. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company, Inc.
    Machin, D., & Papatheoderou F. (2002). `Commercialization and tabloid television in southern Europe: Disintegration or democratization of the public sphere?` Journal of European Area Studies, 10(1): 31-48.
    McManus, J. H. (1994). Market-driven journalism. Sage Publications, Inc.
    Meyer, P. (2003). `The proper role of the news media in a democratic society`, in J. Harper and T. Yantek (eds.) Media, profit, and politics: Competing priorities in an open society (pp. 11-17). Ohio: Kent State University Press.
    Montgomery, M. (2007). The discourse of broadcast news. London: Routledge.
    Morrison, D. E., & Svennevig M. (2007). The defence of public interest and the intrusion of privacy. Journalism, 8(1), 44-65.
    Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press, USA.
    Ornebring, H., & A. M. Jonsson. (2004). `Tabloid journalism and the public sphere: A historical perspective on tabloid journalism`, Journalism Studies, 5(3): 283-295.
    Patterson, T. E. (2000). Doing well and doing good: How soft news and critical journalism are shrinking the news audience and weakening democracy—and what news outlets can do about it. Cambridge, MA: Joan Shorenstein Center for Press, Politics, and Public Policy at Harvard University.
    Plasser, F. (2005). From hard to soft news standard? How political journalist in different media system evaluate the shifting quality of news? Press/Politics, 10(2), 47-68.
    Roberts, M. (2004) `The mundane and the frightening: The sorry state of current affairs`, in, Australian Screen Education, Autumn, pp. 18-22.
    Ryfe, D. M. (2009). Structure, agency, and change in an American newsroom. Journalism, 10(5), 665-83.
    Scheufele, D. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication 49(1): 103–122.
    Scott, D. K. & Gobetz, R. H. (1992). Hard news / soft news content of the national broadcast networks, 1972-1987. Journalism Quarterly, 69(2), 406-412.
    Serazio, M. (2009). Rethinking a Villain, Redeeming a Format: The Crisis and Cure in Tabloidization. In B. Zelizer (ed), The changing Faces of Journalism: Tobloidization, Technology and Truthiness (pp.13-16). London and New York: Routledge.
    Sparks, C. (1992). Popular journalism: theories and practice, In Dahlgren, P. & Sparks, C. (ed), Journalism and Popular Culture. Sage Publications, Inc.
    Sparks, C. (2000). Introduction: the panic over tabloid news. In Sparks C. & Tulloch J. (ed), Tabloid tales: Global debates over media standards (pp. 1-40). Lanham Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield Publisher ,Inc.
    Thornborrow, J. (2010). ‘Going public: constructing the personal in a television news interview. Discourse & Communication, 4(2), 105-123.
    Tuchman, G. (1972). Object as strategic ritual: An examination of newsmen’s notions of objectivity. The American Journal of Sociology, 77(4), 660-679.
    Tuchman, G. (1973). Making news by doing work: Routinizing the unexpected. The American Journal of Sociology, 79(1), 110-131.
    Tuchman, G. (1995). The news net. In O. Boyd-Barrett & C. Newbold (Eds.). Approaches to media: A reader (pp. 294-299). London: Edward Arnold.
    Uribe, R. & Gunter, B. (2004). Research note: The tabloidization of British tabloids. European Journal of Communication 19(3), 387-402.
    Valentine, G. (2001). At the drawing board: Developing a research design. In M. Limb & C. Dwyer(Eds). Qualitative methodologies for geographers: Issue and debates(pp. 41-45). London: Arnold.
    Vettehen, P. H., Nuijten K., & Peeters A. (2008). Explaining effects of sensationalism on liking of television news stories. Communication Research, 35(3), 319-338.
    Wilzig, S. N. L. & Seletzky, M. (2010). Hard news, soft news, ‘general’ news: The necessity and utility of an intermediate classification. Journalism, 11(1), 37-56.
    Zelizer, B. (2009). Introduction: Why journalism’s changing faces matter? In B. Zelizer (ed), The changing faces of journalism: Tobloidization, technology and truthiness (pp.1-10). London and New York: Routledge.
    Zoonen, L. van (1998b). The ethics of making private life public. In K. Brants, J. Hermes and L. van Zoonen (eds), The media in question: Popular cultures and public interests (pp.113–23). London: Sage.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    新聞研究所
    97451006
    102
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097451006
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[新聞學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    100601.pdf173KbAdobe PDF2435View/Open
    100602.pdf2636KbAdobe PDF2879View/Open
    100603.pdf458KbAdobe PDF2587View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback